CClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07442682Updated Mar 2, 2026

Characterisation of a Population of Adults Suffering From Cystic Fibrosis in a Belgian Reference Center

An observational study in Quality of Lifte, Cystic Fibrosis (CF) and Diabetes, sponsored by Erasme University Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Belgium. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-03-02.

Sponsored by Erasme University Hospital · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by May 2026, 5 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
162
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This research project aims to better understand the consequences of diabetes on the quality of life, respiratory function, and nutritional status of patients with cystic fibrosis followed at a Belgian reference center and to compare the quality of life of patients with cystic fibrosis depending on whether or not they have diabetes.

Read the detailed description

This is a monocentric observational cohort study combining retrospective medical record review and cross-sectional assessment using quality-of-life questionnaires in patients with cystic fibrosis(CF) with or without cystic fibrosis-related diabetes.

This study aims to investigate and compare the characteristics of patients with cystic fibrosis according to the presence or absence of cystic fibrosis-related diabetes (CFRD), based on patients currently followed in one of the Belgian reference centers. The impact of diabetes, its early diagnosis, and its metabolic control will be assessed in relation to patients' nutritional and respiratory status, as well as their quality of life.

The influence of cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy on diabetes control will also be evaluated by comparing glycemic control parameters in patients receiving modulators with those not receiving them, and by examining these parameters before and after treatment initiation within the treated group. In addition, the impact of CFTR modulators on nutritional and respiratory status will be assessed in patients without CFRD.

Quality of life will be evaluated using the SF-36 questionnaire in patients with cystic fibrosis, with and without CFRD. The quality of life of patients with CFRD will also be compared with that of an age-matched sample of patients with type 1 diabetes followed at the same hospital. Additional diabetes-related outcomes will be assessed and compared between the two groups of diabetic patients, including hypoglycemia awareness, satisfaction with diabetes treatment, and satisfaction with blood glucose monitoring.

Previous studies suggest that patients with CFRD tend to report a lower overall quality of life, poorer acceptance of insulin therapy and glucose monitoring, but a better perception of hypoglycemia and a lower perceived impact of hypoglycemia on daily life.

02

Conditions studied

  • Quality of Lifte
  • Cystic Fibrosis (CF)
  • Diabetes

Keywords

  • Impact of CFRD on BMI
  • Impact of CFRD on quality-of-life
  • Impact of CFRD on ppFEV1
  • Impact of CFTR modulators on glycemic control
03

In context

Cystic Fibrosis

1,581 studies on the registry are indexed under Cystic Fibrosis; 190 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 162 is above the median of 85 across 482 observational studies indexed under Cystic Fibrosis.

Browse Cystic Fibrosis studies →

Lead sponsor

Erasme University Hospital is the lead sponsor of 178 studies on the registry; 34 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Adult patients with cystic fibrosis followed at a Belgian CF reference center, with or without cystic fibrosis-related diabetes. An additional age-matched cohort of adults with type 1 diabetes followed at the same hospital will be included for comparative analyses

Inclusion criteria

Adults ≥18 years Confirmed diagnosis of cystic fibrosis Followed at the participating CF reference center Ability to complete quality-of-life questionnaires Signed informed consent (if required by EC)

-

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Refusal to participate Inability to complete questionnaires

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Other
Enrollment
162 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • CF with CFRD group

    Patients with cystic fibrosis and diabetes

  • CF without CFRD group

    Patients with cystic fibrosis without diabetes

  • Type 1 diabetes group

    Patients with type 1 diabetes as comparator group

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Comparison of quality of life between patients with cystic fibrosis according to the presence or absence of diabetes

    Use the Short Form Haelth Survey SF-36, a questionnaire comprising 36 items to compare quality of life in patients with CF according to the presence or absence of CFRD. Score scale ranges from 0 to 100. A higher score means a better quality of life.

    Time frame: cross-sectional assessment at study inclusion

  2. Comparison of ppFEV₁ between patients with cystic fibrosis according to the presence or absence of diabetes.

    Predicted forced expiratory volume in 1 second (ppFEV1) FEV₁ values, obtained through pulmonary function testing, will be compared between cystic fibrosis patients according to the presence or absence of diabetes

    Time frame: FEV₁ data will be collected retrospectively from medical records, using the value closest to the time of study inclusion

Secondary outcomes

  1. Comparison of BMI between patients with cystic fibrosis according to the presence or absence of diabetes

    Body mass index (kg/m2) will be compared between patients with cystic fibrosis with and without diabetes.

    Time frame: Data will be collected retrospectively from medical records, using the value closest to the time of study inclusion

  2. Hypoglycemia awareness and treatment satisfaction will be assessed using validated questionnaires and compared between patients with CFTR-related disease and those with type 1 diabetes.

    Standardized and widely used questionnaires for the assessment of insulin-treated patients with diabetes will be. Questionnaires used: 1/ Clarke questionnaire: 8 items with a total score of 7 indicating hypoglycemia awareness. Score \> ou = 4: impaired - \< 4: normal. 2/ Gold score: visual scale ranging from 1 (hypoglycemia always perceived) to 7 (hypoglycemia never perceived). 3/ Hypoglycemia Fear Survey II : a 33 items questionnaire with 15 items behaviour subscale, et 18 items worry subscale. Each item is rated from 0 (never) to 4 (almost always) . Total score 132. Higher score = greater fear of hypoglycemia 4/ PAID-SF = Problem Areas in Diabetes Scale = questionnaire to assess diabetes-related emotional distress. 5 items: each rated from 0 (not a problem) to 4 (serious problem). Total score 20. Higher scores indicates greater distress. 5/ Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQs) - 8 items, each scored from 0 to 6. Total 36. Higher score = greater treatment satisfaction

    Time frame: Cross-sectional assessment at study inclusion

  3. Comparison of glycemic control parameters in patients with Cystic Fibrosis Related Diabetes before and after initiation of CFTR modulator therapy.

    Glycemic control will be assessed by comparing Time in Range (TIR) (%) and HbA1c levels (%) in patients with CFRD before and after the initiation of CFTR modulator therapy.

    Time frame: Glycemic parameters will be recorded retrospectively at the visit closest to the initiation of CFTR modulator treatment and at the visit closest to study inclusion

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Hôpital Erasme - HUB 808 route de Lennik 1070 Brussels Belgium
    Brussels, 1070, Belgium
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Gupta N, Gupta A, Narayanan M R V. Current status of nitrous oxide use in pediatric patients. World J Clin Pediatr. 2022 Mar 9;11(2):93-104. doi: 10.5409/wjcp.v11.i2.93. eCollection 2022 Mar 9. PubMed 35433304 ↗
  • Marks BE, Kilberg MJ, Aliaj E, Fredkin K, Hudson J, Riva D, Roman C, Kelly A, Putman MS. Perceptions of Diabetes Technology Use in Cystic Fibrosis-Related Diabetes Management. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2021 Nov;23(11):753-759. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0201. Epub 2021 Jul 20. PubMed 34185606 ↗
  • Tierney S, Webb K, Jones A, Dodd M, McKenna D, Rowe R, Whitehouse J, Deaton C. Living with cystic fibrosis-related diabetes or type 1 diabetes mellitus: a comparative study exploring health-related quality of life and patients' reported experiences of hypoglycaemia. Chronic Illn. 2008 Dec;4(4):278-88. doi: 10.1177/1742395308094240. PubMed 19091936 ↗
  • Tsabari R, Elyashar HI, Cymberknowh MC, Breuer O, Armoni S, Livnat G, Kerem E, Zangen DH. CFTR potentiator therapy ameliorates impaired insulin secretion in CF patients with a gating mutation. J Cyst Fibros. 2016 May;15(3):e25-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcf.2015.10.012. Epub 2015 Nov 4. PubMed 26547591 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Individual participant-level data from this study will not be shared with other researchers. The study includes a small, monocentric cohort of adults with cystic fibrosis, which may increase the risk of re-identification of participants even after de-identification. Additionally, the data contain sensitive clinical and health-related information, including quality-of-life assessments and diabetes status. To protect participant privacy and comply with ethical and institutional regulations, data sharing is not planned.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Mar 2, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07442682
Lead sponsor
Erasme University Hospital
Responsible party
Agnes Burniat (University hospital professor, Erasme University Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Mar 2, 2026
Start date
Dec 11, 2025
Primary completion
May 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Mar 2, 2026

Study contacts

Laurent Crenier
study director · Erasme University Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion