ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07527676HypoFear-T1DMUpdated Apr 14, 2026

Hypoglycemia Fear Affect Autonomic Function, Physical Activity, and Exercise Capacity in Type I Diabetes

An observational study in Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus, sponsored by Ordu University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 10 Years to 18 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-14.

Sponsored by Ordu University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
67
Ages
10 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This cross-sectional study aims to investigate whether fear of hypoglycemia affects autonomic function, physical activity levels, and exercise capacity in children and adolescents with T1DM.

The main question it aims to answer is:

Does Fear of Hypoglycemia Affect Autonomic Function, Physical Activity, and Exercise Capacity in Children and Adolescents with Type I Diabetes? Participants will answer questionnaires about fear of Hypoglycemia and physical activity. Heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), blood pressure (BP), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) will evaluate for autonomic function.

Read the detailed description

Fear of hypoglycemia (FoH) is a specific fear caused by the risk and/or occurrence of hypoglycemia, and is associated with the frequency of severe hypoglycemic episodes, particularly during the past 3 months. FoH is a major barrier to physical activity and exercise in children and adolescents in T1DM. . Hypoglycaemic stress provides an ideal model with which to examine the interactions and consequences of physiological stress on the autonomic nervous system (ANS). Acute hypoglycaemia has been shown to increase inflammatory markers and impair cardiac-vagal baroreflex sensitivity, and exacerbate autonomic and cardiovascular dysregulation in adults with T1DM. Recurrent hypoglycemia can weaken autonomic responses and reduce awareness of hypoglycemia, which can increase FoH in individuals, leading to behavioral changes and impaired glycemic control. Therefore this study aims to investigate whether fear of hypoglycemia affects autonomic function, physical activity levels, and exercise capacity in children and adolescents with T1DM. Participants will answer questionnaires about fear of Hypoglycemia and physical activity. Heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), blood pressure (BP), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) will evaluate for autonomic function. Incremental shuttle walking test will use to assess exercise capacity of participants.

02

Conditions studied

  • Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Keywords

  • Hypoglycemia
  • physical activity
  • heart rate
03

In context

Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1

3,754 studies on the registry are indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1; 600 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 67 is below the median of 125 across 792 observational studies indexed under Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1.

Browse Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1 studies →

Lead sponsor

Ordu University is the lead sponsor of 32 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Children and adolescents with diagnosed T1DM

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • being aged 10-18 years,
  • having been diagnosed with T1DM at least one year ago,
  • having an of ≤7% in the last three months,
  • being literate in Turkish,
  • voluntarily participating in the study.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • visual, auditory or cognitive problems that would prevent participation, orthopaedic or neurological problems (e.g. walking or running difficulties) that would prevent participation,
  • \<18.5 kg/m², any complications related to T1DM,
  • being in the insulin/sensor dose adjustment/adjustment phase or having a history of diabetic ketoacidosis in the last month.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Cross-sectional
Enrollment
67 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Type 1 Diabetes Participants

    Children and adolecants with Type 1DM participating in autonomic function, exercise capacity, and physical activity assessments. No intervention is applied beyond standard care.

    Other: No intervention (observational study)

Interventions

  • OtherNo intervention (observational study)

    No interventions; patient-reported, functional performance-based and HRV analysis.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The University of Virginia Child/Teen Low Blood Sugar Survey (C-LBSS)

    C-LBSS was developed to assess FoH in children and adolescents. The Turkish version of C-LBSS with Cronbach's alpha of 0.843 and a test-retest correlation of 0.997 will used to assess FoH in this study. It consists of 25 items and includes two sub-dimensions measuring children's/adolescents' levels of hypoglycemia-related behaviors (items 1-10) and anxiety (items 11-25). Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale (0 = "never" to 4 = "almost always"), and the total score on the scale ranges from 0 to 100, with an increase in the score indicating increased FoH.

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)

Secondary outcomes

  1. Autonomic Function

    Heart rate (HR), heart rate variability (HRV), blood pressure (BP), and peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO₂) will evaluate. Polar H10 chest-type HR sensor (Polar Electro Oy, Kempele, Finland) will use. The Polar H10 is a sensor that records R-R intervals based on electrocardiographic principles and provides data suitable for HRV analysis. The sensor was placed at heart level, at the sternum level, via a chest strap according to the manufacturer's instructions. The obtained data will transferred via Bluetooth connection to an iPhone 13 (Apple Inc., Cupertino, CA, USA) used as a mobile device and recorded via the Polar Flow application (© Polar Electro, 2024). HRV analyses will performed using Kubios HRV Standard software (version 3.5.0, Kubios Oy, Finland).

    Time frame: Baseline and immediately post-ISWT (Day 1)

  2. Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C)

    Consisting of ten items and two sub-dimensions, nine of these are used to calculate the physical activity score. The tenth item assesses whether the child has been unable to perform their normal activities due to illness or disability in the last week. The total score is obtained by calculating the average of the scores from the first 9 items, with an average close to 1 indicating a low level of physical activity and an average close to 5 indicating a high level. The first sub-dimension of the questionnaire includes items 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9, which cover physical activities performed "outside of school," while the second sub-dimension includes items 2, 3, and 4, which cover physical activities performed "inside of school."

    Time frame: Baseline (Day 1)

  3. Physical Activity Questionnaire for Adolescents (PAQ-A)

    It consists of nine items, the first eight of which are scored on a five-point Likert scale. The ninth item asks whether normal activities were performed in the last week due to illness or another reason, and it is not included in the total score calculation. The total score is obtained by calculating the average of the first eight items' scores, with an average close to 1 indicating a low level of physical activity and an average close to 5 indicating a high level.

    Time frame: Baseline

  4. Incremental shuttle walking test (ISWT)

    ISWT will use to assess exercise capacity of participants. Two cones will used on a flat, non-slip surface, 9 m apart in this test. The course is calculated as 10 m, assuming a 50 cm turning distance around the cones. Participants are asked to walk back and forth between the two cones, following signals from a pre-recorded standard audio file. The test will start with the first tempo signal given after three preparatory signals. Participants must be at the opposite cone each time an audio signal is given. The starting walking speed in the test is 0.50 m/s, and the speed is increased by 0.17 m/s every minute. The protocol consists of a total of 12 levels, each representing one-minute increments. Each 10 m walk is considered a shuttle, and the total walking distance is calculated by the number of shuttles completed.

    Time frame: Baseline (day 1)

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Limberg JK, Farni KE, Taylor JL, Dube S, Basu A, Basu R, Wehrwein EA, Joyner MJ. Autonomic control during acute hypoglycemia in type 1 diabetes mellitus. Clin Auton Res. 2014 Dec;24(6):275-83. doi: 10.1007/s10286-014-0253-y. Epub 2014 Sep 27. PubMed 25260537 ↗
  • Singh SJ, Morgan MD, Scott S, Walters D, Hardman AE. Development of a shuttle walking test of disability in patients with chronic airways obstruction. Thorax. 1992 Dec;47(12):1019-24. doi: 10.1136/thx.47.12.1019. PubMed 1494764 ↗
  • The University of Virginia Child/Teen Low Blood Sugar Survey: Turkish Validity and Reliability Study
  • Erdim L, Ergun A, Kuguoglu S. Reliability and validity of the Turkish version of the Physical Activity Questionnaire for Older Children (PAQ-C). Turk J Med Sci. 2019 Feb 11;49(1):162-169. doi: 10.3906/sag-1806-212. PubMed 30764593 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for May 2026; primary completion for Jun 2026, 1 month later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 5, 2026
First posted
Apr 14, 2026
StartEst.
May 2, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 30, 2026
Last update
Apr 14, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07527676
Lead sponsor
Ordu University
Responsible party
Semiha Yenişehir (Principal Investigator, Ordu University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 14, 2026
Start date
May 2, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 14, 2026

Study contacts

SEMİHA YENİŞEHİR, Assist. Prof. Dr
Contact
ysehir.semiha8@gmail.com
+90 (452) 226 52 00

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Apr 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion