ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07409220Updated Feb 13, 2026

The Use of an Audio-visual Method in Counseling for Pediatric Lumbar Puncture Procedure

An interventional study of Audio-visual tool/ Video in Meningitis in Children, sponsored by Oman Ministry of Health. Recruiting at 1 site in Oman. Open to participants aged 12 Hours to 13 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-13.

Primary conditionnone(registry's first term: Emergencies)No conditionIs this wrong?Emergencies describes something many studies share rather than a condition a study is about. The study names no condition we can place it under, so it is not compared with other studies by condition.

Sponsored by Oman Ministry of Health · Not applicable, Interventional, and Other

From the registry’s dates

  • Primary completion was expected by Jun 2026, 4 months ago, but the record still lists the study as recruiting.
  • Registered 11 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Jan 2025, registered Jan 2026).
  • Started Jan 2025; still recruiting 1 year 9 months later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
154
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
12 Hours to 13 Years
Sex
All
01

Study summary

The goal of this clinical trial is to compare the use of usual verbal counseling supported by a video illustration comparing to the use of usual verbal counseling alone prior to obtaining spinal fluid ( Lumbar puncture - LP ) procedure, from children suspected to have brain infection in the Emergency department settings.

This trial is trying to answer if use of video illustration is associated with higher acceptance rate for the procedure by the parents of children who are suspected to have brain infection (meningitis) in the pediatric emergency room settings at a tertiary hospital.

Who is suitable to participate? Parents/legal guardians of all children aged between 1day to 12 years, who are suspected to have brain infection (meningitis) attending the Pediatric emergency room at the Royal Hospital.

Participants will:

Be counseled using verbal snd video method = Intervention group OR verbal method only = Control group The Researchers will collect the acceptance rate in performing LP in both groups.

Read the detailed description

This is a clinical trial with the following objectives:

* The primary objective: To determine whether using an audio-visual intervention in counseling for emergent Lumber Puncture procedure will increase the gain of consents from parents/legal guardians of 0-13 years old children who are seen at the Royal Hospital Pediatrics Emergency Department compared to the current standard verbal counseling.

  • The secondary objectives:

    1. To describe the reasons for LP refusal prospectively.
    2. To study the perspectives of involved health care workers in using the audio-visual method in counseling for LP in an emergency setting.
  • The study methodology:

A pragmatic, open label randomized controlled trial, with two parallel groups of parents randomized in a 1:1 ratio and stratified by three age groups according to child's age.

* Study population and settings: This study to be conducted at the Pediatric Emergency Department in Royal Hospital. The hospital is located in Muscat, the capital city, which has a population of approximately 1.5 million

02

Conditions studied

  • Meningitis in Children

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • lumbar puncture
  • counseling
  • audiovisual aids
  • verbal
  • video
  • emergency
  • pediatrics
03

In context

Lead sponsor

Oman Ministry of Health is the lead sponsor of 18 studies on the registry; 12 are open to participants now.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
12 Hours to 13 Years
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • All Parents/legal guardians of 0-13 years old children who were identified to get an emergent lumbar puncture procedure, as decided by the attending physician during the Emergency Department shift.
  • Participants who speak Arabic or English

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

- Participants who are not Arabic nor English speakers.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Other
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
154 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    Audiovisual counseling

    The intervention group will be receiving the audiovisual material with verbal counseling. This involved the usual face-to-face verbal explanations, supplemented by a video animation in Arabic with English subtitles, designed specifically for this trial.

    Other: Audio-visual tool/ Video

  • No intervention
    Verbal counseling

    The control group received verbal counseling alone. This was a usual face-to-face verbal explanations and discussion between the physician and the legal guardians about the LP procedure. No specific instructions or scientific materials were provided which reflects the current standard care and real counseling practices.

Interventions

  • OtherAudio-visual tool/ Video

    Use of Audio-visual tool (Video) during counseling session

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. The acceptance rate of the Lumbar Puncture (LP) procedure

    The acceptance rate of the LP procedure, which was obtained directly from the parents/legal guardians after the counseling in Emergency Department from both groups. Physicians documented acceptance or refusal in the Hospital Information System (HIS).

    Time frame: Within 24 hours from intervention (During their stay in the pediatric ER)

Secondary outcomes

  1. A survey for the parents prepared to get their opinion and compare their experience (between the intervention and control group)

    A survey for the parents prepared to get their opinion and compare their experience (between the intervention and control group) using 4 key questions: their understanding of the procedure, perception of its safety, perception of painfulness, and overall comfort with their child undergoing lumbar puncture. Participants rated each item on a 1-10 Likert scale. The survey to be completed after admission-typically within 48 hours-through in-person interviewing the family or via phone calls.

    Time frame: Within 48 hours from the intervention

  2. Refusal reasons collected during interview time with parents

    The reasons for LP refusal were collected prospectively from parents during the interview time and after the survey. All who refused the procedure in either group were asked to answer a closed-ended question listing reasons: lack of knowledge about LP, not being convinced of its diagnostic importance, or fear of complications. If complications were selected as a reason, they were then asked an open-ended question to specify the side effects or complications they were concerned about.

    Time frame: Within 48 hours from the intervention

  3. online survey with Likert scales

    The Physicians' Perspectives on using an Audio-visual method for Lumbar Puncture counseling in the Emergency Department will be assessed using an online survey with 5-point Likert Agreement Scale related to their agreement level (Strongly agree, Agree, Neutral, disagree, strongly disagree), their feeling, the challenges faced implementing the method in the Emergency Department and if they would recommend standardizing it for LP counseling.

    Time frame: Within 4 weeks from using the intervention

07

Study locations

1 of 1 sites recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • 17th EIP abstract book in critical public health. (2025). Critical Public Health, 35(sup1). https://doi.org/10.1080/09581596.2025.2578123

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reached

Started Jan 2025 (actual). Primary completion is estimated for Jun 2026, 16 months after the start.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 26, 2026
First posted
Feb 13, 2026
StartActual
Jan 31, 2025
Primary completionEst.
Jun 30, 2026
CompletionEst.
Jul 30, 2026
Last update
Feb 13, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 13, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07409220
Lead sponsor
Oman Ministry of Health
Responsible party
Aza Said Hamood Al-Sawafi (Principal Investigator, Oman Ministry of Health) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 13, 2026
Start date
Jan 31, 2025
Primary completion
Jun 30, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Jul 30, 2026 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 13, 2026

Study contacts

Tahlil N AlAmri, MD
Contact
r22114@resident.omsb.org
0096895622148
Aza S AlSawafi, MD
Contact
dr.aza-alsawwafi@hotmail.co.uk
0096896033661
Aza S AlSawafi, MD
study chair · The Royal Hospital

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion