ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07419126EMASEUpdated Feb 18, 2026

Ultrasound Assessment of Arterial Medial Calcification in Endurance Athletes: A Prevalence Study

An observational study in Calcifications, Vascular, sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble. Not yet recruiting. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-18.

Sponsored by University Hospital, Grenoble · Observational

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jul 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as not yet recruiting.
Study type
Observational
Model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Medial arterial calcification (MAC) is an under-recognized vascular condition that remains poorly characterized from an epidemiological perspective. In the general population, its estimated prevalence is approximately 2.5%, mainly based on ankle-brachial index measurements. In contrast, prevalence exceeds 10% in high-risk populations such as patients with diabetes, chronic kidney disease, or established cardiovascular disease, with wide variability depending on the diagnostic method used.

In these populations, MAC is associated with adverse clinical outcomes, including critical limb ischemia, major amputation, and increased cardiovascular mortality, sometimes exceeding the prognostic impact of atherosclerosis. However, data on MAC in healthy individuals are currently lacking, and its clinical significance in this population remains unknown.

Endurance athletes represent a unique population exposed to prolonged and intense hemodynamic stress. Previous studies have reported increased coronary artery calcification in athletes with very high levels of physical activity, and differences according to sporting discipline. Incidental findings of MAC have also been observed in endurance athletes, raising the question of a potential association with training volume and vascular adaptations to long-term exercise.

The objective of this study is to assess the prevalence of medial arterial calcification in endurance athletes using ultrasound imaging, and to explore its relationship with training characteristics and cardiovascular risk markers.

02

Conditions studied

  • Calcifications, Vascular

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • medial arterial calcification
  • endurance athletes
03

In context

Vascular Calcification

82 studies on the registry are indexed under Vascular Calcification; 17 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 60 is below the median of 80 across 23 observational studies indexed under Vascular Calcification.

Browse Vascular Calcification studies →

Lead sponsor

University Hospital, Grenoble is the lead sponsor of 837 studies on the registry; 207 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes
Sampling method
Non-probability sample

Study population

Healthy endurance athletes volunteering for the study, engaging in more than 5 hours of high-intensity endurance exercise per week for at least the past 10 years.

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Healthy volunteer attending a sports medicine consultation for the performance of an exercise stress test*.
  • Male or female subject.
  • Age between 18 and 70 years, inclusive.
  • High-level endurance athlete, with regular practice of endurance sports (trail running, road running, cycling, swimming, cross-country skiing, biathlon), with a MET-min/week > 2000, corresponding to more than 5 hours of vigorous physical activity per week, for more than 10 years.
  • Affiliated with a social security system.
  • No objection to participation in the study. * Undergoing a lower limb arterial ultrasound examination as part of routine clinical care.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Participants with type 1 or type 2 diabetes mellitus.
  • Participants with chronic kidney disease, defined as an estimated (eGFR) \< 60 mL/min/1.73 m².
  • Resting arterial hypertension.
  • Established cardiovascular disease (coronary artery disease, stroke, or peripheral arterial disease).
  • Protected or vulnerable populations as defined by French Public Health Code articles L1121-5 to L1121-8, including:

pregnant or breastfeeding women, women in labor, individuals deprived of liberty by judicial or administrative decision, individuals receiving psychiatric care under articles L.3212-1 and L.3213-1, individuals admitted to healthcare or social institutions for purposes other than research, minors, individuals under legal protection, or individuals unable to provide .

Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

GFR and eGFR (kidney filtering)

GFR (glomerular filtration rate) is how much blood the kidneys filter each minute. It is usually estimated from a blood test — eGFR, by formulas such as CKD-EPI or MDRD — and some studies ask for it to be measured directly instead. Usually given in mL/min/1.73 m².

Check the method, the units and the minimum the study states. A value of 90 or above is in the normal-or-high range, but kidney damage can show in other tests too.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

05

Study design

Observational model
Cohort
Time perspective
Prospective
Enrollment
60 participants (estimated)
Patient registry
No

Groups and cohorts

  • Healthy endurance athletes

    Healthy volunteer attending a sports medicine consultation for the performance of an exercise stress test\*. Male or female subject. Age between 18 and 70 years, inclusive. High-level endurance athlete, with regular practice of endurance sports (trail running, road running, cycling, swimming, cross-country skiing, biathlon), with a MET-min/week \> 2000, corresponding to more than 5 hours of vigorous physical activity per week, for more than 10 years. Affiliated with a social security system. No objection to participation in the study. \* Undergoing a lower limb arterial ultrasound examination as part of routine clinical care.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Presence or absence of medial arterial calcification detected by ultrasound in the lower limb arteries

    Qualitative variable: number of subjects with medial arterial calcification. Measurement method: lower limb arterial duplex ultrasound (common and superficial femoral arteries, popliteal arteries, anterior tibial arteries, posterior tibial arteries), using a severity score ranging from 0 to 4 per side, i.e. 0 to 8 in total (0: completely normal vessel; 1: calcifications extending over \< 1 cm; 2: calcifications over 1-2 cm; 3: calcifications over 2-3 cm; 4: calcifications over \> 3 cm). A score of 0 indicates absence of medial arterial calcification, whereas a score of ≥ 1 indicates presence of medial arterial calcification.

    Time frame: At enrollment (single assessment on the day of inclusion)

07

Study locations

No study locations are listed for this record.

08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Start is estimated for Feb 2026; primary completion for Jul 2026, 5 months later.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Feb 11, 2026
First posted
Feb 18, 2026
StartEst.
Feb 2026
Primary completionEst.
Jul 2026
CompletionEst.
Oct 2026
Last update
Feb 18, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 18, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07419126
Responsible party
Sponsor
First posted
Feb 18, 2026
Start date
Feb 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Jul 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Oct 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 18, 2026

Study contacts

Marwa Melkemi, Resident
Contact
melkmarwa@gmail.com
+33606471880 ext. +33
Christophe Seinturier, Doctor
Contact
CSeinturier@chu-grenoble.fr
+33645270690 ext. +33
Stéphane Doutreleau, Doctor
principal investigator · University Hospital, Grenoble
Christophe Seinturier, Doctor
study director · University Hospital, Grenoble

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Feb 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion