CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07614256Updated May 29, 2026

Multimodal Imaging and Digital Pathology for Prostate Cancer Prediction

An observational study in Prostate Cancer (Diagnosis) and Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer, sponsored by Guangxi Medical University. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to male participants aged 40 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-29.

Sponsored by Guangxi Medical University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
3,000
Ages
40 Years to 90 Years
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

This is a multicenter observational study. A deep learning model integrated with multimodal imaging and digital pathology spatial registration is built based on preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, transrectal ultrasound and postoperative digital pathological whole slide images. The study is designed to achieve accurate prediction of clinically significant prostate cancer and non-invasive risk stratification. Unnecessary prostate biopsy and overdiagnosis can be reduced to support the optimization of clinical diagnosis and treatment strategies.

Read the detailed description

This prospective and retrospective multicenter observational study enrolls patients with suspected prostate cancer who receive standardized preoperative multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging, transrectal ultrasound examination, followed by prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy. Complete clinical data including age, BMI, prostate specific antigen indicators, PI-RADS v2.1 scores, Gleason score and ISUP grading are collected from all eligible participants.

Biomechanically constrained non-rigid spatial registration technique is applied to achieve precise alignment between preoperative multimodal images and postoperative digital pathological whole slide images using high-quality multicenter datasets. A transformer-based multimodal deep learning fusion model is developed to analyze correlations between macroscopic imaging features and microscopic pathological heterogeneity, thereby establishing an interpretable artificial intelligence framework for clinically significant prostate cancer prediction.

Comprehensive model validation is conducted via internal cross-validation, external multicenter independent verification and international public datasets. Decision curve analysis and clinical impact curve are applied to assess clinical applicability. The model serves as an intelligent auxiliary tool to refine biopsy strategies, avoid redundant puncture and excessive treatment, and facilitate early precise diagnosis and risk stratification of prostate cancer.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer (Diagnosis)
  • Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer

Keywords

  • Prostate cancer
  • Clinically significant prostate cancer
  • Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging
  • Transrectal ultrasound
  • Digital pathology
  • Deep learning
  • Artificial intelligence
  • Spatial registration
  • Risk stratification
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

This is a prospective and retrospective multicenter cohort study. The study population consists of consecutive male subjects aged 40-90 years who are scheduled to undergo or have undergone prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy, with complete standard-of-care preoperative multiparametric MRI (mpMRI), transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images, and corresponding pathological diagnosis results. The collected data include:

  1. Preoperative mpMRI and TRUS images
  2. Digital whole-slide images of prostate biopsy specimens
  3. Digital whole-slide images of radical prostatectomy specimens (if performed) The prospective cohort will include newly enrolled subjects who provide written informed consent, while the retrospective cohort will include historical subjects with complete imaging, pathology slide, and clinical data from participating centers.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Subjects who are scheduled to undergo or have undergone prostate biopsy or radical prostatectomy.
  2. Subjects who have completed standard-of-care preoperative multiparametric MRI (mpMRI) and transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) examinations.
  3. Subjects with complete pathological diagnosis results available.
  4. Age between 40 and 90 years.
  5. Able and willing to provide written informed consent (for prospective cohort participants only).

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Prior history of pelvic radiation therapy or radical prostatectomy.
  2. Incomplete or poor-quality mpMRI or TRUS images (e.g., motion artifacts, insufficient sequences).
  3. Concurrent other primary malignant tumors.
  4. Severe systemic diseases that may affect the evaluation of the prostate.
  5. Subjects with incomplete clinical or pathological data.
  6. Contraindications to MRI examination (e.g., incompatible metallic implants, severe claustrophobia).
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
3,000 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
12 Years
Patient registry
Yes

Interventions

  • OtherNo Intervention: Observational Cohort

    This is an observational study. No new treatment, drug, device, or procedure is being administered to participants. Only standard-of-care clinical data, imaging, and pathology records are collected and analyzed.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Area Under the Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve (AUC) for predicting clinically significant prostate cancer (csPCa)

    The diagnostic performance of the multimodal deep learning model in predicting clinically significant prostate cancer using preoperative imaging data from this prospective and retrospective multicenter cohort. The AUC will be calculated to evaluate the model's discriminative ability.

    Time frame: Baseline (at the time of imaging/pathology data collection)

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Liuzhou People's Hospital Affiliated to Guangxi Medical University
    Liuzhou, Guangxi 545006, China
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Shao L, Liang C, Yan Y, Zhu H, Jiang X, Bao M, Zang P, Huang X, Zhou H, Nie P, Wang L, Li J, Zhang S, Ren S. An MRI-pathology foundation model for noninvasive diagnosis and grading of prostate cancer. Nat Cancer. 2025 Oct;6(10):1621-1637. doi: 10.1038/s43018-025-01041-x. Epub 2025 Sep 2. PubMed 40897909 ↗
  • Rusu M, Jahanandish H, Vesal S, Li CX, Bhattacharya I, Venkataraman R, Zhou SR, Kornberg Z, Sommer ER, Khandwala YS, Hockman L, Zhou Z, Choi MH, Ghanouni P, Fan RE, Sonn GA. ProCUSNet: Prostate Cancer Detection on B-mode Transrectal Ultrasound Using Artificial Intelligence for Targeting During Prostate Biopsies. Eur Urol Oncol. 2025 Apr;8(2):477-485. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.12.012. Epub 2025 Jan 28. PubMed 39880746 ↗
  • Saha A, Hosseinzadeh M, Huisman H. End-to-end prostate cancer detection in bpMRI via 3D CNNs: Effects of attention mechanisms, clinical priori and decoupled false positive reduction. Med Image Anal. 2021 Oct;73:102155. doi: 10.1016/j.media.2021.102155. Epub 2021 Jun 29. PubMed 34245943 ↗
  • Lee YJ, Moon HW, Choi MH, Eun Jung S, Park YH, Lee JY, Kim DH, Eun Rha S, Kim SH, Lee KW, Choi YJ, Lee YS, Lee W, Lee S, Grimm R, von Busch H, Han D, Lou B, Kamen A. MRI-based Deep Learning Algorithm for Assisting Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection: A Bicenter Prospective Study. Radiology. 2025 Mar;314(3):e232788. doi: 10.1148/radiol.232788. PubMed 40067105 ↗
  • Twilt JJ, Saha A, Bosma JS, Padhani AR, Bonekamp D, Giannarini G, van den Bergh R, Kasivisvanathan V, Obuchowski N, Yakar D, Elschot M, Veltman J, Futterer J, Huisman H, de Rooij M; PI-CAI Consortium. AI-Assisted vs Unassisted Identification of Prostate Cancer in Magnetic Resonance Images. JAMA Netw Open. 2025 Jun 2;8(6):e2515672. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2025.15672. PubMed 40512493 ↗
  • Goel S, Shoag JE, Gross MD, Al Hussein Al Awamlh B, Robinson B, Khani F, Baltich Nelson B, Margolis DJ, Hu JC. Concordance Between Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Pathology in the Era of Targeted Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Eur Urol Oncol. 2020 Feb;3(1):10-20. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2019.08.001. Epub 2019 Sep 4. PubMed 31492650 ↗
  • Pham THN, Schulze-Hagen MF, Rahnama'i MS. Targeted multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound-guided (mpMRI/TRUS) fusion prostate biopsy versus systematic random prostate biopsy: A comparative real-life study. Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2024 Feb;7(2):e1962. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1962. Epub 2024 Jan 12. PubMed 38217298 ↗
  • Drost FH, Osses DF, Nieboer D, Steyerberg EW, Bangma CH, Roobol MJ, Schoots IG. Prostate MRI, with or without MRI-targeted biopsy, and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Apr 25;4(4):CD012663. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012663.pub2. PubMed 31022301 ↗
  • Moliere S, Hamzaoui D, Ploussard G, Mathieu R, Fiard G, Baboudjian M, Granger B, Roupret M, Delingette H, Renard-Penna R. A Systematic Review of the Diagnostic Accuracy of Deep Learning Models for the Automatic Detection, Localization, and Characterization of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer on Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Eur Urol Oncol. 2025 Aug;8(4):1182-1202. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2024.11.001. Epub 2024 Nov 14. PubMed 39547898 ↗
  • Epstein JI, Amin MB, Reuter VE, Humphrey PA. Contemporary Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma: An Update With Discussion on Practical Issues to Implement the 2014 International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) Consensus Conference on Gleason Grading of Prostatic Carcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol. 2017 Apr;41(4):e1-e7. doi: 10.1097/PAS.0000000000000820. PubMed 28177964 ↗
  • Zeng H, Chen W, Zheng R, Zhang S, Ji JS, Zou X, Xia C, Sun K, Yang Z, Li H, Wang N, Han R, Liu S, Li H, Mu H, He Y, Xu Y, Fu Z, Zhou Y, Jiang J, Yang Y, Chen J, Wei K, Fan D, Wang J, Fu F, Zhao D, Song G, Chen J, Jiang C, Zhou X, Gu X, Jin F, Li Q, Li Y, Wu T, Yan C, Dong J, Hua Z, Baade P, Bray F, Jemal A, Yu XQ, He J. Changing cancer survival in China during 2003-15: a pooled analysis of 17 population-based cancer registries. Lancet Glob Health. 2018 May;6(5):e555-e567. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30127-X. PubMed 29653628 ↗
  • Schafer EJ, Laversanne M, Sung H, Soerjomataram I, Briganti A, Dahut W, Bray F, Jemal A. Recent Patterns and Trends in Global Prostate Cancer Incidence and Mortality: An Update. Eur Urol. 2025 Mar;87(3):302-313. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2024.11.013. Epub 2024 Dec 11. PubMed 39668103 ↗
  • Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024 May-Jun;74(3):229-263. doi: 10.3322/caac.21834. Epub 2024 Apr 4. PubMed 38572751 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and informed consent form · Jan 28, 2026

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — This study does not have a plan to share individual participant data due to institutional and ethical restrictions.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07614256
Lead sponsor
Guangxi Medical University
Responsible party
Fubo Wang (Professor, Doctoral Tutor of Medical Science, Guangxi Medical University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 29, 2026
Start date
May 30, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
May 29, 2026

Study contacts

Caigou Shi, MD
Contact
shicaigou@sr.gxmu.edu.cn
+86 13677729003
Fubo Wang, MD
principal investigator · Guangxi Medical University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion