CClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07468123AFRESHEUpdated Mar 12, 2026

Atrial Fibrillation Risk Estimation With Single-lead Handheld Electrocardiograms

An interventional study of 1L ECG screening and Patch monitor in Atrial Fibrillation (AF), sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in United States. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-12.

Sponsored by Massachusetts General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 7 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2025, registered Mar 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
200
Allocation
Non-randomized
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this prospective, non-randomized pilot study is to learn whether predictions from a previously validated 12-lead ECG-based artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm (ECG-AI) identify people more likely to have undiagnosed atrial fibrillation (AF).

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Do people predicted to have high risk of AF using ECG-AI have a higher rate of new AF diagnosis using 1L ECG screening compared with people predicted to have a low risk? Do AI-based AF risk estimates from the 12-lead ECG correlate with AF risk estimates from the 1L ECG? Do people find 1L ECG screening for AF acceptable and useful?

Participants will:

Undergo screening with 1L ECG mailed to their home Complete a survey assessing attitudes toward 1L ECG screening Complete a 14-day patch monitor on 1 or 2 occasions depending on 1L ECG results

Read the detailed description

This is a prospective, non-randomized pilot study designed to assess whether our 12-lead ECG algorithm can identify individuals with AF detectable using 1L ECG. We will also assess whether AF risk estimates from the 1L ECG correlate with those using the 12-lead ECG. We also plan to assess participant attitudes toward the use of 1L ECGs for AF risk estimation.

Using our AF risk algorithm on existing 12-lead ECGs, will categorize prospective participants into low AF risk (\<1% 1-year AF risk) versus high AF risk (>10% 1-year AF risk). We will mail 1L ECG devices to participants and ask them to obtain 3 tracings which we will then use to estimate AF risk using a 1L ECG version of our AF risk algorithm. We will then screen perform patch monitor screening for AF and compare the rates of AF detection between the two groups.

This study involves use of two consumer digital devices. The AliveCor KardiaMobile 1L ECG device is an FDA cleared cardiac rhythm assessment device capable of producing a 1L ECG in conjunction with a compatible smartphone. The Zio®XT is an FDA cleared medical-grade 1L ECG rhythm monitor.

This pilot study has three main outcomes: 1) prospectively ascertained estimated AF risk using the handheld 1L ECG algorithm, 2) incident AF at 12 months, ascertained using the linked EHR and/or the results of the study patch monitors, and 3) perceived acceptability and usefulness of the handheld ECG. No physical study visits are required according to this protocol.

02

Conditions studied

  • Atrial Fibrillation (AF)

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • atrial fibrillation
  • digital health
  • screening
03

In context

Atrial Fibrillation

3,870 studies on the registry are indexed under Atrial Fibrillation; 924 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 200 is above the median of 144 across 2,380 interventional studies indexed under Atrial Fibrillation.

Browse Atrial Fibrillation studies →

Lead sponsor

Massachusetts General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 2,536 studies on the registry; 446 are open to participants now.

Of its 214 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 161 (75%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Men and women aged 50-90 who are new or established patients in an MGH primary care or ambulatory cardiology practice
  • Willing to provide consent to participate in the study to access data from electronic health records (EHR)
  • At least 1 12-lead ECG obtained within 5 years prior to study start date for AF risk estimation
  • Have access to a smart phone or tablet to use with the AliveCor KardiaMobile 1L ECG device

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter as documented in the patient's current electronic health record medical problem list or self-reported diagnosis
  • Implanted cardiac devices (pacemakers, implantable cardiac defibrillators, or cardiac resynchronization therapy, and implantable loop recorders)
  • History of allergy to adhesive
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Non-randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
200 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Active comparator
    Low-risk

    Low estimated risk for AF (\<1% 1-year AF risk)

    Diagnostic Test: 1L ECG screening · Diagnostic Test: Patch monitor

  • Active comparator
    High-risk

    Low estimated risk for AF (\>10% 1-year AF risk)

    Diagnostic Test: 1L ECG screening · Diagnostic Test: Patch monitor

Interventions

  • Diagnostic test1L ECG screening

    Individuals will undergo 1L ECG screening using the AliveCor KardiaMobile 1L ECG device

  • Diagnostic testPatch monitor

    Individuals who are found to have evidence of AF on 1L ECG will undergo assessment with 14-day patch monitor at the time of initial screen. Otherwise all study participants will undergo 14-day patch monitor at the 1-year timepoint.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. New AF diagnosis (%)

    Rate of new AF diagnosis

    Time frame: 1 year

  2. Acceptability and usefulness

    Survey-based acceptability and usefulness of 1L ECG screening process

    Time frame: 0

  3. AI-based AF risk correlation

    Correlation between 12-lead ECG-based AF risk and 1L ECG-based AF risk using AI model

    Time frame: 0

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Mass General Brigham
    Boston, Massachusetts 02114, United States
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Khurshid S, Friedman SF, Al-Alusi MA, Kany S, Sommers T, Anderson CD, Ho JE, McManus DD, Borowsky LH, Ashburner JM, Lubitz SA, Atlas SJ, Maddah M, Singer DE, Ellinor PT. Artificial intelligence-enabled analysis of handheld single-lead electrocardiograms to predict incident atrial fibrillation: an analysis of the VITAL-AF randomized trial. NPJ Digit Med. 2025 Nov 26;8(1):776. doi: 10.1038/s41746-025-02164-2. PubMed 41299008 ↗
  • Khurshid S, Friedman S, Reeder C, Di Achille P, Diamant N, Singh P, Harrington LX, Wang X, Al-Alusi MA, Sarma G, Foulkes AS, Ellinor PT, Anderson CD, Ho JE, Philippakis AA, Batra P, Lubitz SA. ECG-Based Deep Learning and Clinical Risk Factors to Predict Atrial Fibrillation. Circulation. 2022 Jan 11;145(2):122-133. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.121.057480. Epub 2021 Nov 8. PubMed 34743566 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07468123
Lead sponsor
Massachusetts General Hospital
Responsible party
Shaan Khurshid (Assistant Professor of Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 12, 2026
Start date
Jul 30, 2025
Primary completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 31, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 12, 2026

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion