CClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07595692TPE-LCUpdated May 19, 2026

Tri-Radial Port Extension for Difficult Gallbladder Extraction

An interventional study of Vertical Fascial Extension and Horizontal Fascial Extension in Cholelithiasis, Difficult Gallbladder Extraction and Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery, sponsored by Bangladesh Navy. Completed at 1 site in Bangladesh. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-19.

Sponsored by Bangladesh Navy · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 2 years 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2024, registered May 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
156
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is a common operation for gallbladder stones. In some patients, the removed gallbladder is difficult to extract through the umbilical port because it is large, thick-walled, or packed with stones. Surgeons commonly enlarge the fascial opening either vertically or horizontally to remove the specimen. These extensions may cause bleeding, tissue trauma, pain, and possible port-site complications.

This study compares three methods of enlarging the umbilical fascial opening during difficult gallbladder extraction: vertical fascial extension, horizontal fascial extension, and a new tri-radial fascial micro-incision technique called Tareq's Port Extension (TPE). In TPE, three small radial cuts are made around the fascial opening to create a controlled expansion and facilitate extraction.

The study aims to determine whether TPE reduces extraction difficulty, extraction-site bleeding, extraction time, postoperative pain, and port-site complications compared with conventional vertical and horizontal fascial extension techniques. Patients will also be followed for 12 months to assess port-site hernia.

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, randomized, three-arm interventional study conducted at BNS PATENGA Hospital, Bangladesh Navy. The study evaluates a tri-radial fascial micro-incision technique for difficult gallbladder extraction during laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

During laparoscopic cholecystectomy, the gallbladder is usually removed through a 10 mm umbilical port. In some cases, extraction becomes difficult because of a large gallbladder, thick gallbladder wall, large stone, or multiple packed stones. When the gallbladder cannot pass smoothly through the port, surgeons often enlarge the fascial opening. Conventional methods include vertical or horizontal fascial extension. However, these techniques may be associated with bleeding, irregular tissue tearing, increased pain, and port-site complications.

The intervention being studied is the Tri-Radial Fascial Micro-Incision Technique, also designated as Tareq's Port Extension (TPE). In this technique, instead of extending the fascial opening in one linear direction, three small radial micro-incisions are made around the existing umbilical fascial defect. These small cuts are placed approximately at the 12, 4, and 8 o'clock positions and are kept within the linea alba. The purpose is to create a controlled cloverleaf-shaped expansion of the fascial opening, allowing easier gallbladder extraction while minimizing tissue trauma.

Participants with intraoperatively confirmed difficult gallbladder extraction are randomized into one of three groups:

Vertical fascial extension Horizontal fascial extension Tri-radial fascial micro-incision technique / Tareq's Port Extension

The primary outcomes are extraction time and extraction-site bleeding severity, categorized as minimal, moderate, or profuse. Secondary outcomes include fascial extension length, postoperative pain score, analgesic requirement, port-site infection, hematoma, seroma, clip dislodgement, and port-site hernia at 12 months.

The study is designed to assess whether TPE provides a safer, faster, and more controlled method of gallbladder extraction compared with conventional fascial extension techniques. The technique does not require any special device or additional costly equipment and may be useful in routine laparoscopic surgical practice, especially in settings where commercial specimen retrieval systems are not consistently available or reliable.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cholelithiasis
  • Difficult Gallbladder Extraction
  • Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Surgery
  • Port-Site Fascial Extension

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Laparoscopic cholecystectomy
  • gallbladder extraction
  • Tri-radial fascial micro-incision
  • Tareq's Port Extension
  • port-site extension
  • fascial extension
  • port-site hernia
  • gallstone disease
03

In context

Cholelithiasis

286 studies on the registry are indexed under Cholelithiasis; 48 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 156 is above the median of 90 across 197 interventional studies indexed under Cholelithiasis.

Browse Cholelithiasis studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Bangladesh Navy as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Adult patients aged 18 to 70 years.
  • Patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy for benign gallbladder disease.
  • Intraoperatively confirmed difficult gallbladder extraction through the umbilical port site.
  • Difficult extraction due to large gallbladder size, thickened gallbladder wall, large stone, multiple packed stones, or resistance at the fascial level.
  • Patients willing to participate and provide written informed consent.
  • Patients willing to attend follow-up for assessment of port-site complications and hernia.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Conversion to open cholecystectomy before gallbladder extraction.
  • Suspected or confirmed gallbladder malignancy.
  • Uncorrected coagulopathy.
  • Pregnancy.
  • Previous major midline abdominal surgery affecting the umbilical port site.
  • Uncontrolled gallbladder perforation or major stone spillage before extraction.
  • Refusal to provide informed consent.
  • Inability or unwillingness to complete follow-up.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
156 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Vertical Fascial Extension

    Participants assigned to this arm undergo conventional vertical extension of the umbilical fascial opening when gallbladder extraction is difficult during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The fascial opening is extended vertically in the midline as required to facilitate specimen extraction.

    Procedure: Vertical Fascial Extension

  • Active comparator
    Horizontal Fascial Extension

    Participants assigned to this arm undergo conventional horizontal extension of the umbilical fascial opening when gallbladder extraction is difficult during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The fascial opening is extended transversely as required to facilitate specimen extraction.

    Procedure: Horizontal Fascial Extension

  • Experimental
    Tri-Radial Fascial Micro-Incision

    Participants assigned to this arm undergo the tri-radial fascial micro-incision technique, also designated Tareq's Port Extension. Three small radial fascial micro-incisions are made around the umbilical fascial opening to create controlled expansion and facilitate difficult gallbladder extraction.

    Procedure: Tri-Radial Fascial Micro-Incision

Interventions

  • ProcedureVertical Fascial Extension

    Conventional vertical extension of the umbilical fascial opening during difficult gallbladder extraction in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The fascial defect is extended vertically in the midline as required to allow extraction of a large or stone-filled gallbladder specimen.

  • ProcedureHorizontal Fascial Extension

    Conventional horizontal extension of the umbilical fascial opening during difficult gallbladder extraction in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. The fascial defect is extended transversely as required to facilitate removal of a large or stone-filled gallbladder specimen.

  • ProcedureTri-Radial Fascial Micro-Incision

    Tri-radial fascial micro-incision technique used during difficult gallbladder extraction in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Three small radial fascial micro-incisions are made around the umbilical fascial opening, approximately at the 12, 4, and 8 o'clock positions, to create controlled expansion and facilitate specimen extraction.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Extraction-Site Bleeding Severity

    Severity of bleeding from the umbilical fascial extraction site during difficult gallbladder extraction. Bleeding will be categorized as minimal, moderate, or profuse. Minimal bleeding is defined as no active bleeding or minor oozing controlled with simple pressure or brief cautery. Moderate bleeding is defined as bleeding requiring additional hemostatic intervention but not causing major operative interruption. Profuse bleeding is defined as brisk bleeding requiring prolonged hemostatic effort, suturing, or significant interruption of specimen extraction.

    Time frame: Intraoperative, during gallbladder specimen extraction

  2. Specimen Extraction Time

    Time required to extract the gallbladder specimen after confirmation of difficult extraction and initiation of fascial extension technique. Time will be measured in minutes from the start of fascial extension to complete removal of the gallbladder specimen through the umbilical port site.

    Time frame: Intraoperative, during gallbladder specimen extraction

Secondary outcomes

  1. Fascial Extension Length

    Total length of fascial extension required to complete difficult gallbladder extraction through the umbilical port site, measured in millimeters.

    Time frame: Intraoperative, immediately after specimen extraction

  2. Postoperative Pain Score

    Postoperative pain at the umbilical port site measured using a visual analog scale, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates worst imaginable pain.

    Time frame: 24 hours after surgery

  3. Analgesic Requirement

    Number of doses of postoperative analgesic medication required during the first 24 hours after surgery.

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after surgery

  4. Port-Site Wound Complications

    Occurrence of port-site wound complications including surgical site infection, seroma, hematoma, or wound discharge at the umbilical extraction site.

    Time frame: Up to 30 days after surgery

  5. Cystic Duct Clip Dislodgement

    Occurrence of cystic duct clip displacement or dislodgement during gallbladder extraction.

    Time frame: Intraoperative, during gallbladder specimen extraction

  6. Port-Site Hernia

    Occurrence of clinically detected or ultrasound-confirmed hernia at the umbilical extraction port site

    Time frame: 12 months after surgery

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Bns Patenga
    Dhaka, Chattogram 4204, Bangladesh
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Dindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae. PubMed 15273542 ↗
  • Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c869. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c869. No abstract available. PubMed 20332511 ↗
  • Schulz KF, Altman DG, Moher D; CONSORT Group. CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomized trials. Open Med. 2010;4(1):e60-8. Epub 2010 Mar 24. No abstract available. PubMed 21686296 ↗
  • Owens M, Barry M, Janjua AZ, Winter DC. A systematic review of laparoscopic port site hernias in gastrointestinal surgery. Surgeon. 2011 Aug;9(4):218-24. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2011.01.003. Epub 2011 Feb 1. PubMed 21672662 ↗
  • Swank HA, Mulder IM, la Chapelle CF, Reitsma JB, Lange JF, Bemelman WA. Systematic review of trocar-site hernia. Br J Surg. 2012 Mar;99(3):315-23. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7836. Epub 2011 Dec 30. PubMed 22213083 ↗
  • Comajuncosas J, Hermoso J, Jimeno J, Gris P, Orbeal R, Cruz A, Pares D. Effect of bag extraction to prevent wound infection on umbilical port site wound on elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised clinical trial. Surg Endosc. 2017 Jan;31(1):249-254. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-4965-z. Epub 2016 May 13. PubMed 27177957 ↗
  • La Regina D, Mongelli F, Cafarotti S, Saporito A, Ceppi M, Di Giuseppe M, Ferrario di Tor Vajana A. Use of retrieval bag in the prevention of wound infection in elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it evidence-based? A meta-analysis. BMC Surg. 2018 Nov 19;18(1):102. doi: 10.1186/s12893-018-0442-z. PubMed 30453917 ↗
  • Majid MH, Meshkat B, Kohar H, El Masry S. Specimen retrieval during elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it safe not to use a retrieval bag? BMC Surg. 2016 Sep 19;16(1):64. doi: 10.1186/s12893-016-0181-y. PubMed 27643488 ↗
  • Southern Surgeons Club. A prospective analysis of 1518 laparoscopic cholecystectomies. N Engl J Med. 1991 Apr 18;324(16):1073-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199104183241601. PubMed 1826143 ↗
  • Strasberg SM, Hertl M, Soper NJ. An analysis of the problem of biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. J Am Coll Surg. 1995 Jan;180(1):101-25. No abstract available. PubMed 8000648 ↗

Study documents

  • Protocol and statistical analysis plan · May 8, 2026

Documents are hosted by the registry — open the source record to download them.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the reported results may be shared upon reasonable request after publication of the main study results. Data will include demographic variables, operative findings, allocated intervention, primary outcome measures, secondary outcome measures, and follow-up data relevant to port-site complications and hernia. No directly identifiable patient information will be shared.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07595692
Lead sponsor
Bangladesh Navy
Responsible party
Mohammad Tarequl Islam (Principal Investigator; Head of the Dept of Surgery, BNS PATENGA Hospital, Bangladesh Navy, Bangladesh Navy) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 19, 2026
Start date
Jan 22, 2024
Primary completion
Apr 28, 2025
Completion
Apr 27, 2026
Last update
May 19, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion