An observational study in Schistosomiasis Haematobia, sponsored by Pemba Ministry of Health Zanzibar. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Tanzania. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-30.
Sponsored by Pemba Ministry of Health Zanzibar · Observational
This study aims to develop and evaluate a nanobody-based urine diagnostic test for Schistosoma haematobium infection through IPSE antigen detection. Approximately 2500 participants will be recruited and divided into five groups: confirmed S. haematobium infection, S. mansoni infection, urinary tract infection, nephritis or other renal diseases, and healthy controls (about 500 individuals per group). Each participant will provide a single morning midstream urine sample (30-50 mL), which will be used both for the development and optimization of the nanobody-based colloidal gold lateral flow assay (LFIA) and for evaluation of its diagnostic performance compared with urine-filtration microscopy.
21 studies on the registry are indexed under Schistosomiasis haematobia; 2 are open to participants now.
Browse Schistosomiasis haematobia studies →Pemba Ministry of Health Zanzibar is the lead sponsor of 2 studies on the registry; 1 is open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
A total of 2500 urine samples will be collected. These samples will be divided into five groups, each consisting of 500 individuals: Healthy control group; Schistosoma haematobium infection group; Schistosoma mansoni infection group; Nephritis patient group; Urinary tract infection patient group.
Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.
1) Index assay: nanobody-based lateral flow chromatography; 2) Reference assay: urine filtration microscopy; 3) Stool Kato-Katz examination if clinically indicated. 3. Complete basic demographic and clinical data (including age, sex, presenting symptoms, medical history, etc.) are available, and the participant has consented to the use of these data for study analysis.
4. Participants must fulfill one of the following group definitions:
Exclusion Criteria:
1) Unable to provide first morning midstream urine; 2) Urine volume \< 30 mL; 3) Specimen is obviously contaminated, improperly preserved, or lacks complete labeling; 4) Index assay or reference assay cannot be completed, or results are uninterpretable.
3. Clinical or laboratory data are insufficient to allow for group assignment or subsequent study analysis.
4. Presence of any condition that may significantly interfere with the interpretation of study results (as assessed by the investigator or clinician), including:
5. In the investigator's judgment, the participant is otherwise unsuitable for enrollment or unable to comply with study procedures.
Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Informed consent
Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.
You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.
Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.
Because this is an observational study, participants are not assigned an intervention as part of the study.
Diagnostic performance of the LFIA strip, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, limit of detection, repeatability, and cross-reactivity, using urine filtration microscopy as the reference method.
The diagnostic performance of the LFIA strip, including sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, limit of detection, repeatability, and cross-reactivity, will be evaluated using urine filtration microscopy as the reference standard. Each participant will provide one urine sample at enrollment, and LFIA testing will be performed immediately after sample collection. Diagnostic performance will be assessed based on results obtained at this single time point.
Time frame: At baseline (Day 1), at the time of participant enrollment and urine sample collection, with LFIA testing performed immediately. Diagnostic performance will be assessed based on results obtained at this single time point. The study will commence in April
Plan to share: Undecided
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Pemba Ministry of Health Zanzibar