ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07567898ADHEREUpdated May 5, 2026

Effectiveness of Multidisciplinary Protocolised Interventions on IVT Non-adherence Rates

An interventional study of multidisciplinary protocolized intervention (MPI) and Routine medical care & monitoring in Diabetic Macular Edema, Neovascular (Wet) Age-Related Macular Degeneration and Intravitreal Injection, sponsored by Singapore Eye Research Institute. Not yet recruiting. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-05.

Sponsored by Singapore Eye Research Institute · Not applicable, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Randomized
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this research study is to test whether a personalised care approach improves adherence compared to standard care. Many patients with macular diseases like age-related macular degeneration and diabetic macular edema need regular eye injections to protect their vision. However, some do not adhere to their treatment appointments, risking further vision loss.

You were selected as a possible participant in this research study because you have been diagnosed with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (nAMD) or diabetic macula edema (DME) requiring intravitreal injection treatment (IVT).

This research study targets to recruit 200 participants from the Singapore National Eye Centre.

This study comprises two cohort groups: Cohort 1(Suboptimal CAT scores/ Randomized Control trial) and Cohort 2 (Optimal CAT scores/Observation).

If you agree to take part in this study, the research coordinator will obtain your written consent before proceeding with the study procedures. You will be required to complete CAT assessment (via remote or administered in clinic) and assigned to cohort 1 or cohort 2 based on CAT scores result. If you are assigned to cohort 1, you will be randomly allocated to either the personalized multi-disciplinary protocolized intervention (MPI) or standard care group. Randomization means assigning you to one of two groups by chance, like tossing a coin or rolling a dice.

  • MPI group: You will complete a specialized computerized adaptive testing (CAT) quality of life questionnaire. Based on the domain specific scores, you will receive a medical consultation and a referral to nurse educators, optometrists, occupational therapists, or social workers.
  • Standard care group: If you are allocated to this group, you will receive standard care, where doctors make treatment decisions without using the CAT results.

If you are assigned to cohort 2, you will be placed under prospective observation and undergo routine clinical care.

02

Conditions studied

  • Diabetic Macular Edema
  • Neovascular (Wet) Age-Related Macular Degeneration
  • Intravitreal Injection

Keywords

  • ADHERE, Macular diseases, Intravitreal injections.
  • neovascular age-related macular
03

In context

Macular Degeneration

1,459 studies on the registry are indexed under Macular Degeneration; 238 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 56 across 985 interventional studies indexed under Macular Degeneration.

Browse Macular Degeneration studies →

Lead sponsor

Singapore Eye Research Institute is the lead sponsor of 27 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
Child (0–17), Adult (18–64), Older adult (65+)
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with chronic macula disease including those diagnosed with nAMD and DME, who require IVT.
  • This would include treatment naive patients (no IVT in either eye the last 6 months) and previously treated patients who have had IVT in either eye in the last 6 months and require further IVT treatment at the baseline study visit in either eye.
  • Able to provide and must consent to undergoing the MPI intervention.
  • Speak English or Mandarin.
  • Must be a Singapore resident.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who are unwilling or unable to perform CAT testing.
  • Unable to provide .
  • Significant eye pathology such as cornea problems, glaucoma, or other retinal diseases that may substantially affect vision.
  • Do not speak English or Mandarin fluently.
  • Cognitive impairment (as assessed using 6CIT).
  • Obvious observable physical or hearing disabilities that prevents them from completing the CAT questionnaire and undergoing MPI effectively.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Multidisciplinary protocolized intervention (MPI)

    Consists of medical consultation, to optimize the treatment regimen, and combinations of appropriate referrals to either (1) a nurse-directed patient education program (NE), (2) a low vision optometrist (OP), (3) an occupational therapy services (OT) and/or (4) a medical social worker (SW). CATs specific to AMD and DME will be used to measure QoL by collecting scores in various patient-informed domains. Lower scores at baseline, or a significant reduction in scores on follow-up visits in the various domains, will inform potential areas to address and tailor our MPI accordingly.

    Behavioral: multidisciplinary protocolized intervention (MPI)

  • Placebo comparator
    Standard care

    In the standard care arm, the treating clinician will be masked from the CAT scores and will use his/her own discretion when recommending the treatment regimen or when making any appropriate nurse or allied health referrals, independent of the CAT scores.

    Behavioral: Routine medical care & monitoring

Interventions

  • Behavioralmultidisciplinary protocolized intervention (MPI)

    Our novel proposed approach to improve adherence to IVT is personalized patient-centred care comprising a multidisciplinary protocolized intervention (MPI), which consists of medical consultation, to optimize the treatment regimen, and combinations of appropriate referrals to either (1) a nurse-directed patient education program (NE), (2) a low vision optometrist (OP), (3) an occupational therapy services (OT) and/or (4) a medical social worker (SW).

  • BehavioralRoutine medical care & monitoring

    The CAT scores will be recorded by the clinical research coordinator at baseline and follow-up visits for comparison to the MPI arm.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Effectiveness of multidisciplinary protocolized intervention (MPI) in improving adherence to intravitreal (IVT) Injection.

    Adherence is defined as 1. patient attends all follow-up appointments within 1 month of the planned follow up date, and 2. patient receives IVT within 1 month of when the doctor recommends IVT. At each follow up time point, the study team will assess if the patient has been "adherent" or "non-adherent". If the patient does not visit the clinic or does not attend the scheduled study visit, phone calls will be made to determine reasons or barriers for adherence. A remote invitation to complete the CAT questionnaire will also be sent to these patients or if uncontactable, they will be approached and interviewed at their next clinical visit. For previously treated patients, adherence status up to 2 years prior to study enrolment for the time of IVT treatment will be recorded by the study team from medical records.

    Time frame: From 6 month to 18 months.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of CAT scores (Specific aim 2A) from the CAT questionnaire database

    CAT scores will be collected via a hybrid remote or in-clinic delivery method. At baseline, CATs will be administered in-clinic or via CAT links sent by WhatsApp to their contact number . At subsequent timepoints, relevant CAT links will be sent via a WhatsApp message to their designated contact number, to complete the questionnaire remotely on their own SMART device, before their appointment. Those who are unable to complete CAT testing remotely will be given an additional opportunity to complete them in-clinic using an internet enabled tablet in person at their clinic visit with/without CRC assistance. The CAT scores will be assessed by clinical research coordinator.

    Time frame: Baseline, 6,12 and 18 month

  2. Effectiveness of MPI in improvement of visual function

    Visual function -Monocular and binocular presenting corrected VA and CS (Specific aim 2B) will be collected from the clinical records. If data are not present, the CRCs will conduct these tests on participants using standardized protocols.domain-specific CAT scores at each follow-up time point. Compared to those in standard care, patients in the MPI group will have improved VA and CS at each follow-up time point.

    Time frame: Enrolment to 18 months

  3. Effectiveness of MPI in increasing disease-free intervals in patients with nAMD or DME receiving IVT and having suboptimal CAT scores.

    Disease free intervals as defined by the maximum IVT treatment interval where no disease activity recurrence is detected on OCT will be collected from clinical records and OCT images from the clinical database (Specific aim 2B).

    Time frame: At the end of 18-month time point.

  4. The implementation outcomes of MPI through mixed method testing with interviews and questionnaires (Specific aim 3).

    The PI, assisted by their Co-Is and collaborators, will identify eligible individuals for qualitative interviewing that will be performed with major stakeholders between 6 to 15 months timeline. These include the clinicians, nurses and the allied health specialists (OP, OT and SW) who will be involved in administering the MPI, and patients and care-givers who receive the MPI. Potential individuals will be contacted over email or phone call, and a trained study team will follow up on affirmative responses by obtaining written informed consent to carry out the following study procedures. Semi-structured (1-on-1) interviews with the above key stakeholders will be conducted to explore their perspectives on barriers and enablers of integrating MPI into a Singapore public hospital for the management of nAMD and DME patients receiving IVT. Purposive and snowball sampling will be used to ensure all stakeholder groups are represented. Interviews will be conducted until no new data emerges.

    Time frame: 6 to 15 months.

  5. To assess the cost-effectiveness of the MPI for improving adherence to IVT, considering its potential impact on long term visual acuity (VA) loss and QoL adjusted years (QALYs).

    The sample size required for cost-effectiveness analysis is usually larger than clinical studies as it involves estimating the joint distribution of patient outcomes and costs. Furthermore, power calculations require setting a willingness-to-pay threshold, which is not known for Singapore. However, as cost-effectiveness is more concerned with estimating effect size rather than hypothesis testing, it can still provide valuable information even if underpowered. Instead of confidence intervals, sensitivity analysis will be used to assess the range of estimated values.

    Time frame: Baseline and 18-month

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Apr 2026; primary completion for Mar 2027, 11 months later.

Of 104 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Macular Degeneration, half reached primary completion within 41 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 56. This study's planned 11 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 132 studies reached it within 37 months; a quarter within 17 and three quarters within 60.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 31, 2026
First posted
May 5, 2026
StartEst.
Apr 2026
Primary completionEst.
Mar 2027
CompletionEst.
Sep 2028
Last update
May 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 5, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07567898
Lead sponsor
Singapore Eye Research Institute
Collaborators
Singapore National Eye Centre
Responsible party
Tan Cheng Sim Anna (Associate Professor, Singapore Eye Research Institute) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 5, 2026
Start date
Apr 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Mar 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2028 (estimated)
Last update
May 5, 2026

Study contacts

Anna Tan CS Clinical Associate Professor, PhD
Contact
anna.tan.c.s@singhealth.com.sg
+65-63227424
NEO WT Clinical Research Coordinator, Diploma
Contact
neo.wee.teck@seri.com.sg
+65-90584081
Anna CS Tan, PhD
principal investigator · Singapore Eye Research Institute (SERI)

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion