CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07509866Updated Sep 10, 2026

Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Ropivacaine With Perineural Dexamethasone or Dexmedetomidine as Adjuncts for Adductor Canal Block Combined With IPACK Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty

An interventional study of Liposomal bupivacaine (LB) and Ropivacaine with Perineural Dexamethasone in Total Knee Anthroplasty, Nerve Block and Ropivacaine, sponsored by Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 80 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-10.

Sponsored by Huazhong University of Science and Technology · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
90
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 80 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Effective postoperative pain management remains a cornerstone of enhanced recovery protocols following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Inadequate analgesia not only compromises patient satisfaction but also impedes early mobilization and rehabilitation, thereby increasing the risk of perioperative complications. Current multimodal analgesic strategies frequently incorporate regional techniques, with the adductor canal block (ACB) and infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) block emerging as established modalities that provide motor-sparing analgesia.

Despite their widespread adoption, the optimal local anesthetic regimen for these blocks remains undefined. While liposomal bupivacaine has garnered interest for its extended duration of action, its clinical efficacy relative to conventional local anesthetics combined with perineural adjuncts remains a subject of ongoing debate. Specifically, perineural dexamethasone and dexmedetomidine have each demonstrated the capacity to prolong the analgesic duration of ropivacaine; however, direct comparative data among these three distinct strategies-liposomal bupivacaine alone versus ropivacaine supplemented with either adjunct-are notably limited.

Given the absence of head-to-head randomized trials evaluating these three clinically viable techniques, the optimal approach to maximize analgesic duration while minimizing opioid-related adverse effects remains unclear. This study therefore aims to compare the analgesic efficacy and safety profiles of liposomal bupivacaine, ropivacaine with perineural dexamethasone, and ropivacaine with perineural dexmedetomidine when administered via ACB and IPACK blocks in patients undergoing TKA.

02

Conditions studied

  • Total Knee Anthroplasty
  • Nerve Block
  • Ropivacaine
  • Liposomal Bupivacaine

Keywords

  • total knee arthroplasty
  • adductor canal block
  • IPACK block
  • liposomal bupivacaine
  • ropivacaine
  • perineural adjuncts
  • dexamethasone
  • dexmedetomidine
  • multimodal analgesia
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 80 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients scheduled for elective primary unilateral total knee arthroplasty
  • Age ≥ 18 years and ≤ 80 years
  • American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III
  • Body mass index (BMI) ≥ 18 kg/m² and ≤ 35 kg/m²
  • Ability to understand and provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy or contraindication to local anesthetics (bupivacaine, ropivacaine), dexamethasone, dexmedetomidine, or opioids
  • Infection at the injection site
  • Coagulopathy or current use of anticoagulants
  • Severe cardiovascular disease (New York Heart Association [NYHA] functional class III or IV, or recent myocardial infarction within 6 months)
  • Severe hepatic impairment (Child-Pugh class C) or renal impairment (estimated glomerular filtration rate [eGFR] \< 30 mL/min/1.73 m²)
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (systolic blood pressure > 180 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure > 110 mmHg despite medical therapy)
  • Uncontrolled diabetes mellitus (HbA1c > 8.5%)
  • Bilateral TKA or revision TKA
  • Chronic opioid use (daily opioid consumption for > 3 months prior to surgery)
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial within 30 days prior to enrollment
  • Inability to communicate with study personnel or complete pain assessments (e.g., language barrier, cognitive impairment)
04

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Liposomal Bupivacaine Group

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive ultrasound-guided adductor canal block (ACB) and infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) block using liposomal bupivacaine 6.65%. A total volume of 40 mL will be administered, divided as 20 mL for the ACB and 20 mL for the IPACK block

    Drug: Liposomal bupivacaine (LB)

  • Active comparator
    Ropivacaine with perineural adjuncts Group

    Participants assigned to this arm will receive ultrasound-guided adductor canal block (ACB) and infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) block using ropivacaine 0.375% supplemented with perineural dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg or perineural dexamethasone 4 mg. A total volume of 40 mL will be administered, divided as 20 mL for the ACB and 20 mL for the IPACK block.

    Drug: Ropivacaine with Perineural Dexamethasone · Drug: Ropivacaine with Perineural Dexmedetomidine

Interventions

  • DrugLiposomal bupivacaine (LB)

    Liposomal bupivacaine 6.65% injection. A total volume of 40 mL will be administered as ultrasound-guided adductor canal block (ACB) and infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) block, divided as 20 mL for each block, prior to surgical incision.

  • DrugRopivacaine with Perineural Dexamethasone

    Ropivacaine 0.375% combined with dexamethasone 4 mg per block (total 8 mg) as a perineural adjunct. A total volume of 40 mL will be administered as ultrasound-guided adductor canal block (ACB) and infiltration between the popliteal artery and capsule of the knee (IPACK) block, divided as 20 mL for each block

  • DrugRopivacaine with Perineural Dexmedetomidine

    Ropivacaine 0.375% with dexmedetomidine 1 μg/kg (actual body weight). Total 40 mL (20 mL per block) via ultrasound-guided ACB and IPACK

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Total opioid consumption

    Total postoperative opioid consumption within 72 hour after surgery.

    Time frame: 72 hours

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pain scores at rest and during movement

    Visual Analog Scale (VAS, 0-100 mm) within 72 hour postoperatively.

    Time frame: 72 hours

  2. Time to First Ambulation

    Time from arrival in PACU to first ambulation

    Time frame: Postoperative day 0-2

  3. Duration of Hospital Stay

    Time from surgery to hospital discharge, measured in days.

    Time frame: 0-30 days

  4. Patient Satisfaction with Pain Management

    Patient satisfaction assessed using a 5-point Likert scale (1 = very dissatisfied, 5 = very satisfied).

    Time frame: 24 hours, 48 hours and 27 hours postoperatively

  5. Quality of Recovery

    Quality of recovery assessed using the Quality of Recovery-15 (QoR-15) questionnaire. Scores range from 0 to 150, with higher scores indicating better recovery.

    Time frame: Postoperative day 1-3

06

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
    Wuhan, Hubei 430022, China
    Recruiting
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Yuan Q, Shen W, He W, Wang X, Liu F, Zhang Y, Lu X, Guan Z, Zhang J, Yang L. Liposomal Bupivacaine for Adductor Canal Block Combined with IPACK Block in Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective, Double-Blind, Randomized Controlled Trial. Drug Des Devel Ther. 2026 Jan 14;20:566411. doi: 10.2147/DDDT.S566411. eCollection 2026. PubMed 41858908 ↗
  • Yang Z, Li S, Shen M, Lei W, Huang Y, Sun J, Cheng Y, Lu X. Efficacy and safety of liposomal bupivacaine versus ropivacaine with two adjuncts in serratus anterior plane block for video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a protocol for a single-centre, randomised, double-blinded trial. BMJ Open. 2025 Sep 17;15(9):e102326. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-102326. PubMed 40967653 ↗
  • Hussain N, Brummett CM, Brull R, Alghothani Y, Moran K, Sawyer T, Abdallah FW. Efficacy of perineural versus intravenous dexmedetomidine as a peripheral nerve block adjunct: a systematic review. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2021 Aug;46(8):704-712. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2020-102353. Epub 2021 May 11. PubMed 33975918 ↗
  • Liao C, Li J, Hu X, Sun Y, Zheng K, Pan X, Wang L. Liposomal Bupivacaine Versus Ropivacaine With Perineural Dexamethasone in Adductor Canal Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Arthroplasty. 2026 Aug;41(8):2364-2371.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2025.11.015. Epub 2025 Nov 13. PubMed 41240971 ↗
  • Kim DH, Liu J, Beathe JC, Lin Y, Wetmore DS, Kim SJ, Haskins SC, Garvin S, Oxendine JA, Ho MC, Allen AA, Popovic M, Gbaje E, Wu CL, Memtsoudis SG. Interscalene Brachial Plexus Block with Liposomal Bupivacaine versus Standard Bupivacaine with Perineural Dexamethasone: A Noninferiority Trial. Anesthesiology. 2022 Mar 1;136(3):434-447. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000004111. PubMed 35041742 ↗
  • Desai N, Kirkham KR, Albrecht E. Local anaesthetic adjuncts for peripheral regional anaesthesia: a narrative review. Anaesthesia. 2021 Jan;76 Suppl 1:100-109. doi: 10.1111/anae.15245. PubMed 33426668 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data sharing is not permitted due to restrictions in the informed consent form and institutional policy. Participants did not provide consent for sharing their data beyond the primary study. Additionally, the Institutional Review Board has not approved a data sharing plan for this trial.

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07509866
Lead sponsor
Huazhong University of Science and Technology
Responsible party
Xi Wu (Principal Investigator, Huazhong University of Science and Technology) — Principal investigator
First posted
Apr 3, 2026
Start date
Apr 9, 2026
Primary completion
Sep 4, 2026
Completion
Sep 8, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 10, 2026

Study contacts

Xi Wu
Contact
wu2018whuh@163.com
+8615871715431

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion