ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07621510Updated Jun 2, 2026

Integrating iSYV Within HIV Clinical Care for Youth Living With HIV in Tanzania

An interventional study of iSYV (integrated Sauti ya Vijana; The Voice of Youth) and mHealth in HIV -1 Infection and Mental Health Issue, sponsored by Duke University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Tanzania. Open to participants aged 15 Years to 24 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-02.

Sponsored by Duke University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
5,000
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
15 Years to 24 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Youth living with HIV (YLWH) experience mental health (MH) challenges that compromise their HIV care. Though the MH gap is well described, MH service delivery to YLWH is rare, especially in low resource settings. MH professionals are few and interventions tailored to the needs of this population are scarce. This project proposes a way to bridge the gap by streamlining the Sauti ya Vijana (SYV, The Voice of Youth) intervention redesigned to integrate into the differentiated HIV clinical care model in Tanzania. SYV is a peer-led, group-based treatment designed with and for YLWH to address their self-reported MH challenges and stressors living with HIV.

Read the detailed description

SYV incorporates components of existing evidence-based models: Trauma Focused-Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Interpersonal Psychotherapy, and Motivational Interviewing to address the needs youth described in formative interviews. Preliminary data indicates implementation success with estimated effects towards improved MH, antiretroviral therapy adherence, and a 10% greater increase in viral suppression in the intervention arm compared to standard of care. The central hypothesis here is that the new integrated "i" SYV will be acceptable, feasible, and effective to improve virologic suppression and improve retention in care. The mechanism of change is that improved MH leads to better medication adherence, viral suppression, and care engagement. The rationale is twofold: 1) Tanzania is planning to initiate MH screening in HIV clinical visits, but the MH treatment gap persists; 2) the iSYV stepped-care package could be an effective approach to support integrated MH care for YLWH. The central hypothesis will be tested in a hybrid type-2 effectiveness-implementation trial. The first aim will leverage the Fit to Context Framework, using an iterative Designing for Dissemination and Sustainability approach. Current SYV peer-group leaders with extensive experience delivering SYV will co-design the new iSYV package. The iSYV in-person sessions will be delivered by trained peer youth leaders and be aligned to the Tanzanian differentiated care model: stable youth (those fully suppressed) attend clinic every 6 months; and unstable youth (those with HIV RNA > 50 copies/mL) attend enhanced adherence counseling monthly. Youth with symptoms of MH difficulties on screening (PHQ9-depression, GAD7-anxiety, Trauma-related stress) will join the unstable group. To support engagement between visits, iSYV will explore use of a mHealth gamification strategy. The second aim includes a pilot and a four-arm cluster randomized trial. Two large implementing partners of PEPFAR clinics will support testing of the iSYV care package. The primary outcome is powered to show an increase in viral suppression (HIV RNA \<50 copies/mL) in the unstable group and improved retention in care among the stable group. Change in MH is measured as a secondary outcome. The third aim will evaluate implementation determinants and outcomes, including acceptability, feasibility, fidelity, and cost informed by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research. The proposal is significant because it is expected to help address the MH gap for YLWH with implications for HIV care in Tanzania and other low income areas.

02

Conditions studied

  • HIV -1 Infection
  • Mental Health Issue

Keywords

  • Youth
  • Adolescents
  • Tanzania
  • Cognitive behavioral therapy
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Duke University is the lead sponsor of 2,063 studies on the registry; 273 are open to participants now.

Of its 204 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 167 (82%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
15 Years to 24 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. youth living with (YLWH) 15-24 years;
  2. have understanding of their HIV status;
  3. able to attend iSYV sessions if site is randomized to the intervention.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. inability to provide /assent or participate meaningfully in the intervention due to cognitive impairment, psychosis, or other disability;
  2. enrollment in any other MH, stigma-related, or adherence intervention research study.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HIV

The human immunodeficiency virus, which weakens the immune system.

Many studies now accept people whose HIV is controlled on treatment, judged by the viral load and the CD4 count. Check the limits this study sets.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
5,000 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    eSOC (enhanced Standard of Care)

    Currently mental health screening is not part of routine care. Youth at all trial clinics who report moderate to severe symptoms will be referred for care within the local standard.

    Other: eSOC

  • Experimental
    eSOC (enhanced Standard of Care) + iSYV (integrated Sauti ya Vijana or The voice of youth)

    iSYV is an intervention that will be peer-led and group based in six monthly sessions.

    Behavioral: iSYV (integrated Sauti ya Vijana; The Voice of Youth) · Other: eSOC

  • Experimental
    eSOC (enhanced Standard of Care) + iSYV + mHealth (mobile Health)

    mHealth will be an additional experimental intervention exploring the boosting effect of gamification of intervention content to boost participant knowledge and understanding of iSYV content

    Behavioral: iSYV (integrated Sauti ya Vijana; The Voice of Youth) · Other: mHealth · Other: eSOC

  • Experimental
    eSOC (enhanced Standard of Care) + mHealth (mobile Health)

    mHealth is evaluated as a stand alone experimental intervention in this arm to evaluate if mHealth alone (without in person iSYV content) can improve mental health and/or HIV RNA outcomes.

    Other: mHealth · Other: eSOC

Interventions

  • BehavioraliSYV (integrated Sauti ya Vijana; The Voice of Youth)

    Integrated "i"SYV is a streamlined version of the original intervention SYV that is adapted for integration into routine clinical care. The original SYV intervention included 10 group weekly sessions (2 incorporating caregivers) and 2 individual sessions with adaptation to fit without routine adolescent HIV care based on Tanzanian National HIV Guidelines for HIV care follow up visits.

  • OthermHealth

    A gamified version of iSYV that can be played via SMS or Whatsapp messaging.

  • OthereSOC

    mental health screening and referral within the standard of care for moderate to severe symptoms

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. viral load

    HIV RNA \<50 copies/mL considered suppression (per National guidelines)

    Time frame: at 6-months

  2. retention in care

    clinical follow up as prescribed within 30 days of scheduled 6-month appointment

    Time frame: at 6-months

Secondary outcomes

  1. changes in self-reported antiretroviral therapy (ART) regarding adherence

    Self-reported adherence on a 3 question survey (Wilson) 0-100 range, higher scores indicate greater adherence

    Time frame: 6-months, 12-months, 18-months

  2. change in self-reported mental health difficulties related to depression

    self-report of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9 ) range is 0-27, higher scores indicate greater depression

    Time frame: 6-months, 12-months, 18-months

  3. change in self-reported mental health difficulties related to anxiety

    self-report on the Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) range 0-21 with higher scores indicating greater anxiety

    Time frame: 6-months, 12-months, 18-months

  4. change in HIV knowledge in the SOC+iSYV intervention arm compared to SOC arm at 6 month follow-up and at all timepoints in the intervention arm compared to SOC arm

    self reported knowledge on the HIV-KQ18 (HIV Knowledge questionnaire 18) range 0-18. higher score indicates more HIV knowledge

    Time frame: 6-months, 12-months, 18-months

  5. viral load

    HIV RNA

    Time frame: 12-months, 18-months as drawn per standard of care

  6. retention in care

    follow up in routine HIV care within 30 days of scheduled 12-month and 18-month appointments

    Time frame: 12-months and 18-months

  7. change in coping and self efficacy on the Coping and Self-Efficacy Scale (CSES)

    self-reported, 13 questions with scale of 0 to 2 (range 0 to 26), where a higher number is a better outcome, more coping and self-efficacy

    Time frame: 6-months, 12-months, 18-months

  8. change in resilience on People Living with HIV (PLHIV) Resilience Scale

    10 items, scale 0 to 2 (range 0 to 20), higher number means more resilience and a better outcome

    Time frame: 6-months, 12-months, 18-months

  9. SYV risk behaviors scale

    5 items assessing sexual activity, number of sexual partners, condom use, consumption of alcohol, cocaine, heroin, or other substances. These are yes/no response with clarification of rate/amount. Higher numbers is higher risk.

    Time frame: 6-months, 12-months, 18-months

  10. interpersonal violence on the World Health Organization intimate partner violence (WHO IPV) scale

    self report, 15 items with 0=no and 1-yes. More yes (higher scale) means more experience with IPV.

    Time frame: 6-months, 12-months, 18-months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Elizabeth Glaser Pediatric AIDS Foundation implementing partner sites in Tanzania
    Moshi, Tanzania
    • Akwila Temu, MD, MMED · Principal investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — de-identified data

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Analytic code

Time frame: at the conclusion of trial analysis

Access criteria: Data sharing is critical to confirm findings, discover important new associations, and to test new ideas that impact health. Our core quantitative dataset will be archived in the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Data Archive (NDA). To achieve this we will harmonize our data to NDA common data elements (CDE) as much as possible prior to data collection. We will follow the standard practices of the NDA for data uploads, submitting data biannually beginning in the second submission cycle following the Notice of Award. Data will be made publicly available in the data archive at the time of publication.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Jan 2027; primary completion for Mar 2029, 26 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
May 13, 2026
First posted
Jun 2, 2026
StartEst.
Jan 10, 2027
Primary completionEst.
Mar 31, 2029
CompletionEst.
Sep 30, 2030
Last update
Jun 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07621510
Lead sponsor
Duke University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 2, 2026
Start date
Jan 10, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 31, 2029 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 2, 2026

Study contacts

Stuart T Carr, BA
Contact
stuart.carr@duke.edu
(919) 668-4849
Sandy Askew, MPh
Contact
sandy.askew@duke.edu
Dorothy Dow, MD, MSc
principal investigator · Duke Universtiy

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion