ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07588438REAL-TIRZEPYUpdated May 19, 2026

Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Tirzepatide in Real-World Conditions in Paraguay.

A Phase 4 interventional study of Tirzepatide (LIPOLESS de Laboratorio de Productos Eticos C.E.I.S.A.) in Obesity and Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2, sponsored by Las Rías Medical Center. Recruiting at 1 site in Paraguay. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-19.

Sponsored by Las Rías Medical Center · Phase 4, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This is a prospective cohort study evaluating the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of tirzepatide under real-world conditions in the Paraguayan population. The study includes two cohorts: Cohort 1 consists of adults with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) without type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), and Cohort 2 consists of adults with T2DM with or without obesity. Each cohort will enroll 80 participants (160 total). All participants will receive tirzepatide as part of their standard clinical care and will be followed for 52 weeks with visits approximately every 6 weeks. Primary outcomes include percentage change in body weight from baseline at week 52 (Cohort 1) and change in HbA1c and body weight at week 52 (Cohort 2). Safety outcomes include adverse event rates. The study is conducted at Las Rias Medical Center, Asuncion, Paraguay, and has been approved by the CEI-INCAN Ethics Committee and authorized by DINAVISA.

Read the detailed description

Innovation and Regional Significance This study represents a pioneering milestone as the first prospective, long-term real-world evidence (RWE) investigation of tirzepatide in Paraguay. While global randomized clinical trials have established efficacy within controlled environments, this research addresses a critical knowledge gap by evaluating the performance of dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonism within a South American cohort. By documenting metabolic outcomes, safety, and adherence under routine clinical conditions-shaped by unique genetic, dietary, and socioeconomic factors-this project provides essential data for the regional medical community and sets a new benchmark for metabolic excellence in the region.

Study Design and Long-Term Follow-Up

The study is structured as a 52-week prospective cohort investigation, a duration that exceeds most regional observational studies, allowing for the assessment of weight loss maintenance and long-term glycemic stability. Participants are divided into two distinct metabolic profiles:

  • Cohort 1 (Obesity Focus): Adults with BMI ≥30 kg/m² without T2DM.
  • Cohort 2 (Metabolic Synergy): Adults with T2DM, with or without obesity. This dual-track approach allows for a comprehensive analysis of tirzepatide's pleiotropic effects across the spectrum of metabolic disease.

Treatment Protocol and Nutritional Support All participants receive tirzepatide (Lipoless by Laboratorio de Productos Eticos C.E.I.S.A) via subcutaneous injection once weekly. The treatment follows a standardized titration schedule starting at 2.5 mg, with dose escalations every 4 weeks based on individual clinical response and gastrointestinal tolerability. The pharmacological intervention is supported by a structured hyperproteic, low-carbohydrate nutritional plan (approximately 1,500 kcal/day) aimed at optimizing metabolic results and supporting healthy weight loss. Furthermore, in alignment with standard medical practice, all subjects are prescribed a standardized physical activity regimen and comprehensive healthy lifestyle modifications to ensure a holistic approach to long-term metabolic health.

Advanced Monitoring and Diagnostics To ensure high-quality data collection, the study utilizes precise diagnostic tools at specific intervals:

  • Body Composition: Systematic use of bioelectrical impedance analysis (InBody) to monitor changes in fat mass, visceral fat, and lean body mass at every visit.
  • Imaging: Standardized abdominal and thyroid ultrasound evaluations conducted at the Instituto Radiológico Calvo (weeks 0, 24, 52).
  • Functional Assessment: Measurement of muscle strength to correlate pharmacological efficacy with physical performance at very visit
  • Biochemical Analysis: Comprehensive laboratory panels processed by Laboratorio Díaz Gill to monitor glycemic control, lipid profiles, and safety markers (weeks 0, 24, 52).

Regulatory Rigor and Safety Operating under the strict oversight of the CEI-INCAN Ethics Committee and with the authorization of DINAVISA, the study adheres to International Council for Harmonisation (ICH) Good Clinical Practice guidelines. Safety is monitored through a robust pharmacovigilance system, with a specific focus on gastrointestinal tolerability and hepatobiliary safety, recorded via the PowerMed electronic data capture system.

Exclusionary Clarity In order to isolate the specific effects of incretin-based therapy in a real-world setting, this study strictly excludes patients using insulin, focusing on the potential of tirzepatide as a foundational therapy for metabolic health.

02

Conditions studied

  • Obesity
  • Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2

Keywords

  • Tirzepatide
  • GIP Receptor Agonist
  • GLP-1 Receptor Agonist
  • Incretin-based Therapy
  • Dual Agonist
  • Obesity
  • Overweight
  • Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
  • Metabolic Syndrome
  • Weight Loss
  • Real-World Evidence (RWE)
  • Real-World Data
  • Prospective Cohort Study
  • Post-Marketing Surveillance
  • Observational Study
  • Paraguay
  • Latin America
  • South American Population
  • Body Composition
  • HbA1c Reduction
  • Adverse Events Monitoring
03

In context

Obesity

11,522 studies on the registry are indexed under Obesity; 2,033 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 160 is above the median of 67 across 9,006 interventional studies indexed under Obesity.

Browse Obesity studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Las Rías Medical Center as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 70 years at the time of .
  • Stable residence in Paraguay for at least 12 months prior to screening.
  • Ability to provide written informed consent and comply with all study procedures.
  • Sufficient proficiency in the Spanish language to complete questionnaires and follow study instructions.
  • Clinical stability, defined as the absence of hospitalization related to diabetes or obesity complications within 3 months prior to screening.
  • Adequate renal function, defined as an estimated (eGFR) ≥45 mL/min/1.73m² calculated using the CKD-EPI equation.
  • For participants enrolled in the obesity cohort: clinical diagnosis of obesity with ≥30 kg/m², no prior diagnosis of diabetes mellitus ( \<6.5%), and at least one documented unsuccessful attempt at dietary weight-loss intervention within the previous 12 months.
  • For participants enrolled in the type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) cohort: established diagnosis of T2DM for at least 6 months prior to screening according to ADA 2025 criteria, HbA1c between 7.0% and 9.5% at screening confirmed at baseline, BMI ≥24 kg/m², and stable treatment on monotherapy or dual therapy with metformin, sulfonylureas, DPP-4 inhibitors, or SGLT-2 inhibitors for at least 3 months prior to screening.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of type 1 diabetes mellitus or secondary causes of diabetes.
  • History of diabetic ketoacidosis within 12 months prior to screening.
  • Current or recent use (within 3 months prior to screening) of GLP-1 receptor agonists or dual GIP/GLP-1 receptor agonists.
  • Current or prior use of insulin therapy for the management of diabetes.
  • untreated thyroid dysfunction, including hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism.
  • Personal or family history of medullary thyroid carcinoma or Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia syndrome type 2.
  • Major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE), including acute myocardial infarction, stroke, or hospitalization for heart failure within 6 months prior to screening.
  • Heart failure classified as (NYHA) Functional Class III or IV.
  • Uncontrolled hypertension, defined as systolic blood pressure ≥180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure ≥110 mmHg despite optimal antihypertensive therapy.
  • History of acute or chronic pancreatitis.
  • Active inflammatory bowel disease or prior bariatric surgery.
  • Clinically significant diabetic gastroparesis or other gastrointestinal motility disorders that may interfere with the absorption of concomitant oral medications.
  • Use of systemic for more than 14 consecutive days within 3 months prior to screening.
  • Treatment with oral anti-obesity medications (including orlistat, phentermine, naltrexone/bupropion, or topiramate) within 3 months prior to screening.
  • Participation in another clinical trial involving an medicinal product within 30 days prior to screening.
  • Moderate to advanced chronic kidney disease defined as \<45 mL/min/1.73m² or requirement for dialysis.
  • Active liver disease or transaminase levels (/AST) greater than 3 times the .
  • Active or history of cancer within the previous 5 years, except for completely resected basal cell or squamous cell skin carcinoma.
  • Uncontrolled major psychiatric disorders or history of suicide attempt within the previous 2 years.
  • Confirmed or suspected pregnancy, including positive serum beta-hCG test at screening, or active breastfeeding.
  • Intention to become pregnant during the study period.
  • Women of unwilling to use effective methods (hormonal, intrauterine, or dual-barrier) throughout the study and for 3 months after the final dose.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(13)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Clinically significant

Judged by the study doctor to matter for your health or for the study. It is a doctor’s decision, so ask the study team if you are unsure whether something counts.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Investigational drug or device

A drug or device being studied in a clinical trial.

It may be new, or already approved and being studied for another use, dose or form. Criteria often leave out people who took part in another study of one within a recent period, commonly 30 days or five half-lives.

ALT and AST (liver enzymes)

Two enzymes measured in a routine blood test of the liver. Higher levels can mean the liver is under strain or damaged. SGPT and SGOT are older names for ALT and AST.

Criteria usually give a limit as a multiple of the upper limit of normal (ULN), often higher when cancer has spread to the liver.

ULN (upper limit of normal)

The top of the normal range for a blood test, as set by the laboratory that runs it. Each lab prints its own range next to your result.

“≤ 2.5 × ULN” means the result can be up to two and a half times that top value.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Childbearing potential

Able to become pregnant: from the first period until menopause, unless permanently unable to through surgery (removal of the womb, or of both ovaries or both fallopian tubes).

Criteria for people of childbearing potential usually ask for a negative pregnancy test and for contraception during the study and for a time after it.

Contraception

Ways of preventing pregnancy. “Highly effective” methods fail less than 1% of the time a year when used correctly — for example an IUD or an implant.

Criteria usually say which methods count and how long to keep using them after the last dose, sometimes for male participants too. Some studies accept a partner’s vasectomy if it was confirmed successful and that person is the participant’s only sexual partner.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 4
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
160 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cohort 1: Obesity Without T2DM

    Adults with obesity (BMI ≥30 kg/m²) without type 2 diabetes mellitus, receiving tirzepatide as part of standard clinical care.

    Drug: Tirzepatide (LIPOLESS de Laboratorio de Productos Eticos C.E.I.S.A.)

  • Experimental
    Cohort 2: T2DM With or Without Obesity

    Adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (with or without obesity), receiving tirzepatide as part of standard clinical care.

    Drug: Tirzepatide (LIPOLESS de Laboratorio de Productos Eticos C.E.I.S.A.)

Interventions

  • Participants will receive subcutaneous injections of tirzepatide (LIPOLESS de Laboratorio de Productos Eticos C.E.I.S.A.) once weekly. The dosage will be adjusted according to standard clinical practice and the investigator's discretion, following the manufacturer's titration schedule (starting at 2.5 mg and increasing up to 15 mg as tolerated).

    Also known as: Dual GIP/GLP-1 Receptor Agonist

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Mean Percent Change From Baseline in Body Weight at 52 Weeks.

    Percentage change in total body weight from baseline to week 52 for participants in Cohort A (Adults with obesity without diabetes).

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) at 52 Weeks.

    Absolute change in HbA1c levels from baseline to week 52 for participants in Cohort B (Adults with type 2 diabetes).

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  3. Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs).

    Incidence, severity, and relationship of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), including gastrointestinal, pancreatic, cardiovascular, and other adverse events occurring during the 52-week treatment period.

    Time frame: Through week 52.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Body Weight at 52 Weeks.

    Change in absolute body weight from baseline to week 52.

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in Body Mass Index (BMI) at 52 Weeks.

    Change in BMI calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m2).

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  3. Percentage of Participants Achieving Body Weight Reduction Thresholds at 52 Weeks.

    Percentage of participants achieving ≥5%, 10%, 15%, 20%, 25%, and 30% reduction from baseline body weight.

    Time frame: 52 weeks.

  4. Change From Baseline in Systolic Blood Pressure at 52 Weeks.

    Assessment of the absolute change in resting systolic blood pressure.

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  5. Change From Baseline in Diastolic Blood Pressure at 52 Weeks.

    Assessment of the absolute change in resting diastolic blood pressure.

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  6. Percentage Change From Baseline in Total Cholesterol at 52 Weeks.

    Assessment of percentage change in fasting total cholesterol concentrations from baseline to week 52.

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  7. Percentage Change From Baseline in LDL Cholesterol (LDL-C) at 52 Weeks.

    Assessment of percentage change in fasting LDL cholesterol concentrations from baseline to week 52.

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  8. Percentage Change From Baseline in HDL Cholesterol (HDL-C) at 52 Weeks.

    Assessment of percentage change in fasting HDL cholesterol concentrations from baseline to week 52.

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  9. Percentage Change From Baseline in Triglycerides at 52 Weeks.

    Assessment of percentage change in fasting triglyceride concentrations from baseline to week 52.

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  10. Change From Baseline in Total Fat Mass Measured by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) at 52 Weeks.

    Evaluation of changes in total fat mass measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  11. Change From Baseline in Visceral Fat Mass Measured by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) at 52 Weeks.

    Evaluation of changes in visceral fat mass measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  12. Change From Baseline in Lean Body Mass Measured by Bioelectrical Impedance Analysis (BIA) at 52 Weeks.

    Evaluation of changes in lean body mass measured by bioelectrical impedance analysis (BIA).

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  13. Change From Baseline in Fasting Insulin at 52 Weeks.

    Assessment of the absolute change in fasting serum insulin concentrations from baseline to week 52.

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  14. Change From Baseline in Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) at 52 Weeks.

    Assessment of insulin resistance using the calculated Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) from baseline to week 52.

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  15. Percentage Change From Baseline in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hs-CRP) at 52 Weeks.

    Assessment of systemic inflammation via hs-CRP percentage change.

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  16. Percentage of Participants Achieving HbA1c Targets (Cohort 2) at 52 Weeks.

    Percentage of participants with T2DM reaching HbA1c≤7.0%, 6.5%, and 5.7%.

    Time frame: 52 weeks.

  17. Percentage of Scheduled Tirzepatide Doses Successfully Administered Through 52 Weeks.

    Treatment adherence based on the proportion of scheduled tirzepatide doses successfully administered during the 52-week follow-up period.

    Time frame: Through week 52.

  18. Percentage of Participants Completing the 52-Week Follow-up Period.

    Study retention based on the proportion of participants completing the final scheduled week-52 evaluation.

    Time frame: Through week 52.

Other outcomes

  1. Mean Change From Baseline in Estimated Glomerular Filtration Rate (eGFR) at 52 Weeks.

    Evaluation of renal function through changes in estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) calculated using the CKD-EPI equation from baseline to week 52.

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  2. Mean Change From Baseline in Serum Cystatin C at 52 Weeks.

    Evaluation of renal function through changes in serum Cystatin C concentrations from baseline to week 52.

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  3. Mean Change From Baseline in Alanine Aminotransferase (ALT) Levels at 52 Weeks.

    Assessment of liver function through the absolute change in serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) concentrations from baseline to week 52.

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  4. Mean Change From Baseline in Aspartate Aminotransferase (AST) Levels at 52 Weeks.

    Assessment of liver function through the absolute change in serum aspartate aminotransferase (AST) concentrations from baseline to week 52.

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  5. Mean Change From Baseline in Gamma-glutamyl Transferase (GGT) Levels at 52 Weeks.

    Assessment of liver function through the absolute change in serum gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT) concentrations from baseline to week 52.

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  6. Percentage of Participants With Improvement in Hepatic Steatosis Grade at 52 Weeks.

    Assessment of the proportion of participants with baseline NAFLD demonstrating improvement in hepatic steatosis grade on abdominal ultrasound from baseline to week 52. An objective measurement of hepatic fat load will be performed using the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP, USAT) which calculates the attenuation of ultrasound in a region of interest, expressed in dB/cm/MHz.

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  7. Mean Change From Baseline in Hepatic Fat Content via Ultrasound-Guided Attenuation Parameter (UGAP).

    Quantitative assessment of hepatic fat load using the ultrasound-guided attenuation parameter (UGAP/USAT). This technology calculates the attenuation coefficient of the ultrasound signal within a specified liver region of interest (ROI) to provide a precise objective measurement of steatosis. Unit of Measure: Decibels per centimeter per megahertz (dB/cm/MHz).

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  8. Mean Change From Baseline in Thyroid-Stimulating Hormone (TSH) Levels at 52 Weeks.

    Assessment of thyroid function through the absolute change in serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) concentrations from baseline to week 52.

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  9. Mean Change From Baseline in Free Thyroxine (FT4) Levels at 52 Weeks.

    Assessment of thyroid function through the absolute change in serum free thyroxine (FT4) concentrations from baseline to week 52.

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  10. Mean Change From Baseline in Serum Calcitonin Levels at 52 Weeks.

    Assessment of thyroid safety through the absolute change in serum calcitonin concentrations from baseline to week 52.

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

  11. Mean Change From Baseline in Apnea-Hypopnea Index (AHI) in the OSA Subgroup at 52 Weeks.

    Evaluation of sleep apnea severity by measuring the number of apnea and hypopnea events per hour of sleep in participants with moderate-to-severe OSA at baseline (AHI≥15 events/h).

    Time frame: Baseline and 52 weeks.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Centro Médico Las Rias
    Asunción, Paraguay
    Recruiting
    • Elizabeth Valinotti Delmás, MD · Contactelizabeth.valinotti@lasrias.com.py · 595981312888
    • Sandra Soto Valiente, MD · Contactsmsv81@gmail.com
    • ELIZABETH VALINOTTI DELMAS, MD · Principal investigator
    • SANDRA SOTO VALIENTE, MD · Sub investigator
    • MARIA LIS ALARCON BERNAL, MD · Sub investigator
    • SADY ARZAMENDIA DAVALOS, MD · Sub investigator
    • FRANCISCO CABRERA LOPEZ, MD · Sub investigator
    • KARENN CERMEÑO HERRERA, MD · Sub investigator
    • FEDERICO FARIÑA MENDIETA, MD · Sub investigator
    • NADIA GARCIA FERNANDEZ, MD · Sub investigator
    • ANDRES GIMENEZ BENITEZ, MD · Sub investigator
    • MARIA CRISTINA JIMENEZ BAZZANO, MD · Sub investigator
    • HELEN LOPEZ OVELAR, MD · Sub investigator
    • MARIA GALIANA RODRIGUEZ CABALLERO, MD · Sub investigator
    • FABIOLA ROMERO GOMEZ, MD · Sub investigator
    • LUZ VAZQUEZ VERA, MD · Sub investigator
    • MIGUEL CALVO VILLALBA, MD · Sub investigator
    • ALCIDES CHAUX SALINAS, MD · Sub investigator
    • FRANCISCO ECHAURI DOMINGUEZ, MD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07588438
Lead sponsor
Las Rías Medical Center
Collaborators
LABORATORIO DE PRODUCTOS ETICOS C.E.I.S.A
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
May 14, 2026
Start date
Jul 27, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 10, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Aug 10, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 19, 2026

Study contacts

ELIZABETH VALINOTTI DELMAS, MD
Contact
elizabeth.valinotti@lasrias.com.py
+595 981 312 888
Sandra Soto Valiente
Contact
smsv81@gmail.com
ELIZABETH VALINOTTI DELMAS, MD
principal investigator · LAS RIAS MEDICAL CENTER

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Tirzepatide

Start the discussion