ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07608341STORKIEUpdated May 27, 2026

Influence of Probiotics on Early Gut Microbial Colonization

An interventional study of Probiotic drops and Placebo drops in C-Section, sponsored by BioGaia AB. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in Finland. Open to participants aged 0 Days to 3 Days, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-27.

Sponsored by BioGaia AB · Not applicable, Interventional, and Basic science

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
0 Days to 3 Days
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn whether daily probiotic drops plus vitamin D3 can improve early gut microbiome colonization in healthy infants born by C-section. It will also assess safety and tolerability.

An intervention with probiotics + vitamin D3 will be compared to placebo + vitamin D3 in a double-blind, randomized design, and include an open-label vaginal-born reference group.

Participants will receive study drops daily for 8 weeks and provide stool samples at multiple time points and complete questionnaires/diaries. After the intervention period, there is an optional follow-up period for up to 3 years.

02

Conditions studied

  • C-Section

Keywords

  • microbiome
  • c-section
  • probiotic
  • gut microbiome
03

In context

Lead sponsor

BioGaia AB is the lead sponsor of 20 studies on the registry; 5 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Days to 3 Days
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Infant born by planned C-section or vaginal born infant

Gestational age at birth ≥ 37±0 weeks to \<41 ±0 weeks

Infant Apgar score 7-10, (5 minutes after birth)

Intention to breastfeed the infant

Parents/legal guardians are >18 years

Parents/legal guardians have readiness and the opportunity to fill out a study diary, questionnaires and agree to collect biological samples

Parents/legal guardians with ability to understand and comply with the requirements of the study, as judged by the Investigator

Parents/legal guardians are willing and able to give written for their and their infants participation in the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

>72 hours after birth when collecting the first faecal sample and given the first drops of study product

Infants classified as small for gestational age (SGA), defined as birth weight \< -2 standard deviations (SD) for gestational age and sex according to national reference standards.

Infants with birth of congenital malformations or anomalies

Infants not able to feed adequately by oral means at the time of screening (i.e., requiring tube feeding)

Infants requiring care in neonatal unit

Disruption of amniotic membranes for >24 hours

Infants consuming probiotics, including in infant formula

Mothers use of antibiotics during the last 14 days of pregnancy prior to delivery

Participation in other clinical studies

Any other disease, condition, or circumstance that, in the investigator's opinion, may compromise the participant's safety, adherence to the protocol, or the interpretation of study results

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Basic science
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Probiotic+ Vitamin D3

    C-section, active group

    Dietary Supplement: Probiotic drops

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo+ Vitamin D3

    C-section, placebo group

    Dietary Supplement: Placebo drops

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo+ Vitamin D3 open label group

    Vaginal, placebo group

    Dietary Supplement: Placebo drops

Interventions

  • Dietary supplementProbiotic drops

    Probiotic+vitamin D3 drops

  • Dietary supplementPlacebo drops

    Placebo+vitamin D3

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. To assess early gut microbial colonization in C-section newborns after probiotic supplementation + vitamin D3 or placebo + vitamin D3 and in vaginal born controls.

    To evaluate the faecal relative abundance of Actinobacteria in the gut microbiome

    Time frame: week 2

Secondary outcomes

  1. To evaluate the gut microbiome colonization and composition.

    To evaluate the faecal relative abundance of Bifidobacterium in gut microbiome

    Time frame: week 2

  2. To evaluate the gut microbiome colonization and composition.

    To evaluate the faecal relative abundance and composition of Actinobacteria over time

    Time frame: Baseline, week 1, 2, 4 and 8, with additional follow-up assessments at 6 and 12 months

  3. To evaluate the gut microbiome colonization and composition.

    To evaluate the faecal relative abundance of Bifidobacterium over time

    Time frame: Baseline, week 1, 2, 4 and 8, with additional follow-up assessments at 6 and 12 months

  4. To evaluate the gut microbiome colonization and composition.

    To evaluate faecal relative abundance and composition of Proteobacteria over time

    Time frame: Baseline, week 1, 2, 4 and 8, with additional follow-up assessments at 6 and 12 months

  5. To evaluate the gut microbiome colonization and composition.

    To evaluate faecal relative abundance and composition of Enterobacteriaceae over time

    Time frame: Baseline, week 1, 2, 4 and 8, with additional follow-up assessments at 6 and 12 months

  6. To evaluate the gut microbiome colonization and composition.

    To evaluate faecal relative abundance and composition of Bacillota over time

    Time frame: Baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8, with additional follow-up assessments at 6 and 12 months.

  7. To evaluate the gut microbiome colonization and composition.

    To evaluate faecal relative abundance of Limosilactobacillus reuteri over time

    Time frame: Baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8, with additional follow-up assessments at 6 and 12 months

  8. To evaluate the gut microbiome colonization and composition.

    To evaluate gut microbial profiles (diversity, relative abundance, species alteration, function) in faecal samples among different groups of infants over time

    Time frame: Baseline and at weeks 1, 2, 4 and 8, with additional follow-up assessments at 6 and 12 months.

  9. To assess quality of life

    To evaluate quality of life by Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL),

    Time frame: Weeks 4 and 8, with optional assessments at 6 and 12 months.

  10. To assess quality of life.

    To evaluate symptoms of infant gastrointestinal distress by Infant Gastrointestinal symptoms questionnaire (IGSQ)

    Time frame: Weeks 2, 4 and 8, with optional assessments at 6 and 12 months and 3 years.

  11. To assess quality of life

    To evaluate symptoms of infant sleep distress by Brief Infant Sleep Questionnaire (BISQ-R)

    Time frame: Weeks 4 and 8, with optional assessments at 6 and 12 months.

07

Study locations

2 sites
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07608341
Lead sponsor
BioGaia AB
Collaborators
Aurevia
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 27, 2026
Start date
Aug 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 1, 2030 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 1, 2030 (estimated)
Last update
May 27, 2026

Study contacts

Sofia Nordh, PhD
Contact
son@biogaianewsciences.com
+46 (0)8 555 293 00

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Probiotic

Start the discussion