ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07736027Updated Nov 5, 2026

Effect of Hormone Replacement Therapy on Physiotherapy Outcomes in Postmenopausal Women With Frozen Shoulder

An interventional study of Standardized Physiotherapy Program in Frozen Shoulder, Adhesive Capsulitis and Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder, sponsored by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to female participants aged 40 Years to 60 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-11-05.

Sponsored by Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

Updated Nov 5, 2026Start date movedPrimary completion moved+3 moreGo to Updates ↓
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
30
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
40 Years to 60 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the effects of a physiotherapy program on pain levels, shoulder range of motion, functional status, pain catastrophizing, perceived change, sleep quality, and quality of life in postmenopausal women diagnosed with frozen shoulder, with and without Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT). The findings are expected to contribute to personalized treatment planning for postmenopausal women with frozen shoulder and help fill the gap in current literature.

Read the detailed description

This study investigates the impact of Hormone Replacement Therapy (HRT) on treatment outcomes in postmenopausal women undergoing a standardized physiotherapy program for frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis).

Participants are divided into two groups based on their current HRT status: postmenopausal women receiving HRT and those not receiving HRT. Both groups participate in the same structured physiotherapy program.

Assessments are conducted at baseline and after the intervention using the following outcome measures:

Primary Outcome Measures: Upper extremity disability and functional limitations evaluated by the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire.

Secondary Outcome Measures: Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM) measured by goniometry, sleep quality assessed via the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), menopause-specific quality of life measured by the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL), cognitive response to pain evaluated by the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS), and overall treatment perception evaluated by the Global Rating of Change (GROC) scale.

By comparing these parameters, the study aims to elucidate whether systemic HRT modulates pain perception, functional recovery, and general quality of life during physical rehabilitation in postmenopausal women with frozen shoulder.

02

Conditions studied

  • Frozen Shoulder
  • Adhesive Capsulitis
  • Adhesive Capsulitis of the Shoulder
  • Hormone Replacement Therapy, Post-Menopausal
  • Exercise
  • Physical Therapy

Keywords

  • Frozen Shoulder, Adhesive Capsulitis, Hormone Replacement Therapy, Postmenopause, Physical Therapy, Rehabilitation, Pain Catastrophizing, Range of Motion
03

In context

Bursitis

383 studies on the registry are indexed under Bursitis; 111 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 30 is below the median of 44 across 346 interventional studies indexed under Bursitis.

Browse Bursitis studies →

Lead sponsor

Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa is the lead sponsor of 699 studies on the registry; 213 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
40 Years to 60 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • female patients aged 40 to 60 years.
  • Shoulder pain at rest and during activities of daily living lasting for more than 3 months.
  • Clinical diagnosis of Stage I or Stage II frozen shoulder (adhesive capsulitis).
  • Passive range of motion (ROM) loss of greater than 25% compared to the unaffected shoulder in at least two movement planes (flexion, abduction, internal rotation, or external rotation).
  • Reduced range of motion of less than 50% compared to the unaffected side in at least one movement direction (flexion, abduction, internal rotation, or external rotation).
  • Increased restriction of external and internal rotation during glenohumeral abduction from 45 to 90 degrees.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Passive external rotation range of motion of less than 30 degrees (\<30°).
  • Presence of glenohumeral arthritis confirmed by radiography.
  • History or presence of inflammatory joint disease.
  • History of or active cancer diagnosis.
  • Previous treatment for the current shoulder condition (e.g., physiotherapy and rehabilitation, intra-articular injections, or surgical intervention).
  • Baseline shoulder pain score of less than 3 (\<3) on the Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS).
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Postmenopausal

Periods have stopped for good: usually no period for 12 months in a row without another medical reason, sometimes confirmed by a blood test (FSH).

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
30 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    HRT Group

    Postmenopausal women diagnosed with primary frozen shoulder who are receiving hormone replacement therapy and undergoing the standardized physiotherapy program.

    Procedure: Standardized Physiotherapy Program

  • Active comparator
    Non-HRT Group

    Postmenopausal women diagnosed with primary frozen shoulder who are not receiving hormone replacement therapy and undergoing the standardized physiotherapy program.

    Procedure: Standardized Physiotherapy Program

Interventions

  • ProcedureStandardized Physiotherapy Program

    A standardized and supervised shoulder physical therapy and rehabilitation program delivered face-to-face in a clinical setting by an expert physiotherapist over 6 weeks (2 sessions per week, 50-60 minutes per session), supplemented by a prescribed home exercise program. The program includes patient education, stretching exercises, active-assisted and active range of motion (ROM) exercises, glenohumeral and scapular mobilization, progressive strengthening exercises, and post-treatment cryotherapy. Exercise progression is individualized based on participants' demographic characteristics, pain levels, progressive overload principles, and subjective feedback. Following each session, participants are routinely monitored for any exercise-related adverse effects.

    Also known as: Shoulder Rehabilitation Protocol, Physical Therapy and Exercise Therapy

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in Upper Extremity Function and Disability Scores Using the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire

    Upper extremity disability and functional limitations will be assessed using the Turkish version of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Questionnaire. The questionnaire consists of 30 items evaluating symptoms and the ability to perform various activities of daily living. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale, ranging from 1 (no difficulty or symptoms) to 5 (unable to perform the activity or extreme symptoms). The total DASH score is calculated using the formula \[(sum of item scores / number of completed items) - 1\] × 25, resulting in a score ranging from 0 to 100. Higher scores indicate greater upper extremity disability and functional limitations. At least 27 of the 30 items must be completed to calculate a valid DASH score.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12( follow-up )

  2. Change from Baseline in Shoulder Pain Intensity Scores using Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)

    Shoulder pain intensity will be assessed using the 11-point Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS), where 0 represents "no pain" and 10 represents "worst imaginable pain". Participants will rate their pain levels separately at rest and during movement. Higher scores indicate greater pain severity.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12( follow-up )

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in Active and Passive Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM)

    Active and passive shoulder range of motion (flexion, abduction, internal rotation, and external rotation) will be assessed in degrees using a universal goniometer according to standardized goniometric measurement protocols. Higher degree values indicate better mobility.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12( follow-up )

  2. Change from Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) Scores

    Health-related quality of life will be evaluated using the Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL). The questionnaire consists of 29 items divided into four domains: Vasomotor (3 items), Psychosocial (7 items), Physical (16 items), and Sexual (3 items). Items are scored on a 7-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (not at all bothered) to 6 (extremely bothered). Domain scores and total scores are calculated, with higher scores indicating a greater impact of menopausal symptoms and lower quality of life.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12( follow-up )

  3. Change from Baseline in Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) Scores

    Pain-related catastrophizing thoughts and behaviors will be evaluated using the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS). The 13-item self-report questionnaire assesses three dimensions: Rumination (4 items), Magnification (3 items), and Helplessness (6 items). Items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 ("not at all") to 4 ("all the time"). Total scores range from 0 to 52, with higher scores indicating higher levels of pain catastrophizing.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12( follow-up )

  4. Overall Patient-Perceived Improvement Measured by 5-Point Global Rating of Change (GROC) Scale

    Participants' overall perception of improvement or worsening in their shoulder condition will be assessed using a 5-point Global Rating of Change (GROC) scale. The scale ranges from 1 ("much worse") to 3 ("no change") to 5 ("much better"). Higher scores indicate greater perceived overall improvement in shoulder function and symptoms.

    Time frame: Week 6, Week 12( follow-up )

  5. Change from Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) Scores

    Sleep quality and disturbances over the past month will be evaluated using the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The 19-item self-report questionnaire generates seven component scores: subjective sleep quality, sleep latency, sleep duration, habitual sleep efficiency, sleep disturbances, use of sleeping medication, and daytime dysfunction. Each component is scored from 0 to 3, yielding a global score ranging from 0 to 21. Higher global scores indicate poorer sleep quality, with a total score greater than 5 indicating poor sleep quality.

    Time frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12( follow-up)

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Centro Reformer Pilates Center
    Istanbul, Kadikoy 34710, Turkey (Türkiye)
    • Şükran Acar, MSc Candidate · Contactacarsukran58@gmail.com · +905346071963
    • Derya Çelik, Prof.Dr. · Contactderya.celik@iuc.edu.tr · +905327940169
    • Şükran Acar, MSc Candidate · Principal investigator
    • Derya Çelik, PROF.DR. · Sub investigator
    • Çiğdem Yayla Abide, PROF.DR. · Sub investigator
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant data (IPD) will not be shared because no data-sharing plan was established for this study.

09

Timeline

1 registry update since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedDate before it movedWhere the date was before it movedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Jan 2027; primary completion for Nov 2027, 10 months later.

Of 217 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Bursitis, half reached primary completion within 10 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 17. This study's planned 10 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 217 studies reached it within 10 months; a quarter within 5 and three quarters within 17.

Since we started tracking on Sep 25, 2026, the dates moved once, on Nov 5, 2026: start Sep 2026 → Jan 2027, primary completion Jul 2027 → Nov 2027 and completion Oct 2027 → Dec 2027.

Earlier changes are on the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 25, 2026
First posted
Jul 30, 2026
StartEst.
Jan 1, 2027was Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Nov 1, 2027was Jul 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 1, 2027was Oct 2027
Last update
Nov 5, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
Start date
Sep 1, 2026→Jan 1, 2027
Nov 5, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 1, 2027→Nov 1, 2027
Nov 5, 2026
Study completion
Oct 1, 2027→Dec 1, 2027
Nov 5, 2026
Enrollment
56→30
Nov 5, 2026
Primary outcomes
1 edited, 1 time frame changed
What changed in the outcomes
  • EditedChange from Baseline in ShoulderUpper Extremity Function and Disability Scores usingUsing the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder Pain and Disability IndexHand (SPADIDASH) QuestionnaireTime frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24) → Baseline, Week 6, Week 12( follow-up )
  • Time frameChange from Baseline in Shoulder Pain Intensity Scores using Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24) → Baseline, Week 6, Week 12( follow-up )
Nov 5, 2026
Secondary outcomes
5 time frame changed
What changed in the outcomes
  • Time frameChange from Baseline in Active and Passive Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM)Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24) → Baseline, Week 6, Week 12( follow-up )
  • Time frameChange from Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) ScoresBaseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24) → Baseline, Week 6, Week 12( follow-up )
  • Time frameChange from Baseline in Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) ScoresBaseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24) → Baseline, Week 6, Week 12( follow-up )
  • Time frameOverall Patient-Perceived Improvement Measured by 5-Point Global Rating of Change (GROC) ScaleWeek 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24) → Week 6, Week 12( follow-up )
  • Time frameChange from Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ScoresBaseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24) → Baseline, Week 6, Week 12( follow-up)
Nov 5, 2026
Show all 1 update
  1. Nov 5, 2026
    Start date Sep 1, 2026→Jan 1, 2027
    Primary completion Jul 1, 2027→Nov 1, 2027
    Study completion Oct 1, 2027→Dec 1, 2027
    Enrollment 56→30
    Primary outcomes 1 edited, 1 time frame changed
    What changed in the outcomes
    • EditedChange from Baseline in ShoulderUpper Extremity Function and Disability Scores usingUsing the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder Pain and Disability IndexHand (SPADIDASH) QuestionnaireTime frame: Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24) → Baseline, Week 6, Week 12( follow-up )
    • Time frameChange from Baseline in Shoulder Pain Intensity Scores using Numeric Pain Rating Scale (NPRS)Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24) → Baseline, Week 6, Week 12( follow-up )
    Secondary outcomes 5 time frame changed
    What changed in the outcomes
    • Time frameChange from Baseline in Active and Passive Shoulder Range of Motion (ROM)Baseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24) → Baseline, Week 6, Week 12( follow-up )
    • Time frameChange from Baseline in Menopause-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MENQOL) ScoresBaseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24) → Baseline, Week 6, Week 12( follow-up )
    • Time frameChange from Baseline in Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS) ScoresBaseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24) → Baseline, Week 6, Week 12( follow-up )
    • Time frameOverall Patient-Perceived Improvement Measured by 5-Point Global Rating of Change (GROC) ScaleWeek 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24) → Week 6, Week 12( follow-up )
    • Time frameChange from Baseline in Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI) ScoresBaseline, Week 6, Week 12, and 3-month follow-up (Week 24) → Baseline, Week 6, Week 12( follow-up)
    + 4 other changes: identifiers, verification date, description and arm descriptions

From the registry record's own update history. This site started tracking changes on Sep 25, 2026; for anything earlier, see the record history on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07736027
Responsible party
Sükran Acar (MSc Student, Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa) — Principal investigator
First posted
Jul 30, 2026
Start date
Jan 1, 2027 (estimated)
Primary completion
Nov 1, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Nov 5, 2026

Study contacts

Şükran Acar, Master of Science Candidate
Contact
acarsukran58@gmail.com
+905346071963
Derya Çelik, Prof. Dr.
Contact
derya.celik@iuc.edu.tr
+905327940169
DERYA ÇELİK, PROF.DR.
study director · Istanbul University - Cerrahpasa

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Nov 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion