ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT06808750SchistoBreak-DUpdated Sep 19, 2025

Performance of Tests for Schistosoma Haematobium Diagnosis

An observational study in Schistosoma Haematobium, sponsored by Stefanie Knopp. Completed at 1 site in Tanzania. Open to participants aged 6 Years to 18 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-09-19.

Sponsored by Stefanie Knopp · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
801
Ages
6 Years to 18 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Urogenital schistosomiasis caused by infection with the blood fluke Schistosoma haematobium is a debilitating disease. The World Health Organization (WHO) has set the goal to eliminate schistosomiasis as a public health problem globally by 2030 and to interrupt transmission in selected areas. Many years of control interventions and mass drug administration have reduced substantially the prevalence and infection intensities in several areas. In areas with an infection prevalence \<10%, the WHO suggests to continue population preventive chemotherapy with praziquantel at the same or reduced frequency, or to use a clinical approach of test-and-treat. In areas that have achieved interruption of transmission, elimination needs to be validated and post-elimination surveillance be implemented.

For determination of infection prevalence thresholds, for test-and-treat, for validation of elimination and for pre- and post-elimination surveillance, reliable diagnostic tools are needed.

In a single-centre study conducted in Pemba, United Republic of Tanzania, the investigators aim to assess the accuracy and performance of standard and new diagnostic tests for S. haematobium diagnosis for use in elimination settings.

The primary objective of the study is to assess the sensitivity and specificity of all investigated diagnostic tests, using the S. haematobium egg count results of five urine filtrations conducted on five urine samples collected over five consecutive days as reference test.

Secondary objectives are:

  • To assess the sensitivity and specificity of all investigated diagnostic tests, using latent class analyses.
  • To assess the sensitivity and specificity of all investigated diagnostic tests, in relation to S. haematobium infection intensity, calculated as mean egg count derived from the egg counts in five urine samples collected over 5 consecutive days.
  • To assess the sensitivity and specificity of all investigated diagnostic tests, in relation to S. haematobium infection intensity, calculated from the egg counts of the urine sample that was analysed with the respective test and urine filtration.
  • To assess the sensitivity and specificity of all investigated diagnostic tests, using the results of the up-converting reporter particle-lateral flow circulating anodic antigen assay (UCP-LF CAA) as reference test.
  • To assess the sensitivity and specificity of all investigated molecular diagnostic tests, using the results of the qPCR as reference test.
  • To assess the cost and time needed for the implementation of single or multiple-throughput tests.

Our study will evaluate the accuracy and performance of diagnostic tests, in a formerly highly endemic setting that is now approaching elimination (Pemba), and will hence provide important information about which tests can be recommended for threshold determination, and test-and-treat and surveillance.

02

Conditions studied

  • Schistosoma Haematobium

Keywords

  • schistosomiasis
  • diagnosis
  • elimination
  • control
03

In context

Schistosomiasis haematobia

21 studies on the registry are indexed under Schistosomiasis haematobia; 2 are open to participants now.

Browse Schistosomiasis haematobia studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Stefanie Knopp as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
6 Years to 18 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Probability sample

Study population

Children from Pemba Island, United Republic of Tanzania, that attend one among the two pre-selected study primary schools in grade 3, 4, 5 or 6.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Subjects fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria are eligible for the initial screening:

  • Attendance of grade 3, 4, 5, or 6 in study school
  • Randomized to participate in initial screening
  • Written signed by the parents
  • Written assent signed by the participant if aged12-17 years old

Subjects fulfilling all of the following inclusion criteria are eligible for the diagnostic study:

  • Attendance of grade 3, 4, 5, or 6 in study school
  • Randomized to participate in initial screening
  • Written informed consent signed by the parents
  • Written assent signed by the participant if aged12-17 years old
  • S. haematobium-positive urine filtration result in initial screening OR
  • S. haematobium-negative urine filtration result in initial screening, but randomized for participation in diagnostic study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

The presence of any one of the following exclusion criteria will lead to the exclusion of the subject in the initial screening:

  • Not attending any study school
  • Not attending grade 3, 4, 5 or 6
  • Not randomized to participate in initial screening
  • No written signed by the parents submitted
  • No written assent signed by the participant if aged12-17 years old submitted
  • S. haematobium-negative urine filtration result in initial screening, and not randomized for participation in diagnostic performance study
  • Clinical significant sever disease

The presence of any one of the following exclusion criteria will lead to the exclusion of the subject in the diagnostic study:

  • Not attending any study school
  • Not attending grade 3, 4, 5 or 6
  • Not randomized to participate in initial screening
  • No written informed consent signed by the parents submitted
  • No written assent signed by the participant if aged12-17 years old submitted
  • S. haematobium-negative urine filtration result in initial screening, and not randomized for participation in diagnostic performance study
  • Clinical significant sever disease
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Other
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
801 participants (actual)
Patient registry
No
Biospecimen retention
Samples with dna

Groups and cohorts

  • Participants of initial screening

    Schoolchildren that attend classes in grades 3-6 in each of the two study schools will be invited to submit one urine sample that will be tested with a single urine filtration (Day 1).

    Diagnostic Test: S. haematobium egg detection by single urine filtration · Diagnostic Test: Haematuria assessment using reagent strips

  • Participants of diagnostic study

    All schoolchildren that are tested S. haematobium-positive children in the initial screening plus a sex-adjusted random selection of initially negative-screened children will be included in the diagnostic study. These children will be invited to submit five urine samples in total, over five days (Day 1-5). All samples (Day 1-5) will be tested with a single urine filtration. Samples collected on Day 5 will be tested with all investigated diagnostic tests.

    Diagnostic Test: S. haematobium egg detection by single urine filtration · Diagnostic Test: S. haematobium egg detection by quintuple urine filtration · Diagnostic Test: S. haematobium egg detection by artificial intelligence (AI) microscopy · Diagnostic Test: Haematuria assessment using reagent strips · Diagnostic Test: S. haematobium antigen detection by up-converting reporter particle-lateral flow circulating anodic antigen assay (UCP-LF CAA) · Diagnostic Test: S. haematobium DNA detection by recombinase polymerase amplification assay (RPA) · Diagnostic Test: S. haematobium DNA detection by qPCR

Interventions

  • Diagnostic testS. haematobium egg detection by single urine filtration

    The urine samples of children participating in the initial screening will be tested with a single urine filtration by human microscopy.

  • Diagnostic testS. haematobium egg detection by quintuple urine filtration

    Five urine samples will be collected from children participating in the diagnostic study over five days. Each of the five urine samples collected per participant will be tested with a single urine filtration by human microscopy.

  • Diagnostic testS. haematobium egg detection by artificial intelligence (AI) microscopy

    The urine samples collected on Day 5 of the diagnostic study will be tested with artificial intelligence (AI) microscopy.

  • Diagnostic testHaematuria assessment using reagent strips

    The urine samples collected from children participating in the initial screening and in the diagnostic study, respectively, will be tested with reagent strips.

  • Diagnostic testS. haematobium antigen detection by up-converting reporter particle-lateral flow circulating anodic antigen assay (UCP-LF CAA)

    The urine samples collected on Day 5 of the diagnostic study will be tested with the up-converting reporter particle-lateral flow circulating anodic antigen assay (UCP-LF CAA).

  • Diagnostic testS. haematobium DNA detection by recombinase polymerase amplification assay (RPA)

    The urine samples collected on Day 5 of the diagnostic study will be tested with the recombinase polymerase amplification assay (RPA).

  • Diagnostic testS. haematobium DNA detection by qPCR

    The urine samples collected on Day 5 of the diagnostic study will be tested with qPCR

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of tests for S. haematobium diagnosis when compared with a single urine filtration

    The primary endpoint will be the sensitivity of the investigated diagnostic tests to detect S. haematobium related markers by the examination of a single sample. The primary outcome variable will be the number of S. haematobium infected individuals detected through each test.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the study after 6 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Sensitivity of each diagnostic test (human microscopy, AI microscopy, reagent strips, RPA, UCP-CAA, qPCR).

    Sensitivity is defined as the proportion of positive test results out of all truly positive samples. Reference tests are human microscopy, UCP-CAA, qPCR or a combination thereof, performed with the same urine sample (human microscopy, UCP-CAA, qPCR) or quintuple urine samples (human microscopy).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the study after 6 weeks

Other outcomes

  1. Specificity of each diagnostic test (human microscopy, AI microscopy, reagent strips, RPA, UCP-CAA, qPCR).

    Specificity is defined as the proportion of negative test results out of all truly negative samples. Reference tests are human microscopy, UCP-CAA, qPCR or a combination thereof, performed with the same urine sample (human microscopy, UCP-CAA, qPCR) or quintuple urine samples (human microscopy).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the study after 6 weeks.

  2. Correlation of infection markers.

    Correlation of the amount of infection markers measured by each test (human microscopy: number of S. haematobium eggs, AI microscopy: number of S. haematobium eggs, reagent strips: microhaematuria grading, RPA: fluorescence level, UCP-CAA: amount of CAA antigen, qPCR: cycle-threshold values).

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the study after 6 weeks.

  3. Costs of each diagnostic test (human microscopy, AI microscopy, reagent strips, RPA, UCP-CAA, qPCR).

    Costs are defined as the financial costs incurred by each test for equipment, consumables, and staff time to perform the test.

    Time frame: 6 month, from start of orders of equipment and material to end of laboratory work.

  4. Time to conduct each diagnostic test (human microscopy, AI microscopy, reagent strips, RPA, UCP-CAA, qPCR).

    Amount of time spent completing each test.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of the study after 6 weeks.

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Public Health Laboratory - Ivo de Carneri (PHL-IdC)
    Chake Chake, Pemba Island, Tanzania
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Ndum NC, Ali SM, Ali MN, Hattendorf J, Suleiman KR, Utzinger J, Knopp S. Day-to-day variation of Schistosoma haematobium infection and intensity estimates in the near-elimination setting Pemba, Tanzania. Acta Trop. 2026 Jun 7;280:108177. doi: 10.1016/j.actatropica.2026.108177. Online ahead of print. PubMed 42259467 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — There are data transfer agreements (DTAs) in place between the Public Health Laboratory-Ivo de Carneri (PHL-IdC) in Pemba and the Swiss Tropical and Public Health Institute (Swiss TPH), Switzerland; Leiden University Medical Centre (LUMC), The Netherlands; Natural History Museum (NHM), London, UK; and Enaiblers, Sweden. Anonymized data will be curated and stored for an unlimited period in the data repository "Infectious Diseases Data Observatory" (IDDO; https://www.iddo.org/) and/or Zenodo (https://zenodo.org/). Data may be shared with other researchers upon request.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Ran from Feb 2025 to primary completion in Apr 2025, 2 months.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 8, 2025
First posted
Feb 5, 2025
StartActual
Feb 10, 2025
Primary completionActual
Apr 30, 2025
CompletionActual
Apr 30, 2025
Last update
Sep 19, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 19, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT06808750
Lead sponsor
Stefanie Knopp
Collaborators
Public Health Laboratory Ivo de Carneri, Enaiblers AB, Erasmus Medical Center, Leiden University Medical Center, Natural History Museum, United Kingdom
Responsible party
Stefanie Knopp (Principal Investigator, Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 5, 2025
Start date
Feb 10, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 30, 2025
Completion
Apr 30, 2025
Last update
Sep 19, 2025

Study contacts

Stefanie Knopp, PhD
principal investigator · Swiss Tropical & Public Health Institute
Said M Ali, MSc
study director · Public Health Laboratory Ivo de Carneri

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Sep 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion