ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07816705GDMUpdated Nov 6, 2026

Ultrasound Assessment Of Gastric Volume In Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section

An observational study in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) and Obstetric Anesthesia, sponsored by Gaziantep City Hospital. Not yet recruiting. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-06.

Sponsored by Gaziantep City Hospital · Observational

Updated Nov 6, 2026Start date movedEligibility revised+2 moreGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
54
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The primary objective of this study is to compare gastric volume prior to elective cesarean section between pregnant women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) and those without GDM.

The secondary objectives are to evaluate the effect of GDM on preoperative residual gastric volume and to obtain data that could contribute to clinical anesthesia practices regarding the risk of aspiration.

This study aims to obtain objective ultrasonographic data regarding the adequacy of standard fasting periods in pregnant women, particularly in the presence of GDM.

Read the detailed description

During pregnancy, gastric emptying can be affected and the risk of aspiration may increase due to physiological hormonal changes, elevated intra-abdominal pressure, and slowed gastrointestinal motility. Although cesarean sections are often performed under regional anesthesia, they remain clinically relevant in terms of aspiration risk due to the potential need for general anesthesia (1, 2).

Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) is a common metabolic disorder during pregnancy that may affect autonomic nervous system function and gastrointestinal motility. While diabetic gastroparesis is well characterized in patients with type 1 and type 2 diabetes mellitus, data regarding the effect of GDM on gastric emptying dynamics remain limited (2, 3).

In recent years, gastric ultrasonography has become an increasingly utilized method in anesthesia practice, enabling the non-invasive assessment of gastric contents and volume. This technique allows for the objective evaluation of gastric contents regardless of standard fasting intervals and facilitates an individualized assessment of aspiration risk (3).

The rationale for this study is to determine the effect of GDM on preoperative gastric volume by comparing gastric volumes measured via gastric ultrasound in pregnant women scheduled for elective cesarean sections, with and without a diagnosis of GDM, thereby contributing to perioperative anesthetic risk assessment.

This study has been designed as a prospective, observational, comparative, and parallel-group clinical trial.

Patient Selection: Pregnant women to be included in the study will be selected via a consecutive sampling method (based on the order of arrival) from among patients scheduled for elective cesarean section at Gaziantep City Hospital by the Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation and the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, who meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria.

Patients will be grouped solely based on the presence or absence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). No selective sampling will be performed regarding age, body mass index, obstetric characteristics, surgical team, or fetal characteristics.

Patients will be divided into two groups:

Group 1: Pregnant women diagnosed with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)

Group 2: Pregnant women without a diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)

Data regarding the patients included in the study will be obtained from patient charts, Hospital Information Management System (HIMS) records, and ultrasonographic measurements performed by the researcher during the preoperative period. All data will be prospectively recorded on a standardized case report form.

Data to be Collected:

Demographic Data: Age, body mass index (BMI), gestational age

Clinical Data: Presence of gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM), ASA physical status classification, fasting durations (separately for solids and liquids, in hours), and comorbidities

Ultrasonographic Measurements: Anteroposterior (AP) diameter of the gastric antrum, craniocaudal (CC) diameter, antral cross-sectional area (CSA), and estimated gastric volume (mL)

During the preoperative period, the gastric antrum will be assessed using an ultrasound device by an experienced anesthesia resident or anesthesiologist. The patient will be examined in both the supine and right lateral decubitus positions. The anteroposterior and craniocaudal diameters of the gastric antrum will be measured, and the antral cross-sectional area will be calculated.

For patients enrolled in the study, transabdominal gastric ultrasound will be performed twice, in two different positions, during the preoperative period. No interventions will be made regarding the planned medical treatment or surgical procedure. Only non-invasive routine medical measurements will be performed to assess the patient's current clinical status.

02

Conditions studied

  • Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM)
  • Obstetric Anesthesia

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Gastricusg
  • GDM
  • GestasyonelDiabetesMellitus
03

In context

Diabetes, Gestational

877 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes, Gestational; 203 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 54 is below the median of 180 across 289 observational studies indexed under Diabetes, Gestational.

Browse Diabetes, Gestational studies →

Lead sponsor

Gaziantep City Hospital is the lead sponsor of 21 studies on the registry; 14 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

The criteria were revised on the registry on Nov 6, 2026. See what changed

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

PREGNANT WOMEN AGED 18-65 YEARS WITH A SINGLETON PREGNANCY, GESTATIONAL AGE OF 36 WEEKS OR MORE.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Pregnant women aged 18-65 years with a singleton pregnancy. Gestational age of 36 weeks or more. classification of II-III. Participants will be selected from patients scheduled for elective cesarean section who have been informed about the objectives and procedures of the study and who sign the form.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Emergency cesarean section cases. Multiple pregnancies. Patients with gastrointestinal diseases, including symptomatic or treatment-requiring gastroesophageal reflux disease, peptic ulcer disease, active symptomatic gastritis, a history of diabetic gastroparesis, inflammatory bowel diseases (Crohn's disease or ulcerative colitis), or a history of gastrointestinal surgery, particularly gastric or esophageal surgery.

Patients with systemic diseases that may affect gastric motility, including type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus (excluding GDM), uncontrolled hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism, neurological diseases (e.g., Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, or autonomic neuropathy), or connective tissue diseases (e.g., scleroderma).

Patients with severe systemic comorbidities, including classification IV or higher, advanced cardiac disease (e.g., class III-IV heart failure), advanced respiratory system disease (e.g., severe or restrictive lung disease), renal failure (stage 4-5 chronic kidney disease), or hepatic failure ( class B-C).

Patients using medications that may affect gastric motility, including prokinetic agents, anticholinergic drugs, or opioids.

Patients who refuse to participate in the study or do not sign the form.

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

NYHA class (heart failure)

The New York Heart Association’s four classes of how much heart failure limits physical activity.

I
No limits: ordinary activity causes no undue tiredness or breathlessness.
II
Slight limits: comfortable at rest, ordinary activity causes symptoms.
III
Marked limits: comfortable at rest, less than ordinary activity causes symptoms.
IV
Symptoms even at rest; any activity makes them worse.

Studies set their own limit — many outside heart failure leave out class III–IV, while heart failure studies may ask for a particular class. Check the class this study names.

COPD

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: long-term lung disease that makes it hard to breathe out, including emphysema and chronic bronchitis.

Child-Pugh class

A score of how well the liver works in people with liver disease such as cirrhosis: class A is mild, B moderate and C severe.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
54 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
1 Day
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • GDM Group

    Pregnant women with a confirmed diagnosis of gestational diabetes mellitus (per IADPSG/Carpenter-Coustan criteria) at ≥24 weeks of gestation, undergoing bedside gastric ultrasonography.

    Diagnostic Test: GASTRIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY

  • Non-GDM Group

    Pregnant women without gestational diabetes, matched for gestational age and fasting duration, undergoing the same gastric ultrasonography protocol

    Diagnostic Test: GASTRIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testGASTRIC ULTRASONOGRAPHY

    Bedside gastric ultrasound performed with a curvilinear probe in the supine and right lateral decubitus positions. The antrum is imaged in a sagittal plane at the level of the aorta; antral cross-sectional area (CSA) is measured and gastric volume is estimated using the Perlas model. Qualitative antral grading (Grade 0-2) is also recorded.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The Primary Objective Of This Study Is To Compare Gastric Volume Prior To Elective Cesarean Section Between Pregnant Women Diagnosed With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) And Those Without GDM.

    Time frame: 1 YEAR

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Publications

  • Calisir F, Oksuz G. Comparison of gastric volumes using ultrasound in term pregnant women with and without gestational diabetes before elective cesarean delivery: an observational cohort study. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2025 Dec;38(1):2508267. doi: 10.1080/14767058.2025.2508267. Epub 2025 May 21. PubMed 40399137 ↗
  • Amaral CK, Benevides ML, Benevides MM, Sampaio DL, Fontes CJF. [Ultrasound assessment of gastric antrum in term pregnant women before elective cesarean section]. Braz J Anesthesiol. 2019 May-Jun;69(3):266-271. doi: 10.1016/j.bjan.2019.03.001. Epub 2019 Apr 19. PubMed 31006483 ↗
  • Garg H, Podder S, Bala I, Gulati A. Comparison of fasting gastric volume using ultrasound in diabetic and non-diabetic patients in elective surgery: An observational study. Indian J Anaesth. 2020 May;64(5):391-396. doi: 10.4103/ija.IJA_796_19. Epub 2020 May 1. PubMed 32724247 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Clinical study report

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Nov 2026; primary completion for Sep 2027, 9 months later.

Of 142 non-industry observational studies under Diabetes, Gestational, half reached primary completion within 43 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 70. This study's planned 9 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 144 studies reached it within 43 months; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 73.

Start moved once since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026: Oct 2026 → Nov 2026, on Nov 6, 2026.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Sep 8, 2026
First posted
Sep 14, 2026
StartEst.
Nov 15, 2026was Oct 2026
Primary completionEst.
Sep 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Oct 1, 2027
Last update
Nov 6, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Start date
Oct 1, 2026→Nov 15, 2026
Nov 6, 2026
Eligibility
1 inclusion criterion edited, 3 removed; 1 exclusion criterion edited, 2 removed
What changed in the criteria
Inclusion criteria
  • RemovedPREGNANT WOMEN AGED 18-65 YEARS WITH A SINGLETON PREGNANCY,
  • RemovedGESTATIONAL AGE OF 36 WEEKS OR MORE,
  • RemovedASA PHYSICAL STATUS CLASSIFICATION OF II-III WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE STUDY.
  • EditedPARTICIPANTS WILL BE SELECTED FROM PATIENTS SCHEDULED FOR ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTION WHO HAVE BEEN INFORMED ABOUT THE OBJECTIVES AND PROCEDURES OF THE STUDY AND WHO SIGN THE INFORMED CONSENT FORMPregnant women aged 18-65 years with a singleton pregnancy. Gestational age of 36 weeks or more. ASA physical status classification of II-III. Participants will be selected from patients scheduled for elective cesarean section who have been informed about the objectives and procedures of the study and who sign the informed consent form.
Exclusion criteria
  • RemovedEMERGENCY CESAREAN SECTION CASES.
  • RemovedMULTIPLE PREGNANCIES.
  • EditedPATIENTS WITH GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASESEmergency cesarean section cases. Multiple pregnancies. Patients with gastrointestinal diseases, INCLUDING SYMPTOMATIC OR TREATMENTincluding symptomatic or treatment-REQUIRING GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASErequiring gastroesophageal reflux disease, PEPTIC ULCER DISEASEpeptic ulcer disease, ACTIVE SYMPTOMATIC GASTRITISactive symptomatic gastritis, A HISTORY OF DIABETIC GASTROPARESISa history of diabetic gastroparesis, INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASESinflammatory bowel diseases (CROHNCrohn'S DISEASE OR ULCERATIVE COLITISs disease or ulcerative colitis), OR A HISTORY OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERYor a history of gastrointestinal surgery, PARTICULARLY GASTRIC OR ESOPHAGEAL SURGERYparticularly gastric or esophageal surgery.
Nov 6, 2026
Primary outcomes
1 edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • EditedTHE PRIMARY OBJECTIVE OF THIS STUDY IS TO COMPARE GASTRIC VOLUME PRIOR TO ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTION BETWEEN PREGNANT WOMEN DIAGNOSED WITH GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUSThe Primary Objective Of This Study Is To Compare Gastric Volume Prior To Elective Cesarean Section Between Pregnant Women Diagnosed With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) AND THOSE WITHOUTAnd Those Without GDM.Time frame: 1 YEAR
Nov 6, 2026
Title
ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT OF GASTRİC VOLUME IN PREGNANT WOMEN UNDERGOİNG ELECTİVE CESAREAN SECTİON, WITH AND WITHOUT GESTATİONAL DIABETES MELLITUS→Ultrasound Assessment Of Gastric Volume In Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
Nov 6, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 6, 2026
    Start date Oct 1, 2026→Nov 15, 2026
    Eligibility 1 inclusion criterion edited, 3 removed; 1 exclusion criterion edited, 2 removed
    What changed in the criteria
    Inclusion criteria
    • RemovedPREGNANT WOMEN AGED 18-65 YEARS WITH A SINGLETON PREGNANCY,
    • RemovedGESTATIONAL AGE OF 36 WEEKS OR MORE,
    • RemovedASA PHYSICAL STATUS CLASSIFICATION OF II-III WILL BE INCLUDED IN THE STUDY.
    • EditedPARTICIPANTS WILL BE SELECTED FROM PATIENTS SCHEDULED FOR ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTION WHO HAVE BEEN INFORMED ABOUT THE OBJECTIVES AND PROCEDURES OF THE STUDY AND WHO SIGN THE INFORMED CONSENT FORMPregnant women aged 18-65 years with a singleton pregnancy. Gestational age of 36 weeks or more. ASA physical status classification of II-III. Participants will be selected from patients scheduled for elective cesarean section who have been informed about the objectives and procedures of the study and who sign the informed consent form.
    Exclusion criteria
    • RemovedEMERGENCY CESAREAN SECTION CASES.
    • RemovedMULTIPLE PREGNANCIES.
    • EditedPATIENTS WITH GASTROINTESTINAL DISEASESEmergency cesarean section cases. Multiple pregnancies. Patients with gastrointestinal diseases, INCLUDING SYMPTOMATIC OR TREATMENTincluding symptomatic or treatment-REQUIRING GASTROESOPHAGEAL REFLUX DISEASErequiring gastroesophageal reflux disease, PEPTIC ULCER DISEASEpeptic ulcer disease, ACTIVE SYMPTOMATIC GASTRITISactive symptomatic gastritis, A HISTORY OF DIABETIC GASTROPARESISa history of diabetic gastroparesis, INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASESinflammatory bowel diseases (CROHNCrohn'S DISEASE OR ULCERATIVE COLITISs disease or ulcerative colitis), OR A HISTORY OF GASTROINTESTINAL SURGERYor a history of gastrointestinal surgery, PARTICULARLY GASTRIC OR ESOPHAGEAL SURGERYparticularly gastric or esophageal surgery.
    Primary outcomes 1 edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • EditedTHE PRIMARY OBJECTIVE OF THIS STUDY IS TO COMPARE GASTRIC VOLUME PRIOR TO ELECTIVE CESAREAN SECTION BETWEEN PREGNANT WOMEN DIAGNOSED WITH GESTATIONAL DIABETES MELLITUSThe Primary Objective Of This Study Is To Compare Gastric Volume Prior To Elective Cesarean Section Between Pregnant Women Diagnosed With Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) AND THOSE WITHOUTAnd Those Without GDM.Time frame: 1 YEAR
    Title ULTRASOUND ASSESSMENT OF GASTRİC VOLUME IN PREGNANT WOMEN UNDERGOİNG ELECTİVE CESAREAN SECTİON, WITH AND WITHOUT GESTATİONAL DIABETES MELLITUS→Ultrasound Assessment Of Gastric Volume In Pregnant Women Undergoing Elective Cesarean Section
    + 2 other changes: responsible party and description

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07816705
Lead sponsor
Gaziantep City Hospital
Responsible party
Mehmet Tunç (Resident pysician, Gaziantep City Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Sep 14, 2026
Start date
Nov 15, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Sep 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 6, 2026

Study contacts

Mehmet Tunç
Contact
otuncoo@gmail.com
+90 542 373 6350

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Sep 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion