ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07499401MICRO-CONGESTUpdated Apr 2, 2026

Evaluation of the Microcirculatory Response to Fluids in Critically Ill Patients With Venous Congestion: A Prospective Observational Study

An observational study in Venous Congestion, Microcirculation and Volume Expansion, sponsored by Università Politecnica delle Marche. Recruiting at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-04-02.

Sponsored by Università Politecnica delle Marche · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Dec 2024; still recruiting 1 year 10 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The hypothesis is that fluid-responsive patients who show signs of venous congestion experience a worsening of microcirculatory status after fluid administration compared to patients without signs of venous congestion

02

Conditions studied

  • Venous Congestion
  • Microcirculation
  • Volume Expansion

Browse trials for

03

In context

Hyperemia

98 studies on the registry are indexed under Hyperemia; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 100 across 46 observational studies indexed under Hyperemia.

Browse Hyperemia studies →

Lead sponsor

Università Politecnica delle Marche is the lead sponsor of 48 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Critically ill patients admitted to the intensive care unit
  • Invasive or minimally invasive hemodynamic monitoring

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Suspected or confirmed pregnancy
  • Inability to access the oral cavity (e.g., facial trauma, oral bleeding)
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Interventions

  • Drugfluid challenge

    Signs of venous congestion and microcirculatory status will be assessed at baseline. A fluid challenge will then be performed, and microcirculation will be evaluated at the end of fluid administration and again after 30 minutes

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Sublingual total vessel density (TVD)

    To compare changes in sublingual microcirculatory parameter - total vessel density (TVD) - before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in Sublingual percentage of perfused vessels (PPV)

    To compare changes in sublingual microcirculatory parameter - percentage of perfused vessels (PPV) - before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  2. Change in Sublingual Microcirculatory Flow Index (MFI)

    The primary objective of the study is to compare changes in sublingual microcirculation, measured by the Microcirculatory Flow Index (MFI), before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  3. Change in Sublingual perfused vessel density (PVD)

    To compare changes in sublingual microcirculatory parameters - perfused vessel density (PVD) - before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  4. Change in Sublingual microcirculatory heterogeneity index (MHI)

    To compare changes in sublingual microcirculatory parameters - microcirculatory heterogeneity index (MHI) - before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  5. Change in Sublingual PPV in Non-Preload-Dependent Patients With and Without Venous Congestion

    To compare changes in sublingual PPV before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in non-preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  6. Change in Sublingual TVD in Non-Preload-Dependent Patients With and Without Venous Congestion

    To compare changes in sublingual TVD before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in non-preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  7. Change in Sublingual MFI in Non-Preload-Dependent Patients With and Without Venous Congestion

    To compare changes in sublingual MFI before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in non-preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  8. Change in Sublingual PVD in Non-Preload-Dependent Patients With and Without Venous Congestion

    To compare changes in sublingual PVD before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in non-preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  9. Change in Sublingual MHI in Non-Preload-Dependent Patients With and Without Venous Congestion

    To compare changes in sublingual MHI before fluid administration, immediately after volume expansion, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in non-preload-dependent patients with and without signs of venous congestion.

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  10. Association Between Venous Congestion and TVD in Critically Ill Patients and Subpopulations

    o evaluate the relationship between signs of venous congestion TVD at baseline, after fluid administration, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  11. Association Between Venous Congestion and PVD in Critically Ill Patients and Subpopulations

    To evaluate the relationship between signs of venous congestion and PVD at baseline, after fluid administration, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  12. Association Between Venous Congestion and MFI in Critically Ill Patients and Subpopulations

    To evaluate the relationship between signs of venous congestion and MFI at baseline, after fluid administration, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  13. Association Between Venous Congestion and PPV in Critically Ill Patients and Subpopulations

    To evaluate the relationship between signs of venous congestion and PPV at baseline, after fluid administration, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  14. Association Between Venous Congestion and MHI in Critically Ill Patients and Subpopulations

    To evaluate the relationship between signs of venous congestion and MHI at baseline, after fluid administration, and 30 minutes post-fluid administration in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Time frame: Baseline, immediately post-fluid challenge, and 30 minutes post-fluid challenge

  15. Association Between Venous Congestion and TVD at Baseline

    To evaluate the association between signs of venous congestion and TVD at baseline in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Time frame: Baseline

  16. Association Between Venous Congestion and PVD at Baseline

    To evaluate the association between signs of venous congestion and PVD at baseline in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Time frame: Baseline

  17. Association Between Venous Congestion and MFI at Baseline

    To evaluate the association between signs of venous congestion and MFI at baseline in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Time frame: Baseline

  18. Association Between Venous Congestion and PPV at Baseline

    To evaluate the association between signs of venous congestion and PPV at baseline in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Time frame: Baseline

  19. Association Between Venous Congestion and MHI at Baseline

    To evaluate the association between signs of venous congestion and MHI at baseline in critically ill patients and subgroups (e.g., septic shock).

    Time frame: Baseline

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Dec 2024 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2026, 18 months after the start.

Of 28 observational studies under Hyperemia, half reached primary completion within 21 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 27. This study's planned 18 months is below that.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Apr 18, 2025
First posted
Mar 30, 2026
StartActual
Dec 15, 2024
Primary completionEst.
Jun 2026
CompletionEst.
Jun 2026
Last update
Apr 2, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Apr 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07499401
Lead sponsor
Università Politecnica delle Marche
Responsible party
Abele Donati, MD (MD, PhD, Full Professor of Intensive Care, Head of the ICU, Università Politecnica delle Marche) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 30, 2026
Start date
Dec 15, 2024
Primary completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jun 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Apr 2, 2026

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion