ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07112898Updated Aug 8, 2025

Effect of Platelet-Rich Plasma on Graft Uptake and Postoperative Outcomes in Full-Thickness Skin Grafting of Face and Neck

An interventional study of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) and Standard Skin Grafting in Skin Transplantation and Reconstructive Surgical Procedures, sponsored by Lahore General Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Pakistan. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 65 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2025-08-08.

Sponsored by Lahore General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jan 2026, 9 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
60
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 65 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This clinical study aims to evaluate whether applying platelet-rich plasma (PRP), a substance made from a person's own blood, can improve the success of full-thickness skin grafts used to treat facial and neck wounds. Skin grafting is a common reconstructive technique for covering wounds caused by injuries, burns, surgeries, or other conditions. However, skin grafts sometimes do not heal well, leading to complications such as graft failure, infection, or delayed healing, especially in delicate areas like the face and neck.

Platelet-rich plasma contains special healing components called growth factors that may help tissues heal faster and better. These growth factors support new blood vessel formation, reduce swelling, and promote healthy skin regeneration. In this study, participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups. One group will receive skin grafts along with PRP applied to the wound and graft site, while the other group will receive standard grafting without PRP.

The study will measure how much of the graft survives and integrates into the wound (called "graft uptake") on the 7th day after surgery. It will also assess other early outcomes such as signs of redness (erythema), infection, or blood collection under the graft (hematoma). The hypothesis is that using PRP will lead to better graft healing and fewer complications than using skin grafts alone. The results of this study may help improve recovery and reduce the need for further procedures in patients with facial and neck skin defects.

02

Conditions studied

  • Skin Transplantation
  • Reconstructive Surgical Procedures

Keywords

  • Full-Thickness Skin Graft
  • Platelet-Rich Plasma
  • Wound Healing Enhancement
  • Graft Uptake
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Lahore General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 32 studies on the registry; 4 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 65 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients aged 18 to 65 years undergoing full-thickness skin grafting for facial or cervical skin defects.
  • Indications for grafting include post-traumatic defects, burns, tumor excision, or revision surgeries.
  • Patients with wound defects of size ranging between 3 cm² and 6 cm², amenable to single-session full-thickness skin grafting.
  • Patients in whom the recipient bed is healthy, vascularized, and free of necrotic tissue at the time of surgery.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with systemic conditions known to impair wound healing, including uncontrolled diabetes mellitus ( >8%), severe peripheral vascular disease, collagen vascular disorders, or immunodeficiency.
  • Patients with hematological disorders affecting count or function, including thrombocytopenia (platelet count \<150,000/µL), coagulopathies, or platelet dysfunction syndromes.
  • Patients on systemic anticoagulation therapy (e.g., warfarin, DOACs) or within the last 4 weeks.
  • Presence of active local infection or purulent discharge at the recipient or donor site at the time of surgery.
  • History of previous radiation to the grafted site or underlying with ongoing treatment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(4)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Platelets

Blood cells that help blood clot. Too few raises the risk of bleeding and bruising. A usual adult range is about 150–400 × 10⁹/L (150,000–400,000 per µL); each lab has its own reference range.

Corticosteroids (steroids)

Anti-inflammatory medicines such as prednisone, prednisolone and dexamethasone — not the anabolic steroids used for muscle.

Studies differ in what they allow: check which steroid medicines, routes (tablets, injections, creams, inhalers, eye drops) and doses this study accepts.

Cancer (malignancy)

Malignancy means cancer. Criteria about another or earlier malignancy ask whether you have had a different cancer, usually within a set number of years.

Some are commonly allowed, such as treated skin cancers other than melanoma and early cancers removed completely — check the exceptions this study lists.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Group PRP

    Patients in this group received autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) applied to both the recipient wound bed and the graft before graft placement, during full-thickness skin grafting for facial or neck defects.

    Procedure: Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)

  • Active comparator
    Group Control

    Patients in this group underwent standard full-thickness skin grafting on the face or neck without PRP application.

    Procedure: Standard Skin Grafting

Interventions

  • ProcedurePlatelet-Rich Plasma (PRP)

    Autologous PRP (approximately 4-6 mL) will be prepared using a double centrifugation technique and activated with 10% calcium gluconate. It will be administered by injecting 0.1-0.2 mL/cm² subdermally into the recipient bed and intradermally into the graft prior to placement.

    Also known as: Autologous PRP

  • ProcedureStandard Skin Grafting

    Grafts will be placed on a clean, vascularized wound bed, secured with nonabsorbable sutures, and covered with standard postoperative dressings. No PRP will be applied.

    Also known as: Conventional Full-Thickness Skin Graft

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Percentage of Graft Uptake at Day 7 Postoperatively

    Graft uptake will be assessed as the percentage of the original wound area successfully covered by the viable graft on the 7th postoperative day. This will be calculated using the formula: Graft Uptake (%) = \[(Original wound area - Denuded area) ÷ Original wound area\] × 100. The denuded area will be determined using sterile measurement tools such as a surgical ruler, grid tracing, or digital planimetry. Based on the uptake percentage, the graft will be categorized qualitatively as: Excellent (\>90%), Good (76-90%), Moderate (50-75%), Poor (\<50%), or Failed (0%).

    Time frame: 7th postoperative day

Secondary outcomes

  1. Proportion of Patients with Graft Failure (0% Uptake)

    Graft failure will be defined as complete necrosis or detachment of the graft, resulting in 0% uptake on the 7th postoperative day. Failure will be confirmed through clinical evaluation and photographic documentation.

    Time frame: 7th postoperative day

  2. Local Graft Site Infection

    Infection will be diagnosed if at least two of the following signs are present: purulent discharge, localized swelling, increased warmth, or breakdown at the graft margins. Evaluation will be performed by the surgical team, and swabs may be collected if purulent discharge is observed.

    Time frame: 7th postoperative day

07

Study locations

1 site
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jul 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jan 2026, 6 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Aug 2, 2025
First posted
Aug 8, 2025
StartActual
Jul 15, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jan 15, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jan 15, 2026
Last update
Aug 8, 2025
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Aug 8, 2025, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07112898
Lead sponsor
Lahore General Hospital
Responsible party
Muhammad Irfan Jamil (Principal Investigator, Lahore General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Aug 8, 2025
Start date
Jul 15, 2025
Primary completion
Jan 15, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jan 15, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Aug 8, 2025

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion