An interventional study of clear aligner in Surface Roughness and Thickness Clear Aligner Sheat, sponsored by Mansoura University. Active, not recruiting at 1 site in Egypt. Open to participants aged 16 Years to 24 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-04.
Sponsored by Mansoura University · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment
aim of the study: to evaluate and compare the surface roughness (Ra, Rq, Rz), Vickers microhardness (VHN), and thickness of single-layer and multi-layer clear aligner sheets.
material and methods: the study will be conducted on clear aligners fabricated from two commercial thermoplastic materials: single-layer (0.76 mm, ) and multi-layer (0.76 mm, ). Each material will be evaluated at three stages: before thermoforming, after thermoforming on 3D-printed casts, and after 2 weeks of intraoral wear.
Specimen Preparation For each group, specimens will be prepared at three stages: before thermoforming (T0), after thermoforming (T1), and after intraoral wear (T2). At T0, square-shaped specimens (approximately 5 × 5 mm) will be cut directly from the unused raw sheets. At T1 and T2, specimens of the same dimensions will be obtained from the mid-labial surface of the central incisor region of the thermoformed aligners, both immediately after thermoforming and after two weeks of intraoral wear. The full thickness of the material will be preserved in all specimens to ensure consistency across groups.
Outcomes:
Primary Outcome:
Surface Roughness (Ra):
Measured at three stages:
T0: Raw, unused sheet specimens (baseline) T1: After thermoforming on dental casts T2: After 2 weeks of intraoral use
Secondary Outcomes:
Hardness:
Measured at T0, T1, and T2. Tested using Vickers hardness method (ISO 6507 compliant).
aim of the study: To evaluate and compare the surface roughness (Ra, Rq, Rz), Vickers microhardness (VHN), and thickness of single-layer and multi-layer clear aligner sheets at three stages: before thermoforming, after thermoforming, and following intraoral wear.
material and methods: This in vivo study will be conducted on clear aligners fabricated from two commercial thermoplastic materials: single-layer (0.76 mm, ) and multi-layer (0.76 mm, ). Each material will be evaluated at three stages: before thermoforming (raw sheet), after thermoforming on 3D-printed casts, and after 2 weeks of intraoral wear. At each stage, specimens will be retrieved and tested for changes in mechanical properties, specifically surface roughness and hardness.
Study Design Type: A prospective, randomized, controlled, two-arm parallel clinical study
Design Details: participants will be randomly assigned to one of two groups:
Group A:
Upper arch: Multi-layer clear aligners Lower arch: Multi-layer clear aligners
Group B:
Upper arch: Single-layer clear aligners Lower arch: Single-layer clear aligners Baseline control: Unused aligner sheets of both types to serve as reference for measurements.
Sample Size Calculation: Sample size calculation was calculated using G*Power v3.1.9.7, a paired t-test with an expected effect size dz = 0.65 (based on Bucci et al.), α error = 0.05, and power = 80% indicated a minimum of 19 subjects. To simplify group allocation and ensure adequate power, the sample size was rounded up to 20 patients (10 patients in each group: single-layer vs. multi-layer).
Ethical Considerations:
Informed Consent: All participants (or their legal guardians) will sign an informed.
Appliance Fabrication and Treatment Protocol
Specimen Preparation For each group, specimens will be prepared at three stages: before thermoforming (T0), after thermoforming (T1), and after intraoral wear (T2). At T0, square-shaped specimens (approximately 5 × 5 mm) will be cut directly from the unused raw sheets. At T1 and T2, specimens of the same dimensions will be obtained from the mid-labial surface of the central incisor region of the thermoformed aligners, both immediately after thermoforming and after two weeks of intraoral wear. The full thickness of the material will be preserved in all specimens to ensure consistency across groups.
Outcome Measures:
Primary Outcome:
Surface Roughness (Ra):
Measured at three stages:
T0: Raw, unused sheet specimens (baseline) T1: After thermoforming on dental casts T2: After 2 weeks of intraoral use Assessed using contact profilometry. Roughness defined as the arithmetic average surface deviation (Ra, in µm).
Secondary Outcomes:
Hardness:
Measured at T0, T1, and T2. Tested using Vickers hardness method (ISO 6507 compliant). Higher VHN values indicate greater resistance to indentation and deformation.
Thickness Change:
Measured at T0, T1, and T2. Evaluated using a digital micrometer or 3D scanning system. Calculated as the difference in thickness between the original sheet, thermoformed aligners, and post-use aligner
Mansoura University is the lead sponsor of 1,077 studies on the registry; 183 are open to participants now.
Of its 9 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.
Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.
Exclusion Criteria:
clear aligners fabricated from thermoplastic materials: multi-layer (0.76 mm). the material will be evaluated at three stages: before thermoforming (raw sheet), after thermoforming on 3D-printed casts, and after 2 weeks of intraoral wear. At each stage, specimens will be retrieved and tested for changes in mechanical properties, specifically surface roughness and hardness. Baseline control: Unused aligner sheets of both types to serve as reference for measurements.
Device: clear aligner
clear aligners fabricated from thermoplastic materials: single-layer (0.76 mm) . the material will be evaluated at three stages: before thermoforming (raw sheet), after thermoforming on 3D-printed casts, and after 2 weeks of intraoral wear. At each stage, specimens will be retrieved and tested for changes in mechanical properties, specifically surface roughness and hardness. Baseline control: Unused aligner sheets of both types to serve as reference for measurements.
Device: clear aligner
Appliance Fabrication and Treatment Protocol * Digital impressions will be taken for all patients. * Treatment setup will be performed with standardized staging: maximum 0.25-0.3 mm linear movement or 2-3° rotation per stage. * Aligners will be fabricated by thermoforming using single and multilayer sheets (0.76 mm), cut and finished identically.
surface roughness of clear aligner
evaluate and compare the surface roughness of single-layer and multi-layer clear aligner sheets at three stages: before thermoforming, after thermoforming, and following intraoral wear. Quantitative evaluation of the arithmetic mean surface roughness (Ra) using profilometer
Time frame: 2 weeks
microhardness of clear aligner
evaluate and compare the microhardness of single-layer and multi-layer clear aligner sheets at three stages: before thermoforming, after thermoforming, and following intraoral wear. Quantitative evaluation of surface microhardness using the Vickers hardness test.
Time frame: 2 weeks
thickness change of clear aligner
evaluate and compare the thickness of single-layer and multi-layer clear aligner sheets at three stages: before thermoforming, after thermoforming, and following intraoral wear. Thickness will be measured using a calibrated digital caliper with an accuracy of ±0.01 mm
Time frame: 2 weeks
This study is active, not recruiting, as verified in Dec 2025. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.
Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.
Sign in to followQuestions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.
Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.
Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.
Mansoura University