ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07495306FROZEN-EMGUpdated Mar 27, 2026

Electrophysiologic Changes After Extended 360° Capsular Release

An observational study in Adhesive Capsulitis and Frozen Shoulder, sponsored by Acibadem University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 21 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-27.

Sponsored by Acibadem University · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
15
Ages
21 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis) is a condition characterized by shoulder pain and restricted range of motion, significantly impairing daily living activities. In cases that do not respond to conservative treatment, arthroscopic capsular release is an effective surgical treatment option. The 360° capsular release technique, performed by some surgeons, involves release of the inferior capsule and therefore carries a potential risk of nerve injury due to the anatomical proximity of neurovascular structures such as the axillary nerve. In addition, surgical manipulations performed around the coracoid process may exert mechanical or compressive effects on the musculocutaneous nerve and its sensory continuation, the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve, due to their close relationship with the lateral cord of the brachial plexus.

The aim of this prospective, single-center observational clinical study is to objectively evaluate the morphological and functional effects of inferior capsular release and coracoid region dissection performed during arthroscopic 360° capsular release surgery on the axillary and musculocutaneous nerves, using electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCS) in patients with frozen shoulder.

Patients aged 21-70 years with a diagnosis of frozen shoulder who have not responded to conservative treatments and are scheduled for arthroscopic capsular release will be included in the study. EMG and NCS assessments will be performed at the preoperative baseline, and at 12 weeks postoperatively. For the axillary nerve, the deltoid and teres minor muscles will be evaluated; for the musculocutaneous nerve, the biceps brachii and brachialis muscles will be assessed. Additionally, sensory conduction of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve will be examined. Along with electrophysiological findings, shoulder range of motion (ROM), pain (VAS), muscle strength (MRC), and functional scores will also be recorded.

This study is expected to provide objective evidence regarding the effects of arthroscopic capsular release surgery on peripheral nerve function, thereby contributing new data on the safety of the surgical technique and enriching the currently limited literature on electromyographic evaluation in frozen shoulder surgery.

Read the detailed description

Frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis) is a disabling condition characterized by shoulder pain and significant limitation of active and passive range of motion. When conservative treatments such as physical therapy, medications, and intra-articular injections fail, arthroscopic capsular release is commonly performed to restore shoulder mobility.

Arthroscopic 360° capsular release involves circumferential release of the shoulder capsule, including the inferior capsule. Due to the close anatomical relationship of the inferior capsule with the axillary nerve and the proximity of the coracoid region to the lateral cord of the brachial plexus, surgical manipulation in these regions may theoretically affect the axillary and musculocutaneous nerves. While neurological complications after shoulder arthroscopy are considered rare, the electrophysiological effects of capsular release procedures on peripheral nerve function have not been systematically evaluated in prospective studies.

This prospective single-center observational clinical study aims to evaluate the morphological and functional effects of inferior capsular release and peri-coracoid dissection on the axillary and musculocutaneous nerves in patients undergoing arthroscopic 360° capsular release for adhesive capsulitis.

Patients aged 21-70 years with frozen shoulder who do not respond to conservative treatments and are scheduled for arthroscopic capsular release will be included. Electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCS) will be performed at baseline before surgery and repeated during postoperative follow-up.

For the axillary nerve, the deltoid and teres minor muscles will be evaluated using needle EMG. For the musculocutaneous nerve, the biceps brachii and brachialis muscles will be examined. In addition, sensory conduction studies of the lateral antebrachial cutaneous nerve will be performed.

Along with electrophysiological parameters such as motor unit potentials, recruitment patterns, distal latency, conduction velocity, and compound muscle action potential amplitudes, clinical outcomes including shoulder range of motion, pain scores, muscle strength, and functional shoulder scores will also be recorded.

The primary objective of the study is to compare preoperative and postoperative electrophysiological parameters of the axillary and musculocutaneous nerves. Secondary analyses will evaluate the relationship between electrophysiological changes and clinical outcomes such as improvement in range of motion, reduction in pain, and recovery of muscle strength.

This study aims to provide objective electrophysiological data regarding the effects of arthroscopic capsular release on peripheral nerve function and contribute to the limited literature on neurophysiological outcomes following shoulder arthroscopy. Primary Outcome Measure

Change in electrophysiological parameters of axillary and musculocutaneous nerves

Electrophysiological evaluation using electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCS) will be performed preoperatively and at postoperative follow-up to assess changes in nerve conduction velocity, distal latency, CMAP amplitude, and motor unit potential characteristics.

Time Frame: Preoperative baseline and postoperative follow-up. Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in shoulder range of motion (ROM) Measured using standard goniometric evaluation before and after surgery.

Pain level (VAS score) Pain intensity will be evaluated using the Visual Analog Scale.

Muscle strength (MRC scale) Motor strength of the affected upper extremity will be evaluated.

Functional shoulder scores Functional outcome will be assessed using validated shoulder scoring systems such as the ASES score.

Eligibility Criteria Inclusion Criteria

Age between 21 and 70 years

Diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder)

Failure of conservative treatment

Scheduled for arthroscopic capsular release surgery

Exclusion Criteria

Known peripheral neuropathy

Previous brachial plexus injury

Previous neurovascular surgery of the ipsilateral shoulder

Coagulation disorders

Active infection

Pregnancy

02

Conditions studied

  • Adhesive Capsulitis
  • Frozen Shoulder

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Adhesive Capsulitis
  • 360° Capsular Release
  • Shoulder Arthroscopy
  • Electromyography
  • Axillary Nerve
  • Musculocutaneous Nerve
  • Peripheral Nerve Function
03

In context

Bursitis

383 studies on the registry are indexed under Bursitis; 111 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 15 is below the median of 50 across 29 observational studies indexed under Bursitis.

Browse Bursitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Acibadem University is the lead sponsor of 220 studies on the registry; 51 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
21 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study population will consist of adult patients diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) who do not respond to conservative treatment and are scheduled to undergo arthroscopic capsular release surgery. Patients will be recruited from the orthopedic and traumatology clinics of Acibadem University Hospital. All participants will be between 21 and 70 years of age and will undergo standard clinical evaluation and electrophysiological assessment as part of the study protocol.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 21 and 70 years
  • Diagnosis of adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder)
  • Persistent symptoms despite conservative treatment (e.g., physical therapy, medication, or intra-articular injections)
  • Planned arthroscopic capsular release surgery
  • Ability to provide

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known peripheral neuropathy
  • Previous brachial plexus injury
  • History of ipsilateral shoulder neurovascular surgery
  • Previous proximal brachial plexus surgery
  • Coagulation disorders
  • Active infection
  • Pregnancy
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
15 participants (estimated)
Target follow-up
12 Weeks
Patient registry
Yes

Groups and cohorts

  • Frozen Shoulder Patients Undergoing Arthroscopic 360° Capsular Release

    This cohort includes patients aged 21-70 years diagnosed with adhesive capsulitis (frozen shoulder) who do not respond to conservative treatment and are scheduled to undergo arthroscopic 360° capsular release. All participants will undergo standard arthroscopic capsular release surgery performed by experienced shoulder surgeons. Electrophysiological evaluation of axillary and musculocutaneous nerve function will be performed using electromyography (EMG) and nerve conduction studies (NCS) before surgery and during postoperative follow-up. Clinical outcomes including shoulder range of motion, pain level, muscle strength, and functional shoulder scores will also be recorded.

    Procedure: Arthroscopic 360° Capsular Release

Interventions

  • ProcedureArthroscopic 360° Capsular Release

    Arthroscopic circumferential capsular release performed for the treatment of adhesive capsulitis. The procedure includes release of the anterior, posterior, and inferior capsule, with careful dissection around the inferior capsule and coracoid region.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in CMAP Amplitude of Axillary and Musculocutaneous Nerves

    Compound muscle action potential (CMAP) amplitude measured using nerve conduction studies (NCS).

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline and 12 weeks after surgery

  2. Change in Distal Motor Latency

    Distal motor latency measured using nerve conduction studies (NCS).

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline and 12 weeks after surgery

  3. Change in Nerve Conduction Velocity

    Motor nerve conduction velocity measured using nerve conduction studies (NCS).

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline and 12 weeks after surgery

Secondary outcomes

  1. Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM)

    Active and passive shoulder range of motion measured using standard goniometric evaluation.

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline and 12 weeks after surgery

  2. Pain Level (VAS)

    Pain intensity measured using the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), ranging from 0 to 10, where 0 indicates no pain and 10 indicates the worst imaginable pain.

    Time frame: Preoperative baseline and 12 weeks after surgery

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • Acibadem Mehmet Ali Aydinlar University Hospital
    Istanbul, Istanbul 34752, Turkey (Türkiye)
    Recruiting
    • Nezih Ziroglu, MD · Contactnezih.ziroglu@yahoo.com · +90 505 631 6484
    • Mehmet Oğuz Çolak, MD · Contactoguzcolak22@gmail.com · +90 544 401 7600
    • Nezih Ziroglu, MD · Principal investigator
    • Mehmet Oğuz Çolak, Resident, MD · Sub investigator
    • Kerem Bilsel, MD · Principal investigator
    • Murat Aksu, MD · Principal investigator
    • Elvin Ay, MD · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Undecided — Individual participant data (IPD) sharing has not yet been determined. Data sharing may be considered upon reasonable request after completion of the study and publication of the results, in accordance with institutional policies and applicable data protection regulations.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Feb 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Feb 2027, 12 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 16, 2026
First posted
Mar 27, 2026
StartActual
Feb 26, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Feb 26, 2027
CompletionEst.
Mar 14, 2027
Last update
Mar 27, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 27, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07495306
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 27, 2026
Start date
Feb 26, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 26, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Mar 14, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 27, 2026

Study contacts

Nezih Ziroglu, MD
Contact
nezih.ziroglu@yahoo.com
+90 505 631 6484
Mehmet Oğuz Çolak, MD
Contact
oguzcolak22@gmail.com
+90 544 401 7600
Nezih Ziroglu, MD
principal investigator · Acıbadem Mehmet Ali Aydınlar University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion