ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07489651Updated Sep 24, 2026

RE104 Safety and Efficacy Study in Generalized Anxiety Disorder

A Phase 2 interventional study of RE104 for Injection and Placebo in Generalized Anxiety Disorder, sponsored by Reunion Neuroscience Inc. Recruiting at 28 sites in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 74 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-09-24.

Sponsored by Reunion Neuroscience Inc · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Apr 2026; still recruiting 6 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
160
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 74 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The purpose of this study is to determine if treatment with a single and/or repeat dose of RE104 for Injection reduces anxiety symptoms in participants with Generalized Anxiety Disorder (GAD) as compared to placebo.

02

Conditions studied

  • Generalized Anxiety Disorder

Keywords

  • GAD
03

In context

Generalized Anxiety Disorder

517 studies on the registry are indexed under Generalized Anxiety Disorder; 124 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 160 is above the median of 83 across 439 interventional studies indexed under Generalized Anxiety Disorder.

Browse Generalized Anxiety Disorder studies →

Lead sponsor

Reunion Neuroscience Inc is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 2 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 74 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Has Generalized Anxiety Disorder as defined by
  • If female is not pregnant or planning to become pregnant. If male is not planning to make a partner pregnant.
  • Is willing and able to comply with the conditions and requirements of the study

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Has a significant risk of suicide
  • Has an active or medical history of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, psychotic disorder and/or borderline personality disorder, or first-degree family history of psychosis or bipolar disorder
  • Has other concurrent psychiatric disorders that is the primary disorder.
  • Has other medically significant conditions rendering unsuitability for the study
  • Has used or will need to use prohibited medications or therapies
  • Has a known sensitivity or intolerance to study intervention or potential rescue medications
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

DSM diagnostic criteria

The American Psychiatric Association’s manual of mental health diagnoses. DSM-5 (2013, revised as DSM-5-TR in 2022) replaced DSM-IV, and some studies still name the older edition. “Meets DSM criteria for …” means diagnosed by that edition’s diagnostic criteria, usually by a clinician in an interview.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
160 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Placebo comparator
    Placebo

    A single subcutaneous injection of 0.9% sodium chloride for injection per dosing session

    Drug: Placebo

  • Experimental
    30 mg RE104

    A single subcutaneous injection of 30 mg RE104 for Injection per dosing session

    Drug: RE104 for Injection

Interventions

  • Single dose (Part A) or Repeat-dose (Part B), subcutaneous injection(s) of RE104 for Injection

  • DrugPlacebo

    Single-dose (Part A) or Repeat-dose (Part B), subcutaneous injection(s) of 0.9% sodium chloride for injection

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. RE104 when administered as a single 30 mg dose or as two 30 mg doses 3 weeks apart versus placebo change from Baseline at Week 4 in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) total score

    The Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) is a 14-item scale that is used to rate the severity of symptoms of anxiety. The total score ranges from 0-56 with higher scores representing greater severity of anxiety.

    Time frame: Week 4

Secondary outcomes

  1. RE104 versus placebo changes in total score from baseline in Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A)

    The Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) is a 14-item scale that is used to rate the severity of symptoms of anxiety. The total score ranges from 0-56 with higher scores representing greater severity of anxiety.

    Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 8 and 12

  2. RE104 versus placebo percentage of participants with HAM-A response (≥50% reduction in score from Baseline)

    The Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) is a 14-item scale that is used to rate the severity of symptoms of anxiety. The total score ranges from 0-56 with higher scores representing greater severity of anxiety.

    Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12

  3. RE104 versus placebo percentage of participants with HAM-A remission (total score ≤7)

    The Hamilton Rating Scale for Anxiety (HAM-A) is a 14-item scale that is used to rate the severity of symptoms of anxiety. The total score ranges from 0-56 with higher scores representing greater severity of anxiety.

    Time frame: Day 1 and Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12

  4. RE104 versus placebo change from Baseline at Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) depression subscore

    The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS) is a self-reported scale measure the severity of depression and anxiety in patients with comorbid medical conditions. The scale consists of 14 items (7 for anxiety and 7 for depression), with a score ranging between 0 and 21 for the anxiety and depression subscales.

    Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8 and 12

  5. RE104 versus placebo incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) by frequency, severity and seriousness.

    A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) is defined as any unfavorable and unintended sign, symptom or disease temporally associated with the use of a study drug.

    Time frame: From dosing through study completion (post-dose follow-up is for 12 weeks)

  6. RE104 versus placebo change from Baseline in Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) (Part B only)

    The Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) is a 10-item clinician rated scale measuring depression severity. The total score ranges from 0-60 with higher scores representing greater severity of depression.

    Time frame: Weeks 1, 2, 4, 8, and 12

07

Study locations

27 of 28 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Data sharing will be consistent with the results submission policy of ClinicalTrials.gov.

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Apr 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jul 2027, 15 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 18, 2026
First posted
Mar 24, 2026
StartActual
Apr 20, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2027
CompletionEst.
Sep 2027
Last update
Sep 24, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Sep 24, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07489651
Lead sponsor
Reunion Neuroscience Inc
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 24, 2026
Start date
Apr 20, 2026
Primary completion
Jul 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Sep 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Sep 24, 2026

Study contacts

Mark Pollack Chief Medical Officer, M.D.
Contact
info@reunionneuro.com
1-888-880-REUN
Mark Pollack, M.D.
study director · Reunion Neuroscience Inc

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
Yes
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Luvesilocin

Start the discussion