CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07619794Updated Jun 2, 2026

tSCS and AR on Pain and Balance in Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy

An interventional study of transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and Augmented Reality in Diabetic Neuropathies, sponsored by Riphah International University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-06-02.

Sponsored by Riphah International University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

tSCS and AR-based training have individually shown benefits in neuromotor rehabilitation; no study to date has evaluated their combined effects on pain, balance, lower-limb strength, retention, and vibration sense in diabetic neuropathy. The rationale for combining them lies in their complementary mechanisms: tSCS at 30 Hz activates large-diameter Aβ afferents, inhibiting nociceptive input, enhancing spinal excitability, and facilitating motor activation.

Read the detailed description

In Pakistan, 26.3% of the population is affected, and DN impacts about 40% of cases, with early signs reducing function. (9-11) Standard care includes glycemic control, medications like duloxetine and pregabalin, topical agents, and modalities such as TENS.

Alongside pain, lower-limb strength declines due to motor axonal degeneration and prolonged disuse, (1) limiting mobility and increasing the risk of falls. Balance impairments are frequent in DN and result from compromised proprioceptive input and impaired postural control mechanisms; (4) these deficits are exacerbated by pain-related inactivity and muscular weakness.

Augmented reality (AR) based rehabilitation delivers multisensory feedback, such as visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive inputs, during interactive, task-specific training. It enhances sensorimotor coordination, dynamic postural stability, and proprioceptive reweighting. AR training can improve balance responses, promote lower-limb engagement, and reinforce accurate proprioceptive input.

The tSCS enabled stepping in individuals with complete motor loss, confirming its impact on lower-limb functional recovery. Additionally, this stimulation frequency targets mechano-sensory pathways associated with vibration sense and is believed to support retention of sensorimotor gains through repeated activation of neuroplastic mechanisms at the spinal and cortical levels.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Neuropathies

Keywords

  • Spinal cord stimulation
  • diabetic peripheral neuropathy
  • pain
  • balance
03

In context

Diabetic Neuropathies

617 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetic Neuropathies; 91 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 36 is below the median of 73 across 510 interventional studies indexed under Diabetic Neuropathies.

Browse Diabetic Neuropathies studies →

Lead sponsor

Riphah International University is the lead sponsor of 2,133 studies on the registry; 633 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • More than or equals to 4 score on Douleur Neuropathique 4 Questionnaire
  • More than or equals to 6 Hz at Neurothesiometer
  • More than or equals to 4 score on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitively compromised (MOCA ≤ 26/30)
  • Metallic implants at skull
  • Shunting
  • Skin allergy
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
36 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation and Augmented Reality Group

    Other: transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation · Other: Augmented Reality

  • Active comparator
    Augmented Reality Group

    Other: Augmented Reality

  • Active comparator
    Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation Group

    Other: transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation

Interventions

  • Othertranscutaneous spinal cord stimulation

    Transcutaneous spinal cord stimulation will be administered non-invasively using surface electrodes placed over the D12-L1 spinal segment. This segmental level has been shown to effectively engage lower-limb motor and sensory networks across multiple spinal segments. Stimulation will be delivered using the Soterix 1×1 Transcutaneous Electrical Stimulation (TES) unit. Stimulation will be applied at a frequency range of 30 Hz. Pulse duration of 1 ms, and intensity will be set at 2 mA. A ramp-up and ramp-down time of 30 seconds will be used to enhance participant comfort during the start and end of each stimulation session, following standardized electrode placement and safety protocols.

  • OtherAugmented Reality

    AR-based rehabilitation will consist of interactive balance and coordination tasks conducted in a virtual environment, with real-time visual feedback provided to guide movement accuracy and postural control. The core training block will include five structured modules: interactive kicking exercises to promote ankle and knee coordination; color-target foot-reaching tasks to enhance proprioception and reaction time; virtual obstacle navigation to improve gait and stepping control; static and dynamic balance challenges, such as maintaining posture on virtual planks; and lower-limb strengthening activities, including squats and stepping-based games. Each module will be performed for 5-8 minutes, with brief rest periods between tasks.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    The Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS) is a quick, 11-point measure (0 = no pain to 10 = worst imaginable) commonly used across clinical and research settings. Recent studies demonstrate test-retest reliability ranging from 0.58 to 0.93 (good to excellent), with moderate evidence for a minimal clinically important difference (MCID) of 1.5-2.5 points.

    Time frame: Up to week 5 (baseline/week 1/week 5)

  2. Time Up and Go (TUG)

    The TUG test is a simple, clinically validated tool used to assess dynamic balance and functional mobility. It requires an individual to rise from a seated position, walk three meters, turn, return, and sit down. The TUG demonstrated excellent test-retest reliability, with intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) ranging from 0.89 to 0.94 across multiple trials.

    Time frame: Up to week 5 (Baseline/week 1/week 5)

Secondary outcomes

  1. 30 Second Chair Stand Test

    The 30-Second Chair Stand Test is a widely used, performance-based tool for assessing lower-limb strength and functional mobility. Among individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus, a population commonly affected by diabetic neuropathy, the test has demonstrated excellent reliability. A test-retest intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) of 0.92, indicating excellent relative reliability. In terms of measurement precision, the standard error of measurement (SEM) was 1.08 repetitions, and the smallest real difference (SRD) was 3 repetitions, reflecting the threshold for clinically meaningful change.

    Time frame: Up to week 5 (Baseline/week 1/week 5)

  2. Neurothesiometer

    The neurothesiometer is a non-invasive and reliable instrument used to assess vibration perception threshold (VPT). It has demonstrated excellent reliability, with intra-class correlation coefficients (ICCs) exceeding 0.90, indicating strong measurement consistency. A VPT cut-off value of ≥ 6 Hz is indicative of neuropathy. Owing to its ease of use, objective quantification, and ability to detect subclinical neuropathy, the neurothesiometer is highly valuable in clinical practice. Its superior standardization makes it a preferred method for evaluating protective sensation and vibration loss, particularly in individuals with diabetes.

    Time frame: Up to week 5 (Baseline/Week 1/week 5)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Pakistan Railway Hospital
    Rawalpindi, Punjab Province, Pakistan
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Petersen EA, Stauss TG, Scowcroft JA, Brooks ES, White JL, Sills SM, Amirdelfan K, Guirguis MN, Xu J, Yu C, Nairizi A, Patterson DG, Tsoulfas KC, Creamer MJ, Galan V, Bundschu RH, Paul CA, Mehta ND, Choi H, Sayed D, Lad SP, DiBenedetto DJ, Sethi KA, Goree JH, Bennett MT, Harrison NJ, Israel AF, Chang P, Wu PW, Gekht G, Argoff CE, Nasr CE, Taylor RS, Subbaroyan J, Gliner BE, Caraway DL, Mekhail NA. Effect of High-frequency (10-kHz) Spinal Cord Stimulation in Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Neurol. 2021 Jun 1;78(6):687-698. doi: 10.1001/jamaneurol.2021.0538. PubMed 33818600 ↗
  • Lamichhane P, Sukralia S, Alam B, Shaikh S, Farrukh S, Ali S, Ojha R. Augmented reality-based training versus standard training in improvement of balance, mobility and fall risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Med Surg (Lond). 2023 Jun 20;85(8):4026-4032. doi: 10.1097/MS9.0000000000000986. eCollection 2023 Aug. PubMed 37554880 ↗
  • Henson JV, Varhabhatla NC, Bebic Z, Kaye AD, Yong RJ, Urman RD, Merkow JS. Spinal Cord Stimulation for Painful Diabetic Peripheral Neuropathy: A Systematic Review. Pain Ther. 2021 Dec;10(2):895-908. doi: 10.1007/s40122-021-00282-9. Epub 2021 Jul 10. PubMed 34244979 ↗
  • Strand NH, Burkey AR. Neuromodulation in the Treatment of Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: A Review of Evidence for Spinal Cord Stimulation. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2022 Mar;16(2):332-340. doi: 10.1177/19322968211060075. Epub 2021 Nov 29. PubMed 34842478 ↗
  • Gylfadottir SS, Christensen DH, Nicolaisen SK, Andersen H, Callaghan BC, Itani M, Khan KS, Kristensen AG, Nielsen JS, Sindrup SH, Andersen NT, Jensen TS, Thomsen RW, Finnerup NB. Diabetic polyneuropathy and pain, prevalence, and patient characteristics: a cross-sectional questionnaire study of 5,514 patients with recently diagnosed type 2 diabetes. Pain. 2020 Mar;161(3):574-583. doi: 10.1097/j.pain.0000000000001744. PubMed 31693539 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Jun 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07619794
Lead sponsor
Riphah International University
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Jun 2, 2026
Start date
Jun 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Jun 2, 2026

Study contacts

Mahnoor Imtiaz, DPT
Contact
mahnoorimtiaz54@gmail.com
0092 315 5214237
Mirza Obaid Baig, MSPT
Contact
obaid.baig@riphah.edu.pk
00923332238706
Mirza Obaid Baig, MSPT
principal investigator · Riphah International University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jun 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion