ClinicalTrials.gg
Enrolling by invitationNCT07422727COOLVASUpdated Feb 20, 2026

Impact of Cooling Mats on Vasomotor Symptoms in Patients Receiving Endocrine Therapy

An interventional study of Cooling Gel Mats in Hot Flashes, Sleep and Hormonal, sponsored by Sligo General Hospital. Enrolling by invitation at 1 site in Ireland. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-20.

Sponsored by Sligo General Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Supportive care

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2026, 7 months ago, but the record still lists the study as enrolling by invitation.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

This research study will investigate whether using a non-drug option, like a cooling mat, made of temperature-regulating materials, can help relieve the discomfort of hot flushes and/or night sweats for people receiving hormone treatment following a cancer diagnosis.

Cooling mats are made from specialised material designed to keep body temperature in a comfortable range by reducing heat. Previous research has shown these materials can be helpful for managing hot flushes during menopause, and the investigators are investigating if the same benefits apply to cancer patients.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hot Flashes
  • Sleep
  • Hormonal
  • Cancer
03

In context

Hot Flashes

339 studies on the registry are indexed under Hot Flashes; 56 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is below the median of 90 across 306 interventional studies indexed under Hot Flashes.

Browse Hot Flashes studies →

Lead sponsor

Sligo General Hospital is the lead sponsor of 5 studies on the registry; 3 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

Age ≥ 18 years at time of consent

confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer or prostate cancer

Currently receiving endocrine therapy (e.g., tamoxifen, aromatase inhibitors, ovarian suppression therapy, androgen deprivation therapy)

Self-reported vasomotor symptoms (e.g., hot flushes and/or night sweats) occurring at least once daily during the 2 weeks prior to screening

Ability to understand the study procedures and provide written

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

Prior use of cooling mat devices specifically for management of vasomotor symptoms within the past 3 months

Known or allergy to polyvinyl chloride (PVC) or any component of the cooling mat device

Cognitive impairment, psychiatric condition, or other medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, would interfere with adherence to study procedures

Concurrent participation in another interventional clinical trial for management of vasomotor symptoms

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Histologically or cytologically confirmed

The diagnosis was confirmed by looking at a sample under a microscope: tissue from a biopsy or surgery (histology), or cells from a fluid or needle sample (cytology).

Your pathology report is the document that shows this.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Hypersensitivity

An allergy, or another reaction of the immune system, to a substance. “Hypersensitivity to the study drug” means a known allergic reaction to it — not every side effect a medicine can have.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Supportive care
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Cooling Mat

    This is a prospective single arm pilot study to assess the feasibility and effectiveness of cooling mats in reducing the frequency and severity of vasomotor symptoms.

    Other: Cooling Gel Mats

Interventions

  • OtherCooling Gel Mats

    Participant will use the Cooling gel mats for 8 weeks at night

    Also known as: Silentnight© cooling gel pads

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change From Baseline to Week 8 in Weekly Hot Flash Score as Recorded in the Three-Category Daily Hot Flash Diary

    Reduction in Severity and Frequency of Vasomotor Symptoms Description: Participants will record daily hot flash frequency and severity (1=mild, 2=moderate, 3=severe). Weekly Hot Flash Score is calculated as frequency × severity. Higher scores indicate worse symptom burden. The outcome is the mean change in weekly Hot Flash Score from baseline to Week 8.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

Secondary outcomes

  1. Number of Participants With Treatment-Related Adverse Events as Assessed by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 5.0

    Adverse events will be graded using NCI CTCAE v5.0 (Grades 1-5). Higher grades indicate greater severity. The outcome is the number and proportion of participants experiencing at least one treatment-related adverse event during the study period.

    Time frame: 8weeks

  2. Mean Daily Cooling Pad Usage and Participant Satisfaction Score Over 8 Weeks

    Participants will record daily usage in hours (0-24 hours/day) and rate satisfaction on a 5-point Likert scale (1=very dissatisfied to 5=very satisfied). Higher satisfaction scores indicate better acceptability. Outcomes include mean daily usage and mean satisfaction score over 8 weeks.

    Time frame: 8 weeks

  3. Sleep quality

    Assess change in sleep quality using multiple tools * Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS): Measures the impact of hot flashes on daily life. * NCI CTCAE v5 Hot Flashes: Classifies the severity of hot flashes based on their impact on daily functioning. * PRO-CTCAE® Symptom Terms: Allows patients to report the frequency, severity, and interference of hot flashes and insomnia. * 3-Category Daily Hot Flash Diary: Tracks the frequency and severity of hot flashes over time. * Cooling Pad Utilization and Satisfaction: Participants will record daily usage and satisfaction with the cooling pads.

    Time frame: 8 Weeks

  4. QoL

    Hot Flash-Related Daily Interference Scale (HFRDIS): 10-item scale assessing interference of hot flashes with daily activities; total score 0-100 (items scored 0-10). Higher scores indicate worse interference; mean change from baseline to Week 8 analyzed. National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) Version 5.0 - Hot Flashes: Clinician-graded severity scale, Grade 1 (mild) to Grade 5 (death). Higher grades indicate worse severity; maximum grade and proportion with Grade ≥2 analyzed. Patient-Reported Outcomes Version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE®): Frequency, severity, and interference scored 0-4 per item. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms; mean change from baseline to Week 8 analyzed. Three-Category Daily Hot Flash Diary: Daily frequency and severity (1-3); hot flash score = frequency × severity. Higher scores indicate worse symptoms; mean weekly change analyzed. Cooling Pad Utilization and Satisfaction

    Time frame: 8 weeks

07

Study locations

1 site
  • SligoUniversity HospitaL
    Sligo, Sligo F91H684, Ireland
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Rada G, Capurro D, Pantoja T, Corbalan J, Moreno G, Letelier LM, Vera C. Non-hormonal interventions for hot flushes in women with a history of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Sep 8;(9):CD004923. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004923.pub2. PubMed 20824841 ↗
  • Hutton B, Hersi M, Cheng W, Pratt M, Barbeau P, Mazzarello S, Ahmadzai N, Skidmore B, Morgan SC, Bordeleau L, Ginex PK, Sadeghirad B, Morgan RL, Cole KM, Clemons M. Comparing Interventions for Management of Hot Flashes in Patients With Breast and Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review With Meta-Analyses. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2020 Jul 1;47(4):E86-E106. doi: 10.1188/20.ONF.E86-E106. PubMed 32555553 ↗
  • Guttuso T Jr, DiGrazio WJ, Reddy SY. Review of hot flash diaries. Maturitas. 2012 Mar;71(3):213-6. doi: 10.1016/j.maturitas.2011.12.003. Epub 2012 Jan 9. PubMed 22230663 ↗
  • Gupta A. Hormone Therapy-Related Hot Flashes and Their Management. JAMA Oncol. 2018 Apr 1;4(4):595. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4439. No abstract available. PubMed 29285546 ↗
  • Carpenter JS. The Hot Flash Related Daily Interference Scale: a tool for assessing the impact of hot flashes on quality of life following breast cancer. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2001 Dec;22(6):979-89. doi: 10.1016/s0885-3924(01)00353-0. PubMed 11738160 ↗
  • Hervik JB, Stub T. Adverse effects of non-hormonal pharmacological interventions in breast cancer survivors, suffering from hot flashes: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2016 Nov;160(2):223-236. doi: 10.1007/s10549-016-4002-x. Epub 2016 Oct 5. PubMed 27709351 ↗
  • Avis NE, Levine BJ, Coeytaux R. Results of a pilot study of a cooling mattress pad to reduce vasomotor symptoms and improve sleep. Menopause. 2022 Aug 1;29(8):973-978. doi: 10.1097/GME.0000000000002010. PubMed 35881974 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — not appropiate

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 20, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07422727
Lead sponsor
Sligo General Hospital
Responsible party
Breege Farrelly (Advanced Nurse Practitioner, Sligo General Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 20, 2026
Start date
Nov 10, 2025
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 20, 2026

Study contacts

Breege Farrelly
principal investigator · Sligo General Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

No contact was published for this record. The registry link below has the sponsor’s details.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion