A Phase 4 interventional study of Adherence package consisting of additional education and adherence reminders in Breast Cancer and Adherence, Medication, sponsored by Institute of Oncology Ljubljana. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Slovenia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-05.
Sponsored by Institute of Oncology Ljubljana · Phase 4, Interventional, and Health services research
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy in women, with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer accounting for approximately 70% of cases. Although adjuvant endocrine therapy substantially reduces the risk of recurrence, a clinically meaningful proportion of patients, particularly those with intermediate- and high-risk disease, still experience relapse. The addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors such as ribociclib to endocrine therapy has demonstrated significant improvement in invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) and is now part of standard adjuvant treatment for selected patients. However, the real-world effectiveness of prolonged oral therapy depends heavily on patient adherence, which may be negatively affected by treatment duration, adverse events, and the absence of immediate perceived benefit. Evidence regarding adherence to adjuvant ribociclib therapy in routine clinical practice remains limited. This study therefore aims to evaluate whether a structured adherence-support intervention can improve treatment adherence during ribociclib therapy and to explore the relationship between adherence and long-term clinical outcomes, including iDFS.
Breast cancer (BC) is the most prevalent malignant tumour in women, with an estimated 2.308 million new cases and over 665,000 deaths globally in 2022. Around 90% of patients are diagnosed at an early stage and the majority of these cases, approximately 70%, are hormone receptor-positive and HER2-negative (HR+/HER2-).
Despite advancements in adjuvant endocrine therapy that significantly lower recurrence and mortality rates, 20-30 % of early-stage BC patients experience relapse within the first decade post-surgery. Around 12% of patients with HR+/HER2- BC belong to high-risk population with 5-years invasive disease-free survival (IDFS) of 70.2% vs 90.0% in non-high-risk. In the large EBCTCG meta-analysis which included 62,923 women with ER-positive early breast cancer who completed 5 years of adjuvant endocrine therapy, the risk of distant recurrence remained substantial over the subsequent 15 years and was strongly dependent on initial tumour size and nodal status.
Among patients with T1 tumours, 13-34% experienced distant recurrence during years 5-20, whereas 19-24% of those with T2 tumours relapsed over the same period, depending on nodal burden and tumour grade. These findings delineate an intermediate-risk group within HR+/HER2- early breast cancer-patients with T1-2, node-negative or limited node-positive disease-who, despite not meeting conventional "high-risk" criteria, still face a clinically meaningful long-term risk of recurrence after standard endocrine therapy. This persistent residual risk highlights the unmet need for improved risk stratification tools and additional adjuvant strategies to optimize outcomes in this intermediate-risk population.
The most recent clinically meaningful therapeutic option for these patients has been cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6 inhibitors).
Endocrine therapy combined with CDK4/6 inhibitors (abemaciclib, palbociclib and ribociclib) is now the standard, most effective, and recommended treatment for these patients in the first or subsequent lines of treatment for advanced disease. Two CDK4/6 inhibitors, abemaciclib and ribociclib, have been assessed also for use in the adjuvant setting (MonarchE and NATALEE study). Both studies showed improvement in iDFS of combined endocrine therapy and CDK4/6 inhibitor vs endocrine therapy alone.
Ribociclib has been approved by both the FDA and EMA for patients with HR+/HER2- early breast cancer at high and intermediate risk of disease recurrence and has therefore recently been added to our current regimen for this indication in routine clinical practice.
Non-adherence to adjuvant therapy may compromise the efficacy of combined treatment in preventing disease recurrence and mortality. Some historical data report that only 60-70% of patients with early BC adhere to adjuvant therapy, making adherence a significant challenge. Key factors influencing adherence to cancer treatment include the perceived benefits of the treatment, the setting in which the treatment is administered (at home or in a hospital), the associated risks, the impact on quality of life, and the costs involved. Non-adherence often arises because patients do not experience the immediate benefits. With no visible or measurable signs of the disease and no physical symptoms of the disease, as is the case in patients receiving adjuvant treatment, and given that many would not have experienced a relapse even without adjuvant therapy, patients are much more likely to discontinue treatment if they experience adverse events/reactions (AE/AR).
Adherence to treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors in combination with aromatase inhibitors differs from some other systemic treatments due to the continuous treatment regimen that lasts for several years without interruption. In early BC, it lasts two (abemaciclib) or three (ribociclib) years and is associated with some specific AEs. Aromatase inhibitors are associated with arthralgias, myalgias, and joint stiffness, osteopenia19-21, whereas CDK4/6 inhibitors with myelotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, cardiac toxicity and gastrointestinal symptoms.
The duration of treatment, five or more vs three years (aromatase inhibitors as monotherapy vs ribociclib in combination with aromatase inhibitors, respectively), may lead to different discontinuation rates. Despite the growing amount of real-world experiences with combined treatment with aromatase inhibitors and ribociclib in the adjuvant setting, there is currently a lack of literature specifically exploring how patient adherence and attitudes are influenced by this combination. This gap underscores the need for further research to fully understand the impact of these therapies on medication adherence.
Breast cancer is the most common malignancy among women worldwide, with HR+/HER2- early BC representing approximately 70% of cases. Despite advances in adjuvant endocrine therapy, 20-30% of patients relapse within 10 years, and high-risk subgroups have significantly lower 5-year invasive disease-free survival (iDFS) compared to non-high-risk patients6. The addition of CDK4/6 inhibitors to endocrine therapy has demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements in iDFS in large trials such as MonarchE and NATALEE. Clinically significant Overall Survival with abemacyclib in high risk early BC8 and Overall Survival trend (data immature in 2025) in high and intermediate risk early BC with ribociclib10, lead to regulatory approval of ribociclib for patients at high and intermediate risk of recurrence.
However, the effectiveness of these therapies in real-world settings depends heavily on patient adherence. Non-adherence to long-term oral therapy remains a major challenge, with historical data suggesting adherence rates as low as 60-70%. Factors influencing adherence include treatment duration, adverse events and the absence of immediate perceived benefits. Ribociclib combined with aromatase inhibitors requires continuous administration for up to three years and is associated with specific adverse events such as neutropenia, ALT/AST elevations, QTc prolongation, fatigue, alopecia which may further impact adherence.
Currently, there is limited evidence on adherence patterns and patient attitudes toward combined ribociclib and endocrine therapy in the adjuvant setting. This gap underscores the need for research to evaluate whether structured adherence-support interventions can improve medication adherence and potentially influence clinical outcomes like iDFS. Understanding these relationships will inform strategies to optimize real-world effectiveness of CDK4/6 inhibitor ribociclib therapy.
14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.
This study's planned enrollment of 90 is above the median of 72 across 10,896 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.
Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →Institute of Oncology Ljubljana is the lead sponsor of 81 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
Exclusion Criteria:
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
HER2 is a protein, made from the ERBB2 gene, that drives the growth of some cancers. A study may look for a level of the protein, extra copies of the gene, or a particular change in it.
In breast cancer, protein tests are read as HER2-positive, HER2-low or HER2-negative; other cancers use their own rules. Check which test result the study requires.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Metastases
Cancer that has spread from where it began to other parts of the body. “Metastatic” cancer is cancer that has spread this way.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
HER2
HER2 is a protein, made from the ERBB2 gene, that drives the growth of some cancers. A study may look for a level of the protein, extra copies of the gene, or a particular change in it.
In breast cancer, protein tests are read as HER2-positive, HER2-low or HER2-negative; other cancers use their own rules. Check which test result the study requires.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
structured adherence-support package consisting of scheduled reminders, structured educational reinforcement discussion and materials delivered at enrolment and reinforced at specified intervals
Behavioral: Adherence package consisting of additional education and adherence reminders
Control arm: usual care according to local practice (no additional adherence package).
Adherence package consisting of additional education and adherence reminders
This study also gives Ribociclib. No intervention listed here names it: that was found by reading the record.
Proportion of days covered (PDC)
The primary objective is to show that a structured adherence package increases mean adherence, expressed as days\_taken/days\_prescribed. To maintain comparability with previous studies, we will use the independent samples t test with alpha=0.05 to compare the means between groups. H0: there is no difference in mean PDC between groups (SoC + behavioural intervention vs SoC)
Time frame: Randomization to end of treatment with ribociclib: 3 years from enrollment
iDFS
estimate invasive disease free survival (iDFS) in both treatment groups
Time frame: 5 years form randomization
5-year survival
estimate association between adherence and survival
Time frame: 5 years form randomization
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Studies of the drug tested here: Ribociclib
Institute of Oncology Ljubljana