ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07470359Updated Mar 13, 2026

Comparison of Functional Outcomes Following Arthroscopic ACL Reconstruction With Peroneus Longus Autograft With and Without Intra-articular Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection.

A Phase 2 interventional study of PRP injection in ACL Reconstruction, Intraarticular Injection and PRP, sponsored by Lahore General Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 50 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-13.

Sponsored by Lahore General Hospital · Phase 2, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 8 months later.
Phase
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 50 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This prospective RCT investigates if a single 4 ml intra-articular PRP injection improves knee function after ACL reconstruction using peroneus longus autograft. In Pakistan's resource-limited context, 88 patients (18-50 years) with isolated ACL tears receive either PRP or saline during surgery, then randomized equally. KOOS4 scores compared at 3, 6, and 12 months via ANCOVA (adjusted baseline, α=0.05). Positive results could establish affordable enhancement for recovery and guide practice in similar settings.

Read the detailed description

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injuries impair knee function, particularly in young athletes, with many failing to regain pre-injury performance post-reconstruction (ACLR). Peroneus longus autografts offer comparable strength to traditional grafts with reduced donor site morbidity, but early recovery remains challenging. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) may enhance graft healing, yet its efficacy with peroneus longus autografts is understudied, especially in resource-limited settings like Pakistan, where costly PRP methods are impractical. This prospective randomized controlled trial (RCT) evaluates whether a single intra-articular PRP injection (4 ml, 2 ml per femoral/tibial tunnel) improves functional outcomes in ACLR with peroneus longus autograft. The hypothesis is that PRP will lead to superior knee functions. The study aims to compare KOOS4 scores at 3, 6, and 12 months between PRP and control groups. Eighty-eight patients (44 per group) aged 18-50 with isolated ACL tears will be randomized (1:1) to receive 4 ml PRP (from 15-20 ml blood, single-spin centrifugation at 3500 rpm) or saline during surgery at Lahore General Hospital. Assessments at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months will use validated KOOS4 questionnaires, integrated into clinic visits to ensure low dropout (10%). Data will be analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) for KOOS4 scores (α = 0.05) in SPSS, adjusting for baseline differences. Improved KOOS4 scores with PRP could validate a cost-effective approach, enhance recovery and inform clinical guidelines in resource-constrained settings, ultimately improving patient outcomes.

02

Conditions studied

  • ACL Reconstruction
  • Intraarticular Injection
  • PRP

Keywords

  • Anterior Cruciate Ligament, ACL Reconstruction, Peroneus Longus Autograft, Platelet-Rich Plasma, Intra-articular Injection
  • Randomized Controlled Trial, KOOS4 Score, Functional Outcomes, Graft Healing, Resource-Limited Settings
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Lahore General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 32 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 50 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Eligibility criteria

Inclusion Criteria: Age between 18 and 50 years. Diagnosis of a primary, complete ACL tear requiring reconstruction. Willingness to undergo arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with peroneus longus autograft.

Active individuals participating in sports or regular physical activity. Willingness to provide and adhere to the study protocol, including follow-up visits and rehabilitation.

Ability to understand and complete study questionnaires. - Exclusion Criteria: Previous knee surgery on the affected limb. Concomitant ligamentous injuries requiring additional reconstruction (e.g., PCL, MCL, LCL Grade III).

Significant chondral damage (Outerbridge grade > 2 on pre-operative MRI or intra-operative assessment).

Pre-existing knee osteoarthritis (Kellgren-Lawrence grade > 2). Systemic inflammatory conditions (e.g., rheumatoid arthritis). Bleeding disorders or coagulopathies. Current use of anticoagulants. injection into the knee within 6 weeks prior to surgery. Pregnancy or lactation. Inability to comply with the rehabilitation protocol. Infection or history of infection in the affected knee. History of previous contralateral ACL injury (to isolate primary injury outcomes).

-

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

05

Study design

Phase
Phase 2
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Intraarticular PRP Group

    Intraarticular Platelet rich plasma injection

    Biological: PRP injection

  • Placebo comparator
    Saline group

    Normal saline group

    Biological: PRP injection

Interventions

  • BiologicalPRP injection

    Platelets rich plasma from patients own blood

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. KOOS4 score

    To compare knee-related functional outcomes, as measured by the KOOS4 score, between patients undergoing arthroscopic ACL reconstruction with peroneus longus autograft and intra-articular PRP injection versus those undergoing ACL reconstruction with peroneus longus autograft alone at 3-, 6-, and 12-months post-surgery.

    Time frame: 12 months

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kunze KN, Pakanati JJ, Vadhera AS, Polce EM, Williams BT, Parvaresh KC, Chahla J. The Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review of Basic Science Literature With Protocol Quality Assessment. Orthop J Sports Med. 2022 Feb 9;10(2):23259671211066504. doi: 10.1177/23259671211066504. eCollection 2022 Feb. PubMed 35155701 ↗
  • Gong H, Huang B, Zheng Z, Fu L, Chen L. Clinical Use of Platelet-Rich Plasma to Promote Tendon-Bone Healing and Graft Maturation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction-A Randomized Controlled Study. Indian J Orthop. 2022 Jan 27;56(5):805-811. doi: 10.1007/s43465-021-00533-z. eCollection 2022 May. PubMed 35103026 ↗
  • Cao Y, Wan YD. Effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials. Orthop Surg. 2022 Oct;14(10):2406-2417. doi: 10.1111/os.13279. Epub 2022 Sep 2. PubMed 36056588 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07470359
Lead sponsor
Lahore General Hospital
Responsible party
Hafiz Sohail Ahmad (Post Graduate Resident, Lahore General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 13, 2026
Start date
Feb 20, 2026
Primary completion
Aug 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Nov 30, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 13, 2026

Study contacts

Hafiz Sohail Ahmad, Dr
Contact
Hafiz.sohail.315@gmail.com
+923204085069
Abdul Subhan Zahid, Dr
Contact
Abdulsubhanzahid3@gmail.com
+923104052587

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Studies of the drug tested here: Platelet rich plasma

Start the discussion