ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07610382Updated May 28, 2026

Balanced Crystalloid vs Normal Saline in Pediatric Acute Gastroenteritis

An observational study in Gastroenteritis Acute, Dehydration and Acidosis, Metabolic, sponsored by Aydin Adnan Menderes University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 6 Months to 5 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-28.

Sponsored by Aydin Adnan Menderes University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started May 2026; still recruiting 5 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
180
Ages
6 Months to 5 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Acute gastroenteritis (AGE) is among the most common reasons for paediatric emergency visits. Children with significant dehydration often require intravenous (IV) fluid therapy. Two main types of IV crystalloid solutions are currently used in clinical practice: 0.9% sodium chloride (normal saline, NS) and balanced crystalloids such as Isolyte-S, which contain acetate and gluconate as bicarbonate precursors.

Normal saline has a high chloride content (154 mEq/L), which may worsen the metabolic acidosis already present in many children with acute gastroenteritis. Balanced crystalloids have a chloride content closer to that of plasma (98 mEq/L) and additionally contain acetate and gluconate, which are metabolised in peripheral tissues to consume hydrogen ions and thereby raise serum bicarbonate - a mechanism distinct from simply avoiding chloride overload.

This study prospectively observes and compares early biochemical and clinical outcomes in children with acute gastroenteritis who receive one of these two fluid types as part of their routine clinical care. The treating physician independently decides which fluid to use; the research team does not influence this decision and does not order any additional tests or procedures. Laboratory values used as outcomes are drawn solely from blood tests obtained as part of standard care.

The primary aim is to determine whether, at approximately 4 hours after IV fluid start, serum bicarbonate has changed more in children who received a balanced crystalloid compared with those who received normal saline. Secondary aims include comparing blood pH, chloride levels, need for additional IV boluses, time to first oral fluid intake, hospitalisation rate, and 72-hour return visits.

Read the detailed description

BACKGROUND AND SCIENTIFIC RATIONALE Acute gastroenteritis causes gastrointestinal bicarbonate loss through diarrhoea, combined with reduced oral intake and, in severe cases, lactate accumulation from hypoperfusion, resulting in metabolic acidosis.

The conventional choice, 0.9% sodium chloride (NS), carries a supraphysiological chloride load (154 mEq/L versus plasma reference of 98-103 mEq/L). This reduces the strong ion difference (SID), independently precipitating hyperchloraemic metabolic acidosis and failing to correct pre-existing acidosis.

Isolyte-S has a chloride content of 98 mEq/L and contains acetate (27 mEq/L) and gluconate (23 mEq/L) as bicarbonate precursors. Acetate is rapidly metabolised in cardiac muscle, skeletal muscle, and renal cortex independently of hepatic function (half-life approximately 30 minutes) via: CH3COO- + O2 + H+ → 2CO2 + 2H2O, consuming 1 mEq of H+ per mEq of acetate. Gluconate undergoes hepatic oxidation via the pentose phosphate pathway with analogous H+ consumption. The total buffer capacity of Isolyte-S is 50 mEq/L - approximately twice that of Ringer's lactate (28 mEq/L). This active acid-neutralisation capacity is mechanistically distinct from simply avoiding chloride overload.

EVIDENCE BASE The 2023 Cochrane systematic review (Florez et al., 5 RCTs, 465 children) demonstrated improved bicarbonate and pH with balanced crystalloids but judged certainty as low to very low and explicitly called for new adequately powered studies. The meta-analysis by Lehr et al. (2022) reported a pooled delta-HCO3 of +1.60 mmol/L (95% CI 0.04-3.16) favouring balanced fluids in critically ill children. The only RCT using Plasma-Lyte A versus NS in paediatric AGE (Allen et al., 2016) reported delta-HCO3 of +1.6 versus 0.0 mEq/L at 4 hours (p=0.004) but was underpowered for clinical outcomes. No published study has investigated Isolyte-S (acetate/gluconate-buffered, 50 mEq/L total buffer capacity) specifically in children with AGE.

STUDY DESIGN Single-centre, prospective, non-interventional observational cohort study conducted in the paediatric emergency department of Aydin Adnan Menderes University Research and Training Hospital, Turkey (KAD-KLVZ-25). No randomisation, allocation, or investigator-initiated prescribing occurs. The treating physician's independent clinical decision determines group assignment before research consent and enrolment.

STATISTICAL FRAMEWORK

Sample size: 180 total enrolments (anticipated), yielding 126 evaluable participants assuming 70% T4 laboratory availability. Power calculation: minimum clinically important difference delta = 1.5 mmol/L, SD = 3.0 mmol/L, alpha = 0.05 (two-sided), power = 0.80.

Primary analysis: PS-IPTW (propensity score inverse probability of treatment weighting) combined with IPOW (inverse probability of observation weighting) to simultaneously address confounding by indication and informative T4 laboratory missingness. A pre-specified covariate list is fixed prior to data lock. Supporting analysis: multivariable linear regression with robust standard errors (HC3).

Pre-specified mechanistic mediation analysis: causal mediation framework (R package mediation) to partition the total effect on delta-HCO3 into the indirect effect mediated via delta-Cl (hyperchloraemic mechanism) and the direct effect attributable to acetate/gluconate buffering (ACME and ADE). This analysis is exploratory and will be reported as mechanism-consistent association, not causal inference. Seven pre-specified sensitivity analyses are defined in the statistical analysis plan.

Reporting standard: STROBE statement for observational studies. Software: R version 4.3 or later.

DATA COLLECTION Data are recorded on a standardised case report form at three time points: T0 (baseline, at IV fluid start), T4 (3-6 hour window, only if routine laboratory results are available), and 72 hours (electronic health record review for return visits). No study-mandated procedures, tests, or visits are added to the routine care pathway. T4 laboratory values are ascertained exclusively from blood gas or electrolyte results obtained during routine clinical management.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gastroenteritis Acute
  • Dehydration
  • Acidosis, Metabolic
  • Diarrhea
  • Vomiting

Keywords

  • balanced crystalloid
  • normal saline
  • bicarbonate
  • metabolic acidosis
  • pediatric emergency
  • Acute Gastroenteritis
  • Dehydration
03

In context

Dehydration

201 studies on the registry are indexed under Dehydration; 28 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 180 is above the median of 105 across 46 observational studies indexed under Dehydration.

Browse Dehydration studies →

Lead sponsor

Aydin Adnan Menderes University is the lead sponsor of 241 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Months to 5 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Consecutive eligible children aged 6 months to 5 years presenting to the paediatric emergency department of Aydin Adnan Menderes University Hospital with acute gastroenteritis and a clinician-initiated indication for intravenous rehydration. Enrolment is prospective and observational; the treating physician independently determines IV fluid type and dose based on clinical judgment, without involvement from the research team.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age: 6 months to 5 years (60 months) inclusive
  • Clinical diagnosis of acute gastroenteritis: acute diarrhoea (3 or more loose stools per 24 hours) with or without vomiting; symptom duration 7 days or less
  • Clinician-initiated indication for intravenous rehydration
  • IV fluid order placed and treatment initiated independently by the treating physician, without research team influence

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Chronic systemic disease (congenital heart disease, chronic kidney disease, chronic lung disease, inborn errors of metabolism, primary immunodeficiency)
  • Hypernatraemic dehydration (serum sodium >= 150 mEq/L at baseline)
  • Diabetic ketoacidosis, primary metabolic crisis, or suspected surgical abdomen
  • Bloody diarrhoea or suspected invasive enteric infection requiring alternative management algorithm
  • Hypoglycaemia (blood glucose \< 60 mg/dL) at presentation
  • Symptom duration exceeding 7 days
  • Receipt of 20 mL/kg or more of IV fluid in the 24 hours preceding enrolment
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
180 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • 0.9% Sodium Chloride

    Children with acute gastroenteritis who received 0.9% sodium chloride (Na+ 154, Cl- 154 mEq/L) as the initial IV crystalloid, as independently selected by the treating physician. No research-directed intervention.

  • Balanced Crystalloid (Isolyte-S)

    Children with acute gastroenteritis who received an acetate/gluconate-buffered balanced isotonic crystalloid (Isolyte-S: Na+ 141, K+ 5, Mg2+ 3, Cl- 98, acetate 27, gluconate 23 mEq/L) as the initial IV crystalloid, as independently selected by the treating physician. No research-directed intervention.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Serum Bicarbonate (Delta-HCO3)

    Change from baseline in serum bicarbonate concentration (mmol/L) at approximately 4 hours after IV fluid initiation. Defined as HCO3(T4) minus HCO3(T0), where T4 is the routine blood gas or electrolyte measurement obtained 3 to 6 hours after IV fluid start. Analysis performed only in participants for whom T4 laboratory results are available as part of routine clinical care. No additional blood sampling is performed for research purposes.

    Time frame: Approximately 4 hours (3-6 hour window) after IV fluid initiation

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Blood pH (Delta-pH)

    Change from baseline in arterial or capillary blood pH at approximately 4 hours. Calculated as pH(T4) minus pH(T0). Obtained from routine blood gas analysis only.

    Time frame: 3-6 hours after IV fluid initiation

  2. Change in Base Excess (Delta-BE)

    Change from baseline in base excess (mmol/L) at approximately 4 hours. Calculated as BE(T4) minus BE(T0). Obtained from routine blood gas analysis only.

    Time frame: 3-6 hours after IV fluid initiation

  3. Change in Serum Chloride (Delta-Cl)

    Change from baseline in serum chloride (mEq/L) at approximately 4 hours. Calculated as Cl(T4) minus Cl(T0). Serves as the mediator variable in the pre-specified causal mediation analysis.

    Time frame: 3-6 hours after IV fluid initiation

  4. Additional IV Fluid Bolus Requirement

    Binary outcome: whether the treating physician administered one or more additional IV fluid boluses within 6 hours of initial IV fluid start, as documented in the routine clinical record.

    Time frame: Within 6 hours of IV fluid initiation

  5. Time to First Tolerated Oral Intake

    Time in hours from IV fluid initiation to first documented tolerated oral fluid intake. Censored at 24 hours or at hospital admission, whichever occurs first. Analysed using weighted Cox regression.

    Time frame: From IV fluid initiation until first tolerated oral intake, assessed up to 24 hours

  6. Hospital Admission Decision

    Binary outcome: whether the treating physician decided to admit the child (observation unit, ward, or ICU), as documented in the electronic health record.

    Time frame: From emergency department presentation until disposition decision, up to 24 hours

  7. 72-Hour Emergency Department Return Visit

    Binary outcome: unplanned return to the emergency department within 72 hours of discharge, regardless of cause, as identified through electronic health record linkage.

    Time frame: Within 72 hours of discharge

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Bampoe S, Odor PM, Dushianthan A, Bennett-Guerrero E, Cro S, Gan TJ, Grocott MP, James MF, Mythen MG, O'Malley CM, Roche AM, Rowan K, Burdett E. Perioperative administration of buffered versus non-buffered crystalloid intravenous fluid to improve outcomes following adult surgical procedures. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Sep 21;9(9):CD004089. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004089.pub3. PubMed 28933805 ↗
  • Mahajan V, Sajan SS, Sharma A, Kaur J. Ringers lactate vs Normal saline for children with acute diarrhea and severe dehydration- a double blind randomized controlled trial. Indian Pediatr. 2012 Dec;49(12):963-8. doi: 10.1007/s13312-012-0251-x. Epub 2012 Mar 30. PubMed 22791671 ↗
  • Kartha GB, Rameshkumar R, Mahadevan S. Randomized Double-blind Trial of Ringer Lactate Versus Normal Saline in Pediatric Acute Severe Diarrheal Dehydration. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2017 Dec;65(6):621-626. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0000000000001609. PubMed 28422812 ↗
  • Antequera Martin AM, Barea Mendoza JA, Muriel A, Saez I, Chico-Fernandez M, Estrada-Lorenzo JM, Plana MN. Buffered solutions versus 0.9% saline for resuscitation in critically ill adults and children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Jul 19;7(7):CD012247. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012247.pub2. PubMed 31334842 ↗
  • Fernandez Montes R, Alonso Alvarez MA, Fernandez Miaja M, Vega Lopez L, Alvarez Merino M, Garrido Garcia E. Plasmalyte versus saline solution for rapid rehydration in gastroenteritis: prospective observational study. An Pediatr (Engl Ed). 2025 Jun;102(6):503855. doi: 10.1016/j.anpede.2025.503855. Epub 2025 Jun 10. PubMed 40500670 ↗
  • Allen CH, Goldman RD, Bhatt S, Simon HK, Gorelick MH, Spandorfer PR, Spiro DM, Mace SE, Johnson DW, Higginbotham EA, Du H, Smyth BJ, Schermer CR, Goldstein SL. A randomized trial of Plasma-Lyte A and 0.9 % sodium chloride in acute pediatric gastroenteritis. BMC Pediatr. 2016 Aug 2;16:117. doi: 10.1186/s12887-016-0652-4. PubMed 27480410 ↗
  • Lehr AR, Rached-d'Astous S, Barrowman N, Tsampalieros A, Parker M, McIntyre L, Sampson M, Menon K. Balanced Versus Unbalanced Fluid in Critically Ill Children: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2022 Mar 1;23(3):181-191. doi: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002890. PubMed 34991134 ↗
  • Florez ID, Sierra J, Perez-Gaxiola G. Balanced crystalloid solutions versus 0.9% saline for treating acute diarrhoea and severe dehydration in children. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 May 17;5(5):CD013640. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013640.pub2. PubMed 37196992 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data will not be publicly shared due to Turkish personal health data protection regulations (KVKK). De-identified aggregate summary data will be made available upon reasonable request to the corresponding author following publication.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07610382
Responsible party
Aykut Çağlar, MD (Professor, Aydin Adnan Menderes University) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 28, 2026
Start date
May 15, 2026
Primary completion
Jan 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 28, 2026

Study contacts

Aykut Çağlar, Professor
Contact
aykutcaglar@gmail.com
+905303337877

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion