CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07414446SONASUpdated Feb 17, 2026

Non-Invasive Detection of Pulmonary Right-to-Left Shunts Using the SONAS Ultrasound Device

An interventional study of Transcranial Ultrasound Device in Hereditary Haemorrhagic Telangiectasia, PFO - Patent Foramen Ovale and Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformation, sponsored by St. Antonius Hospital. Recruiting at 1 site in Netherlands. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-17.

Sponsored by St. Antonius Hospital · Not applicable, Interventional, and Diagnostic

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Apr 2026, 6 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Started Jan 2026; still recruiting 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
40
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn how well the SONAS ultrasound device can detect right-to-left shunts of adults with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT) who are already scheduled for a contrast bubble echocardiogram (TTCE). The main questions it aims to answer are:

  1. How accurately does SONAS detect right-to-left shunts compared to the standard TTCE test?
  2. Can SONAS results help tell the difference between shunts in the heart and shunts in the lungs?

Participants will wear a headband with the SONAS device on the head while they undergo their routine TTCE bubble test. They will receive the usual contrast (agitated saline) through a vein, and both SONAS and TTCE signals will be recorded at the same time. There will be one examination in rest, and one during a breathing exercise (the Valsalva manoeuvre).

Read the detailed description

This study is being done to find out whether a new ultrasound device called SONAS can safely and reliably detect "right-to-left shunts" in people with hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT). Right-to-left shunts are abnormal connections between blood vessels that allow blood to bypass the lungs and go directly from the right side of the heart to the left side. This can increase the risk of problems such as stroke or brain abscess. Today, these shunts are usually found with a "bubble heart ultrasound" (TTCE), which needs experienced staff and can be time-consuming. SONAS is a small, portable device that detects blood flow signals in the brain after a bubble injection and may offer a simpler way to detect these shunts.

In this study, all participants are are already scheduled to have a bubble heart ultrasound as part of their regular care. The study adds the SONAS device on top of this routine test. During the procedure, a soft headband with small ultrasound sensors is placed in frond of the ears on both sides of the head. At the same time, the standard bubble test is done: normal saline mixed with a small amount of the participant's blood and some air is injected into a vein, and the heart is imaged with ultrasound. Participants will be asked to perform a straining manoeuvre (called a Valsalva) to see if this makes a shunt more visible. While this is happening, SONAS continuously records signals from the brain that show when the bubbles pass through.

There will be a comparison between what SONAS shows with what the standard heart ultrasound shows. By comparing these results, the researchers want to see how closely the SONAS score matches the standard test and whether certain SONAS outcomes indicate a clinically important shunt. They will also look at the timing and pattern of the bubble signals to explore whether SONAS can help tell the difference between shunts that come from the heart and those that come from the lungs. The study does not change any decisions about diagnosis or treatment: all medical decisions remain based on the usual heart ultrasound and other standard tests.

Throughout the procedure, the safety and comfort of participants are closely monitored. SONAS does not deliver any contrast or radiation. All problems or unusual events that occur during or shortly after the combined test are recorded. The information collected in this study will help determine whether SONAS is a practical, safe, and useful tool to support or simplify screening for right-to-left shunts.

02

Conditions studied

  • Hereditary Haemorrhagic Telangiectasia
  • PFO - Patent Foramen Ovale
  • Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformation

Keywords

  • Hereditary Hemorrhagic Telangiectasisa
  • Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformation
  • Right-to-Left Shunt
  • Contrast Echocardiography
  • Transcranial Ultrasound
  • Microbubbles
  • Patent Foramen Ovale
  • Cryptogenic Stroke
03

In context

Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic

99 studies on the registry are indexed under Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic; 23 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 40 is above the median of 33 across 59 interventional studies indexed under Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic.

Browse Telangiectasia, Hereditary Hemorrhagic studies →

Lead sponsor

St. Antonius Hospital is the lead sponsor of 94 studies on the registry; 28 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

  • Age 18 years or older.
  • Suspected or confirmed hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia (HHT).
  • Incidentally: Patients who have experienced cryptogenic stroke

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding.
  • Known or suspected fracture(s) of the temporal / parietal skull bones, or with open skin injuries in the anatomical area of the temporal / parietal lobes.
  • Patients with known metal skull implants in the anatomical area of the temporal / parietal bones, or with anatomical formation of the head or ear tha may interfere with proper headset placement.
  • Patients with known allergies or reactions to parabens, which are present in the gel pad material of the applied part.
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Diagnostic
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
40 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SONAS Ultrasound During Contrast Echocardiography

    This study has a single arm in which all participants undergo SONAS monitoring during a standard contrast echocardiogram (transthoracic contrast echocardiography). In this arm, adults with (possible) hereditary hemorrhagic telangiectasia or PFO who are already scheduled for a clinically indicated bubble echocardiogram have a headband with the SONAS ultrasound device examination. Agitated saline is injected into a vein as part of usual care, and the heart is imaged with echocardiography while SONAS simultaneously records ultrasound signals from the brain.

    Device: Transcranial Ultrasound Device

Interventions

  • DeviceTranscranial Ultrasound Device

    The intervention is the SONAS ultrasound device used during a routine bubble echocardiogram. A battery-powered unit connects to a headset with two ultrasound sensors placed in front of the ears. The device does not deliver contrast or drugs; it records ultrasound signals in the brain while standard agitated saline is injected and the heart is imaged. SONAS analyzes bubble-related signals and calculates a numeric score to evaluate right-to-left shunts without changing the usual echocardiography protocol.

    Also known as: SONAS, Foqus

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Capability of detecting Right-to-Left Shunts

    Device capability of detecting High Intensity Transient Signals (HITS) using SONAS in presence of RLS, as confirmed by reference method TTCE. SONAS output is expressed as maximum HITS Density Score (0-100%). TTCE outcome is assessed by RLS grade (0-3), maximum microbubble count in left ventricle, and corrected change in echo density.

    Time frame: Periprocedurally

  2. Diagnostic accuracy

    Diagnostic accuracy (sensitivity and specificity) of SONAS for detection of clinically significant RLS (≥grade 2 on TTCE) at different HITS Density Score thresholds.

    Time frame: Periprocedurally

Secondary outcomes

  1. Distinguishing intracardiac from pulmonary Right-to-Left Shunts

    SONAS capability to distinguish intracardiac from pulmonary RLS based on time delay between contrast administration and first HITS occurrence, and difference in HITS Density Score between rest and Valsalva maneuver.

    Time frame: Periprocedurally

  2. Test-retest reliability of SONAS for HITS assessment

    Test-retest reliability of SONAS for HITS assessment using Intraclass Correlation Coefficient.

    Time frame: Periprocedurally

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
  • St. Antonius Hospital
    Nieuwegein, Utrecht 3435CM, Netherlands
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Individual participant data

Plan to share: Yes — All anonymized Individual Patient Data that underlie results in the publication.

Supporting information: Study protocol

No publications or documents are linked to this record.

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 17, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07414446
Lead sponsor
St. Antonius Hospital
Collaborators
Burl Concepts, Inc.
Responsible party
Prof. Marco C. Post (Professor, St. Antonius Hospital) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 17, 2026
Start date
Jan 7, 2026
Primary completion
Apr 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 1, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 17, 2026

Study contacts

Pier HJ van Veen, Medical Doctor
Contact
ja.van.veen@antoniusziekenhuis.nl
0883205336
Martijn C. Post, Professor
principal investigator · St. Antonius Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion