ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07630935NIGHT-SCANUpdated Oct 20, 2026

Breast Cancer Risk Assessment in Night Shift Workers - Implementation of a Personalized Consultation

An observational study in Breast Neoplasms Diagnosis, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Recruiting at 1 site in France. Open to female participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-20.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Jul 2026; still recruiting 4 months later.
Updated Oct 20, 2026Study contact changedGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

This study evaluates adherence to a personalized prevention plan in female night shift workers at increased risk of breast cancer. Night shift work is associated with circadian disruption and increased cancer risk, as well as cardiovascular and reproductive health risks.

Participants attend an initial consultation including clinical assessment and development of a personalized prevention plan targeting modifiable risk factors such as alcohol consumption, physical activity, smoking, diet, and weight.

Follow-up is conducted remotely over 5 years to assess adherence to recommendations and screening. Participant satisfaction and adherence to additional consultations are also evaluated.

Read the detailed description

Breast cancer is the most common cancer among women, and prognosis depends on early detection. Night shift work is associated with circadian rhythm disruption and increased cancer risk.

This single-center interventional study evaluates adherence to a personalized prevention plan (PPP) developed during an initial consultation. This consultation includes a review of medical history, a lifestyle assessment, and a physical examination.

The PPP targets modifiable risk factors, including smoking, alcohol consumption, diet, physical activity, and weight.

Participants are followed for 5 years, with assessments at 1, 2, 3, and 5 years. Adherence is defined as the implementation of at least one recommendation or the completion of prescribed screening tests.

Secondary objectives include assessing satisfaction with and adherence to cardiology and fertility consultations when recommended.

02

Conditions studied

  • Breast Neoplasms Diagnosis

Keywords

  • Breast neoplasms
  • prevention & control Cancer prevention
  • Risk reduction behavior
  • Night shift work
  • Personalized prevention
  • Risk assessment
03

In context

Breast Neoplasms

14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 100 is below the median of 184 across 3,235 observational studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,592 studies on the registry; 1,033 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The target population consists of female night staff at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female participants aged 18 years or older
  • Night shift workers at Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital
  • Attending consultation for breast cancer risk assessment PGRC
  • Affiliated with a social security system
  • No personal history of breast cancer
  • Provided (non-opposition procedure according to French regulations)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women
  • Individuals under legal protection or deprived of liberty
  • Individuals without standard health insurance coverage
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
100 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Participants with Personalized Prevention Plan

    Participants receive a tailored prevention plan following risk assessment

    Behavioral: Personalized Prevention Plan

Interventions

  • BehavioralPersonalized Prevention Plan

    Personalized recommendations for night shift workers targeting modifiable risk factors, including lifestyle, diet, physical activity, smoking, alcohol consumption, and adherence to screening

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Adherence to Personalized Prevention Plan established during the initial risk assessment consultation

    Proportion of participants adhering to at least one recommendation of the Personalized Prevention Plan or completing prescribed screening. Percentage of participants who lost weight when overweight had been identified during the initial consultation. Percentage of participants with modified sporting activity according to the recommendations at the initial consultation. Percentage of participants who had quit smoking. Percentage of participants who modified their alcohol consumption when it was excessive at the initial consultation. Percentage of participants who changed their diets when a dietary imbalance was observed during the initial consultation. Percentage of women who underwent screening as recommended following the initial consultation.

    Time frame: At 1, 2, 3 and 5 years.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Overal patient satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction regarding the PPP will be assessed 1 year following the intervention using the validated "Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18)", based on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree"

    Time frame: At 1, 2, 3 and 5 years

  2. Participant satisfaction with the adapted consultation to night work

    Satisfaction rate of women with the consultation system adapted to night. Patient satisfaction will be assessed using the validated "Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire Short Form (PSQ-18)", based on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from "strongly disagree" to "strongly agree".

    Time frame: At 1, 2, 3 and 5 years.

  3. Screening adherence to a cardiovascular consultation recommendation

    Proportion of participants who had the consultation with a cardiologist when recommended

    Time frame: At 1, 2, 3 and 5 years.

  4. Screening adherence to a fertility consultation consultation recommendation

    Proportion of participants who had the consultation with a cardiologist when recommended

    Time frame: At 1, 2, 3 and 5 years.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Data are available upon reasonable request The procedures carried out with the French data privacy authority (CNIL, Commission nationale de l'informatique et des libertés) do not provide for the transmission of the database, nor do the information and consent documents signed by the patients. Consultation by the editorial board or interested researchers of individual participant data that underlie the results reported in the article after deidentification may nevertheless be considered, subject to prior determination of the terms and conditions of such consultation and in respect for compliance with the applicable regulations.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

Time frame: Beginning 3 months and ending 3 years following article publication. Requests out of these time frame can also be submitted to the sponsor

Access criteria: Researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Contact
Study contact changed: a•••@aphp.fr · •••8114→c•••@aphp.fr · •••8114. See the current contact
Oct 20, 2026
Site contacts
Changed at 1 site. See the sites
Show the site
  • Pitié Salpêtrière hospital · Paris, FranceContact a•••@aphp.fr · •••8111→c•••@aphp.fr · •••8114
Oct 20, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 20, 2026
    Contact Study contact changed: a•••@aphp.fr · •••8114→c•••@aphp.fr · •••8114. See the current contact
    Site contacts Changed at 1 site. See the sites
    Show the site
    • Pitié Salpêtrière hospital · Paris, FranceContact a•••@aphp.fr · •••8111→c•••@aphp.fr · •••8114
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07630935
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 5, 2026
Start date
Jul 8, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 8, 2032 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 8, 2032 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 20, 2026

Study contacts

Catherine UZAN, PU-PH
Contact
catherine.uzan@aphp.fr
+33 01 42 17 81 14
Catherine UZAN, PU-PH
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion