ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07622472REMODEL-HFUpdated Oct 5, 2026

Remote Monitoring and Optimization of Heart Failure Therapy

An interventional study of Wearable Monitoring Device for Heart Failure in Heart Failure, sponsored by Zoll Medical Corporation. Not yet recruiting at 9 sites in 9 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-05.

Sponsored by Zoll Medical Corporation · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Oct 5, 20262 sites added2 sites removedGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
800
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Heart failure is a condition in which the heart cannot pump blood effectively, often leading to symptoms such as shortness of breath and fluid retention. After hospitalization for heart failure, patients remain at high risk of worsening symptoms, emergency visits, and hospital readmission.

This study is designed to evaluate whether using a wearable monitoring device, called the Heart Failure Management System (HFMS), can help improve the management of patients after a recent hospitalization for heart failure.

Participants in this study will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will receive standard medical care alone. The other group will receive standard medical care in combination with the HFMS device. The HFMS device is worn on the body and continuously collects information such as heart rate, breathing, activity level, and signs of fluid accumulation. These data are reviewed by the clinical care team and may help detect early worsening of heart failure.

Participants will wear the device for 90 days (if assigned to the device group) and will be followed for up to one year. During the study, information will be collected on serious health events such as death, hospitalizations, emergency visits, and changes in heart failure status, as well as quality of life.

The goal of this study is to determine whether this monitoring approach can improve outcomes for patients with heart failure by enabling earlier and more effective clinical management.

Read the detailed description

The REMODEL-HF study is a prospective, multi-center, randomized, open-label clinical investigation designed to evaluate whether the use of HFMS in addition to usual care improves clinical outcomes in patients recently hospitalized for acute heart failure.

Approximately 800 participants will be enrolled and randomized in a 1:1 ratio to either: standard of care alone (control group), or standard of care plus HFMS-guided management (intervention group).

The primary objective is to determine whether HFMS-guided management results in improved overall clinical outcomes compared to usual care. Outcomes of interest include major clinical events such as cardiovascular death and heart failure hospitalization, as well as earlier indicators of clinical deterioration and changes in relevant biomarkers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Heart Failure

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Heart Failure, Remote Monitoring, Wearable Device
03

In context

Heart Failure

6,331 studies on the registry are indexed under Heart Failure; 1,396 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 800 is above the median of 76 across 4,049 interventional studies indexed under Heart Failure.

Browse Heart Failure studies →

Lead sponsor

Zoll Medical Corporation is the lead sponsor of 36 studies on the registry; 6 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥18 years
  • Ability and willingness to provide written and comply with study procedures
  • Hospital admission for acute heart failure with dyspnea at rest and pulmonary congestion on chest X-ray, and other signs and/or symptoms of heart failure such as edema and/or positive rales on auscultation.
  • All measures within 24 hours prior to randomization of systolic blood pressure ≥ 100 mmHg, and of heart rate ≥ 60 bpm.
  • All measures within 24 hours prior to randomization of serum potassium ≤ 5.5 mEq/L (mmol/L).
  • Biomarker criteria for persistent congestion:

    • NT-proBNP >1500 pg/mL at the time of admission, and;
    • NT-proBNP >1000 pg/mL >=3 days after initial admission measure
  • At 1 week prior to admission, either (a) ≤ ½ the optimal dose of ACEi/ARB/ARNi (see Table) prescribed, no beta-blocker prescribed, and ≤ ½ the optimal dose of MRA prescribed or (b) no ACEi/ARB/ARNi prescribed, ≤ ½ the optimal dose of beta-blocker prescribed, and ≤ ½ the optimal dose of MRA prescribed. All study participants prescribed per label and commercially fit with the HFMS device will be eligible for enrollment.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Age \< 18 years
  • Clearly documented intolerance to high doses (≥50% of target dose) of beta-blockers.
  • Clearly documented intolerance to high doses (≥50% of target dose) of RAS blockers (both ACEi and ARB).
  • Mechanical ventilation (not including CPAP/BIPAP) in the 24 hours prior to Screening.
  • Significant pulmonary disease contributing substantially to the patients' dyspnea such as \< 1 liter or need for chronic systemic or nonsystemic therapy, or any kind of primary right heart failure such as precapillary pulmonary hypertension or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension.
  • Cardiac surgery within 3 months prior to Screening
  • Index Event (admission for AHF) triggered primarily by a correctable etiology such as significant arrhythmia (e.g., sustained ventricular tachycardia, or atrial fibrillation/flutter with sustained ventricular response >130 beats per minute, or bradycardia with sustained ventricular arrhythmia \<45 beats per minute), severe anemia, acute coronary syndrome, pulmonary embolism, planned admission for device implantation or severe nonadherence leading to very significant fluid accumulation prior to admission and brisk diuresis after admission. Troponin elevations without other evidence of an acute coronary syndrome are not excluded.
  • Uncorrected thyroid disease, active myocarditis, or known amyloid, sarcoidosis, or hypertrophic obstructive cardiomyopathy.
  • History of heart transplant or on a transplant list, or using or planned to be implanted with a ventricular assist device.
  • Adhesive allergy/sensitivity (e.g., acrylic adhesives).
  • Compromised skin at the device application site (wound, severe dermatitis, etc.) .
  • Having a prescribed wearable cardioverter defibrillator
  • Pulmonary artery pressure implant (e.g. CardioMems)
  • Expected survival \<1 year
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

FEV1

From a breathing test (spirometry): how much air you can blow out in the first second. Often given as a percentage of what is expected for your age, height and sex.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
800 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Control Group

    Participants receive standard medical care for heart failure according to local clinical practice without use of the HFMS device.

  • Active comparator
    Intervention Group

    Participants receive standard medical care in addition to remote monitoring using the Heart Failure Management System (HFMS). Clinical teams review device data and may adjust treatment based on observed trends and alerts.

    Device: Wearable Monitoring Device for Heart Failure

Interventions

  • DeviceWearable Monitoring Device for Heart Failure

    Participants assigned to the intervention group will use a noninvasive wearable physiological monitoring device (Heart Failure Management System, HFMS) designed to continuously collect data related to cardiopulmonary status, including heart rate, respiratory parameters, activity levels, and indicators of fluid status (Thoraic Fluid Index = TFI). Clinical care teams perform regular reviews of device-derived data and may respond to alerts or trends suggestive of worsening heart failure. Based on these data, the care team may adjust patient management, including modification of guideline-directed medical therapy or scheduling of follow-up assessments. The device does not deliver therapy and is used to support clinical decision-making in the outpatient management of heart failure.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Hierarchical Composite Outcome (Win Ratio)

    A hierarchical composite outcome comparing the intervention and control groups using a win ratio approach. The components are prioritized as follows: (1) cardiovascular death, (2) heart failure hospitalization, (3) Unplanned visit (emergency room or other emergency facilities) requiring intravenous diuretic treatment, and (4) change in NT-proBNP concentration. Participants are compared pairwise, with outcomes evaluated sequentially according to this hierarchy.

    Time frame: 90 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Participants Achieving Target Doses of Guideline-Directed Medical Therapy (GDMT)

    Percentage of participants reaching target doses of guideline-directed medical therapy for heart failure during the first 90 days after randomization.

    Time frame: 90 days

  2. Quality of Life Assessed by KCCQ-12

    Change in health-related quality of life measured using validated questionnaire : the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ-12)

    Time frame: Baseline, 90 days,180 days and 365 days

  3. Time to First Clinical Event Composite

    Time to First Occurrence of Cardiovascular Death, Heart Failure Hospitalization, or Unplanned Visit Requiring Intravenous Diuretic Treatment

    Time frame: Up to 365 days

  4. Quality of Life Assessed by EQ-5D-5L

    Change in health-related quality of life measured using validated questionnaire : the EQ-5D-5L

    Time frame: Baseline, 90 days,180 days and 365 days

  5. Hierarchical Composite Outcome (Win Ratio at 1 Year)

    Hierarchical composite outcome using the same win ratio methodology as the primary endpoint, evaluated at 1 year.

    Time frame: 365 days

  6. Cardiovascular Death

    Occurrence of death due to cardiovascular causes.

    Time frame: 90 days and 365 days

  7. Heart Failure Hospitalization

    Occurrence of hospitalization due to heart failure.

    Time frame: 90 days and 365 days

  8. Unplanned Visit Requiring Intravenous Diuretic Treatment

    Occurrence of an unplanned visit requiring intravenous diuretic treatment. Scheduled or planned intravenous diuretic treatments are not considered events.

    Time frame: 90 days and 365 days

  9. NT-proBNP Response

    Change in NT-proBNP concentration from baseline. Response defined as ≥30% decrease from baseline.

    Time frame: Baseline to 90 days

07

Study locations

9 sites
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Scholte NTB, Gurgoze MT, Aydin D, Theuns DAMJ, Manintveld OC, Ronner E, Boersma E, de Boer RA, van der Boon RMA, Brugts JJ. Telemonitoring for heart failure: a meta-analysis. Eur Heart J. 2023 Aug 14;44(31):2911-2926. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad280. PubMed 37216272 ↗
  • Mebazaa A, Davison B, Chioncel O, Cohen-Solal A, Diaz R, Filippatos G, Metra M, Ponikowski P, Sliwa K, Voors AA, Edwards C, Novosadova M, Takagi K, Damasceno A, Saidu H, Gayat E, Pang PS, Celutkiene J, Cotter G. Safety, tolerability and efficacy of up-titration of guideline-directed medical therapies for acute heart failure (STRONG-HF): a multinational, open-label, randomised, trial. Lancet. 2022 Dec 3;400(10367):1938-1952. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(22)02076-1. Epub 2022 Nov 7. PubMed 36356631 ↗
  • Boehmer JP, Cremer S, Abo-Auda WS, Stokes DR, Hadi A, McCann PJ, Burch AE, Bonderman D. Impact of a Novel Wearable Sensor on Heart Failure Rehospitalization: An Open-Label Concurrent-Control Clinical Trial. JACC Heart Fail. 2024 Dec;12(12):2011-2022. doi: 10.1016/j.jchf.2024.07.022. Epub 2024 Oct 9. PubMed 39387771 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Oct 2026; primary completion for Aug 2028, 22 months later.

Of 236 industry-sponsored interventional studies with no phase under Heart Failure, half reached primary completion within 34 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 18 and three quarters within 62. This study's planned 22 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 1,354 studies reached it within 31 months; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 52.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 18, 2026
First posted
Jun 3, 2026
StartEst.
Oct 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 1, 2028
CompletionEst.
Aug 1, 2029
Last update
Oct 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Sites
2 sites added, 2 sites removed
Show 2 added (1 Netherlands, 1 Switzerland)
  • University Medical Centre Groningen · Groningen, Netherlands
  • USB Basel · Basel, Switzerland
Show 2 removed
  • UMC Utrecht · Utrecht, Netherlands
  • University Zurich · Zurich, Switzerland
Oct 5, 2026
Site contacts
Changed at 1 site. See the sites
Show the site
  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre · Madrid, SpainContact added (no phone or email listed)
Oct 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 5, 2026
    2 sites added, 2 sites removed
    Show 2 added (1 Netherlands, 1 Switzerland)
    • University Medical Centre Groningen · Groningen, Netherlands
    • USB Basel · Basel, Switzerland
    Show 2 removed
    • UMC Utrecht · Utrecht, Netherlands
    • University Zurich · Zurich, Switzerland
    Site contacts Changed at 1 site. See the sites
    Show the site
    • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre · Madrid, SpainContact added (no phone or email listed)
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07622472
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 3, 2026
Start date
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2029 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 5, 2026

Study contacts

Manon Lemaire, Master
Contact
mlemaire@zoll.com
+33 (0)6 33 57 18 52
Lars Weber, PhD
Contact
lweber@zoll.com
+49 (0) 151 611 404 98

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
Yes
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion