CClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07468786Updated Mar 13, 2026

Masseter Muscle Thickness in Individuals With Chronic Neck Pain

An observational study in Masseter Muscle, Ultrasonographic and Chronic Neck Pain, sponsored by Hasan Kalyoncu University. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Turkey (Türkiye). Open to participants aged 18 Years to 45 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-13.

Sponsored by Hasan Kalyoncu University · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
90
Ages
18 Years to 45 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The primary objective of our study is to compare the thickness of the masseter muscle, measured by ultrasound, in individuals with chronic neck pain to that of healthy individuals. The secondary objective of the study is to examine the relationships between masseter muscle thickness and pain intensity, neck disability level, pain catastrophizing level, and clinical diagnostic criteria in individuals with chronic neck pain.

Read the detailed description

The aim of this study is to evaluate masseter muscle thickness in individuals with chronic neck pain using ultrasonography and to compare it with healthy individuals. Thus, it is intended to reveal possible morphological changes related to the craniomandibular system in chronic neck pain and to determine whether these changes contribute to clinical evaluations. The literature reports that there are biomechanical and neuromuscular connections between the temporomandibular system and the cervical spine, and that changes in masseter muscle activity and morphology may be related to neck pain. The literature emphasizes that there are biomechanical, neuromuscular, and sensory connections between the temporomandibular system and the cervical spine, and that dysfunctions in these two regions may influence each other reciprocally. The masseter muscle, in particular, being one of the primary muscles of the temporomandibular system, may exhibit increased muscle activity, parafunctional habits, and morphological adaptations due to central sensitization mechanisms in chronic pain conditions. Chronic neck pain is reported to be more common in individuals with temporomandibular disorders, along with increased muscle sensitivity and functional limitations, and this condition is associated with cervical pain severity and disability level. Ultrasonography is a reliable, valid, and non-invasive method for assessing muscle thickness and is widely used to evaluate the morphological characteristics of the masseter muscle. Measuring masseter muscle thickness by ultrasonography allows for the evaluation of the muscle's structural response to functional loading and enables comparisons between different clinical groups. However, the literature shows that studies comparing possible changes in masseter muscle thickness in individuals with chronic neck pain with healthy individuals are limited, and this relationship has not been sufficiently elucidated. Accordingly, the primary objective of this study is to compare the masseter muscle thickness measured by ultrasonography in individuals with chronic neck pain with that in healthy individuals. The secondary objective of the study is to examine the relationships between masseter muscle thickness and pain intensity, neck disability level, pain catastrophizing level, and clinical diagnostic criteria in individuals with chronic neck pain.

02

Conditions studied

  • Masseter Muscle
  • Ultrasonographic
  • Chronic Neck Pain

Keywords

  • chronic neck pain
  • Ultrasonographic measurement
  • Masseter muscle
03

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 45 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

The study will include individuals aged 18-45 who have experienced neck pain for at least 3 months but do not have a diagnosed cervical pathology. The control group will include individuals aged 18-45 who do not have any health problems.

Inclusion criteria

  • Be between the ages of 18 and 45
  • Have neck pain that has persisted for at least 3 months
  • Agree to participate in the study voluntarily and provide written informed consent

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of cervical spine surgery or severe trauma
  • Diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy, myelopathy, or neurological disease
  • Rheumatic, inflammatory, or systemic musculoskeletal diseases
  • Diagnosed temporomandibular joint disorder (TMD)
  • Diagnosis of bruxism or a pronounced habit of teeth clenching/grinding
  • History of manual therapy, injection, or surgical intervention in the face, jaw, or neck region within the last 6 months
  • Currently undergoing orthodontic treatment or history of orthodontic treatment within the last 6 months
  • Cognitive impairment or conditions that prevent understanding and responding to questionnaires
04

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
90 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Chronic neck pain group

    The study will include individuals aged 18-45 who have experienced neck pain for at least 3 months but do not have a diagnosed cervical pathology.

  • Healthy Group

    The control group will also include individuals aged 18-45 with no health problems.

05

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Ultrasonographic Measurement

    Masseter muscle thickness will be assessed using the B-mode ultrasound method with a 7.5-10 MHz frequency linear probe on an ALEXUS brand ultrasound device. During measurements, participants will be positioned sitting upright, with the head in a neutral position and the jaw at rest (teeth not in occlusion). Prior to measurement, participants will be instructed to avoid activities such as intense chewing or gum chewing for the last 24 hours. The measurement point will be determined as the midpoint of the line between the zygomatic arch and the mandibular angle. The linear probe will be placed parallel to the long axis of the masseter muscle fibers, perpendicular to the skin surface, and with minimal pressure applied. The ultrasound image will clearly distinguish the skin, subcutaneous tissue, and superficial and deep fascial borders of the masseter muscle.

    Time frame: through of the study, average 3 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Visual Analog Scale (VAS)

    The VAS is a one-dimensional measurement tool used to assess the intensity of pain as perceived by the individual. The scale consists of a horizontal line with endpoints defined as "0 = no pain" and "10 = unbearable pain," on which the individual marks their current pain level. Participants are asked to rate the intensity of their neck pain, and the distance from the starting point to the marked point is measured in centimeters or millimeters and scored. Higher scores indicate higher pain intensity.

    Time frame: through of the study, average 3 months

  2. Neck Disability Index - NDI

    The Neck Disability Index (NDI) is a multidimensional self-report scale developed to assess the level of functional limitation associated with neck pain, covering activities of daily living. The scale consists of a total of 10 items covering pain, personal care, lifting, reading, headaches, concentration, work, driving, sleep, and recreation. Each item is scored from 0 to 5, and the total score ranges from 0 to 50. Higher scores indicate an increased level of disability related to the neck. The validity and reliability study of the 7-item questionnaire in Turkish was conducted by Emine Aslan and colleagues in 2008.

    Time frame: through of the study, average 3 months

  3. Pain Catastrophizing Scale

    The Pain Catastrophizing Scale was developed to assess an individual's negative cognitive and emotional responses to their pain experience. The scale consists of three subscales: rumination (persistent thinking), magnification, and helplessness. The scale is answered using a Likert-type rating, and a total score is calculated. High scores indicate an increased tendency to catastrophize pain.

    Time frame: through of the study, average 3 months

  4. Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ)

    The Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) is a self-report measure that assesses functional impairment and symptom severity associated with neck pain. The scale consists of items covering pain, paresthesia, sleep, social life, and daily activities. Participants select the statement that best applies to them for each item. The total score reflects the level of functional impairment, with higher scores indicating greater disability and symptom severity.

    Time frame: through of the study, average 3 months

06

Study locations

1 site
  • Hasan Kalyoncu University
    Gaziantep, Şahinbey 27000, Turkey (Türkiye)
07

References and documents

Publications

  • Aslan EM, Artas A. Ultrasonographic Assessment of Masseter and Anterior Temporal Muscle Thickness and Internal Structure in Young Adult Patients With Bruxism. J Clin Ultrasound. 2025 Feb;53(2):286-293. doi: 10.1002/jcu.23866. Epub 2024 Oct 11. PubMed 39391995 ↗
  • Leak AM, Cooper J, Dyer S, Williams KA, Turner-Stokes L, Frank AO. The Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire, devised to measure neck pain and disability. Br J Rheumatol. 1994 May;33(5):469-74. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/33.5.469. PubMed 8173853 ↗
  • Ilcin N, Gurpinar B, Bayraktar D, Savci S, Cetin P, Sari I, Akkoc N. Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Turkish version of the pain catastrophizing scale among patients with ankylosing spondylitis. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016 Jan;28(1):298-303. doi: 10.1589/jpts.28.298. Epub 2016 Jan 30. PubMed 26957778 ↗
  • Darnall BD, Sturgeon JA, Cook KF, Taub CJ, Roy A, Burns JW, Sullivan M, Mackey SC. Development and Validation of a Daily Pain Catastrophizing Scale. J Pain. 2017 Sep;18(9):1139-1149. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2017.05.003. Epub 2017 May 19. PubMed 28528981 ↗
  • Aslan E, Karaduman A, Yakut Y, Aras B, Simsek IE, Yagly N. The cultural adaptation, reliability and validity of neck disability index in patients with neck pain: a Turkish version study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 May 15;33(11):E362-5. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31817144e1. PubMed 18469684 ↗
  • Vernon H, Mior S. The Neck Disability Index: a study of reliability and validity. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 1991 Sep;14(7):409-15. PubMed 1834753 ↗
  • Delgado DA, Lambert BS, Boutris N, McCulloch PC, Robbins AB, Moreno MR, Harris JD. Validation of Digital Visual Analog Scale Pain Scoring With a Traditional Paper-based Visual Analog Scale in Adults. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev. 2018 Mar 23;2(3):e088. doi: 10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-17-00088. eCollection 2018 Mar. PubMed 30211382 ↗
  • Rohila AK, Sharma VP, Shrivastav PK, Nagar A, Singh GP. An ultrasonographic evaluation of masseter muscle thickness in different dentofacial patterns. Indian J Dent Res. 2012 Nov-Dec;23(6):726-31. doi: 10.4103/0970-9290.111247. PubMed 23649053 ↗
  • Ariji Y, Sakuma S, Izumi M, Sasaki J, Kurita K, Ogi N, Nojiri M, Nakagawa M, Takenaka M, Katsuse S, Ariji E. Ultrasonographic features of the masseter muscle in female patients with temporomandibular disorder associated with myofascial pain. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2004 Sep;98(3):337-41. doi: 10.1016/j.tripleo.2004.06.068. PubMed 15356473 ↗
  • Campi LB, Jordani PC, Tenan HL, Camparis CM, Goncalves DA. Painful temporomandibular disorders and central sensitization: implications for management-a pilot study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2017 Jan;46(1):104-110. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2016.07.005. Epub 2016 Aug 21. PubMed 27553896 ↗
  • Olivo SA, Fuentes J, Major PW, Warren S, Thie NM, Magee DJ. The association between neck disability and jaw disability. J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Sep;37(9):670-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02098.x. Epub 2010 May 27. PubMed 20524969 ↗
  • Armijo-Olivo S, Silvestre RA, Fuentes JP, da Costa BR, Major PW, Warren S, Thie NM, Magee DJ. Patients with temporomandibular disorders have increased fatigability of the cervical extensor muscles. Clin J Pain. 2012 Jan;28(1):55-64. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e31822019f2. PubMed 21677569 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

08

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07468786
Lead sponsor
Hasan Kalyoncu University
Responsible party
Tuğba GÖNEN (Asisst. Prof. Dr., Hasan Kalyoncu University) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 13, 2026
Start date
Mar 20, 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Apr 20, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
May 20, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 13, 2026

Study contacts

Tuğba GÖNEN, Asisst. Prof. Dr.
Contact
tugba.badat@hku.edu.tr
505 090 58 46
Tuğba GÖNEN, Asisst. Prof. Dr.
principal investigator · Hasan Kalyoncu University

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion