ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07482696Updated Aug 7, 2026

Electromyographic Biofeedback Therapy in Patients With Dyssynergic Defecation

An interventional study of Game-Based Electromyographic (EMG) Biofeedback Therapy and Sham Control in Defecation Disorder, sponsored by Kocaeli University. Recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-08-07.

Sponsored by Kocaeli University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Mar 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
36
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This study aimed to investigate the effects of game-based electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback therapy on the quality of life and sleep quality of individuals diagnosed with dyssynergic defecation.

Read the detailed description

This study aimed to investigate the effects of game-based electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback therapy on quality of life, sleep quality, constipation severity, and pelvic floor muscle function in individuals diagnosed with dyssynergic defecation and chronic constipation. Dyssynergic defecation is a common functional defecation disorder and is one of the leading causes of chronic constipation. It is characterized by paradoxical contraction or inadequate relaxation of the pelvic floor muscles and anal sphincters during defecation, resulting in impaired evacuation of the rectum. This condition leads to excessive straining, a sensation of incomplete evacuation, prolonged stool retention, and significant deterioration in quality of life. Epidemiological studies indicate that dyssynergic defecation accounts for a substantial proportion of chronic constipation cases referred to tertiary care centers for treatment. In patients with dyssynergic defecation, pharmacological treatments alone are often insufficient because they do not address the underlying neuromuscular coordination disorder. Therefore, contemporary management strategies emphasize behavioral and rehabilitative interventions aimed at retraining pelvic floor muscle coordination in women with UI. Among these approaches, EMG biofeedback therapy has emerged as one of the most effective and evidence-based treatment modalities for this condition. Previous randomized controlled trials have demonstrated that EMG biofeedback improves defecation dynamics, reduces constipation-related symptoms, and provides sustained benefits compared with conventional treatment. Despite its proven efficacy, conventional EMG biofeedback therapy may be limited by reduced patient motivation, difficulty in understanding abstract muscle activity patterns, and decreased adherence. In recent years, game-based biofeedback systems have been introduced to overcome these limitations by enhancing patient engagement and facilitating the motor learning process. Game-based biofeedback integrates real-time visual feedback with interactive tasks, allowing patients to actively control on-screen elements through appropriate muscle activation and relaxation. This approach supports motor learning principles, promotes neuromuscular adaptation, and may improve treatment compliance in patients. Another important but often overlooked consequence of chronic constipation and dyssynergic defecation is the impaired sleep quality. Persistent abdominal discomfort, bloating, and defecation-related anxiety can negatively affect sleep patterns, leading to fatigue, reduced daytime functioning, and further deterioration in quality of life (QoL). However, limited data are available on the effects of pelvic floor rehabilitation and biofeedback therapy on sleep quality in this patient population. In recent years, increasing attention has been given to the role of objective physiological assessments in evaluating the efficacy of treatments. Anorectal manometry provides quantitative information on anorectal motility and pelvic floor muscle coordination and is considered the gold standard for diagnosing of dyssynergic defecation. The inclusion of objective manometric measurements alongside patient-reported outcomes allows for a comprehensive evaluation of both the clinical and physiological responses to treatment. Therefore, this randomized controlled study aimed to evaluate the short- and mid-term effects of game-based EMG biofeedback therapy, applied in addition to standard pelvic floor rehabilitation, compared with sham EMG biofeedback in individuals with dyssynergic defecation. The primary outcome of this study was the change in quality of life, assessed using the Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life (PAC-QOL) questionnaire. Secondary outcomes included sleep quality, constipation severity, defecation patterns, pain intensity, pelvic floor muscle function assessed using surface EMG, and anorectal motility evaluated using anal manometry. By combining subjective clinical scales with objective physiological measurements, this study aimed to provide high-quality evidence regarding the effectiveness of adaptive, game-based EMG biofeedback therapy in the management of dyssynergic defecation. The findings are expected to contribute to the development of patient-centered, motivation-enhancing rehabilitation strategies and support the integration of game-based biofeedback approaches into standard pelvic floor rehabilitation programs.

02

Conditions studied

  • Defecation Disorder

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Dyssynergic Defecation
  • Electromyographic Biofeedback
  • Pelvic Floor Rehabilitation
  • Constipation
03

In context

Constipation

1,046 studies on the registry are indexed under Constipation; 161 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 36 is below the median of 75 across 884 interventional studies indexed under Constipation.

Browse Constipation studies →

Lead sponsor

Kocaeli University is the lead sponsor of 215 studies on the registry; 39 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  1. Diagnosis of dyssynergic defecation was confirmed by anorectal manometry, which demonstrated paradoxical pelvic floor muscle contraction and/or inadequate relaxation during defecation.
  2. Eligibility for a pelvic floor rehabilitation program was based on a comprehensive evaluation conducted at the Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic.
  3. Age between 18 and 70 years.
  4. A history of chronic constipation lasting at least six months, in accordance with the Rome IV diagnostic criteria.
  5. Stool consistency was classified as type 1 or type 2 according to the Bristol Stool Scale, indicating a hard stool pattern.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Presence of communication barriers that may interfere with participation in the study.
  2. Cognitive impairment affects the ability to comply with rehabilitation programs or assessments.
  3. Pregnancy.
  4. Presence of severe depression and/or anxiety disorder.
  5. Untreated metabolic or endocrine disorders, including but not limited to diabetes mellitus, hypothyroidism, hypokalemia, and hypercalcemia.
  6. Use of medications known to cause or exacerbate constipation.
  7. History of spinal, rectal, or pelvic surgery, excluding cholecystectomy, hysterectomy, and appendectomy.
  8. Presence of colorectal or inflammatory bowel disease.
  9. Anorectal malformations or congenital pelvic floor anomalies.
  10. Spina bifida, spinal cord injury, or neurological disorders, including multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, dementia, or epilepsy.
  11. Presence of severe cardiac or renal disease.
  12. Advanced-stage hemorrhoids, anal fissures, or anal fistulas.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(1)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
36 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Biofeedback Group

    Participants in the experimental group will receive game-based electromyographic (EMG) biofeedback therapy in addition to the standard pelvic floor rehabilitation program.

    Device: Game-Based Electromyographic (EMG) Biofeedback Therapy

  • Sham comparator
    Control Group

    Participants in the control group will receive sham EMG biofeedback therapy alongside the same standard pelvic floor rehabilitation program with identical session frequency and duration.

    Device: Sham Control

Interventions

  • DeviceGame-Based Electromyographic (EMG) Biofeedback Therapy

    Game-based biofeedback integrates real-time visual feedback with interactive tasks, allowing patients to actively control on-screen elements through appropriate muscle activation and relaxation. This approach supports motor learning principles, promotes neuromuscular adaptation, and may improve treatment compliance.

  • DeviceSham Control

    Sham EMG biofeedback therapy will be administered alongside the same standard pelvic floor rehabilitation program with identical session frequency and duration. Surface electrodes will be placed in the same anatomical locations; however, the biofeedback device will operate in demo mode, and visual feedback will not reflect actual muscle activity.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life Questionnaire

    The Patient Assessment of Constipation-Quality of Life questionnaire is a validated and reliable patient-reported outcome measure developed to assess the impact of chronic constipation on the quality of life. The scale consists of 28 items grouped into four subdomains. * Physical Discomfort: Assesses constipation-related physical symptoms and bodily discomfort. * Psychosocial Discomfort: Evaluates the impact of the condition on emotional status, social functioning, and psychological well-being. * Worries and Concerns: Assesses anxiety, concerns, and illness-related perceptions associated with constipation. * Satisfaction: Evaluates patients' satisfaction with their current bowel function and treatments. Each item is scored on a 5-point Likert scale, with higher scores indicating a greater negative impact on the quality of life.

    Time frame: At baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 2-months after the intervention.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index

    The Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index is a self-reported questionnaire that assesses sleep quality over 1-month period. The measure consists of 19 individual items, creating seven components that produce one global score, and takes 5-10 minutes to complete. Each item is weighted on a 0-3 interval scale. The global PSQI score is calculated by totaling the seven component scores, providing an overall score ranging from 0 to 21, with lower scores denoting healthier sleep quality.

    Time frame: At baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 2-months after the intervention.

  2. Constipation Severity Instrument

    Constipation severity will be evaluated using the Constipation Severity Instrument, which assesses the severity of constipation-related symptoms and their impacts on daily life. It uses a five-point Likert scale (0-4), resulting in a total score from 0-73, where higher scores indicate greater severity.

    Time frame: At baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 2-months after the intervention.

  3. Bristol Stool Scale

    The Bristol Stool Scale categorizes human feces into seven types based on their shape and consistency, ranging from constipation (types 1-2) to diarrhea (types 5-7). This classification facilitates the objective monitoring of changes in bowel habits by assessing stool form and consistency.

    Time frame: At baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 2-months after the intervention.

  4. Visual Analog Scale

    Pain intensity and defecation-related discomfort will be measured using the Visual Analog Scale, a widely used tool for quantifying subjective pain perception. It is resulting in a total score from 0-100 mm, where higher scores indicate severe pain.

    Time frame: At baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 2-months after the intervention.

  5. Anorectal manometry

    Anorectal manometry is considered the gold standard for assessing anorectal function and for objectively monitoring physiological responses to treatment in patients with dyssynergic defecation.

    Time frame: At baseline, immediately after the intervention, and 2-months after the intervention.

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Yamamoto S, Kawamura Y, Yamamoto K, Yamaguchi Y, Tamura Y, Izawa S, Nakagawa H, Wakita Y, Hijikata Y, Ebi M, Funaki Y, Ohashi W, Ogasawara N, Sasaki M, Maekawa M, Kasugai K. Internet Survey of Japanese Patients With Chronic Constipation: Focus on Correlations Between Sleep Quality, Symptom Severity, and Quality of Life. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2021 Oct 30;27(4):602-611. doi: 10.5056/jnm20135. PubMed 34642281 ↗
  • Sadeghi A, Akbarpour E, Majidirad F, Bor S, Forootan M, Hadian MR, Adibi P. Dyssynergic Defecation: A Comprehensive Review on Diagnosis and Management. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2023 Mar;34(3):182-195. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2023.22148. PubMed 36919830 ↗
  • Schrader R, Maschuw R. [Reduction of the surface dose of Co 60 rays in a tissue depth of 0 to 3 mm by means of a magnetic field (author's transl)]. Strahlentherapie. 1980 Apr;156(4):257-63. German. PubMed 7368232 ↗
  • Rao SS, Patcharatrakul T. Diagnosis and Treatment of Dyssynergic Defecation. J Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2016 Jul 30;22(3):423-35. doi: 10.5056/jnm16060. PubMed 27270989 ↗
  • Rao SS, Seaton K, Miller M, Brown K, Nygaard I, Stumbo P, Zimmerman B, Schulze K. Randomized controlled trial of biofeedback, sham feedback, and standard therapy for dyssynergic defecation. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2007 Mar;5(3):331-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2006.12.023. PubMed 17368232 ↗
  • Simon MA, Bueno AM. Efficacy of Biofeedback Therapy in the Treatment of Dyssynergic Defecation in Community-Dwelling Elderly Women. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2017 Nov/Dec;51(10):e90-e94. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000794. PubMed 28059942 ↗
  • Chiarioni G, Whitehead WE, Pezza V, Morelli A, Bassotti G. Biofeedback is superior to laxatives for normal transit constipation due to pelvic floor dyssynergia. Gastroenterology. 2006 Mar;130(3):657-64. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2005.11.014. PubMed 16530506 ↗
  • Sahin M, Dogan I, Cengiz M, Unal S. The impact of anorectal biofeedback therapy on the quality of life of patients with dyssynergic defecation. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2015 Mar;26(2):140-4. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2015.4689. PubMed 25835112 ↗
  • Ozkutuk N, Eser I, Bor S. Effectiveness of Biofeedback Therapy on Quality of Life in Patients with Dyssynergic Defecation Disorder. Turk J Gastroenterol. 2021 Jan;32(1):22-29. doi: 10.5152/tjg.2020.19678. PubMed 33893763 ↗
  • Heymen S, Scarlett Y, Jones K, Ringel Y, Drossman D, Whitehead WE. Randomized, controlled trial shows biofeedback to be superior to alternative treatments for patients with pelvic floor dyssynergia-type constipation. Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Apr;50(4):428-41. doi: 10.1007/s10350-006-0814-9. PubMed 17294322 ↗
  • Rao SS, Valestin J, Brown CK, Zimmerman B, Schulze K. Long-term efficacy of biofeedback therapy for dyssynergic defecation: randomized controlled trial. Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Apr;105(4):890-6. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2010.53. Epub 2010 Feb 23. PubMed 20179692 ↗
  • Xu Y, Li X, Xia F, Xu F, Chen JDZ. Efficacy of a Modified Training Program of Adaptive Biofeedback Therapy for Dyssynergic Defecation in Patients with Chronic Constipation. Dig Dis Sci. 2022 Apr;67(4):1320-1327. doi: 10.1007/s10620-021-07094-z. Epub 2021 Jun 15. PubMed 34129127 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Mar 2026 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Oct 2026, 7 months after the start.

Of 243 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Constipation, half reached primary completion within 17 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 7 and three quarters within 35. This study's planned 7 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 314 studies reached it within 14 months; a quarter within 6 and three quarters within 30.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Mar 1, 2026
First posted
Mar 19, 2026
StartActual
Mar 31, 2026
Primary completionEst.
Oct 31, 2026
CompletionEst.
Dec 31, 2026
Last update
Aug 7, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 7, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07482696
Lead sponsor
Kocaeli University
Responsible party
Tugba Gokbel (Assisstant Prof. Dr., Kocaeli University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 19, 2026
Start date
Mar 31, 2026
Primary completion
Oct 31, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 7, 2026

Study contacts

Tugba Gokbel, Assistant Prof, MD
Contact
tugbagokbelftr@gmail.com
+905442877390

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion