ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07504926RE-LACSUpdated Sep 14, 2026

A Randomised Feasibility Study of CPAP in Large Airway Collapse

An interventional study of CPAP in Large Airway Collapse and Asthma, sponsored by Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine. Recruiting at 1 site in United Kingdom. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-14.

Sponsored by Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Large airway collapse (LAC) is an increasingly recognised condition characterised by either bowing of the posterior membrane/trachealis muscle into the trachea or main bronchi (also known as excessive dynamic airway collapse, EDAC) or weakening of the tracheal cartilage (also known as tracheobronchomalacia, TBM).(1-3) LAC often co-exists with other chronic airway conditions, such as asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and is frequently misdiagnosed or overlooked as symptoms, such as shortness of breath, cough and wheeze overlap with other respiratory disease.(1) There is no standardised treatment pathway for patients diagnosed with LAC and current treatment options are limited to physiotherapy and/or hypertonic saline.(3) Exacerbations of LAC, defined as an acute worsening of respiratory symptoms, typically reduce health-related quality of life and increase healthcare utilisation.(4) Small studies and case series have suggested continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) as a potential treatment for LAC to reduce exacerbations and improve quality of life.(5,6) It is hypothesised CPAP may work as a pneumatic splint helping to prevent dynamic collapse of the large airways. This may increase lung volumes due to increase in flow at functional residual capacity (FRC) and support higher elastic recoil and increased expiratory flow. Additionally, splinting of the large airways may cause stiffening of the large airways, resulting in less resistance and turbulence during expiration and may support sputum expectoration.(3) There is a need for high quality randomised controlled trial (RCT) evidence to inform clinical recommendations in the United Kingdom (UK), as well as globally. Prior to this there is a need for further work exploring the feasibility of performing a large RCT and understanding the acceptability of CPAP as a future treatment for LAC.

Aim To conduct a randomised feasibility study that will provide data to confirm if a larger randomised trial of CPAP in patients diagnosed with LAC is viable

02

Conditions studied

  • Large Airway Collapse
  • Asthma

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • CPAP
  • Large Airways Collapse
  • Asthma
03

In context

Asthma

4,841 studies on the registry are indexed under Asthma; 600 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 78 across 3,341 interventional studies indexed under Asthma.

Browse Asthma studies →

Lead sponsor

Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine is the lead sponsor of 57 studies on the registry; 23 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Adult (≥18 years) at visit 1
  2. Able to provide
  3. Prior confirmation of LAC (diagnosed either radiographically or with bronchoscopy)
  4. Respiratory co-morbidities optimised
  5. ≥1 course of antibiotics and/or prednisolone for an exacerbation of chronic airway disease in the preceding 12 months before visit 1.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria

  1. to CPAP as per British Thoracic Society (BTS) guidelines
  2. Already using domiciliary CPAP (including privately purchased)
  3. Known obstructive sleep apnoea syndrome (OSAS) eligible for CPAP
  4. Suspected OSAS that is awaiting further investigation
  5. Pregnant or planning a pregnancy in the next 12 months
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • No intervention
    Standard of Care

    Standard of care for LACS. Which includes physio and good asthma management

  • Experimental
    Intervention (CPAP)

    Nocturnal CPAP

    Device: CPAP

Interventions

  • DeviceCPAP

    Nocturnal CPAP

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient acceptability

    1. All participants will be asked to complete a questionnaire, which will give us information about their diagnosis pathway, current health and wellbeing related to LAC and other information about treatment options. 2. Participation in an audio-recorded semi-structured interview will be offered to participants in both arms, to facilitate the collection of more detailed insights surrounding LAC as a condition, diagnosis pathway, treatments (including CPAP). Interview topic guides will be co-produced with the patient and public involvement (PPI) lead. Interviews will be scheduled at the patient's convenience on or after visit 3 (6 months) and will be conducted face-to-face, virtually or by telephone. We will aim to interview up to 10 participants in each arm, or until data saturation is reached. Interviews will be recorded using industry standard recording device/Dictaphone, transcribed, and data analysed under the guidance of the qualitative lead.

    Time frame: From Enrolment until 1 year

  2. Recruitment and Retention

    The site will be asked to keep a screening log of all patients identified, approached and given an information leaflet. The number of participants enrolled (defined as a participant providing written informed consent) and the proportion randomised will be reported. Reasons for screen failure and withdrawal will be collected and summarised in the CRF. Recruitment and retention will be periodically assessed in line with agreed targets with the funder.

    Time frame: At 18 months post enrolment

Secondary outcomes

  1. Health Related Quality of Life Assessment

    The SGRQ is a 50-item questionnaire used to assess the health and wellbeing of patients with chronic respiratory disease. The questionnaire is composed of 2 parts: part 1 measures symptom burden and part 2 ascertains the impact of their disease on a range of activities that encompass social function, psychological disturbance and physical ability. Scores range from 0 to 100 with a higher score indicating more limitations. The SGRQ will be administered at all on-site visits. A total score will be collected to analyse participant trajectories over the duration of the study and conduct comparative analyses between study arms, considering minimally important clinical differences.

    Time frame: At enrolment and 18 months

  2. Healthcare Resource Utilisation

    * Primary care (General Practitioner (GP), nurse, other) * Secondary care (respiratory, non-respiratory, consultant, nurse, or other), community service (pharmacist, other) * Emergency department attendance (respiratory or non-respiratory) * Inpatient admission (elective, emergency), admission duration

    Time frame: At 18 months post enrolment

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 14, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07504926
Lead sponsor
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine
Collaborators
Royal Liverpool University Hospital
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Apr 1, 2026
Start date
Apr 20, 2026
Primary completion
Jun 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 14, 2026

Study contacts

Rebecca Nightingale Dr Nightingale, PhD
Contact
rebecca.nightingale@lstmed.ac.uk
+441517053100
Rachel Burton Dr Burton, MD
Contact
rachel.burton@lstmed.ac.uk
+441517053100

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion