ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07496645Updated Mar 27, 2026

EFFECT OF ANODAL TRANSCRANIAL DIRECT CURRENT STIMULATION ON NAMING IN APHASIC PATIENTS WITH ACUTE ISCHEMIC STROKE

A Phase 3 interventional study of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation and Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation in Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease, Post Stroke Aphasia and Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction, sponsored by Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-27.

Sponsored by Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital · Phase 3, Interventional, and Health services research

Phase
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
28
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The use of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) for the management of deficits developed in stroke is a relatively new type of management option. Many of the studies performed using tDCS have focused on improvements noted in hemiplegia as compared to aphasia, which is an equally disabling outcome of strokes. The results of these studies have not been conclusive and concordant with each other.

In aphasia management, the majority of the studies have focused on chronic strokes. Since the use of tDCS is relatively new, the studies have not focused on a particular type of deficit or stroke. Very few studies have focused on the impact of solely using tDCS. Very few studies have focused on acute to subacute strokes. The results of the studies have, nevertheless, been encouraging.

Improvements in aspects of language tested after a single session of tDCS are short-lived. There is an unmet need to probe the utility of repetitive tDCS on aspects of language function in patients who are aphasic due to acute stroke. There is also a paucity of data in the Indian scenario regarding the same.

02

Conditions studied

  • Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease
  • Post Stroke Aphasia
  • Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction
  • Aphasia, Acquired

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation
  • tDCS
  • Acute Ischemic Cerebrovascular Disease
  • Post stroke aphasia
  • Aphasia Following Cerebral Infarction
03

In context

Aphasia

338 studies on the registry are indexed under Aphasia; 95 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 28 is close to the median of 30 across 298 interventional studies indexed under Aphasia.

Browse Aphasia studies →

Lead sponsor

Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Aphasic patients with left middle cerebral artery territory Acute Ischemic Stroke
  • Patients between 18-65 years of age.
  • Within 5 days of onset of stroke.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with malignant Middle Cerebral Artery territory infarcts and previous clinical history of cerebral hemisphere stroke.
  • Patients with history of previous brain surgery or skull defect due to surgery e.g. craniectomy.
  • Patients with epilepsy.
  • Patients with history of significant head trauma in the last 1 month.
  • Patients with documented history of major depression prior to stroke.
  • Patients with alcohol/drug abuse in the past 6 months.
  • Patients with prior significant cognitive impairment.
  • Pacemaker in situ, cochlear implant in situ.
  • Pregnancy.
05

Study design

Phase
Phase 3
Primary purpose
Health services research
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Quadruple (Participant, Care provider, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
28 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Anodal tDCS arm (will receive true tDCS)

    Will receive true Anodal tDCS

    Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

  • Sham comparator
    Sham tDCS arm (will receive Sham stimulation)

    Will receive Sham tDCS stimulation

    Device: Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation

    Anodal tDCS

  • DeviceTranscranial Direct Current Stimulation

    Sham tDCS

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Primary Outcome: Difference of change in Accuracy between Anodal tDCS group and Sham tDCS group at 5 days

    Accuracy is defined as the number of words spoken without the help of a semantic or phonemic cue on the ICMR Picture Naming Test

    Time frame: at 5 days after tDCS

  2. Co-Primary outcome: Difference of change in Reaction Time between Anodal tDCS group and Sham tDCS group at 5 days

    Reaction times were documented in milliseconds.

    Time frame: at 5 days after tDCS

Secondary outcomes

  1. Difference of change in Correct Response between Anodal tDCS group and Sham tDCS group at 5 days

    Correct Response is defined as the total number of words spoken, with or without the help of either a semantic or a phonemic cue on the ICMR Picture Naming Test.

    Time frame: at 5 days after tDCS

  2. Difference of change in PNT Score between Anodal tDCS group and Sham tDCS group at 5 days

    PNT scores are recorded as per the guidelines of the ICMR Picture Naming Test

    Time frame: at 5 days after tDCS

  3. Difference of change in Accuracy between Anodal tDCS group and Sham tDCS group at 4 weeks

    Accuracy is defined as the number of words spoken without the help of a semantic or phonemic cue on the ICMR Picture Naming Test

    Time frame: at 4 weeks after tDCS

  4. Difference of change in Reaction Time between Anodal tDCS group and Sham tDCS group at 4 weeks

    Reaction times were documented in milliseconds.

    Time frame: at 4 weeks after tDCS

  5. Difference of change in Correct Response between Anodal tDCS group and Sham tDCS group at 4 weeks

    Correct Response is defined as the total number of words spoken, with or without the help of either a semantic or a phonemic cue on the ICMR Picture Naming Test.

    Time frame: at 4 weeks after tDCS

  6. Difference of change in PNT Score between Anodal tDCS group and Sham tDCS group at 4 weeks

    PNT scores are recorded as per the guidelines of the ICMR Picture Naming Test.

    Time frame: at 4 weeks after tDCS

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — IPD collected throughout the trial will be available from the Principle Investigator upon reasonable request.

Supporting information: Study protocol, Statistical analysis plan, Informed consent form

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07496645
Lead sponsor
Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital
Responsible party
Dr Ashish Kumar Duggal (Professor, Department of Neurology, ABVIMS and Dr RML Hospital, New Delhi, Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 27, 2026
Start date
Mar 31, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 27, 2026

Study contacts

Ashish Kumar Duggal, Doctor (Professor)
Contact
ashishduggal2005@gmail.com
+919810523332
Devavrata Sahu, Doctor
Contact
devsahu.90@gmail.com
+918800815928
Ashish Kumar Duggal, DM (Neurology)
principal investigator · Atal Bihari Vajpayee Institute of Medical Sciences and Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital, New Delhi

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion