ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07529418BALANCEUpdated Oct 27, 2026

The BALANCE Study: BlAck and Mixed Men's Lived Experience With Prostate cANCEr-Diversity in Prostate Cancer PROMS Study

An observational study in Prostate Cancer, sponsored by Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom. Recruiting at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to male participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-10-27.

Sponsored by Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Updated Oct 27, 2026Now RecruitingFirst site in Netherlands+5 moreGo to Updates ↓
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
800
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
Male
01

Study summary

The BALANCE study is a prospective Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) study developed to look at the quality of life (QoL) of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) in communities underrepresented in research, especially Black men of African, and Caribbean ancestry as well as men of Mixed ethnicity. This study will also investigate various PCa treatment types and their mental health impact on patients. There is a lack of research on PROMs in diverse populations. Collecting PROMs specifically from Black men and individuals with prostates who are receiving/have received treatment for PCa is essential for understanding their unique post-treatment experiences. The insights are vital to addressing documented disparities, tailoring supportive care and ultimately providing equitable health outcomes.

Participants in this study will be asked to complete a questionnaire (either electronically or hardcopy) to share their insights following their PCa diagnosis.

Read the detailed description

The BALANCE study is a Patient Reported Outcomes Measures (PROMs) study developed to look at the quality of life (QoL) of patients diagnosed with prostate cancer (PCa) in communities underrepresented in research, especially Black men of African, and Caribbean ancestry as well as men of Mixed ethnicity. This study is a questionnaire based study collecting data through electronic surveys. The study will also investigate various PCa treatment types and their mental health impact on patients. There is a lack of research on PROMs in diverse populations. Collecting PROMs specifically from Black men and individuals with prostates who are receiving/have received treatment for PCa is essential for understanding their unique post-treatment experiences. The insights are vital to addressing documented disparities, tailoring supportive care and ultimately providing equitable health outcomes.

The study will recruit a minimum of 800 participants who will be asked to complete an electronic survey. Participants will be aged 18 years or over and have had a prostate cancer diagnosis. All participants will be asked to provide informed consent before proceeding with the survey. After consenting, participants will be able to access the electronic survey. Participants will have the opportunity to save their results and access the survey across multiple sessions if not able to complete in one sitting. However, they will be asked to complete the survey only once.

Potential participants will be identified through collaboration with cancer charities, support groups, hospitals, study advertisements in the press, use of social media (in collaboration with the European Association of Urology Patient Office, the funders of the study), outreach work in communities, presentations, cancer alliances, posters/leaflets and animation videos about the study that could be displayed in hospitals, public spaces and other community organisations. Participants will be able to either contact the study team, their associated cancer charity or support group to express interest in taking part in this study and receive further information.

02

Conditions studied

  • Prostate Cancer

Browse trials for

03

In context

Prostatic Neoplasms

7,046 studies on the registry are indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms; 1,580 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 800 is above the median of 200 across 1,310 observational studies indexed under Prostatic Neoplasms.

Browse Prostatic Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom is the lead sponsor of 113 studies on the registry; 27 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
Male
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study will recruit a minimum of 800 participants who are of either Black African, Caribbean or Mixed ancestry who will be asked to complete an electronic survey. Participants will be aged 18 years or over and have had a prostate cancer diagnosis.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

In order to be eligible to participate in this study, a subject must meet all of the following criteria:

  • Age ≥ 18 years;
  • Be of either:

    • Black African ancestry; OR
    • Black African-Caribbean ancestry; OR
    • Mixed Black ancestry.
  • Diagnosed with PCa;
  • Assigned male at birth;
  • Participants with access to digital devices (smartphones, tablets, computers) or able to complete hardcopy versions of the survey;
  • Participants willing to participate and provide .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

A potential subject who meets any of the following criteria will be excluded from participation in this study:

  • Participants having no diagnosis of PCa;
  • Participants unable to provide consent;
  • Participants assigned female at birth.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
800 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Black men and those of Mixed ethnicity.

    Black men of African, and Caribbean ancestry as well as men of Mixed ethnicity.

    Other: Patient Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs)

Interventions

  • OtherPatient Reported Outcome Measurements (PROMs)

    Patient Reported Outcome Measurements collected via questionnaire

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The impact of prostate cancer on quality of life

    Impact of prostate cancer on quality of life measured through European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30): overall health score, overall Quality of Life (QoL) score. Minimum score =1; Maximum = 7; a higher score = better outcome; a lower score = worse outcome.

    Time frame: 18 months

  2. The physical impact of treatments on quality of life

    Physical impact of treatments on quality of life measured through the Expanded Prostate cancer Index Composite 26 (EPIC-26): sexual function, urinary function; bowel function; hormonal related symptoms. The EPIC-26 consists of multiple measurements where the lowest score indicates a better outcome while the highest score indicates a worst outcome.

    Time frame: 18 months

  3. The impact of treatments in mental health outcomes

    Impact of treatments in mental health outcomes measured through European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30): anxiety, depression, financial worries. Minimum score =1; Maximum = 4; a lower score = better outcome; a higher score = worse outcome.

    Time frame: 18 months

  4. The functional impact of treatments on quality of life

    Functional impact of treatments on quality of life measured through European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 (EORTC-QLQ-C30): energy levels, physical activity. Minimum score =1; Maximum = 4; a lower score = better outcome; a higher score = worse outcome.

    Time frame: 18 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Usability and acceptance of ePROMs

    The ease of use and acceptability of the electronic questionnaire will be measured by comparing the number of men who complete it online with the number who choose a paper version. We will also assess the quality of the information collected by comparing the number of unanswered questions in each format.

    Time frame: 18 months

  2. Barriers and facilitators to successful ePROMs implementation

    Identification of barriers and facilitators to successful ePROMs implementation.

    Time frame: 18 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Anonymised data can be applied for via the Data Access Committee.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Aug 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 16 months after the start.

Of 541 non-industry observational studies under Prostatic Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 67 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 162. This study's planned 16 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 650 studies reached it within 60 months; a quarter within 29 and three quarters within 141.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Oct 27, 2026: start May 2026 → Aug 2026, primary completion Mar 2027 → Dec 2027 and completion Mar 2027 → Dec 2027.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 8, 2026
First posted
Apr 14, 2026
StartActual
Aug 21, 2026was May 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 2027was Mar 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027was Mar 2027
Last update
Oct 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Status
Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
changed Oct 27, 2026
Sites
1 site added — first site in Netherlands
Show site
  • The Erasmus MC · Rotterdam, Netherlands
Oct 27, 2026
Start date
May 5, 2026→Aug 21, 2026 (actual)
Oct 27, 2026
Primary completion
Mar 2027→Dec 2027
Oct 27, 2026
Study completion
Mar 2027→Dec 2027
Oct 27, 2026
Primary outcomes
1 removed, 4 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • RemovedVariation in health and wellbeing outcomes by treatment type and sociodemographic characteristics.Time frame: 18 months
  • DescriptionThe functional impact of treatments on quality of life: how it is measured was reworded
  • DescriptionThe impact of prostate cancer on quality of life: how it is measured was reworded
  • DescriptionThe impact of treatments in mental health outcomes: how it is measured was reworded
  • DescriptionThe physical impact of treatments on quality of life: how it is measured was reworded
Oct 27, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 description edited
What changed in the outcomes
  • DescriptionUsability and acceptance of ePROMs: how it is measured was reworded
Oct 27, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Oct 27, 2026
    Not yet recruiting→Recruiting
    1 site added — first site in Netherlands
    Show site
    • The Erasmus MC · Rotterdam, Netherlands
    Start date May 5, 2026→Aug 21, 2026 (now actual)
    Primary completion Mar 2027→Dec 2027
    Study completion Mar 2027→Dec 2027
    Primary outcomes 1 removed, 4 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • RemovedVariation in health and wellbeing outcomes by treatment type and sociodemographic characteristics.Time frame: 18 months
    • DescriptionThe functional impact of treatments on quality of life: how it is measured was reworded
    • DescriptionThe impact of prostate cancer on quality of life: how it is measured was reworded
    • DescriptionThe impact of treatments in mental health outcomes: how it is measured was reworded
    • DescriptionThe physical impact of treatments on quality of life: how it is measured was reworded
    Secondary outcomes 1 description edited
    What changed in the outcomes
    • DescriptionUsability and acceptance of ePROMs: how it is measured was reworded
    + 2 other changes: verification date and responsible party

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07529418
Collaborators
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, European Association of Urology
Responsible party
Elizabeth Bancroft (Nurse Consultant, Institute of Cancer Research, United Kingdom) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 14, 2026
Start date
Aug 21, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Oct 27, 2026

Study contacts

Esther Robijn
Contact
e.robijn@uroweb.org
+31 (0)26 389 0680
Denzil James, MSc
Contact
denzil.james@rmh.nhs.uk
+44 (0)20 87224483
Eamonn Rogers, FRCS(Urol)
study director · The European Association of Urology Patient Office

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion