ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07565662DEX-RCTUpdated Oct 21, 2026

Intrathecal Dexmedetomidine and Acute Neuropathic Pain After Lower Limb Amputation

An interventional study of Hyperbaric Bupivacaine plus Saline and Hyperbaric Bupivacaine plus Dexmedetomidine in Phantom Limb Pain, Neuropathic Pain and Lower Limb Amputation, sponsored by Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco. Completed at 1 site in Mexico. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-21.

Sponsored by Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Sep 2025, registered Apr 2026).
Updated Oct 21, 2026Primary outcomes revisedStart date moved+2 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This randomized controlled trial evaluated the effect of adding intrathecal dexmedetomidine (10 µg) to hyperbaric bupivacaine (11 mg) for spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing lower limb amputation. Thirty patients (ASA I-III) scheduled for elective supra- or infracondylar amputation were randomly allocated to two groups: Control Group (n=15) received hyperbaric bupivacaine 11 mg plus saline 0.9%, and Experimental Group (n=15) received hyperbaric bupivacaine 11 mg plus dexmedetomidine 10 µg. Primary outcomes were duration of motor and sensory neuraxial block and postoperative analgesia at 48 hours. As a prespecified exploratory secondary outcome, incidence of acute neuropathic pain was assessed using the DN4 screening tool at 48 hours. The study was conducted at the Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad Dr. Juan Graham Casasús, Villahermosa, Tabasco, Mexico, from 30 September to 15 December 2025. Ethics approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board (CEI/JGC/C02-25) prior to patient enrollment.

02

Conditions studied

  • Phantom Limb Pain
  • Neuropathic Pain
  • Lower Limb Amputation
03

In context

Phantom Limb

163 studies on the registry are indexed under Phantom Limb; 35 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 30 is close to the median of 30 across 125 interventional studies indexed under Phantom Limb.

Browse Phantom Limb studies →

Lead sponsor

Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; none are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients scheduled for elective supra- or infracondylar lower limb amputation
  • Age 18 to 65 years
  • I-III
  • Acceptance of neuraxial anesthetic technique

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient refusal of anesthetic procedure

    • Prolonged coagulation times
    • Anatomical abnormalities of the spine
    • classification
    • Atrioventricular block grade 2 or 3 without pacemaker
    • Neurological deterioration (Glasgow score less than 8)
    • Hemodynamic instability
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Double (Participant, Care provider)
Enrollment
30 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Control Group - Bupivacaine Alone

    Patients in this arm received hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 11 mg plus saline 0.9% 0.1 ml administered intrathecally via spinal injection at level L2-L3. Total volume: 2.3 ml.

    Drug: Hyperbaric Bupivacaine plus Saline

  • Experimental
    Experimental Group - Bupivacaine plus Dexmedetomidine

    Patients in this arm received hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 11 mg plus dexmedetomidine 10 µg administered intrathecally via spinal injection at level L2-L3. Total volume: 2.3 ml.

    Drug: Hyperbaric Bupivacaine plus Dexmedetomidine

Interventions

  • DrugHyperbaric Bupivacaine plus Saline

    Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 11 mg plus saline 0.9% 0.1 ml administered intrathecally. Total volume 2.3 ml.

  • DrugHyperbaric Bupivacaine plus Dexmedetomidine

    Hyperbaric bupivacaine 0.5% 11 mg plus dexmedetomidine 10 µg administered intrathecally. Total volume 2.3 ml.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Proportion Requiring Analgesic Rescue

    Proportion of patients requiring at least one analgesic rescue dose during the postoperative period.

    Time frame: 48 hours postoperatively

  2. Duration of Motor Block

    Duration of motor block assessed by modified Bromage scale (0-3, higher scores indicate greater motor block). Measured at multiple timepoints through 48 hours postoperatively.

    Time frame: 48 hours postoperatively

  3. Duration of Sensory Block

    Duration of sensory block assessed by Hollmen scale. Measured at multiple timepoints through 48 hours postoperatively.

    Time frame: 48 hours postoperatively

Secondary outcomes

  1. Incidence of Acute Neuropathic Pain

    Incidence of acute neuropathic pain assessed by DN4 screening tool (0-10, score ≥4 indicates neuropathic pain component). Reported as exploratory secondary outcome.

    Time frame: 48 hours postoperatively

  2. Heart Rate

    Heart rate measured in beats per minute during the first 4 hours post-block.

    Time frame: 4 hours postoperatively

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hospital Regional de Alta Especialidad Dr. Juan Graham Casasus
    Villahermosa, Tabasco 86126, Mexico
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — De-identified individual participant data underlying the published results will be available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Time frame: Data will be available beginning 3 months after article publication and ending 5 years after publication.

Access criteria: De-identified individual participant data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal, approved by the corresponding author, for the purpose of verifying the published results or conducting individual-participant-data meta-analysis. Requests should be directed to the corresponding author.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

3 registry updates since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Sep 2025 to primary completion in Dec 2025, 2 months.

Of 61 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Phantom Limb, half reached primary completion within 32 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 12 and three quarters within 47. This study's 2 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 64 studies reached it within 34 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 50.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 5, 2026: start Apr 2025 → Sep 2025, primary completion Oct 2025 → Dec 2025 and completion Oct 2025 → Dec 2025.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 23, 2026
First posted
May 4, 2026
StartActual
Sep 30, 2025was Apr 2025
Primary completionActual
Dec 15, 2025was Oct 2025
CompletionActual
Dec 15, 2025was Oct 2025
Last update
Oct 21, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Start date
Apr 1, 2025→Sep 30, 2025
Oct 5, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2025→Dec 15, 2025
Oct 5, 2026
Study completion
Oct 31, 2025→Dec 15, 2025
Oct 5, 2026
Primary outcomes
2 removed
What changed in the outcomes
  • RemovedTime to First Analgesic RescueTime frame: 48 hours postoperatively
  • RemovedHeart RateTime frame: 4 hours postoperatively
Oct 21, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 added
What changed in the outcomes
  • AddedHeart RateTime frame: 4 hours postoperatively
Oct 21, 2026
Show all 3 updates
  1. Oct 21, 2026
    Primary outcomes 2 removed
    What changed in the outcomes
    • RemovedTime to First Analgesic RescueTime frame: 48 hours postoperatively
    • RemovedHeart RateTime frame: 4 hours postoperatively
    Secondary outcomes 1 added
    What changed in the outcomes
    • AddedHeart RateTime frame: 4 hours postoperatively
    + 2 other changes: design details and data sharing statement
  2. Oct 16, 2026
    Minor edits only
    + 2 other changes: verification date and description
  3. Oct 5, 2026
    Start date Apr 1, 2025→Sep 30, 2025
    Primary completion Oct 31, 2025→Dec 15, 2025
    Study completion Oct 31, 2025→Dec 15, 2025
    + 1 other change: verification date

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07565662
Lead sponsor
Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco
Responsible party
Gabriel López (Professor-Researcher, División Académica de Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco) — Principal investigator
First posted
May 4, 2026
Start date
Sep 30, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 15, 2025
Completion
Dec 15, 2025
Last update
Oct 21, 2026

Study contacts

Gabriel López-Ramírez, PhD
principal investigator · Universidad Juárez Autónoma de Tabasco

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Oct 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion