ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07771829QLESPUpdated Sep 29, 2026

QLESP Block Versus PENG+LFCN Block for Total Hip Arthroplasty

An interventional study of QLESP Block and PENG+LFCN Block in Pain Management and Arthroplasty Total Hip Replacement, sponsored by Huazhong University of Science and Technology. Recruiting at 1 site in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-29.

Sponsored by Huazhong University of Science and Technology · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Aug 2026; still recruiting 2 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
136
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common surgery to replace damaged hip joints, but many patients experience significant pain after surgery, which can delay recovery and increase the need for strong pain medications (opioids). Nerve blocks are a technique where anesthetic medication is injected near specific nerves to reduce pain. This study compares two different ultrasound-guided nerve block techniques for pain control after THA: the QLESP block (a newer technique that targets two areas with a single injection) and the PENG block combined with the LFCN block (a currently used technique that targets nerves around the hip joint and the outer thigh). Participants in this study will be randomly assigned (like a coin flip) to receive either the QLESP block or the PENG+LFCN block after surgery. The study aims to determine which nerve block provides better pain relief and reduces the need for opioid pain medications in the first 24 hours after surgery. Pain scores, recovery of leg movement, time to first walk, length of hospital stay, and any side effects will also be compared between the two groups.

Read the detailed description

Background: Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a common orthopedic procedure, but postoperative pain remains a significant challenge that can delay recovery and increase opioid consumption. Regional nerve blocks are a key component of multimodal analgesia. The QLESP block is a novel single-puncture, dual-plane technique developed by our group, while the PENG+LFCN block is a currently used motor-sparing technique. However, no randomized controlled trial has directly compared these two approaches.

Objective: This study aims to compare the analgesic efficacy and functional recovery outcomes of QLESP block versus PENG+LFCN block in patients undergoing THA.

Design: This is a single-center, prospective, randomized, assessor-blinded, parallel-controlled trial. Participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive either QLESP block or PENG+LFCN block after surgery. All participants will receive standardized general anesthesia and postoperative multimodal analgesia.

Exploratory biomarker sub-study: An exploratory sub-study will analyze plasma proteomic profiles in a subset of participants to identify potential molecular mechanisms underlying differences in pain response. Blood samples will be collected at baseline and 24 hours postoperatively. This analysis is exploratory and hypothesis-generating.

Sample size: A total of 140 participants will be enrolled (70 per group). Follow-up: Participants will be followed for 48 hours after surgery.

02

Conditions studied

  • Pain Management
  • Arthroplasty Total Hip Replacement

Keywords

  • Total Hip Arthroplasty
  • Nerve Block
  • Postoperative Analgesia
  • QLESP Block
  • PENG Block
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Huazhong University of Science and Technology is the lead sponsor of 247 studies on the registry; 62 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 to 70 years
  • Scheduled for elective unilateral total hip arthroplasty via posterolateral approach
  • (ASA) physical status I-III
  • (BMI) \< 35 kg/m²
  • Ability to understand pain scoring and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) use
  • Willing and able to provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Allergy or to local anesthetics (ropivacaine)
  • Long-term opioid use or chronic pain history requiring regular analgesic use
  • Active or infection at the puncture site
  • Severe psychiatric disorders or communication barriers
  • Severe cardiopulmonary disease
  • History of opioid abuse or substance dependence
  • Participation in another interventional clinical trial within 3 months prior to enrollment
  • Coagulation abnormalities
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Any condition that, in the investigator's opinion, would compromise patient safety or data integrity
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(5)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

ASA physical status

The anaesthetists’ scale of health before surgery: I is healthy, II has a mild illness that is under control, III a severe one, IV a severe illness that is a constant threat to life. V and VI are used for the critically ill and for organ donors.

BMI (body mass index)

Weight in kilograms divided by height in metres squared. Example: 70 kg and 1.75 m gives 70 ÷ (1.75 × 1.75) ≈ 22.9.

What counts as overweight or obesity differs between countries (some use lower cut-offs), so go by the range the study states.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
136 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    QLESP Group

    Participants receive ultrasound-guided QLESP block with 30 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine (15 mL between the erector spinae and transverse process, and 15 mL between the quadratus lumborum and psoas major).

    Procedure: QLESP Block · Drug: ropivacaine

  • Active comparator
    PENG+LFCN Group

    Participants receive ultrasound-guided PENG block with 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine combined with LFCN block with 10 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine.

    Procedure: PENG+LFCN Block · Drug: ropivacaine

Interventions

  • ProcedureQLESP Block

    Ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum and modified erector spinae plane block. A single-puncture, dual-injection technique at the L4 level. Total volume: 30 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine.

  • ProcedurePENG+LFCN Block

    Ultrasound-guided pericapsular nerve group block combined with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block. PENG: 20 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine; LFCN: 10 mL of 0.375% ropivacaine.

  • Ropivacaine hydrochloride injection, 0.375% solution, administered as a single dose via ultrasound-guided nerve block. Total dose: 112.5 mg (30 mL of 0.375% solution) for the QLESP group; 112.5 mg (30 mL of 0.375% solution) for the PENG+LFCN group.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Postoperative 24-Hour Cumulative Opioid Consumption

    Time frame: At 24 hours after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Postoperative VAS Pain Scores

    The Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) is a 10-cm line ranging from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst imaginable pain). Higher scores indicate worse pain. Pain scores are assessed at rest and during movement (passive hip flexion to 15 degrees) at each time point.

    Time frame: At 6, 12, 24, 36, and 48 hours after surgery

  2. Rescue Analgesia Requirement

    Time frame: Within 24 hours after surgery

  3. Motor Block Assessment (Bromage Score)

    The Bromage Score is a 4-point scale ranging from 0 (no motor block, able to perform full knee flexion and foot dorsiflexion against resistance) to 3 (complete motor block, unable to move knee or foot). Higher scores indicate worse motor function. Assessed on the operative side at each time point. A score of 0-1 is considered clinically acceptable for early ambulation.

    Time frame: At 6, 24, and 48 hours after surgery

  4. Time to First Ambulation

    Time frame: From surgery end to first walk, up to 7 days

  5. Length of Hospital Stay

    Time frame: From surgery date to discharge, up to 30 days

  6. Incidence of Adverse Events

    Time frame: From surgery end to 48 hours after surgery

  7. Change in Plasma Proteomic Profile from Baseline to 24 Hours Postoperatively

    Time frame: Baseline and 24 hours after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Tian Y, Lu Q, Yuan Y, Hu Z, Li W, Li K. The effect of pericapsular nerve group block and lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block on postoperative recovery after hip arthroplasty. Sci Rep. 2025 Jun 6;15(1):19913. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-04699-6. PubMed 40481108 ↗
  • Pascarella G, Costa F, Strumia A, Ruggiero A, Remore LM, Lanteri T, Hazboun A, Longo F, Gargano F, Schiavoni L, Mattei A, Agro FE, Carassiti M, Cataldo R. Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve Block or Wound Infiltration Combined with Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Block for Postoperative Analgesia following Total Hip Arthroplasty through Posterior Approach: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Med. 2024 May 2;13(9):2674. doi: 10.3390/jcm13092674. PubMed 38731203 ↗
  • Liang L, Zhang C, Dai W, He K. Comparison between pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block and supra-inguinal fascia iliaca compartment block (S-FICB) for total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. J Anesth. 2023 Aug;37(4):503-510. doi: 10.1007/s00540-023-03192-6. Epub 2023 Apr 12. PubMed 37043081 ↗
  • Yang F, Tang Q, Wang B, Chen L. Pericapsular nerve group block combined with lateral femoral cutaneous nerve block for hip surgery: a meta-analysis. Front Pain Res (Lausanne). 2026 Jan 12;6:1723417. doi: 10.3389/fpain.2025.1723417. eCollection 2025. PubMed 41601711 ↗
  • Vetrone F, Marelli S, Galimberti A, Umbrello M, Gotti M, Pezzi A, Girombelli A. Pericapsular Nerve Group (PENG) Associated with Lateral Femoral Cutaneous Nerve (LFCN) Block Versus Fascia Iliaca Compartment Block (FICB) for Total Hip Replacement Surgery: Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pers Med. 2025 Jun 3;15(6):230. doi: 10.3390/jpm15060230. PubMed 40559093 ↗
  • Hay E, Kelly T, Wolf BJ, Hansen E, Brown A, Lautenschlager C, Wilson SH. Comparison of pericapsular nerve group and lateral quadratus lumborum blocks on cumulative opioid consumption after primary total hip arthroplasty: a randomized controlled trial. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2026 Jan 5;51(1):69-75. doi: 10.1136/rapm-2024-105875. PubMed 39389587 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — The study protocol and informed consent form did not include provisions for secondary data analysis by external researchers.

09

Updates

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
Secondary outcomes
1 added
What changed in the outcomes
  • AddedChange in Plasma Proteomic Profile from Baseline to 24 Hours PostoperativelyTime frame: Baseline and 24 hours after surgery
Sep 29, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Sep 29, 2026
    Secondary outcomes 1 added
    What changed in the outcomes
    • AddedChange in Plasma Proteomic Profile from Baseline to 24 Hours PostoperativelyTime frame: Baseline and 24 hours after surgery
    + 2 other changes: verification date and description

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07771829
Responsible party
Xi Wu (Principal Investigator, Huazhong University of Science and Technology) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 18, 2026
Start date
Aug 19, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 15, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 28, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 29, 2026

Study contacts

Xi Wu
Contact
wu2018whuh@163.com
+8615871715431

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion