ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07426328Updated Feb 23, 2026

Promoting Motivation and Linguage in Developmental Language Disorder Through Interaction With the Humanoid Social Robot

An interventional study of Nao assisted therapy and Standard therapeutic protocol in Development Language Disorder, sponsored by IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Italy. Open to participants aged 4 Years to 5 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-23.

Sponsored by IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2026, 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
  • Registered 5 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Feb 2025, registered Jul 2025).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
50
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
4 Years to 5 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) is a communication disorder that interferes with learning, understanding, and using language. This pilot study investigates the use of the humanoid robot NAO as part of a rehabilitative program designed for children with DLD. NAO, with its predictable and engaging interaction style, is hypothesized to enhance communicative initiative, expressive communication, and social interaction in this population. The study employs a randomized controlled trial design, assigning participants to either a NAO-assisted intervention group or a control group receiving standard therapy. Outcomes will be assessed using standardized measures of communication, motivation, and observational data. This research aims to explore the potential of social robots as an innovative tool for addressing the unique needs of individuals with DLD, contributing to the development of effective, accessible therapeutic options that improve their quality of life and that of their families.

Read the detailed description

Developmental Language Disorder (DLD) is a communication disorder that interferes with learning, understanding, and using language. DLD is a neurodevelopmental disorder caused by complex interactions between genes and the environment that affect brain development. The exact causes of the brain differences that lead to DLD are unknown. Like other neurodevelopmental disorders, DLD often shows familial aggregation. Children with DLD are more likely than their typically developing peers to have first-degree relatives-such as parents and siblings-who have experienced language-related difficulties or delays. In fact, it is estimated that 5-7% of the population is affected by DLD, and many children with DLD have at least one family member with the disorder. In addition, other potentially related neurodevelopmental disorders, such as dyslexia or autism, are more common among the family members of children with DLD.

Early diagnosis and tailored therapeutic interventions are crucial for improving long-term outcomes in this population. However, conventional therapies often face limitations, including variability in efficacy and difficulty maintaining engagement among children with DLD. In recent years, the integration of advanced technologies into therapeutic programs has gained traction as an innovative approach to address communication challenges in neurodevelopmental disorders. Social robots, such as the humanoid robot NAO, offer unique opportunities to engage children with DLD through consistent and predictable interactions. NAO is equipped with capabilities including speech recognition, gestures, and responses to touch and movement, making it a promising tool for promoting communication and social behaviors. Preliminary studies suggest that social robots can enhance engagement and improve social skills in children, yet their potential remains underexplored in Developmental Language Disorder. This single-blind, randomized controlled study aims to evaluate the feasibility and effectiveness of a rehabilitative treatment program integrating the NAO robot for children with DLD.

02

Conditions studied

  • Development Language Disorder
03

In context

Language Development Disorders

121 studies on the registry are indexed under Language Development Disorders; 49 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 50 is below the median of 74 across 106 interventional studies indexed under Language Development Disorders.

Browse Language Development Disorders studies →

Lead sponsor

IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo is the lead sponsor of 67 studies on the registry; 31 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
4 Years to 5 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Developmental language disorder
  • Age between 4 and 5 years.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of severe intellectual disability.
  • Diagnosis of neurological disorders.
  • Significant medical conditions that could interfere with study participation.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
50 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    NAO-Assisted Therapy

    This group includes 50 children diagnosed with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD). Participants were randomly assigned to a structured rehabilitative program integrated with the NAO humanoid robot. The intervention was tailored to individual needs and aimed to improve communicative initiative, verbalization, and social engagement. Each child received therapy over 24 weeks, for a total of 48 sessions (2 per week, 45 minutes each).

    Behavioral: Nao assisted therapy

  • Active comparator
    Standard Speech Therapy

    This group includes 50 children diagnosed with Developmental Language Disorder (DLD). Participants were randomly assigned to receive standard therapeutic approaches, including traditional speech therapy provided by trained therapists. The intervention was adapted to meet the specific needs of minimally verbal children. Each child received therapy over 24 weeks, for a total of 48 sessions (2 per week, 45 minutes each).

    Behavioral: Standard therapeutic protocol

Interventions

  • BehavioralNao assisted therapy

    The sessions included tasks designed to engage children in verbal and social interactions (e.g., naming objects, responding to questions, performing gestures). The NAO robot provided consistent and predictable feedback, while therapists supported and reinforced appropriate communicative behaviors.

  • BehavioralStandard therapeutic protocol

    The therapy included exercises aimed at improving verbal communication and social engagement (e.g., naming objects, sentence construction, and comprehension tasks). Therapists adjusted the intervention to match each child's communication goals.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Language Development Level Test (TVL)

    The Test of Verbalization and Language Development is a standardized tool designed to assess various aspects of language development, including verbal production, comprehension, sentence construction, phonological accuracy, and morphosyntactic abilities. The weighted score ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating better language development.

    Time frame: T0(baseline)-T1(6months)

  2. The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL)

    The Child Behavior Checklist (CBCL) is a caregiver-reported questionnaire used to identify emotional and behavioral problems in children. It measures multiple domains, including emotional reactivity, anxiety, attention problems, and social difficulties. The T-scores do not have a specific range, but values between 50 and 70 are considered within the normal range, while 70 to 100 indicates clinical significance. Higher scores indicate greater behavioral problems.

    Time frame: T0(baseline)-T1(6months)

  3. Conners' Parent Rating Scale Long Form

    The Conners' Parent Rating Scale - Revised: Long Form (CPRS-R:L) is a standardized parent-report questionnaire used to assess Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) symptoms and other behavioral problems in children aged 6 to 18 years. The scale includes 80 items, each rated from 0 (Not True at All) to 3 (Very Much True). Subscale scores and a total score are derived. Total scores typically range from 0 to 240, with higher scores indicating more severe behavioral and attentional problems (i.e., a worse outcome).

    Time frame: T0(baseline)-T1(6 months)

  4. Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Preschool Version (BRIEF-P)

    The Behavior Rating Inventory of Executive Function - Preschool Version (BRIEF-P) is a standardized parent-report questionnaire used to assess executive function behaviors in children aged 2 to 5 years. The scale consists of 63 items, each rated on a 3-point Likert scale (Never = 1, Sometimes = 2, Often = 3). Raw scores are converted to T-scores, which typically range from 30 to 90. Higher T-scores indicate greater executive function difficulties (i.e., a worse outcome). T-scores above 65 are considered clinically elevated.

    Time frame: T0(baseline)-T1(6 months)

  5. Motivation Requests During Sessions

    This observational measure tracks and records the number of spontaneous and prompted requests initiated by the child to express needs or desires during therapy sessions. Frequency count per session. Higher frequencies indicate greater communicative initiative

    Time frame: Each therapy session over 24 weeks (48 sessions total)

07

Study locations

1 site
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Garon NM, Piccinin C, Smith IM. Does the BRIEF-P Predict Specific Executive Function Components in Preschoolers? Appl Neuropsychol Child. 2016;5(2):110-8. doi: 10.1080/21622965.2014.1002923. Epub 2015 Apr 29. PubMed 25923441 ↗
  • Isquith PK, Gioia GA, Espy KA. Executive function in preschool children: examination through everyday behavior. Dev Neuropsychol. 2004;26(1):403-22. doi: 10.1207/s15326942dn2601_3. PubMed 15276902 ↗
  • Shriberg LD, Tomblin JB, McSweeny JL. Prevalence of speech delay in 6-year-old children and comorbidity with language impairment. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 1999 Dec;42(6):1461-81. doi: 10.1044/jslhr.4206.1461. PubMed 10599627 ↗
  • Norbury CF, Gooch D, Wray C, Baird G, Charman T, Simonoff E, Vamvakas G, Pickles A. The impact of nonverbal ability on prevalence and clinical presentation of language disorder: evidence from a population study. J Child Psychol Psychiatry. 2016 Nov;57(11):1247-1257. doi: 10.1111/jcpp.12573. Epub 2016 May 16. PubMed 27184709 ↗
  • Calder SD, Brennan-Jones CG, Robinson M, Whitehouse A, Hill E. The prevalence of and potential risk factors for Developmental Language Disorder at 10 years in the Raine Study. J Paediatr Child Health. 2022 Nov;58(11):2044-2050. doi: 10.1111/jpc.16149. Epub 2022 Aug 3. PubMed 35922883 ↗
  • Bishop DV. Genes, cognition, and communication: insights from neurodevelopmental disorders. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Mar;1156(1):1-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04419.x. PubMed 19338500 ↗
  • L.B. Leonard Children with Specific Language Impairment MIT Press, (2014)
09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Started Feb 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Apr 2026, 14 months after the start.

Of 72 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Language Development Disorders, half reached primary completion within 30 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 57. This study's planned 14 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 72 studies reached it within 30 months; a quarter within 19 and three quarters within 57.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jul 4, 2025
First posted
Feb 23, 2026
StartActual
Feb 1, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Apr 1, 2026
CompletionEst.
Apr 2026
Last update
Feb 23, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 23, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07426328
Lead sponsor
IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 23, 2026
Start date
Feb 1, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 23, 2026

Study contacts

Cucinotta Francesca, CF
principal investigator · IRCCS Centro Neurolesi Bonino Pulejo

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion