ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07580001Updated May 12, 2026

Evaluating the Diagnostic Performance and Impact on Clinical Outcomes of the NuRapid-CRISPR Pathogen Profile Assay in ICU Patients With Sepsis

An interventional study of NuRapid-CRISPR Rapid Pathogen Detection Technology and Traditional pathogen culture in Sepsis, sponsored by Shanghai 10th People's Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 3 sites in China. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-12.

Sponsored by Shanghai 10th People's Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
396
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study is a prospective, multicenter, integrated trial designed to evaluate, from the perspectives of diagnostic performance and clinical utility, whether a diagnostic and treatment strategy based on the NuRapid-CRISPR rapid pathogen detection technology can reduce the 28-day all-cause mortality rate in patients with sepsis or septic shock in the ICU, compared to traditional pathogen culture.

The study consists of two parts:

  1. Diagnostic Accuracy Study: For all enrolled sepsis patients, microbiological specimens will undergo concurrent blinded testing, with NuRapid-CRISPR serving as the test of interest and traditional pathogen culture as the reference standard. A prospective comparison will evaluate differences between the two methods in key metrics such as pathogen detection rate, sensitivity, specificity, and turnaround time.
  2. Clinical Utility Cohort Study: All patients will undergo NuRapid-CRISPR testing as part of routine clinical care. Based on whether the rapid results are adopted clinically to guide early antimicrobial therapy decisions, the cohort will naturally form an exposure group (early treatment adjustments based on NuRapid-CRISPR results) and a control group (treatment primarily based on traditional culture results or empirical therapy). The study will prospectively compare the two groups in terms of the time to optimize antimicrobial therapy, coverage of the initial treatment spectrum, and infection-related clinical outcomes.
02

Conditions studied

  • Sepsis

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Sepsis
  • Pathogen Detection Technologies
03

In context

Sepsis

2,416 studies on the registry are indexed under Sepsis; 541 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 396 is above the median of 102 across 1,165 interventional studies indexed under Sepsis.

Browse Sepsis studies →

Lead sponsor

Shanghai 10th People's Hospital is the lead sponsor of 167 studies on the registry; 45 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age ≥ 18 years, length of stay in the ICU ≤ 24 hours;
  • Meets the Sepsis-3.0 diagnostic criteria (an increase in SOFA score of ≥2 points from baseline, and evidence of infection);
  • Clinically suspected sepsis or septic shock; the pathogen is unknown; the clinical plan is to collect sterile or suitable specimens, such as blood, respiratory specimens, cerebrospinal fluid, and ascites, for microbiological testing;
  • Expected ICU stay of ≥48 hours and ability to complete at least 28 days of clinical follow-up;
  • A written form signed by the patient or their legally authorized representative;

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • At the time of admission, the patient had already received a definitive pathogen diagnosis (based on microbiological culture, reliable molecular testing, or serological evidence), and targeted antimicrobial therapy against that pathogen had been initiated for more than 48 hours;
  • Vital signs are extremely unstable; death is expected within 24 hours;
  • Patients with severe primary immunodeficiency (e.g., AIDS, active hematologic , post-transplantation of solid organs or hematopoietic stem cells, or long-term use of high-dose [prednisone ≥ 20 mg/day or equivalent dose for more than 4 weeks] or other potent );
  • Women who are pregnant or breastfeeding;
  • The patient or their authorized representative has expressly refused to undergo any pathogen testing;
  • It is not possible to obtain a suitable specimen for testing due to anatomical, physiological, or technical reasons;
  • The patient is currently participating in another interventional clinical trial that may interfere with the assessment of the primary outcome of this study;
  • The patient or their authorized representative has declined to participate in this study;
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Immunosuppression

A weakened immune system. It can come from an illness, such as HIV or some blood cancers, or from medicines that turn the immune system down, for example after an organ transplant or for an autoimmune disease; steroids at higher doses count.

Read whether the line is about a condition or about medicines, and which medicines and doses it means.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
396 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    NuRapid-CRISPR

    Eligible specimens from enrolled patients undergo NuRapid-CRISPR testing concurrently with submission for conventional culture. Test results (including pathogen species and resistance gene information) are delivered to the attending physician via the hospital information system and/or telephone notification within 2-4 hours of validation. The test report is accompanied by an abstract of the \*Expert Consensus on Clinical Interpretation of Rapid Molecular Test Results and Treatment Recommendations\*, developed by experts in infectious diseases and clinical microbiology. Clinicians are encouraged and authorized to adjust antimicrobial treatment regimens as appropriate based on these rapid results and the patient's specific clinical condition, even before receiving conventional antimicrobial susceptibility test results. The timing of decisions to adjust antimicrobial therapy based on rapid results, the specific regimens, and the rationale for such adjustments must be documented in detail.

    Diagnostic Test: NuRapid-CRISPR Rapid Pathogen Detection Technology

  • Active comparator
    Pathogen culture

    Patient specimens were submitted for conventional pathogen culture and antimicrobial susceptibility testing in accordance with standard clinical procedures. The NuRapid-CRISPR assay was performed concurrently; however, its results were blinded to clinicians until the conventional culture report was issued and were not used as a basis for clinical decision-making. The initial selection and adjustment of antimicrobial agents were based entirely on clinical experience, routine inflammatory markers such as procalcitonin, and subsequent conventional culture and susceptibility test results. All treatment decisions and their rationale were routinely documented.

    Diagnostic Test: Traditional pathogen culture

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testNuRapid-CRISPR Rapid Pathogen Detection Technology

    Adjusting early-stage treatment based on NuRapid-CRISPR results.

  • Diagnostic testTraditional pathogen culture

    Primarily based on traditional cultivation methods or empirical treatment.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. 28-day all-cause mortality rate

    Death from any cause occurring between the date of randomization and day 28 (±2 days).In-hospital deaths: Recorded in real time through daily medical record reviews. Out-of-hospital deaths: Confirmed via a structured telephone follow-up conducted on Day 28 of enrollment. The telephone follow-up will use a standardized questionnaire and will be conducted by trained study coordinators.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization through Day 28 (±2 days)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Time to first targeted therapy

    The time interval (in hours) from the time of enrollment to the first use of an antimicrobial agent effective against the final confirmed pathogen (based on conventional culture or clinical diagnosis).Calculated precisely by comparing the time of antibiotic prescription execution with the time of the final microbiology report.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization through Day 28 (±2 days)

  2. Rate of adequate initial treatment

    The proportion of empirical antimicrobial regimens initiated within 24 hours of enrollment whose antimicrobial spectrum covers the ultimately identified pathogen.Conducted by infectious disease specialists based on the final microbiological diagnosis and antimicrobial susceptibility testing results.

    Time frame: From the date of randomization through Day 28 (±2 days)

  3. Length of stay in the ICU

    Length of stay in the ICU.Extracted directly from discharge records in the hospital information system, accurate to the day.

    Time frame: From the subject's admission to the ICU until their discharge from the ICU

  4. Total length of stay

    Total length of stay.Extracted directly from discharge records in the hospital information system, accurate to the day.

    Time frame: From the subject's admission to the hospital until their final discharge

  5. Number of days without ventilator or vasoactive drug support

    Calculated based on cumulative daily organ support records over the 28-day observation period.

    Time frame: During the 28-day observation period, every day

  6. SOFA Rating

    Calculate the SOFA score daily and record any new or worsening cases of organ failure.The higher the SOFA score, the higher the incidence of multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (MODS); conversely, the lower the score, the lower the incidence.

    Time frame: During the 28-day observation period, every day

  7. Total medical expenses

    Retrieve the total medical costs for patients from enrollment through discharge from the hospital's financial system.

    Time frame: On the day of discharge from the hospital

07

Study locations

3 sites
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07580001
Collaborators
Shanghai Tongji Hospital, Tongji University School of Medicine, Yangpu District Central Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University, Dongfang Hospital Affiliated to Tongji University
Responsible party
Sheng Wang MD PhD (Chief Physician, Center for Critical Care Medicine, Tongji Hospital, Shanghai, Shanghai 10th People's Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 12, 2026
Start date
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2028 (estimated)
Last update
May 12, 2026

Study contacts

Du Yingying, Doctor
Contact
dyy9522@163.com
+862166111524

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in May 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion