ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07631091ROBUTHAUpdated Jun 5, 2026

Post-Operative Spinal Block Duration and Pain Relief After Hip Replacement Surgery: Comparing Single-Shot Spinal Ropivacaine and Bupivacaine

A Phase 4 interventional study of Spinal Anesthesia with Ropivacaine 15 mg (5 mg/ml) and Spinal Anesthesia with Bupivacaine 11 mg (5 mg/ml) in Hip Osteoarthritis, Hip Arthroplasty Replacement and Postoperative Pain After Ambulatory Surgery, sponsored by University of Turku. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-05.

Sponsored by University of Turku · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
176
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aims to determine whether isobaric ropivacaine is more suitable than isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA). The study will evaluate whether ropivacaine allows faster recovery of sensory and motor function while still providing adequate surgical anesthesia and postoperative pain control. Additional aims are to assess the effects of the anesthetic technique on same-day discharge rates, postoperative recovery, urinary retention, opioid consumption, and patient satisfaction after outpatient THA.

Read the detailed description

Patients undergoing outpatient total hip arthroplasty (THA) under spinal anesthesia require an anesthetic technique that provides adequate surgical anesthesia while allowing rapid postoperative recovery and same-day discharge. Bupivacaine is currently the most commonly used spinal anesthetic for hip arthroplasty, but its relatively long duration of action may delay recovery of motor and sensory function, prolong post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay, and increase the risk of urinary retention. Ropivacaine is a long-acting amide-type local anesthetic with a shorter duration of action and a potentially more favorable safety profile, including lower cardiotoxicity and reduced hemodynamic effects. This study aims to determine whether isobaric ropivacaine is more suitable than isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia in outpatient THA and to identify the optimal dose of ropivacaine for this surgical setting.

Altogether 176 patients scheduled for elective outpatient unilateral total hip arthroplasty at TYKS ORTO Surgical Hospital will be enrolled in this prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled phase IV clinical trial. Eligible participants will be between 18 and 80 years of age, with a height of 160-186 cm, ASA physical status I-II, and body mass index below 35 kg/m², in accordance with local outpatient surgery criteria. Written informed consent will be obtained from all participants prior to study inclusion.

Patients will be randomized into two study groups to receive either intrathecal isobaric ropivacaine or intrathecal isobaric bupivacaine for spinal anesthesia. Both participants and investigators will remain blinded to group allocation throughout the study period. Spinal anesthesia will be performed according to standard clinical practice. Patient monitoring and perioperative care will follow institutional protocols routinely used for outpatient joint replacement surgery.

Baseline measurements including heart rate, blood pressure, and oxygen saturation will be recorded before administration of spinal anesthesia. After intrathecal injection, patients will undergo continuous monitoring including blood pressure, pulse, electrocardiography (ECG), oxygen saturation, and assessment of sensory block height. Measurements will initially be recorded every five minutes during the intraoperative period and subsequently at longer intervals after transfer to the ward.

The primary outcome of the study is the time to full recovery of sensory and motor function following spinal anesthesia. Secondary outcome measures include the proportion of patients discharged home as planned on the day of surgery, duration of PACU stay and total hospital stay, postoperative pain intensity measured using the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS; minimum 0, maximum 10, higher scores indicating more severe pain), incidence of urinary retention, time required to achieve adequate surgical anesthesia, adequacy of anesthesia during surgery, incidence of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), postoperative opioid consumption, and patient satisfaction with care and recovery.

Postoperative pain management will follow standard institutional protocols. Pain intensity will be assessed regularly in the PACU and surgical ward using the NRS scale. Additional postoperative opioid analgesics may be administered as clinically indicated. Follow-up telephone interviews will be conducted on postoperative days 2 and 3 to assess recovery at home, pain management, discharge-related challenges, and patient satisfaction.

Bupivacaine and ropivacaine are both widely used amide-type local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia in orthopedic surgery. Their mechanism of action is based on reversible blockade of sodium channels in nerve cells, thereby inhibiting nerve impulse conduction. Ropivacaine has been associated with less cardiotoxicity, reduced central nervous system toxicity, and shorter duration of motor blockade compared with bupivacaine, which may improve suitability for outpatient surgery.

Both study medications are routinely used in clinical practice at TYKS ORTO Surgical Hospital and throughout the Nordic countries. Serious adverse effects are rare and are typically associated with overdose or unintentional intravascular administration. Common effects related to spinal anesthesia include transient hypotension due to sympathetic blockade, urinary retention, post-spinal headache, and temporary back pain. Severe complications such as infection or nerve injury are extremely uncommon. The study specifically aims to evaluate whether shorter-duration spinal anesthesia may reduce delayed recovery and urinary retention while maintaining adequate surgical conditions and postoperative analgesia.

All participant data will be handled confidentially. Personal identifiers will be removed from study documents and replaced with study identification numbers. The code key linking participant identities to study data will be stored separately in a password-protected file accessible only to the research team. Paper records will be maintained in locked facilities at Turku University Hospital, and no identifiable data will be shared outside the study team.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hip Osteoarthritis
  • Hip Arthroplasty Replacement
  • Postoperative Pain After Ambulatory Surgery

Browse trials for

03

In context

Osteoarthritis, Hip

641 studies on the registry are indexed under Osteoarthritis, Hip; 120 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 176 is above the median of 90 across 457 interventional studies indexed under Osteoarthritis, Hip.

Browse Osteoarthritis, Hip studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Turku is the lead sponsor of 122 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 - 80 years of age
  • Scheduled for a primary elective total hip arthroplasty
  • Patient must be a candidate for same day discharge
  • understood and signed
  • Patient is 160 - 186 cm tall

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Scheduled bilateral THA
  • to or failed spinal anesthesia
  • Allergy or contraindication to NSAIDs (e.g. chronic kidney disease)
  • Diabetes requiring insulin medication
  • Preoperative chronic use of illegal substances
  • Renal insufficiency ( \< 60)
  • Unstable psychiatric conditions
  • Severe neurological disorder
  • Cognitive deficiencies preventing
  • Language barrier preventing completion of study
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Chronic pain syndrome
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
176 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Ropivacaine

    Patients receive spinal anesthesia with intrathecal ropivacaine

    Drug: Spinal Anesthesia with Ropivacaine 15 mg (5 mg/ml)

  • Active comparator
    Bupivacaine

    Patients receive spinal anesthesia with intrathecal bupivacaine

    Drug: Spinal Anesthesia with Bupivacaine 11 mg (5 mg/ml)

Interventions

  • DrugSpinal Anesthesia with Ropivacaine 15 mg (5 mg/ml)

    Drug page: Ropivacaine

    Patients receive spinal anesthesia with intrathecal ropivacaine

  • DrugSpinal Anesthesia with Bupivacaine 11 mg (5 mg/ml)

    Drug page: Bupivacaine

    Patients receive spinal anesthesia with intrathecal bupivacaine

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Return of Sensory and Motor Function

    Time frame: 24 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Postoperative Pain

    Pain intensity score assessed using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain (range 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst possible pain; higher scores indicate worse pain outcomes).

    Time frame: 24 hours

  2. Urinary retention

    Time frame: 24 hours

  3. Post-operative nausea and vomiting

    Time frame: 24 hours

  4. Postoperative opioid consumption in morphine milligram equivalents (MME)

    Time frame: 24 hours

  5. 5-Point Likert Satisfaction Scale

    Patient satisfaction score assessed using the 5-Point Likert Satisfaction Scale (range 1 to 5, where 1 indicates very dissatisfied and 5 indicates very satisfied; higher scores indicate better satisfaction outcomes).

    Time frame: 24 hours

  6. Perioperative hemodynamics

    Mean, systolic, and diastolic arterial pressure measured by non-invasive oscillometric monitoring and heart rate measured by continuous ECG/pulse oximetry at 10-minute intervals intraoperatively and in the PACU. Incidence of hypotension (MAP \<65 mmHg) is also recorded. Units of measure: mmHg, beats per minute, and % of patients with hypotensive episodes.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  7. Onset time of block

    Time frame: 24 hours

  8. Adequacy of anesthesia

    Sensory block level assessed by cold sensation testing (dermatomal level) at 10-minute intervals following spinal anesthesia, and incidence of requirement for supplemental sedation or analgesia recorded from anesthesia and PACU charts. Units of measure: dermatomal level (T-level) and % of patients requiring supplemental medication.

    Time frame: 24 hours

  9. Same day discharge rate

    Time frame: 24 hours

  10. Length of stay in the postoperative care unit and length of hospital stay

    Time frame: 72 hours

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because the study data contain sensitive personal health information collected from a relatively small patient population at a single study center. Due to the limited sample size and detailed clinical information, there is a risk that participants could be indirectly identifiable even after de-identification. Data sharing is therefore restricted in order to protect participant privacy and confidentiality in accordance with applicable data protection legislation, institutional policies, and the informed consent provided by study participants.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07631091
Responsible party
Panu Uusalo (MD, PhD, Adjunct Professor, University of Turku) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 5, 2026
Start date
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
May 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 5, 2026

Study contacts

Panu Uusalo, MD, PhD
Contact
panu.uusalo@varha.fi
+35823133077
Maarit Rantakokko, MD
Contact
maarit.rantakokko@varha.fi
Panu Uusalo, MD, PhD
study director · University of Turku and Turku University Hospital, Finland

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drugs tested here: Ropivacaine · Bupivacaine

Start the discussion