ClinicalTrials.gg
CompletedNCT07420270Updated Feb 19, 2026

Study of The Effects of Mandibular Advancement Aligners in Treating Children With Class II Division 1 Malocclusion

An interventional study of Mandibular Advancement Aligner in Treatment and Growth Modification, sponsored by University of Malaya. Completed at 1 site in Malaysia. Open to participants aged 11 Years to 16 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-19.

Sponsored by University of Malaya · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 6 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jul 2024, registered Jan 2026).
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
21
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
11 Years to 16 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn the effects of Mandibular Advancement Aligner in growth modification of children with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. It will also learn about the psychosocial impact of the participants during the process. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Is there a difference in the skeletal, dental and soft tissue effects of treatments using the mandibular advancement (MA) aligners?

What is the patient's perception on the treatment outcome and is there any difference between the group treated with the mandibular advancement (MA) aligners and the control group?

Is there any tooth movements can be assess during the treatments using the mandibular advancement (MA) aligners?

Participants will:

Participants will be randomly assigned to three groups: mandibular advancement (MA) aligners with vertical bite opening, mandibular advancement (MA) aligners without vertical bite opening, and twin-block appliances.

The intervention groups will receive specific instructions on how to wear the appliance accordingly.

The trial will span an estimated 6 months for each sample, during which monthly follow-up visits will be carried out to monitor the changes and compliance of the appliance.

The primary outcome measures include the measurements in the lateral cephalometric, changes in the intraoral assessment, and questionnaires.

02

Conditions studied

  • Treatment
  • Growth Modification

Keywords

  • Class II Division 1 malocclusion
  • Mandibular advancement aligners
  • Twin Block appliance
03

In context

Malocclusion, Angle Class II

124 studies on the registry are indexed under Malocclusion, Angle Class II; 19 are open to participants now.

This study's enrollment of 21 is below the median of 34 across 115 interventional studies indexed under Malocclusion, Angle Class II.

Browse Malocclusion, Angle Class II studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Malaya is the lead sponsor of 284 studies on the registry; 58 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
11 Years to 16 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Cervical Vertebrae Maturity: CS3-CS4 (Growing participants)
  • Chronological age: 10-14 years old (Female), 12-16 years old (Male)
  • Average or reduced lower anterior facial height (LAFH\<57%)
  • Mild to moderate skeletal Class II (4°\<ANB\<9°)
  • Retrognathic mandible (SNB\<78°)
  • Increased overjet (7mm≤OJ≤11mm)
  • Increased overbite by more than 30%
  • Molar relationship by more than ½ unit Class II bilaterally
  • Mild to moderate crowding

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participant with an anterior open bite
  • Participant with syndromic dentofacial anomalies
  • Participant with a previous history of orthodontic intervention
  • Participant with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder
  • Participant with severe facial asymmetry (Deviation ≥4mm)
  • Not being consented to by both parents and participants
  • Poor quality of pre-treatment Lateral Cephalometric records
  • Participant with mental or physical disabilities affecting the ability to wear an appliance
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
21 participants (actual)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Mandibular Advancement Aligner with bite opening

    Active intervention, AngelAlign A6 system

    Device: Mandibular Advancement Aligner

  • Experimental
    Mandibular Advancement Aligner without bite opening

    Active intervention, Graphy system

    Device: Mandibular Advancement Aligner

  • Experimental
    Twin-block appliance

    Control group for the intervention

    Device: Mandibular Advancement Aligner

Interventions

  • DeviceMandibular Advancement Aligner

    Device use as growth modification in children with Class II Division 1 malocclusion. The twin-block appliance have been used for a long time, whereas in recent years the aligner technology have come out with new design of the Mandibular Advancement Aligner.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change from Baseline in the skeletal, dentoalveolar, and soft tissue after 6 months as assessed by Lateral Cephalometric values

    Comparing the value of linear and angular measurements of Lateral Cephalometric at baseline and after 6 months.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Changes from baseline in the participants' perceptions of oral health-related quality of life in Class II Division 1 malocclusion treatment at 6 months as assessed by the score of CPQ11-14 questionnaire.

    The score of CPQ11-14 is as follows: "never" = 1, "hardly ever" = 2, "sometimes" = 3, "fairly often" = 4, and "very often" = 5.

    Time frame: From enrollment to the end of treatment at 6 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • Faculty of Dentistry
    Kuala Lumpur, Kuala Lumpur 50603, Malaysia
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Salek, F., Benyahia, H., & Zaoui, F. (2025). Comparative efficacy of mandibular advancement aligners and conventional orthopedic appliances in treating Class II malocclusion: A systematic review. Discover Medicine, 2.
  • O'Brien K, Wright J, Conboy F, Sanjie Y, Mandall N, Chadwick S, Connolly I, Cook P, Birnie D, Hammond M, Harradine N, Lewis D, McDade C, Mitchell L, Murray A, O'Neill J, Read M, Robinson S, Roberts-Harry D, Sandler J, Shaw I. Effectiveness of early orthodontic treatment with the Twin-block appliance: a multicenter, randomized, controlled trial. Part 1: Dental and skeletal effects. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2003 Sep;124(3):234-43; quiz 339. doi: 10.1016/S0889540603003524. PubMed 12970656 ↗
  • Hosseini HR, Ngan P, Tai SK, Andrews LJ 2nd, Xiang J. A comparison of skeletal and dental changes in patients with a Class II relationship treated with clear aligner mandibular advancement and Herbst appliance followed by comprehensive orthodontic treatment. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2024 Feb;165(2):205-219. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2023.08.015. Epub 2023 Oct 10. PubMed 37831020 ↗
  • He J, Hu L, Yuan Y, Wang P, Zheng F, Jiang H, Li W. Comparison between clear aligners and twin-block in treating class II malocclusion in children: a retrospective study. J Clin Pediatr Dent. 2024 Sep;48(5):125-130. doi: 10.22514/jocpd.2023.070. Epub 2024 Sep 3. PubMed 39275829 ↗
  • Al Subaie H, Alturki G, Alsulaimani F, Ghoneim S, Baeshen H. Assessment of dental, skeletal, and soft tissue changes following mandibular advancement with Invisalign in skeletal Class II. Saudi Dent J. 2024 Jan;36(1):66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.sdentj.2023.09.005. Epub 2023 Sep 14. PubMed 38375387 ↗
  • Ghorbani M, Mousavi SA, Bardideh E, Saeedi P, Shahnaseri S, Shafaee H, Akyalcin S. The Effectiveness of Functional Clear Aligners for Class II Correction in Growing Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2025 Aug;28(4):577-592. doi: 10.1111/ocr.12908. Epub 2025 Feb 26. PubMed 40008555 ↗
  • Caruso S, Nota A, Caruso S, Severino M, Gatto R, Meuli S, Mattei A, Tecco S. Mandibular advancement with clear aligners in the treatment of skeletal Class II. A retrospective controlled study. Eur J Paediatr Dent. 2021;22(1):26-30. doi: 10.23804/ejpd.2021.22.01.05. PubMed 33719479 ↗

Study documents

PDFs hosted by the registry, ClinicalTrials.gov.

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No — Access to participant information was restricted to research team members directly involved in data collection, analysis, and management. Furthermore, any published or disseminated findings were presented in aggregate form to prevent the identification of individual participants. Before the data collection, participants were informed about the confidentiality measures in place and were required to provide informed consent for their participation, including the use and storage of their data. Compliance with data protection regulations and ethical guidelines was ensured throughout the study to safeguard the confidentiality and privacy of the participants.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Ran from Jul 2024 to primary completion in Oct 2025, 15 months.

Of 86 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Malocclusion, Angle Class II, half reached primary completion within 15 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 22. This study's 15 months is close to that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 86 studies reached it within 15 months; a quarter within 11 and three quarters within 22.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 11, 2026
First posted
Feb 19, 2026
StartActual
Jul 4, 2024
Primary completionActual
Oct 20, 2025
CompletionActual
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Feb 19, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07420270
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 19, 2026
Start date
Jul 4, 2024
Primary completion
Oct 20, 2025
Completion
Dec 31, 2025
Last update
Feb 19, 2026

Study contacts

Wey Mang Chek, Associate Prof
study chair · Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya
Nurul Aliaa Ahmad Fauzi, Dr
study director · Faculty of Dentistry, Universiti Malaya

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is completed, as verified in Jul 2024. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion