ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07462572VITAL-RDNUpdated Mar 10, 2026

Virtual Twins as Tools for Personalized Clinical Care in Renal Denervation - Pilot Study

An observational study in Hypertension, sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris. Not yet recruiting at 2 sites in France. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 90 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-10.

Sponsored by Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris · Observational

Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
18 Years to 90 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

High blood pressure (hypertension) is a common condition. Despite the availability of several medications, many patients continue to have poorly controlled blood pressure. Renal denervation (RDN), a minimally invasive procedure that reduces overactive kidney nerves, has emerged as a potential treatment for certain patients with difficult-to-control hypertension. However, not all patients benefit from this procedure, and there is currently no reliable way to predict who will respond.

The VITAL-RDN study (Virtual twins as tools for personalized clinical care in renal denervation - Pilot study) aims to test whether a "digital twin" can help predict which patients are most likely to respond to renal denervation. A digital twin is a personalized computer model built from an individual patient's clinical, biological, and physiological data. It is designed to simulate how that patient's cardiovascular system functions and how it may respond to treatment.

The main objective of this pilot study is to evaluate whether the digital twin can accurately distinguish between patients who will respond to renal denervation and those who will not. A responder is defined as a patient whose daytime systolic blood pressure decreases by at least 5 mmHg three months after the RDN.

Three groups of patients will be enrolled:

30 patients with resistant hypertension or other clinical indications for renal denervation.

20 patients with untreated primary hypertension who are starting blood pressure-lowering medication.

10 patients with primary aldosteronism who are scheduled for surgical adrenalectomy.

In addition to evaluating prediction of response to renal denervation, the study will also assess the performance of the digital twin in predicting response to antihypertensive medication or adrenalectomy in the respective subgroups.

If successful, this approach could support more personalized treatment decisions, reduce unnecessary procedures, and improve blood pressure control by matching the right therapy to the right patient.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hypertension

Keywords

  • Hypertension
  • Resistant HTN
  • RDN
  • Aldosteronism
  • adrenalectomy.
03

In context

Hypertension

6,114 studies on the registry are indexed under Hypertension; 912 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 350 across 1,163 observational studies indexed under Hypertension.

Browse Hypertension studies →

Lead sponsor

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris is the lead sponsor of 3,592 studies on the registry; 1,033 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 90 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Patients included in this study are recruited from the active patient population regularly seen in outpatient consultations or during hospitalization at the Hypertension Unit or the Pharmacology Unit of the Georges Pompidou European Hospital (Paris - France)

Eligibility criteria

General inclusion criteria:

  • Age between 18 and 90 years for both sexes.
  • Patient information and verbal non-opposition expressed by the patient, recorded in writing on the non-opposition form by the investigator.
  • Patients affiliated with social security or an equivalent scheme.

Specific inclusion criteria:

Patients with clinical indication for RDN:

  • Stable treatment for at least 1 month.
  • Clinical indication for RDN according to current recommendations or clinical judgment, as part of routine care.

Patients with untreated primary hypertension:

  • Treatment-naïve hypertensive patients or continuous antihypertensive treatment for \< 6 months.
  • Office BP >140/90 mmHg in repeated measures or office BP >140/90 mmHg in a single visit and home BP or daytime 24h-ABPM BP >135/85 mmHg.
  • Clinical indication to start antihypertensive treatment.

Patients with clinical indication to surgical adrenalectomy:

  • Confirmed diagnosis of primary aldosteronism according to current guidelines.
  • Clinical indication for monoliteral surgical adrenalectomy.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy.
  • Presence of skin irritation or non-intact skin at sensor attachment sites (sternum, chest, finger) preventing the possibility to pose sensors.
  • Known allergies to ultrasound gel, adhesives, Ag/AgCl electrodes, metals, or plastics.
05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Patients considered eligible for RDN because of resistant HTN or other clinical indications

    Other: Data collection in order to train the digital twin

  • Patients with untreated primary hypertension

    Other: Data collection in order to train the digital twin

  • Patients diagnosed with primary aldosteronism and scheduled for surgical adrenalectomy

    Other: Data collection in order to train the digital twin

Interventions

  • OtherData collection in order to train the digital twin

    In this research, results from routine examinations performed to monitor the patient's health will be used to train the digital twin. These include resting blood pressure and heart rate measurements, vascular assessments (pulse wave velocity, carotid stiffness), electrocardiogram (ECG), echocardiography, extracellular water measurement by bioimpedance, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, and routine blood tests for renal and neurohumoral markers. In addition, the patient's autonomic nervous system will be evaluated using functional tests. The patient will place his or her hand in cold water and squeeze a handgrip device to assess blood pressure and heart rate reactivity (about 20 minutes). The patient will wear a portable device (Calamari) recording heart rhythm, chest vibrations, and blood volume. The patient will also complete questionnaires.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of the virtual twin in classifying the participants in responders and non-responders to RDN (in the group of patients eligible for RDN because of resistant HTN or other clinical indication)

    Responders defined as patients with a reduction of at least 5 mmHg in daytime systolic BP at 3 months post-RDN.

    Time frame: 3 months post-RDN

Secondary outcomes

  1. Accuracy of the virtual twin in classifying the participants in responders and non-responders to adrenalectomy (in the group of patients with primary aldosteronism)

    Responders to treatment are defined as patients with a reduction of at least 5 mmHg in daytime systolic BP at 3 months.

    Time frame: 3 months post adrenalectomy

  2. Accuracy of the virtual twin in classifying the participants in responders and non-responders after starting antihypertensive treatment (in the group of individuals with untreated primary hypertension)

    Responders to treatment are defined as patients with a reduction of at least 5 mmHg in daytime systolic BP at 3 months after antihypertensive treatment start

    Time frame: 3 months after antihypertensive treatment start

07

Study locations

2 sites
  • Hypertension Unit - Georges Pompidou European Hospital
    Paris, France
  • Pharmacology Unit - Georges Pompidou European Hospital
    Paris, France
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — Individual participant data (IPD) that underlie results in publication could be shared. IPD detailed in the protocol of a planned metaanalysis could be shared

Supporting information: Study protocol, Informed consent form

Time frame: Two years after the last publication

Access criteria: Data sharing must be accepted by the sponsor and the PI based on a scientific project and scientific involvement of the PI team. Collaboration will be fostered. The founder and other collaborators could be involved in the decision. Teams wishing obtain IPD must meet the sponsor and IP team to present scientifics (and commercial) purpose, IPD needed, format of data transmission, and timeframe. Technical feasibility and financial support will be discussed before mandatory contractualization. Processing of shared data must comply with European General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR).

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 10, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07462572
Collaborators
University Ghent, University of Auckland, New Zealand, University of Pisa, Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Delft University of Technology, Maastricht University, AIT Austrian Institute of Technology GmbH, Stichting IMEC-NL, ELEM Biotech, Spain, Westerhof Cardiovascular Research, Netherlands
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Mar 10, 2026
Start date
Apr 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Oct 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2028 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 10, 2026

Study contacts

Youcef SEKOUR
Contact
youcef.sekour@aphp.fr
+33156095823
Rosa Maria BRUNO
principal investigator · Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Mar 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion