ClinicalTrials.gg
RecruitingNCT07406945Updated Feb 12, 2026

Safety and Efficacy of a Novel SpydrBlade Flexible Bipolar in POEM

An interventional study of SpydrBlade Flex in Achalasia and EGJ Outflow Obstruction, sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong. Recruiting at 2 sites in 2 countries. Open to participants aged 18 Years and older. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-02-12.

Sponsored by Chinese University of Hong Kong · Not applicable, Interventional, and Treatment

From the registry’s dates

  • Registered 1 year 3 months after the study started (first participant enrolled Nov 2024, registered Feb 2026).
  • Started Nov 2024; still recruiting 2 years later.
Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
73
Allocation
Not applicable
Ages
18 Years and older
Sex
All
01

Study summary

Achalasia is an idiopathic motility disorder, primarily identified by the absence of esophageal peristalsis and the inability of the lower esophageal sphincter (LES) to relax properly. Although it is usually misdiagnosed and treated as gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), the main symptom is progressive dysphagia, accompanied by additional symptoms like nocturnal cough, heartburn, weight loss, regurgitation of undigested food and aspiration.

The severity of achalasia and the effectiveness of treatments are commonly assessed using the Eckardt Symptom Score (ESS), which evaluates symptoms like weight loss, regurgitation, dysphagia, and retrosternal pain.

Diagnosis of achalasia is often delayed, affecting up to 50% of patients. It typically involves a combination of diagnostic tools, such as time barium esophagram (TBE) study, which assesses the movement and clearance of barium in the esophagus; esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD), which allows visual examination of the esophagus, stomach, and duodenum; and high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM), considered the gold standard for achalasia. HREM can also help stratify the condition into different types, influencing treatment choices. Furthermore, the endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe (Endoflip, Crospon Corp, Dangan Galaway, Ireland), which measures baseline parameters of LES, aiding in both diagnosis and treatment evolution.

While there is no cure for achalasia, treatments aim to reduce LES pressure. The include pharmacological treatments, such as calcium channel blockers or nitrates; endoscopic treatment, including injection of botulinum toxin in the LES, pneumatic dilation, or per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM); and surgical therapies (laparoscopic Heller myotomy). POEM has emerged as a first-line treatment for achalasia due to its minimally invasive nature and high success rates (80%-90%). This technique involves creating a submucosal tunnel and performing myotomy, and it can be performed anteriorly (at 2 o'clock) or posteriorly (at 5 o'clock).

The choice between anterior and posterior approaches to POEM often depends on the endoscopist's experience and preference. While current data is inconclusive regarding the superiority of either approach, some suggest that the posterior approach might be technically easier due to procedural characteristics (i.e., alignment between endoscopic accessories and mucosal incision). The introduction to novel technologies with smaller diameters can improve this minimally invasive approach making the procedure more efficient and safer for patients with achalasia. Thus, we aim to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of a novel radiofrequency and microwave ablation flexible bipolar (SpydrBlade Flex, CREO Medical, UK) for per-oral endoscopic myotomy in patients with achalasia.

02

Conditions studied

  • Achalasia
  • EGJ Outflow Obstruction

Browse trials for

Keywords

  • Novel Flexible Bipolar
  • POEM
03

In context

Esophageal Achalasia

143 studies on the registry are indexed under Esophageal Achalasia; 44 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 73 is above the median of 56 across 95 interventional studies indexed under Esophageal Achalasia.

Browse Esophageal Achalasia studies →

Lead sponsor

Chinese University of Hong Kong is the lead sponsor of 1,454 studies on the registry; 474 are open to participants now.

Of its 6 completed or terminated interventional studies of FDA-regulated products, 0 (0%) have results posted.

Counted across the registry records on this site, refreshed daily.

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years and older
Sexes eligible
All
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Patients with 18 years of age or older.
  • Patients referred to the participating center with a clinical indication for POEM. This includes conditions such as: achalasia, native or failed Heller myotomy, balloon dilation, and EGJ outflow obstruction.
  • Patients who provide .

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who have for EGD.
  • Patients with an Eckardt score \< 3 before POEM.
  • Positive diagnosis of Chagas disease.
  • Patients unable to withstand general anesthesia.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(2)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Informed consent

Before you join, the study team explains what taking part involves — its purpose, what happens, the risks and possible benefits — and answers your questions, so you can decide freely. Consent is usually recorded on a form (the informed consent form, ICF) signed by you or, where the law allows, by someone legally authorised to decide for you.

You can keep asking questions during the study, you are told of new information that matters, and you can choose to leave at any time.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Treatment
Allocation
Not applicable
Intervention model
Single group
Masking
None (open label)
Enrollment
73 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    SpydrBlade Flex Group

    Patients will undergo Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy (POEM) using the novel SpydrBlade Flex device.

    Device: SpydrBlade Flex

Interventions

  • DeviceSpydrBlade Flex

    The POEM procedure will be performed using the novel radiofrequency and microwave ablation flexible bipolar (SpydrBlade Flex, CREO Medical, UK). Both anterior and posterior POEM could be performed, depending on the clinical presentation and endoscopist's preference.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Technical Success Rate

    This involves assessing the procedural success of the POEM using the novel bipolar device. Success would typically mean completing the procedure as planned, without technical difficulties or complications. Unit of measure: % of procedures

    Time frame: 1 day

  2. Clinical Success Rate

    Clinical success rate is defined as the proportion of patients in whom clinical success (as defined by an Eckardt symptom score ≤ 3) is achieved following the procedure. The Eckardt score (range 0-12) will be assessed for each patient before the procedure and at the 1 month postoperative follow-up. Clinical success for an individual patient is defined as achieving a follow-up Eckardt score of 3 or less. The clinical success rate is the percentage of patients who meet this success criterion out of the total analyzed population. Unit of measure: % of patients

    Time frame: 30 days

  3. [Safety] Incidence of intraoperative complications

    Incidence of adverse events occurring during the procedure, including: perforation, bleeding, infection, and any complications directly related to the device. Unit of measure: % of procedures

    Time frame: 1 day

  4. [Safety] Incidence of postoperative complications

    Incidence of adverse events occurring within 30 days after the procedure, including: perforation, bleeding, infection, and any complications directly related to the device. Unit of measure: % of procedures

    Time frame: 30 days

Secondary outcomes

  1. Post-Procedural Reflux - Symptom Assessment

    Reflux symptoms reported by the patient after the POEM procedure. Patient-reported symptoms tracked during follow-up visits. Unit of Measure: Presence/absence and description of symptoms (Categorical).

    Time frame: 30 days

  2. Post-Procedural Reflux - Endoscopic Features

    The presence of esophagitis features identified during endoscopic examination. Endoscopic examination performed at postoperative 6 months follow-up. Unit of Measure: Presence/absence and grading of esophagitis (Categorical).

    Time frame: 6 months

  3. Post-Procedural Reflux - pH Monitoring

    Quantitative assessment of acid reflux. A pH level below 4 for more than 6% of the monitoring period is considered indicative of significant reflux. Measured by the number of patients with significant reflux at postoperative 1 month follow-up divided by total number of patients. Unit of measure: % of patients

    Time frame: 30 days

  4. Distensibility of the Lower Esophageal Sphincter (LES)

    The distensibility of the LES, an important parameter in Achalasia treatment, will be measured using the EndoFLIP® system during the 6-month follow-up endoscopic examination. It is measured as the Distensibility Index (DI). Unit of Measure: mm²/mmHg for DI.

    Time frame: 6 months

  5. Postoperative Northwestern Esophageal Quality of Life questionnaire (NEQOL) score

    The NEQOL questionnaire, a tool designed to measure the quality of life specifically in patients with esophageal conditions, will be administered 6 months post-procedure. The NEQOL questionnaire is consisted of 14 questions answered on a 5-point Likert scale, where higher score means a better health-related quality of life (HRQOL). Unit of Measure: score (0-56)

    Time frame: 6 months

07

Study locations

2 of 2 sites recruiting
  • academy tertiary, IECED
    Guayaquil, Ecuador
    Recruiting
  • Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, the Chinese University of Hong Kong
    Hong Kong, Hong Kong
    Recruiting
08

References and documents

Publications

  • Kamal F, Ismail MK, Khan MA, Lee-Smith W, Sharaiha RZ, Sharma S, McDonough S, Tariq R, Marella HK, Khan Z, Heda RP, Tombazzi C, Howden CW, Adler DG. Efficacy and safety of peroral endoscopic myotomy in the management of recurrent achalasia after failed Heller myotomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Ann Gastroenterol. 2021;34(2):155-163. doi: 10.20524/aog.2020.0563. Epub 2020 Dec 7. PubMed 33654353 ↗
  • Oleas R, Puga-Tejada M, Sanchez-Carriel M, Valero M, Martin-Delgado J, Ospina J, Munoz-Jurado G, Egas-Izquierdo M, Arevalo-Mora M, Alvarado-Escobar H, Pitanga-Lukashok H, Baquerizo-Burgos J, Robles-Medranda C. Spanish translation and validation of a hybrid, health-related quality of life questionnaire for chronic esophageal conditions: NEQOL-S. Neurogastroenterol Motil. 2023 Mar;35(3):e14511. doi: 10.1111/nmo.14511. Epub 2022 Dec 11. PubMed 36502466 ↗
  • Shiu SI, Chang CH, Tu YK, Ko CW. The comparisons of different therapeutic modalities for idiopathic achalasia: A systematic review and network meta-analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jun 17;101(24):e29441. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029441. PubMed 35713453 ↗
  • Onimaru M, Inoue H, Fujiyoshi Y, Abad MRA, Nishikawa Y, Toshimori A, Shimamura Y, Tanabe M, Sumi K, Ikeda H. Long-term clinical results of per-oral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia: First report of more than 10-year patient experience as assessed with a questionnaire-based survey. Endosc Int Open. 2021 Mar;9(3):E409-E416. doi: 10.1055/a-1333-1883. Epub 2021 Feb 19. PubMed 33655041 ↗
  • Haisley KR, Swanstrom LL. The Modern Age of POEM: the Past, Present and Future of Per-Oral Endoscopic Myotomy. J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Feb;25(2):551-557. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04815-z. Epub 2020 Nov 2. PubMed 33140317 ↗
  • Cappell MS, Stavropoulos SN, Friedel D. Updated Systematic Review of Achalasia, with a Focus on POEM Therapy. Dig Dis Sci. 2020 Jan;65(1):38-65. doi: 10.1007/s10620-019-05784-3. Epub 2019 Aug 27. PubMed 31451984 ↗
  • Su B, Callahan ZM, Novak S, Kuchta K, Ujiki MB. Using Impedance Planimetry (EndoFLIP) to Evaluate Myotomy and Predict Outcomes After Surgery for Achalasia. J Gastrointest Surg. 2020 Apr;24(4):964-971. doi: 10.1007/s11605-020-04513-w. Epub 2020 Jan 14. PubMed 31939098 ↗
  • Moran RA, Brewer Gutierrez OI, Rahden B, Chang K, Ujiki M, Yoo IK, Gulati S, Romanelli J, Al-Nasser M, Shimizu T, Hedberg MH, Cho JY, Hayee B, Desilets D, Filser J, Fortinsky K, Haji A, Fayad L, Sanaei O, Dbouk M, Kumbhari V, Wolf BJ, Elmunzer BJ, Khashab MA. Impedance planimetry values for predicting clinical response following peroral endoscopic myotomy. Endoscopy. 2021 Jun;53(6):570-577. doi: 10.1055/a-1268-7713. Epub 2020 Nov 4. PubMed 33147642 ↗
  • Lundell L. Current and Future Treatment Options in Primary Achalasia. The Role of POEM. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2020 Sep 9;29(3):289-293. doi: 10.15403/jgld-2915. No abstract available. PubMed 32919412 ↗
  • Mundre P, Black CJ, Mohammed N, Ford AC. Efficacy of surgical or endoscopic treatment of idiopathic achalasia: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021 Jan;6(1):30-38. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(20)30296-X. Epub 2020 Oct 6. PubMed 33035470 ↗
  • Drexel S, Kishawi S, Marks J. Peroral Esophageal Myotomy. Surg Clin North Am. 2020 Dec;100(6):1183-1192. doi: 10.1016/j.suc.2020.08.004. Epub 2020 Oct 10. PubMed 33128887 ↗
  • Chadalavada P, Thota PN, Raja S, Sanaka MR. Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy as a Novel Treatment for Achalasia: Patient Selection and Perspectives. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2020 Nov 3;13:485-495. doi: 10.2147/CEG.S230436. eCollection 2020. PubMed 33173323 ↗
  • Ahmed Y, Othman MO. Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) for achalasia. J Thorac Dis. 2019 Aug;11(Suppl 12):S1618-S1628. doi: 10.21037/jtd.2019.07.84. PubMed 31489229 ↗
  • Ponds FA, Fockens P, Lei A, Neuhaus H, Beyna T, Kandler J, Frieling T, Chiu PWY, Wu JCY, Wong VWY, Costamagna G, Familiari P, Kahrilas PJ, Pandolfino JE, Smout AJPM, Bredenoord AJ. Effect of Peroral Endoscopic Myotomy vs Pneumatic Dilation on Symptom Severity and Treatment Outcomes Among Treatment-Naive Patients With Achalasia: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Jul 9;322(2):134-144. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.8859. PubMed 31287522 ↗

Individual participant data

Plan to share: No

09

Updates

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on Feb 12, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
10

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07406945
Collaborators
Academy tertiary center, IECED, Guayaquil, Ecuador
Responsible party
Hon Chi Yip (Assistant Professor, Chinese University of Hong Kong) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 12, 2026
Start date
Nov 1, 2024
Primary completion
Oct 1, 2026 (estimated)
Completion
Apr 1, 2027 (estimated)
Last update
Feb 12, 2026

Study contacts

Hon Chi Yip
Contact
hcyip@surgery.cuhk.edu.hk
+852 3505 2956

Oversight

Data monitoring committee
No
FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Interested in this study?

Eligibility is decided by the study team. Share this record with your doctor or contact the team directly.

Contact study team

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion