ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07627945Updated Jul 1, 2026

Natural Enzyme Mouthwash After Third Molar Surgery

An interventional study of ORAL7® Mouthwash and 0.2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Mouthwash in Impacted Third Molar, Postoperative Pain and Trismus, sponsored by MBD MARKETING SDN. BHD.. Completed at 1 site in Malaysia. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-07-01.

Sponsored by MBD MARKETING SDN. BHD. · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Oct 2025, registered May 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
58
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical study investigates whether a natural enzyme-containing mouthwash (ORAL7®) can improve healing, pain and mouth opening after the surgical removal of impacted lower wisdom teeth (mandibular third molars), compared to a commonly used antiseptic mouthwash (0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate).

Wisdom tooth removal is a routine dental surgery, but it can lead to common postoperative problems such as pain, swelling, difficulty in opening the mouth, and delayed healing of the surgical wound. After surgery, patients are usually advised to use an antiseptic mouthwash to reduce bacteria in the mouth and support healing. Chlorhexidine mouthwash is widely used for this purpose, but it may cause side effects such as tooth staining, taste disturbance, and irritation in some patients.

ORAL7® is a newer type of mouthwash that contains natural enzymes similar to those found in saliva, including lactoperoxidase, lysozyme, lactoferrin, and glucose oxidase. These enzymes help the mouth's natural defense system by reducing harmful bacteria, controlling inflammation, and supporting tissue repair. Because of these properties, ORAL7® may offer a gentler alternative to chlorhexidine while still promoting good healing.

The study will involve patients undergoing surgical removal of impacted lower wisdom teeth. After surgery, participants will be randomly assigned to use either ORAL7® mouthwash or 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash for one week. Neither group will know which mouthwash they are using in order to reduce bias. The researchers will then monitor healing by measuring wound recovery, pain levels, and how easily patients can open their mouths during the first week after surgery.

The main outcome being studied is how well the surgical wound heals after one week. Additional outcomes include the level of pain experienced each day and the degree of mouth opening after surgery.

Study Hypothesis

The study hypothesis is that patients using ORAL7® mouthwash will have similar or better wound healing, less postoperative pain, and improved mouth opening compared to patients using 0.2% chlorhexidine mouthwash after wisdom tooth surgery.

Read the detailed description

This study is a single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the effects of a natural enzyme-containing mouthwash (ORAL7®) on postoperative outcomes following the surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars, in comparison with 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate (CHX) mouthwash.

Postoperative management following third molar surgery typically includes antiseptic mouth rinses to reduce microbial load and support soft tissue healing. While chlorhexidine remains the standard adjunctive mouthwash due to its broad-spectrum antimicrobial activity, its use is associated with well-documented adverse effects, including tooth staining, taste alteration, and potential cytotoxic effects on oral tissues. These limitations have prompted increasing interest in alternative agents that can support oral wound healing while maintaining antimicrobial efficacy.

ORAL7® is an enzyme-based oral rinse formulated to mimic components of the innate salivary defense system. It contains lactoperoxidase, lysozyme, lactoferrin, and glucose oxidase, which collectively contribute to antimicrobial activity through enhancement of the lactoperoxidase-thiocyanate-hydrogen peroxide system. This enzymatic system supports microbial homeostasis, limits pathogenic bacterial growth, and may contribute to a more favorable environment for tissue repair without disrupting normal oral microflora to the same extent as conventional antiseptics.

The biological rationale for this intervention is based on the role of salivary enzymes in regulating inflammation, microbial colonization, and tissue regeneration. Lactoperoxidase generates antimicrobial hypothiocyanite ions, lysozyme disrupts bacterial cell walls and modulates inflammatory activity, lactoferrin regulates iron availability while supporting immune modulation and tissue repair, and glucose oxidase contributes to controlled hydrogen peroxide production that sustains enzymatic antimicrobial activity. Collectively, these mechanisms may influence early wound healing dynamics, postoperative discomfort, and functional recovery.

Eligible participants undergoing surgical extraction of impacted mandibular third molars under local anesthesia will be allocated into either the ORAL7® group or the CHX group using a randomized allocation method with allocation concealment. Postoperative care will be standardized across both groups except for the assigned mouthwash regimen.

Participants will be instructed to use the allocated mouthwash for a fixed period following surgery, and postoperative recovery will be monitored over the first week. Clinical assessments will focus on soft tissue healing status at the surgical site, patient-reported pain intensity, and functional limitation related to mouth opening. These outcomes reflect key domains of postoperative recovery in oral surgery, including tissue repair, inflammation-related discomfort, and functional impairment.

The study is designed to generate comparative clinical evidence regarding whether an enzyme-based oral rinse can provide equivalent or improved postoperative outcomes compared to chlorhexidine, particularly in terms of wound healing quality, pain reduction, and recovery of mandibular function. Findings may contribute to optimizing postoperative oral care protocols and reducing reliance on antiseptic agents with known side-effect profiles.

02

Conditions studied

  • Impacted Third Molar
  • Postoperative Pain
  • Trismus
  • Wound Healing

Keywords

  • impacted mandibular third molar
  • ORAL7®
  • Chlorhexidine
  • wound healing
  • pain score
  • mouth opening
03

In context

Pain, Postoperative

5,640 studies on the registry are indexed under Pain, Postoperative; 1,230 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 58 is below the median of 75 across 4,821 interventional studies indexed under Pain, Postoperative.

Browse Pain, Postoperative studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with MBD MARKETING SDN. BHD. as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • 18 years old and older until required number of samples has been obtained
  • Impacted mandibular third molar required bone removal
  • Absence of acute infection in impacted mandibular third molar
  • Absence of deep caries in the adjacent tooth
  • No known medical illness
  • No known drug allergy
  • Not on medication (prescribed or over the counter)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1 Mandibular third molar with soft tissue impaction only
  • Distoangulated tooth with deep impaction.
  • Active smoker
  • Pregnant women
  • Patients undergoing removal of impacted mandibular third molar due to trauma justification, such as the impacted tooth is at the fractured site.
  • Mentally challenged patient
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
58 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    ORAL7® Enzyme-Containing Mouthwash Group

    ORAL7® Enzyme-Containing Mouthwash Group Participants in this arm will receive ORAL7® mouthwash as the postoperative rinse following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. ORAL7® is an enzyme-based oral rinse containing lactoperoxidase, lysozyme, lactoferrin, and glucose oxidase, which support the natural salivary antimicrobial system. Participants will be instructed to rinse with approximately 10 mL of the mouthwash for 30 seconds, three times daily for 7 days starting on the first postoperative day.

    Drug: ORAL7® Mouthwash

  • Active comparator
    0.2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Mouthwash Group

    0.2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Mouthwash Group Participants in this arm will receive 0.2% chlorhexidine gluconate mouthwash as the postoperative rinse following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Chlorhexidine is a broad-spectrum antiseptic commonly used in oral surgery to reduce microbial load and support wound healing. Participants will be instructed to rinse with approximately 10 mL of the solution for 30 seconds, three times daily for 7 days starting on the first postoperative day.

    Drug: 0.2% Chlorhexidine Gluconate Mouthwash

Interventions

  • DrugORAL7® Mouthwash

    Enzyme-containing mouthwash used postoperatively after surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Contains lactoperoxidase, lysozyme, lactoferrin, and glucose oxidase. Used as a 10 mL rinse for 30 seconds, three times daily for 7 days starting from postoperative day 1.

  • Standard antiseptic mouth rinse used following oral surgery. Participants rinse with 10 mL for 30 seconds, three times daily for 7 days starting from postoperative day 1.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative Pain Score

    Assessment of postoperative pain intensity using the Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) ranging from 0 to 10 following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

    Time frame: Daily from Postoperative Day 1 to Postoperative Day 7

  2. Landry Wound Healing Index Score

    Assessment of postoperative soft tissue healing using the Landry Wound Healing Index following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Healing will be evaluated based on tissue color, bleeding on palpation, granulation tissue, incision margin condition, and suppuration.

    Time frame: Postoperative Day 7

  3. Postoperative Mouth Opening

    Assessment of postoperative mouth opening measured in millimeters between the maxillary and mandibular incisal reference points following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars.

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline and Postoperative Day 7

Secondary outcomes

  1. Analgesic Consumption

    Assessment of the total number of analgesic medications consumed following surgical removal of impacted mandibular third molars. Analgesic use will include prescribed celecoxib and rescue paracetamol intake recorded daily by participants.

    Time frame: Daily from Postoperative Day 1 to Postoperative Day 7

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Unit, School of Dental Sciences, Universiti Sains Malaysia
    Kota Bharu, Kelantan 16150, Malaysia
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Oct 2025 to primary completion in Jun 2026, 8 months.

Of 2,102 interventional studies with no phase under Pain, Postoperative, half reached primary completion within 11 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 23. This study's 8 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 21, 2026
First posted
Jun 4, 2026
StartActual
Oct 6, 2025
Primary completionActual
Jun 15, 2026
CompletionActual
Jun 22, 2026
Last update
Jul 1, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jul 1, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07627945
Lead sponsor
MBD MARKETING SDN. BHD.
Responsible party
Dr. Nabeel Reza (Principle Investigator, MBD MARKETING SDN. BHD.) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jun 4, 2026
Start date
Oct 6, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 15, 2026
Completion
Jun 22, 2026
Last update
Jul 1, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion