ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07515742Updated Apr 13, 2026

Empowering Youth With School Discipline Referrals as Peer Coaches

An interventional study of Peer Coach Training (PCT) and Delayed control in Disruptive Behavior, sponsored by University of Southern California. Recruiting at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 10 Years to 15 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-13.

Sponsored by University of Southern California · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
150
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
10 Years to 15 Years
Sex
All
01

Where this study stands

Counted across the records on this site · 2026-11-12

Among 92 studies in Problem Behavior with a site in United States — 25 open to participants now, 29 under way, 1 of them phase 3. Problem Behavior · United States.

Planned enrollment
25th of 86
150 · median 71
Started
2026
with 6 others
No phase
73 of 92
20 open now
Primary completion
2027-12
later than 15 of 28 live
Registered
87th of 92
by date

Among the 92 studies in Problem Behavior with a site in United States, this one is the 25th largest by planned enrollment of the 86 interventional ones that give a count, is one of 7 that started in 2026, is one of 73 with no phase, reaches primary completion later than 15 of the 28 other live ones, and was the 87th registered.

Problem Behavior

178 studies on the registry are indexed under Problem Behavior; 47 are open to participants now.

Browse Problem Behavior studies →

Open to participants now

25 of the 92 studies in Problem Behavior with a site in United States are open now. Recruiting first, the newest first:

19 more — sign in →

All 25 open studies →

A study can be open while its sites in United States have not opened yet or have stopped. Only those recruiting at a site in United States →

Who these studies take

Of the 36 Problem Behavior studies recruiting now, 9 (25%) set no upper age limit and 26 (72%) stop at 75 or younger; 28 take children under 18; 18 take healthy volunteers.

This study: 10 Years to 15 Years · all sexes · no healthy volunteers.

The full table on the hub →

This tab as a report to print or save as PDF → With an account.

Was this useful?
Watch this landscapeDownload CSVNarrow it in search →With an account: a weekly mail of what changed among 92 studies in Problem Behavior with a site in United States, or all of them as a file.
02

Study summary

The study will examine the effects of Peer Coach Training (PCT), a strengths-based behavioral intervention for discipline-referred middle-school youth who might benefit when trained to act as change agents for their peers. Successful completion of this study will provide support for implementing PCT in school communities to empower youth in prosocial peer engagement.

Read the detailed description

In this proposal, the investigators evaluate the effects of PCT, an approach that deemphasizes existing problems and focuses instead on training youth to help their peers.

In urban public school districts across the US, exclusionary discipline (e.g., suspension and expulsion) disproportionally affects Black and Latinx youth. Although many school-based interventions are promising, they overlook the motivational potential of helping others and fail to build on the culturally grounded prosocial orientation of Black and Latinx students. This study evaluates the effectiveness of Peer Coach Training (PCT), a strengths-based intervention that deemphasizes existing problems and focuses instead on empowering youth to help their peers. A cluster randomized trial will be conducted across ten middle schools (n=150 youth), with schools randomized to either PCT or control (i.e., delayed treatment). Youth referred for disruptive behavior at intervention schools will receive PCT immediately, whereas youth at control schools will receive PCT nine months later. Outcomes related to disruptive and prosocial behavior, school engagement, and empowerment will be assessed at baseline, post-intervention, and follow-up. Successful completion of this trial will not only provide support for implementing PCT in school communities to empower youth prosocially, but also potentially validate an approach to reducing discipline disparities within school contexts.

03

Conditions studied

  • Disruptive Behavior

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Strengths-based interventions
  • Help-giving
  • Youth prosociality
  • Disruptive behaviors
  • Discipline-referred middle-school youth
04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
10 Years to 15 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Youth who have received at least one disciplinary referral between the first day of school and recruitment

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Youth who have not received any disciplinary referrals between the first day of school and recruitment
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
150 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Peer Coach Training (PCT)

    Discipline-referred middle-school youth in schools randomized to the experimental arm will be offered immediate PCT delivered by trained research team members

    Behavioral: Peer Coach Training (PCT)

  • Active comparator
    Delayed control

    Discipline-referred middle-school youth in schools randomized to the delayed control will be provided behavioral services according to their middle school's standard practice of care. These youth will receive PCT after completion of follow-up assessments.

    Behavioral: Delayed control

Interventions

  • BehavioralPeer Coach Training (PCT)

    Six to seven session strengths-based behavioral intervention focusing on skills development and help-giving practices

  • BehavioralDelayed control

    Services offered by middle schools for students according to their standard practice of care. These youth will then receive PCT after completion of follow-up assessments.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Behavioral Problem Checklist

    12-item self-report questionnaire that assesses youth behavioral problems

    Time frame: Baseline assessment, 3 months after baseline assessment, 8 months after baseline assessment

  2. Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire

    25-item self-report questionnaire that assesses youth emotional symptoms, conduct problems, hyperactivity, peer problems, and prosocial behavior, along with additional questions related to functioning

    Time frame: Baseline assessment, 3 months after baseline assessment, 8 months after baseline assessment

  3. Teacher Disruptive Behavior Disorders Rating Scale

    45-item self-report questionnaire that assesses symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder, oppositional defiant disorder, and conduct disorder

    Time frame: Baseline assessment, 3 months after baseline assessment, 8 months after baseline assessment

  4. School archival data of youth behavior and discipline

    School archival records of behavioral and disciplinary outcomes such as the number of disciplinary referrals and citations, as well as suspensions and exclusions

    Time frame: Baseline assessment, 3 months after baseline assessment, 8 months after baseline assessment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Engagement versus disaffection with learning - student report

    20-item self-report questionnaire that assesses youth behavioral and emotional engagement in learning

    Time frame: Baseline assessment, 3 months after baseline assessment, 8 months after baseline assessment

  2. MacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status - Youth Version

    2-item self-report measure that assesses youths' perceived social status relative to society and peers in school

    Time frame: Baseline assessment, 3 months after baseline assessment, 8 months after baseline assessmentMacArthur Scale of Subjective Social Status - Youth Version

  3. Moral Identity Internalization Scale

    5-item self-report measure that assesses the degree to which a list of personal characteristics are important to an individual

    Time frame: Baseline assessment, 3 months after baseline assessment, 8 months after baseline assessment

  4. Personal Efficacy Scale

    10-item self-report measure that assesses an individual's perceived ability to deal with challenges and influence outcomes

    Time frame: Baseline assessment, 3 months after baseline assessment, 8 months after baseline assessment

  5. Psychological Empowerment Indices - Youth School Belonging and Identification

    6-item self-report measure that assesses school belonging and identification

    Time frame: Baseline assessment, 3 months after baseline assessment, 8 months after baseline assessment

  6. Wentzel Prosocial Peer Goals and Compliance Goals Scales

    22-item self-report measure that assesses the frequency youth work towards prosocial, compliance, mastery, and evaluation goals

    Time frame: Baseline assessment, 3 months after baseline assessment, 8 months after baseline assessment

  7. Esbensen Gang Involvement Scale

    20-item self-report measure that assesses the level of youth gang involvement and behaviors of the youths' friends

    Time frame: Baseline assessment, 3 months after baseline assessment, 8 months after baseline assessment

  8. Possible selves survey

    Self-report measure that assesses youths' future-oriented self-concept (expected, hoped-for, and feared selves) using open-ended prompts and a rating scale

    Time frame: Baseline assessment, 3 months after baseline assessment, 8 months after baseline assessment

  9. Behavioral Problem Checklist - Youth Peer Assessment

    12-item self-report questionnaire that assesses behavioral problems of the youths' peers

    Time frame: Baseline assessment, 3 months after baseline assessment, 8 months after baseline assessment

  10. Child and Adolescent Social Support Scale (Social Network Interview)

    48-item interview that assesses youths' perceived social support from parents, teachers, classmates, and friends

    Time frame: Baseline assessment, 3 months after baseline assessment, 8 months after baseline assessment

  11. Teacher Construals Indices

    23 self-report items that assesses teacher's commitment and feelings towards their students

    Time frame: Baseline assessment, 3 months after baseline assessment, 8 months after baseline assessment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Dec 2027, 21 months after the start.

Of 111 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Problem Behavior, half reached primary completion within 24 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 51. This study's planned 21 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 112 studies reached it within 24 months; a quarter within 13 and three quarters within 51.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 31, 2026
First posted
Apr 7, 2026
StartActual
Mar 24, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Dec 31, 2027
CompletionEst.
Jun 30, 2028
Last update
Apr 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07515742
Responsible party
Stanley Huey (Professor of Psychology, University of Southern California) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 7, 2026
Start date
Mar 24, 2026
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 30, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 13, 2026

Study contacts

Stanley J Huey, Ph.D.
Contact
hueyjr@usc.edu
213-740-2033
Janus Wong, B.A.
Contact
januswon@usc.edu
213-740-2203

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion