ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07595302PIVOTALUpdated Sep 23, 2026

Comparing Pain Improvement for Intravenous Versus Oral Acetaminophen in Acute Pelvic Pain

A Phase 4 interventional study of Acetaminophen 1000mg PO and IV Acetaminophen 1000mg in Pelvic Pain, sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to female participants aged 16 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-23.

Sponsored by Montefiore Medical Center · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
140
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
16 Years to 50 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The investigator team proposes a randomized, double-blind, double-dummy comparative effectiveness trial conducted in two urban emergency departments (EDs) in the Bronx, New York. This study is designed to determine the relative efficacy of IV acetaminophen compared to PO acetaminophen in treating pelvic pain. This design focuses on the early onset of action and short-term efficacy, which may better capture potential differences between IV and PO acetaminophen in the acute ED setting.

Read the detailed description

An estimated 70% of Emergency Department (ED) visits involve pain as a complaint. Although ED practice has shifted away from routine opioid prescribing, uncertainty remains regarding optimal selection among commonly used non-opioid analgesics such as nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and acetaminophen. Medication selection varies by pain etiology, and among patients presenting with musculoskeletal pain, opioids (40.7%), acetaminophen (37.8%), and NSAIDs (22.6%) remain the most frequently administered medications in the ED.

Pain in women has been comparatively understudied. Pelvic pain is common among women of childbearing age, and chronic pelvic pain affects up to 24% of women overall. In nonpregnant women, NSAIDs are widely considered first-line therapy for both acute and chronic pelvic pain. In pregnant women and in those attempting to conceive, NSAIDs are typically avoided. Observational studies have associated NSAID use around the time of conception or prior to 20 weeks' gestation with an increased risk of miscarriage, while acetaminophen has not shown a similar association. NSAID exposure in early pregnancy has also been linked to congenital anomalies.

Guidelines recommend limiting opioid use during pregnancy and in women of childbearing age. Opioid exposure has been associated with congenital anomalies and with poorer maternal and neonatal outcomes. As a result, opioids are generally avoided as first-line therapy for pelvic pain in patients who are pregnant or may be pregnant.

Therefore, it is routine to ascertain pregnancy status prior to administering NSAIDs or opioids to women of childbearing age for an informed decision making discussion. Acetaminophen, in contrast, is generally considered safe in pregnancy and can be administered without delay while awaiting pregnancy testing. Acetaminophen is associated with relatively mild side effects, which may vary by route of administration.

Pharmacokinetic studies demonstrate that intravenous acetaminophen achieves higher peak plasma concentrations and faster central nervous system penetration than oral administration. Outside the ED, IV acetaminophen has been associated with faster onset of meaningful pain relief and reduced opioid use in some surgical populations. Whether these pharmacologic advantages translate into clinically meaningful improvements in acute pelvic pain management in the Emergency Department for patients of childbearing potential with pelvic pain is unclear.

The investigator team hypothesizes that among women aged 16-50 presenting to the emergency department with pelvic pain, patients receiving intravenous acetaminophen will achieve a greater improvement in the numeric rating scale (NRS) pain score at 30 minutes compared with oral acetaminophen.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pelvic Pain

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • pregnancy
  • acetaminophen
  • randomized controlled trial
03

In context

Pelvic Pain

375 studies on the registry are indexed under Pelvic Pain; 89 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 140 is above the median of 60 across 277 interventional studies indexed under Pelvic Pain.

Browse Pelvic Pain studies →

Lead sponsor

Montefiore Medical Center is the lead sponsor of 416 studies on the registry; 69 are open to participants now.

Of its 87 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 76 (87%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
16 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Female sex at birth
  • Presentation to the Emergency Department (ED) with pelvic pain
  • Baseline numeric pain score (NRS) ≥4
  • Ability to provide in English or Spanish

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Receipt of any analgesic medication within 2 hours or acetaminophen within 6 hours
  • Known allergy or intolerance to acetaminophen
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
140 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Oral Drug + IV Placebo

    Oral Acetaminophen 1000mg + IV placebo Oral Acetaminophen 1000mg No additional analgesics will be administered prior to two hours unless clinically indicated. Rescue analgesia may be administered at any time at the discretion of the treating clinician.

    Drug: Acetaminophen 1000mg PO · Other: IV Placebo

  • Active comparator
    Intravenous Drug + Oral Placebo

    Intravenous Acetaminophen + PO placebo IV Acetaminophen 1000mg No additional analgesics will be administered prior to two hours unless clinically indicated. Rescue analgesia may be administered at any time at the discretion of the treating clinician.

    Drug: IV Acetaminophen 1000mg · Other: PO Placebo

Interventions

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Change in Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) score

    Mean Change in NRS score will be assessed at 30 minutes post-treatment. The NRS is a patient self-assessment pain scale that instructs patients to use a facial grimace scale ranging from 0-10 rating to express pain intensity, wherein 0 is "No pain" and 10 is "Worst pain possible," such that higher scores are indicative of greater pain intensity. For purposes of the primary outcome change in NRS score from baseline will be assessed. Results will be summarized by study arm using descriptive statistics.

    Time frame: From baseline to 30 minutes following medication administration

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain Intensity

    Participants will be asked to serially assess their current level of pain intensity as either "Severe," "Moderate," "Mild," or "None." Categorical assessments of pain intensity will be summarized by study arm at each prespecified timepoint.

    Time frame: 0-, 5-, 10-, 15-, 30-, 45-, 60- and 120-minutes following medication administration

  2. Time to Clinically Meaningful Reduction in Pain

    Time to clinically meaningful pain reduction as assessed by the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS). The NRS is a pain scale that uses a 0-10 rating to measure pain intensity, where 0 is "No pain" and 10 is "Worst pain possible." Clinically meaningful pain reduction will be defined as achieving a reduction in NRS score of ≥1.3 from baseline. Results will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.

    Time frame: Within 2 hours after medication administration

  3. Use of Rescue Medications

    The number/percentage of patients requiring rescue analgesia of any type within 120 minutes will be summarized by study arm using basic descriptive statistics.

    Time frame: Within 2 hours following medication administration

  4. Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI-C) Score

    Effectiveness of treatment will be evaluated using the PGI-C scale. The PGI-C scale is a 7-point self-reported scale used to assess the patient's perception of change in condition/health status following treatment. Patients will provide a single response as to their self-perception of change in condition/health status on a scale ranging from 1 ("Very much improved") to 7 ("Very much worse)" with 4 representing "No change" as the midpoint. Lower scores are indicative of an improved self-assessment of condition following treatment. Scores will be summarized by study arm using descriptive statistics.

    Time frame: 30- and 120-minutes following medication administration

  5. Treatment-Related Adverse Events (TRAEs)

    All treatment-related adverse events occurring within 2 hours of medication administration will be recorded and summarized by study arm.

    Time frame: Within 2 hours following medication administration

  6. Emergency Department (ED) Disposition

    ED disposition will be summarized at 2 hours. Patients will be categorized as either having been admitted, discharged, or status yet to be determined. Categorical data will be summarized by study arm.

    Time frame: At 2 hours following medication administration

  7. Length of Stay (LOS)

    Length of stay will be determined based on the time interval between arrival in the ED and disposition determination. Mean LOS will be summarized by study arm.

    Time frame: Less than 24 hours following medication administration

  8. Patient Satisfaction

    Patient satisfaction will be determined by asking patients whether they would prefer the same medication which was administered during the study if they returned to the ED with the same condition. The number/percentage of patients who prefer the same medication will be summarized by study arm.

    Time frame: At 2 hours following medication administration

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Committee Opinion No. 711: Opioid Use and Opioid Use Disorder in Pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;130(2):e81-e94. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002235. PubMed 28742676 ↗
  • Interrante JD, Ailes EC, Lind JN, Anderka M, Feldkamp ML, Werler MM, Taylor LG, Trinidad J, Gilboa SM, Broussard CS; National Birth Defects Prevention Study. Risk comparison for prenatal use of analgesics and selected birth defects, National Birth Defects Prevention Study 1997-2011. Ann Epidemiol. 2017 Oct;27(10):645-653.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.annepidem.2017.09.003. Epub 2017 Sep 20. PubMed 28993061 ↗
  • Gottlieb M, Bernard K. Epidemiology of back pain visits and medication usage among United States emergency departments from 2016 to 2023. Am J Emerg Med. 2024 Aug;82:125-129. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2024.06.020. Epub 2024 Jun 15. PubMed 38905718 ↗
  • Moller PL, Sindet-Pedersen S, Petersen CT, Juhl GI, Dillenschneider A, Skoglund LA. Onset of acetaminophen analgesia: comparison of oral and intravenous routes after third molar surgery. Br J Anaesth. 2005 May;94(5):642-8. doi: 10.1093/bja/aei109. Epub 2005 Mar 24. PubMed 15790675 ↗
  • Singla NK, Parulan C, Samson R, Hutchinson J, Bushnell R, Beja EG, Ang R, Royal MA. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid pharmacokinetic parameters after single-dose administration of intravenous, oral, or rectal acetaminophen. Pain Pract. 2012 Sep;12(7):523-32. doi: 10.1111/j.1533-2500.2012.00556.x. Epub 2012 Apr 24. PubMed 22524979 ↗
  • van Bree JB, de Boer AG, Danhof M, Ginsel LA, Breimer DD. Characterization of an "in vitro" blood-brain barrier: effects of molecular size and lipophilicity on cerebrovascular endothelial transport rates of drugs. J Pharmacol Exp Ther. 1988 Dec;247(3):1233-9. PubMed 3204515 ↗
  • Yazdy MM, Mitchell AA, Tinker SC, Parker SE, Werler MM. Periconceptional use of opioids and the risk of neural tube defects. Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Oct;122(4):838-844. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3182a6643c. PubMed 24084542 ↗
  • Shah S, Banh ET, Koury K, Bhatia G, Nandi R, Gulur P. Pain Management in Pregnancy: Multimodal Approaches. Pain Res Treat. 2015;2015:987483. doi: 10.1155/2015/987483. Epub 2015 Sep 13. PubMed 26448875 ↗
  • Li DK, Liu L, Odouli R. Exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during pregnancy and risk of miscarriage: population based cohort study. BMJ. 2003 Aug 16;327(7411):368. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7411.368. PubMed 12919986 ↗
  • Latthe P, Latthe M, Say L, Gulmezoglu M, Khan KS. WHO systematic review of prevalence of chronic pelvic pain: a neglected reproductive health morbidity. BMC Public Health. 2006 Jul 6;6:177. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-6-177. PubMed 16824213 ↗
  • Juganavar A, Joshi KS. Chronic Pelvic Pain: A Comprehensive Review. Cureus. 2022 Oct 26;14(10):e30691. doi: 10.7759/cureus.30691. eCollection 2022 Oct. PubMed 36465795 ↗
  • Hansen RN, Pham AT, Boing EA, Lovelace B, Wan GJ, Miller TE. Comparative analysis of length of stay, hospitalization costs, opioid use, and discharge status among spine surgery patients with postoperative pain management including intravenous versus oral acetaminophen. Curr Med Res Opin. 2017 May;33(5):943-948. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2017.1297702. Epub 2017 Mar 9. PubMed 28276273 ↗
  • Cordell WH, Keene KK, Giles BK, Jones JB, Jones JH, Brizendine EJ. The high prevalence of pain in emergency medical care. Am J Emerg Med. 2002 May;20(3):165-9. doi: 10.1053/ajem.2002.32643. PubMed 11992334 ↗
  • Boubred F, Vendemmia M, Garcia-Meric P, Buffat C, Millet V, Simeoni U. Effects of maternally administered drugs on the fetal and neonatal kidney. Drug Saf. 2006;29(5):397-419. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200629050-00004. PubMed 16689556 ↗
  • Antonucci R, Zaffanello M, Puxeddu E, Porcella A, Cuzzolin L, Pilloni MD, Fanos V. Use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in pregnancy: impact on the fetus and newborn. Curr Drug Metab. 2012 May 1;13(4):474-90. doi: 10.2174/138920012800166607. PubMed 22299823 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07595302
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 19, 2026
Start date
Nov 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 23, 2026

Study contacts

Mustfa Manzur, MD MPH MS
Contact
mmanzur@montefiore.org
718-920-6674
Eddie M Irizarry, MD
principal investigator · Montefiore Medical Center

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Acetaminophen

Start the discussion