ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07530926SMA-ABCUpdated Apr 24, 2026

Adrenal& Bone Complications in Paediatric Patients Living With Spinal Muscular Atrophy (SMA)

An observational study in SMA - Spinal Muscular Atrophy, sponsored by Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 0 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-24.

Sponsored by Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
550
Ages
0 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a genetic disorder that is known to cause damage to specialised nerve cells, called motor neurons. These neurons are located in the spinal cord and transfer signals from the brain to muscles to allow movement. A lack of nerve signalling leads to progressive muscle weakness and wasting, which affects a person' mobility, breathing and swallowing. Treatments have only recently been developed and there are now three commercially available drugs for SMA. These drugs improve survival and mobility of patients with SMA. Patients are surviving longer but other problems apart from muscle weakness have been found in patients with SMA that may be related to SMA. One of the additional problems in SMA investigators have noted is poor bone health. Investigators observed low impact fractures, vertebral fractures, and reduce bone density from a very early age in our cohort.

Investigators however do not know if this is related to reduced mobility and subsequent loss of muscle loading of bone in SMA or if this is a direct effect of reduced Survival Motor Neuron (SMN) protein. The natural history of bone health in SMA patients is not well described. Investigators also do not know if the drugs used to treat SMA improves bone health. The additional need of high dose steroids in patients receiving onasemnogene abeparvovec (OA) may also reduce bone health in those receiving this therapy. There are also no licensed treatments for the management of fragile bones (osteoporosis) in children or guidelines or consensus on management of osteoporosis or fractures in SMA.

Investigators want to study the bone health in paediatric patients with SMA in UK by looking at the incidence and type of fractures and comparing this in the different drug therapy groups against those who do not receive a SMA drug, assess impact of duration of steroid use and bone health in those that received onasemnogene aberparvovec, and to determine what needs to be measured and recorded to assess bone health most effectively in SMA. To do this investigators will be utilising data collected nationally through the SMA REACH UK network already and study medical records on data that is felt important but not collected by the SMA REACH UK database. Investigators are only planning to review existing information - no additional tests will be performed.

Read the detailed description

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is an autosomal recessive neuromuscular disorder characterised by the dysfunction and degeneration of specialised nerve cells, the motor neurons1 This leads to progressive muscle wasting and weakness affecting mobility, respiration and bulbar function. The worldwide incidence of SMA is approximately 1 in 10,000 live births 2,3. The disease is caused by homozygous deletion and/or mutations of the survival motor neuron 1 (SMN1) gene on chromosome 5, encoding SMN protein. SMN protein is vital for the survival and health of motor neurons.

In humans, SMN protein is also encoded by a paralogous gene, SMN2, also located on chromosome 5 in varying copy numbers. Due to a single nucleotide difference from SMN1 (a change of cytosine to thymidine in exon 7), the majority of SMN protein encoded is truncated and unstable. Approximately 10% of SMN protein produced from SMN2 is functional and can compensate for SMN1 mutations.3 Disease severity of SMA is therefore largely dependent on the number of SMN2 copies, with greater copy numbers associated with milder forms of the disease. SMA has been classified into five types (0,1,2,3,4) based on age of onset and best motor function. Type 0 is a very rare severe type of SMA with symptoms beginning in-utero. Type 1, a severe and the most common form (50-60% of cases), with onset before 6 months, is associated with one to two copies of SMN2. Untreated type 1 SMA usually leads to death before the age of 2. In contrast, type 4, the mildest form with adult onset, is associated with more than four copies of SMN2.

There are now three commercially available drugs shown to improve survival and mobility of patients with SMA1.

They work either by increasing functional SMN protein production via targeting SMN2 activity (risdiplam and nusinersen) or by introducing a fully functional copy of the SMN1 gene (onasemnogene abeparvovec). The drugs can be administered locally, to target key functional areas (intrathecal nusinersen), or systemically (orally administered risdiplam and intravenously administered onasemnogene abeparvovec).

Since introduction of commercially available drugs for spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) in the UK in 2018, mostpatients with SMA, particularly the paediatric population (under 16 years old) have tried at least one of the three disease modifying drugs that increases SMN protein production. These drugs evidently improve survival and ventilatory outcomes along with changes to other domains of function as well (e.g., mobility). Patients are now surviving longer than in the natural history of the condition. Cell culture systems suggest SMN protein interacting with osteoclast stimulating factor (OSF) leading to signaling cascade inducing stimulators for osteoclast (cells that degrade bone) formation5. Smn-/- SMN2 mouse models of SMA had osteoporotic bone phenotype on microcomputed tomography analysis. Results also show decreased osteoblast differentiation markers, osteocalcin, osteopontin and osterix mRNA expression with increased rate of osteoclast formation and bone resorption capacity, all these indicating SMA mice have higher bone turnover with increased bone resorption and osteoclast formation. Immobility or reduced mobility and the subsequent loss of muscle loading of bone in SMA can lead to secondary osteoporosis with low bone mass and increased fracture risk. There have been case reports of congenital fractures in SMA7,8, but also in older patients9. Furthermore, when bone mineral density (BMD) is compared between different paediatric neuromuscular disorders including Duchenne muscular dystrophy, children with SMA had the lowest BMD, although use of steroids or vertebral fractures were not controlled in the Duchenne muscular dystrophy group10. BMD also differed significantly between walkers and non-walkers (Z-score of -1.07 vs -2.70, P\< 0.05) in the SMA cohort with no difference in the mean age of the walkers and non-walkers10.

The largest natural history cohort studies to date, prior to use of SMA specific drugs, of children with SMA and bone health was performed in 2017, and included 85 children with type 1 to 3 SMA (24 SMA type 1, 44 SMA type 2, and 17 SMA type 3) but excluded children less than 12 months old and those on drugs or medical conditions known to affect bone metabolism e.g. corticosteroids11. The study concluded that SMA children had high prevalence of low BMD and fractures at a young age, with SMA type 1 having the lowest areal BMD at all skeletal sites. Low BMD was common at the lateral distal femur where fractures often occur in these patients, but only 12.9% met the criteria of osteoporosis in children (The International Society for Clinical Densitometry, ISCD, 2013 peadiatric criteria).

There has only been one small study (N=32)12 published which included patients on novel drugs for SMA looking at bone health in children with SMA. This study only had BMD data on two type 1 SMA patients, the most common and severe type of SMA. The study did not have any patients who received onasemnogene abeparvovec treatment.

Low BMD in the paediatric SMA population has been reported variably between 16.7 to 93.3% over the last twenty years8 and there is no agreement on factors that are associated with low BMD. Femur fractures seem the predominant fracture type, with the distal femur being involved most commonly11,12. There is only one study specifically on intravenous bisphosphonate use in children with SMA for osteoporosis and low BMD and included 8 children (6 type 1 and 2 type 2 SMA) who were all on nusinersen13. The study showed that intravenous bisphosphonates appeared safe and effective in reducing fractures in children with SMA.

A retrospective analysis of 28 children with SMA (16 type 1, 7 type 2, 4 type 3 and 1 pre-symptomatic) receiving neuromuscular care in Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust (SCFT), all of whom have now had SMA drug treatment with either one or more of SMA drugs, nusinersen, risdiplam or onasemnogene abeparvovec, showed that 13/28 (46%) had osteopenia reported radiologically, some as early as 1 year of age. These are seen in various bones on x-ray e.g. ribs, pelvis, femur, vertebrae and feet and can also be detected in some on dual energy Xray absorptiometry (dual-energy X-ray absorptiometr (DXA) scan) with or without vertebral fracture assessment (VFA). 1 in 7 (4 children) had a fracture and the majority (4 of 6) were in the femur, some with very trivial impact. One child had two fractures on the same femur at different timepoints and a vertebral fracture. Two children had bisphosphonate treatment for osteoporosis, vertebral fractures were present in both.

There are currently no national or international guidelines, nor consensus, on the management of secondary osteoporosis or fragility fractures in patients living with SMA14, particularly after introduction of SMA modifying drugs. There are no licensed treatments for the management of osteoporosis in children. The mainstay of treatment is with intravenous bisphosphonates and its duration is important to explore. The need for immunosuppression with prednisolone post-omnasemnogene aberparvovec infusion may have secondary effects to reduce bone integrity. There is no evidence to date on the effect of a course of prednisolone on bone health in infants and very young children with SMA.

Investigators propose reviewing data available on the paediatric SMA REACH UK database (currently about 600 active patients) on bone health (DXA scan results, vitamin D levels and supplements, fractures, endocrinologist input, bisphosphonate use) and associated parameters that may contribute to bone health (SMA type, SMN2 copy numbers, ambulation, motor scores, use of SMA drugs, and use of other drugs including steroids contributing to bone health, growth parameters). Investigators would then obtain further information on patients with bone health events or risk factors for suboptimal bone health (fractures, DXA scan, bisphosphonate treatment and long-term steroid treatment) from the local neuromuscular centres that are not recorded on the paediatric SMA REACH UK database. Understanding bone health status in this retrospective observational dataset will allow us to consider important factors in bone health in SMA patients and design prospective studies to improve bone health outcomes and inform standards of care in this field.

The primary hypothesis to be tested is that patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) have low bone density and increased fracture risk. The secondary hypothesis is that treating SMA with commercially available drugs that increase SMN protein production improves bone density and reduces fracture risks in patients with SMA.

02

Conditions studied

  • SMA - Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Keywords

  • Bone mineral density
  • Spinal muscular atrophy
  • Vertebral fracture assessment
  • Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry
03

In context

Muscular Atrophy, Spinal

282 studies on the registry are indexed under Muscular Atrophy, Spinal; 73 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 550 is above the median of 139 across 114 observational studies indexed under Muscular Atrophy, Spinal.

Browse Muscular Atrophy, Spinal studies →

Lead sponsor

Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust is the lead sponsor of 53 studies on the registry; 10 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
0 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Participants included on the paediatric SMA REACH UK database

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Participants who have been consented by 1 May 2025 and included on the paediatric SMA REACH UK database who are younger than 16 years.
  • Participants included on the paediatric SMA REACH UK database who are over the age of 16 years on 1 May 2025 who have been reconsented by SMA REACH UK after the age of 16 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • If participants included on the paediatric SMA REACH UK database who are over the age of 16 years on 1 May 2025 have not been reconsented after turning 16 years old, retrospective data from after the age of 16 years will not be included.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Retrospective
Enrollment
550 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No
06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Outcome

    To determine the prevalence and type of fractures in paediatric patients living with SMA in the UK.

    Time frame: Through study completion, and average of 1 year

Secondary outcomes

  1. Secondary Outcome

    To compare the prevalence of fractures in patients living with SMA who receive disease modifying drugs (risdiplam, nusinersen or onasemnogene abeparvovec) to those who do not.

    Time frame: Through study completion, and average of 1 year

  2. Secondary Outcome

    To determine the proportion of paediatric patients with SMA in the UK who have had an assessment of their bone density.

    Time frame: Through study completion, and average of 1 year

  3. Secondary Outcome

    To determine the prevalence of low bone mineral density in paediatric patients with SMA in the UK.

    Time frame: Through study completion, and average of 1 year

  4. Secondary Outcome

    To compare the prevalence of low bone mineral density in patients living with SMA who receive disease modifying drugs (risdiplam, nusinersen or onasemnogene abeparvovec) to those who do not.

    Time frame: Through study completion, and average of 1 year

  5. Secondary Outcome

    To identify bone health risk factors in paediatric patients with SMA in the UK.

    Time frame: Through study completion, and average of 1 year

  6. Secondary Outcome

    To evaluate the variation in practice across the UK of the individual neuromuscular centres with respect to the management (screening, testing, treatment) of bone health in paediatric patients with SMA in the UK.

    Time frame: Through study completion, and average of 1 year

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for May 2026; primary completion for Jun 2027, 13 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Nov 14, 2025
First posted
Apr 15, 2026
StartEst.
May 1, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 1, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 1, 2027
Last update
Apr 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07530926
Lead sponsor
Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 15, 2026
Start date
May 1, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 24, 2026

Study contacts

Gillian Gatenby
Contact
gillian.gatenby@nhs.net
01142267980 ext. 7980
Charlotte Heath
Contact
charlotte.heath17@nhs.net
01142267980 ext. 7980
Min Tsui Ong
principal investigator · Sheffield Children's NHS Foundation Trust

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion