ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07084389FinSocUpdated Aug 19, 2026

A Financial Social Work Intervention for Families With Complex Financial Difficulties (FinSoc)

An interventional study of FinSoc in Financial Difficulties, sponsored by University of Turku. Recruiting at 1 site in Finland. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-19.

Sponsored by University of Turku · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2025; still recruiting 1 year 4 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
136
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

As of 2022, about 12% of children in Finland lived in poverty. Many of these families face not only a lack of money but also stress, low confidence in managing finances, and limited access to financial guidance. This study aims to support these families by improving their financial skills and well-being through a practical and research-based program.

The intervention includes five sessions with a trained social service professional, focusing on budgeting, financial decision-making, emotions around money, and the role of money in relationships. The goal is to reduce financial anxiety, improve knowledge, and build confidence in managing finances. The sessions also aim to help families talk more openly about money and set realistic financial goals.

To test effectiveness, a randomized controlled trial (RCT) will be conducted. Families are randomly assigned to either the intervention group (receiving the FinSoc program) or a control group (receiving regular social work services and, after final measurements, a material package to promote financial capability).

At least 136 participants-families with at least one child under 18 and facing financial difficulties-will take part. Information will be collected at three time points: before the intervention, after it ends, and three months later. Outcomes include financial literacy, financial anxiety, economic self-efficacy, and health-related quality of life, measured with self-rating scales in questionnaires.

In addition to questionnaires, interviews will be conducted with a sample of families and social workers to explore their experiences-what worked, what could be improved, and how the sessions were received. This qualitative feedback will guide future development.

Formative evaluation involves feedback from families before and after each session, covering topic clarity, session usefulness, and experiences with the techniques. For fidelity assessment, social workers will report after each session on adherence to the planned approach and tool use.

The FinSoc program is offered through public and private social service providers. It was developed and is being implemented by an interdisciplinary team with expertise in financial social work, social policy, and mental health.

The study aims to improve families' everyday lives, inform social work practices, and contribute to knowledge on social and economic well-being.

02

Conditions studied

  • Financial Difficulties

Keywords

  • financial difficulties
  • social work
  • poverty
  • financial literacy
  • economic self-efficacy
  • financial anxiety
03

In context

Lead sponsor

University of Turku is the lead sponsor of 122 studies on the registry; 16 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Client status in child welfare services, family social work, adult social work, assessment of the need for services, health social work, and financial social work
  • Within the past six months, the client has brought up one or more of the following challenges in managing their finances during their contact with social services: (1) Difficulties paying bills, housing-related expenses, or repaying debts on time, (2) Difficulties meeting the basic needs of family members (e.g. food, medication, clothing) (3) A perceived lack of sufficient knowledge, skills, or competence to manage financial matters (4) Feelings of anxiety or stress related to financial situation.
  • There is at least one underage child in the family. In cases of shared custody, the child must reside in the household for an average of at least half of the time in each calendar month.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • There is an ongoing crisis or life situation in the family that, in the assessment of the social worker, prevents commitment to the intervention process.
  • There is an active criminal proceeding within the family.
  • The parents do not speak Finnish (all project materials are in Finnish, and there are no resources available to provide translations into other languages).
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
136 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Experimental: FinSoc intervention

    FinSoc intervention FinSoc intervention is delivered to the Experimental group by their social worker or social work professional.

    Behavioral: FinSoc

  • No intervention
    FinSoc control group

    No Intervention: Control The control group will receive the usual social work services. After the third measurement point, they will receive a materials package.

Interventions

  • BehavioralFinSoc

    Financial Social Work intervention (FinSoc) The FinSoc intervention is a structured financial social work program designed for families experiencing complex financial difficulties. It consists of five modules, each delivered in a one-on-one session with a trained social worker. The modules focus on key areas such as budgeting, emotional and relational aspects of money, financial decision making, building long-term financial capability. The intervention aims to reduce financial anxiety, improve financial literacy, strengthen economic self-efficacy, and support overall wellbeing. Motivational interviewing techniques and client-centred approaches are used throughout to encourage active participation and goal-setting.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Financial Literacy Scale

    Financial literacy is operationalised as an adapted OECD/INFE financial behaviour score. The score consists of six selected behaviour indicators: four Likert-based financial behaviour statements, one saving behaviour item, and one budgeting item. The four Likert-based items are dichotomised so that responses indicating "mostly true" or "completely true" are scored as 1 and other responses as 0. The saving item is scored as 1 if the respondent reports active saving behaviour according to OECD/INFE scoring principles. The budgeting item is scored as 1 if the respondent reports preparing a household or personal budget. The total score ranges from 0 to 6, with higher scores indicating more financially responsible behaviours.

    Time frame: Measured at three timepoints: 1) baseline pre-randomization, 2) within 2 week post-intervention for intervention group and at 3 months post-baseline for control group, 3) 3 months after previous measurement

Secondary outcomes

  1. Economic Self-Efficacy

    Economic self-efficacy is measured using the 10-item Scale of Economic Self-Efficacy. Items are rated from 1 to 5. The outcome is calculated as the item mean, ranging from 1 to 5, with higher scores indicating greater economic self-efficacy.

    Time frame: Measured at three timepoints: 1) baseline pre-randomization, 2) within 2 weeks post-intervention for intervention group and at 3 months post-baseline for control group, 3) 3 months after previous measurement.

  2. Financial Anxiety

    Financial anxiety is assessed using a modified eight-item version of the Financial Anxiety Scale (FAS). Two items referring to university education and academic performance were omitted because they were not applicable to the study population. The outcome is calculated as the item mean, ranging from 1 to 4. The score is calculated when at least 7 of the 8 items have been completed.

    Time frame: Measured at three timepoints: 1) baseline pre randomization, 2) within 2 week post-intervention for intervention group and at 3 months post-baseline for control group, 3) 3 months after previous measurement.

  3. Health related quality of life

    Health-related quality of life is measured using PROMIS Global Health v1.2. The instrument produces two profile scores: Global Physical Health and Global Mental Health. Both scores are converted to PROMIS T-scores according to PROMIS scoring instructions and will be analysed separately. Higher T-scores indicate better health-related quality of life.

    Time frame: Measured at three timepoints: 1) baseline pre-randomization, 2) within 2 week post-intervention for intervention group and at 3 months post-baseline for control group, 3) 3 months after previous measurement

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • OECD INEF. (2018). Organisation for Economic Co-Operation and Development. OECD/INFE Toolkit for Measuring Financial Literacy and Financial Inclusion. Available from: https://www.oecd.org/ financial/education/2018-INFE-FinLit-Measurement-Toolkit.pdf.
  • Hoge GL, Stylianou AM, Hetling A, Postmus JL. Developing and Validating the Scale of Economic Self-Efficacy. J Interpers Violence. 2020 Aug;35(15-16):3011-3033. doi: 10.1177/0886260517706761. Epub 2017 May 3. PubMed 29294740 ↗
  • Hays RD, Bjorner JB, Revicki DA, Spritzer KL, Cella D. Development of physical and mental health summary scores from the patient-reported outcomes measurement information system (PROMIS) global items. Qual Life Res. 2009 Sep;18(7):873-80. doi: 10.1007/s11136-009-9496-9. Epub 2009 Jun 19. PubMed 19543809 ↗
  • Kaittila A, Isoniemi H, Viitasalo K, Moisio M, Raijas A, Toikka E, Tuominen J, Hakovirta M. A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of Intervention for Social Work Clients with Children Facing Complex Financial Problems in Finland (FinSoc): A Study Protocol. J Evid Based Soc Work (2019). 2024 Jan 2;21(1):32-49. doi: 10.1080/26408066.2023.2257174. Epub 2023 Sep 15. PubMed 37712670 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The data is sensitive and must not be shared outside of the research group.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07084389
Collaborators
University of Helsinki, University of Eastern Finland
Responsible party
Anniina Kaittila (university lecturer, associate professor, University of Turku) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 24, 2025
Start date
Jul 1, 2025
Primary completion
Oct 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 19, 2026

Study contacts

Anniina Kaittila senior lecturer, PhD
Contact
sairai@utu.fi
+358445071983
Katri Viitasalo senior lecturer, PhD
Contact
katri.viitasalo@helsinki.fi
Anniina Kaittila senior lecturer, PhD
study director · University of Turku

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion