CClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07410364DISTAL-SVUpdated May 19, 2026

Safety and Efficacy of CAG and PCI Via Distal Transradial Access in Patients With Small Vessels

An interventional study of Performing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the distal transradial access in patients with small vessels (DRA < 2.0 mm) using a 6-Fr Glidesheath Slender sheath. and Performing coronary interventional procedures via the distal radial artery in patients with small vessels ( DRA diameter < 2.0 mm ) using a 6-Fr Conventional sheath. in Coronary Artery Disease, sponsored by Cai gaojun, MD. Recruiting at 2 sites in China. Open to participants aged 18 Years to 85 Years, including healthy volunteers. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-19.

Sponsored by Cai gaojun, MD · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

From the registry’s dates

  • Started Feb 2026; still recruiting 7 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
594
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 85 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Randomized controlled trial of adaptive design for the safety and efficacy of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via distal transradial access using a 6-French Glidesheath Slender in patients with small vessels.

Read the detailed description

The safety and efficacy of coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via distal transradial access (dTRA) have been confirmed by a large number of studies, but there are still few studies on its safety and efficacy in patients with small vessels (distal radial artery diameter \< 2.0mm). The 6-French Glidesheath Slender, with its smaller outer diameter, should be more suitable for patients with small vessels. To this end, we plan to conduct a single-center, adaptive, randomized controlled trial enrolling 594 patients aged 18-85 years old with distal radial artery diameters \<2.0 mm and ≥1.0 mm who are scheduled to undergo coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the distal radial artery approach in our center. The study employed a stratification-block randomized design. Stratification was performed based on patient gender, with a block size of 4 within each stratum. Eligible patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to either the 6-French Glidesheath Slender group or the 6-French conventional sheath group.

The primary endpoint of the study was distal radial artery occlusion assessed by vascular ultrasound 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary endpoints included puncture success rate, procedure success rate, number of punctures, puncture time, total procedural time, visual analogue scale pain scores during sheath placement, bleeding, hematoma, arteriovenous fistula, finger numbness, and conventional radial artery occlusion at 24 hours postoperatively.

An interim analysis will be conducted when 50% of the total sample size (297 patients) is enrolled, with subsequent sample size adjustments based on preliminary study results.

The results of this study will provide evidence for the safety and efficacy of 6-French Glidesheath Slender for coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with small vessels via distal transradial access, and provide information for the selection of the best sheath equipment for patients with small vessels.

02

Conditions studied

  • Coronary Artery Disease

Keywords

  • Distal radial artery
  • Small vessel
  • Ultrasound
  • Distal radial artery occlusion
  • Radial artery occlusion
  • Visual analog scale
  • Safety
  • Efficacy
03

In context

Coronary Artery Disease

5,598 studies on the registry are indexed under Coronary Artery Disease; 957 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 594 is above the median of 124 across 3,436 interventional studies indexed under Coronary Artery Disease.

Browse Coronary Artery Disease studies →

Lead sponsor

This is the only study on the registry with Cai gaojun, MD as lead sponsor.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 85 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

  • Age between 18 and 85 years
  • Palpable pulses in both the distal radial artery and conventional radial artery
  • All patients signed informed consent forms prior to procedure

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Ultrasound assessment of the distal radial artery diameter ≥2.0mm or \<1.0mm
  • Height ≥185.0cm
  • Patients with acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction, cardiogenic shock, or hemodynamic instability
  • Contraindications for puncture of the distal radial artery
  • Patients with Raynaud's syndrome
  • Patients with coagulation disorders or hematologic diseases
  • Patients currently enrolled in other clinical studies
05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Triple (Participant, Care provider, Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
594 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    6-French Glidesheath Slender group

    Performing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the distal transradial access using a 6-French Glidesheath Slender sheath.

    Device: Performing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the distal transradial access in patients with small vessels (DRA < 2.0 mm) using a 6-Fr Glidesheath Slender sheath.

  • Sham comparator
    6-F Conventional sheath group

    Performing coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the distal transradial access using a 6-F Conventional sheath.

    Device: Performing coronary interventional procedures via the distal radial artery in patients with small vessels ( DRA diameter < 2.0 mm ) using a 6-Fr Conventional sheath.

Interventions

  • DevicePerforming coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention via the distal transradial access in patients with small vessels (DRA < 2.0 mm) using a 6-Fr Glidesheath Slender sheath.

    Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in participants with small vessels (DRA \< 2.0 mm) via the distal transradial access using a 6-French Glidesheath Slender sheath.

    Also known as: 6-French Glidesheath Slender

  • DevicePerforming coronary interventional procedures via the distal radial artery in patients with small vessels ( DRA diameter < 2.0 mm ) using a 6-Fr Conventional sheath.

    Coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention was performed in participants with small vessels (DRA \< 2.0 mm) via the distal transradial access using a 6-French Conventional sheath.

    Also known as: 6-Fr Conventional sheath

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Distal radial artery occlusion(dRAO)

    The dRAO is defined as the absence of blood flow in the distal radial artery assessed by the doppler ultrasound.

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively.

Secondary outcomes

  1. Puncture success

    Puncture success is defined as complete insertion of the artery sheath.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  2. Procedure success

    Procedure success is defined as the whole procedure was completed from the same access.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  3. Number of punctures

    The number of punctures is defined as the number of attempts made before a successful puncture.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  4. Puncture time(second)

    Puncture time is defined as the time from the end of local anaesthesia to the sheath completely implanted into the vessel.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  5. Procedural time(minute)

    Procedural time is defined as the time from the initiation of the puncture to the completion of the procedure.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  6. Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) pain scores(0-10) during sheath placement

    With a 10-cm straight line divided into 10 equal parts to rate pain with 0 indicating no pain and 10 for extreme pain.

    Time frame: Periprocedural

  7. Bleeding

    Bleeding events are defined according to the BARC criteria.

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

  8. Haematoma

    Haematoma was assessed according to the mEASY( A modified version of the Early Discharge After Transradial Stenting of Coronary Arteries Study) classification.

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

  9. Arteriovenous fistula

    Number of participants with the arteriovenous fistula is assessed by the doppler ultrasound 24 hours postoperatively.

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively.

  10. Finger numbness

    Number of participants with the finger numbness 24 hours postoperatively.

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

  11. Conventional radial artery occlusion (cRAO)

    The cRAO is defined as the absence of blood flow in the conventional radial artery assessed by the doppler ultrasound.

    Time frame: 24 hours postoperatively

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • Changzhou Wujin People's Hospital
    Changzhou, Jiangsu 213017, China
    Recruiting
  • Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University.
    Changzhou, Jiangsu 213017, China
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Li F, Zhou T, Fan X, Chen T, Shi G, Li L, Cai G. Safety and Efficacy of Distal Transradial Access in Patients With Small Diameter Distal Radial Artery: A Post Hoc Analysis of 2 Randomized Trials. Can J Cardiol. 2026 Jun;42(6):1221-1229. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2025.12.048. Epub 2025 Dec 30. PubMed 41478549 ↗
  • Kim Y, Ahn Y, Kim I, Lee DH, Kim MC, Sim DS, Hong YJ, Kim JH, Jeong MH. Feasibility of Coronary Angiography and Percutaneous Coronary Intervention via Left Snuffbox Approach. Korean Circ J. 2018 Dec;48(12):1120-1130. doi: 10.4070/kcj.2018.0181. Epub 2018 Aug 6. PubMed 30088362 ↗
  • Lin Y, Sun X, Chen R, Liu H, Pang X, Chen J, Dong S. Feasibility and Safety of the Distal Transradial Artery for Coronary Diagnostic or Interventional Catheterization. J Interv Cardiol. 2020 Dec 9;2020:4794838. doi: 10.1155/2020/4794838. eCollection 2020. PubMed 33380922 ↗
  • Tsigkas G, Papageorgiou A, Moulias A, Kalogeropoulos AP, Papageorgopoulou C, Apostolos A, Papanikolaou A, Vasilagkos G, Davlouros P. Distal or Traditional Transradial Access Site for Coronary Procedures: A Single-Center, Randomized Study. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jan 10;15(1):22-32. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.09.037. Epub 2021 Dec 15. PubMed 34922888 ↗
  • Chen T, Huang H, Li L, Yang A, Shi G, Li F, Lu W, Xu L, Cai G. Analysis of the diameter of the distal radial artery at anatomic snuffbox by ultrasonography in patients scheduled for coronary intervention. J Vasc Access. 2025 May;26(3):896-903. doi: 10.1177/11297298241250263. Epub 2024 May 16. PubMed 38752401 ↗
  • Lu W, Chen T, Wang H, Yang A, Li L, Shi G, Xue S, Li F, Xiao J, Gu J, Zhang L, Liang X, Li W, Cai G. Comparison of the Effect of a 6-French Glidesheath Slender and a Conventional Sheath on Distal Radial Artery Occlusion: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Can J Cardiol. 2024 Nov;40(11):2292-2300. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2024.07.011. Epub 2024 Jul 19. PubMed 39032557 ↗
  • Chen T, Li L, Yang A, Huang H, Shi G, Li F, Li W, Lu W, Xu L, Li L, Cai G. Incidence of Distal Radial Artery Occlusion and its Influencing Factors After Cardiovascular Intervention Via the Distal Transradial Access. J Endovasc Ther. 2025 Oct;32(5):1408-1416. doi: 10.1177/15266028231208638. Epub 2023 Oct 31. PubMed 37906607 ↗
  • Chen T, Li L, Li F, Lu W, Shi G, Li W, Yang A, Huang H, Xiao J, Zhang Q, Gu J, Xue S, Zhang L, Li L, Xu L, Ji R, Wang H, Cai G. Comparison of long-term radial artery occlusion via distal vs. conventional transradial access (CONDITION): a randomized controlled trial. BMC Med. 2024 Feb 8;22(1):62. doi: 10.1186/s12916-024-03281-7. PubMed 38331793 ↗

Related links

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 19, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07410364
Lead sponsor
Cai gaojun, MD
Responsible party
Cai gaojun, MD (Director, Head of Departments of Cardiology, Clinical Professor., Wujin People's Hospital) — Sponsor-investigator
First posted
Feb 13, 2026
Start date
Feb 24, 2026
Primary completion
Feb 1, 2028 (estimated)
Completion
Feb 1, 2028 (estimated)
Last update
May 19, 2026

Study contacts

gaojun GJ cai, PhD
Contact
caigaojun@wjrmyy.cn
+86 0519-85579192
feng F li, MD
Contact
lifeng@wjrmyy.cn
+86 85579192
haiyan HY zhang, BS
principal investigator · Wujin Hospital Affiliated with Jiangsu University.

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
Yes
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion