An observational study in Acute Respiratory Disease and Non Invasive Ventilation (NIV), sponsored by Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital. Completed at 2 sites in India. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-11-18.
Sponsored by Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital · Observational
To date, the practice pattern of humidification during Non-Invasive Ventilation (NIV) is unknown. This study aims to assess the practice pattern of physicians regarding humidification use in hospitalized adult patients on NIV. This study will recognize the gaps between current practice and available evidence.
Primary Objective:
(a) Prevalence of Humidification use and their types
Secondary Objective:
Non-invasive ventilation (NIV) provides respiratory support through a mask compared to invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) using an endotracheal or tracheostomy tube. NIV has become a standard of care in managing acute respiratory failure, especially in acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema, immunocompromised patients, and weaning from IMV. Over the past few decades, its use has increased drastically in these patients, reducing the need for IMV, morbidity, and mortality. However, various studies have reported NIV failure in 20-50% of patients owing to poor tolerance. Non-humidified inspired gases used in NIV and IMV are very dry, and their humidification can prevent their harmful effect on the respiratory system. Heat and Humidification in IMV is the standard of care worldwide, but no consensus or guidelines regarding its use during NIV. Although the upper airways are not bypassed in NIV, physiological air conditioning could be insufficient due to circuit leaks, high respiratory drive, a high fraction of inspired oxygen (FiO2), type of mask, mouth breathing, and use of dry air with ICU ventilators. Inadequate humidification in hospitalized patients with acute respiratory failure using NIV can lead to difficult intubation after NIV failure, life-threatening airway obstruction due to thick secretions, and increased airway reactivity. Based on various physiological and clinical studies, AARC clinical practice guidelines suggested humidification in patients with NIV. To date, the practice pattern of humidification during NIV is unknown.
This study aims to assess the practice pattern of physicians regarding humidification use during NIV in hospitalized adult patients. This study will recognize the gaps between current practice and available evidence.
Objective:
Primary Objective:
(a) Humidification utilization rate and their types
Secondary Objective:
Methodology:
Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital is the lead sponsor of 9 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
web-based survey among physicians dealing with NIV in adult patients with acute respiratory failure
Exclusion Criteria:
to assess the practice pattern of humidification use among physicians during NIV in hospitalized adult patients
Humidification utilization rate and their types
Humidification utilization rate will be calculated by a total number of respondents using humidification during NIV in patients with acute respiratory failure divided by a total number of respondents involved in managing patients of acute respiratory failure on NIV. Details will also be collected regarding the type of humidification type (Heated humidifier or Heat Moisture Exchange (HME)).
Time frame: six months
Reasons for not using humidification
Details about the reasons for not using humidification during NIV use will also will be collected.
Time frame: six months
Reasons for choosing a specific humidification device
Depending upon their preference of humidification devices (Heated humidifier or HME), details will also be collected for the reasons about their preference.
Time frame: six months
Plan to share: Yes — Data obtained through this study may be provided to qualified researchers with academic interest in non-invasive ventilation. Shared Data will be coded, with no PHI included. Approval of the request and execution of all applicable agreements are prerequisites for sharing the data with the requesting party.
Supporting information: Study protocol, Sap
No publications or documents are linked to this record.
This study is completed, as verified in Apr 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Dr. Ram Manohar Lohia Hospital