ClinicalTrials.gg
Not yet recruitingNCT07405385REFLEXUpdated May 28, 2026

REstoring Metabolic FLEXibility Through Combined Exercise in Breast Cancer Survivors: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

An interventional study of Control and Exercise in Cancer, Breast Cancer and Neoplasm, sponsored by University of Castilla-La Mancha. Not yet recruiting at 1 site in Spain. Open to female participants aged 18 Years to 70 Years. Per ClinicalTrials.gov, last updated 2026-05-28.

Primary conditionBreast NeoplasmsRegistry: NeoplasmsReclassifiedWhy we changed it
Registry
Neoplasms — the first condition term the registry derived for this study.
ClinicalTrials.gg
Breast Neoplasms
Why
  1. The study's listed conditions name Breast Neoplasms, a narrower term within Neoplasms.
Confidence
High: the new condition is named in the study's own listed conditions. Of 351 hand-checked studies reclassified this way, 68% were exactly right and 84% in the right disease family; the registry's first term was right for 5% (measured 2026-10-21). How we classify →
Wrong?
Tell us the study's main condition →

Sponsored by University of Castilla-La Mancha · Not applicable, Interventional, and Prevention

Phase
Not applicable
Study type
Interventional
Enrollment
44
Allocation
Randomized
Ages
18 Years to 70 Years
Sex
Female
01

Study summary

The REFLEX study is a randomized, controlled clinical trial designed to evaluate the impact of a 16-week supervised, combined exercise program on metabolic flexibility and cardiorespiratory fitness in breast cancer survivors. While cancer treatments have significantly improved survival rates, the disease and its therapies often cause systemic mitochondrial dysfunction and muscle loss. This leads to persistent "metabolic inflexibility"-a reduced ability to efficiently switch between burning carbohydrates and fats for energy. This inflexibility, exacerbated by sedentary behavior and cancer-related fatigue, can severely diminish a patient's functional autonomy and overall quality of life. The trial focuses on assessing whether exercise can restore this metabolic adaptability in women aged 18 to 70 with stage I-III breast cancer who are currently on hormonal treatment and completed neo/adjuvant chemotherapy within the past 6 months.

The study operates on the primary hypothesis that an individualized exercise intervention will significantly improve the participants' metabolic flexibility-measured via the metabolic crossover point-and overall aerobic capacity (VO2max) when compared to a control group. Additionally, the trial will analyze secondary outcomes, including changes in cardiovascular and metabolic risk factors, muscle strength, body composition (such as bone mineral density), and patient-reported outcomes assessing quality of life, fatigue, joint pain, anxiety, and depression.

A total of 44 participants will be randomly assigned to either the intervention or control group. Participants in the intervention group will complete a 16-week program consisting of two weekly supervised sessions. Each session lasts between 55 and 85 minutes and includes a tailored combination of aerobic and strength training based on the individual's baseline fitness and metabolic thresholds. Participants in the control group. will receive standard educational materials via email, featuring healthy lifestyle and exercise guidelines from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM).

To evaluate the program's effectiveness, comprehensive medical and functional assessments will be conducted at baseline, immediately after the 16-week intervention, and at a 3-month follow-up. These evaluations include submaximal and maximal exercise tests on a cycle ergometer to analyze respiratory gases, detailed blood tests, body composition imaging (DXA scans), and maximum dynamic strength testing. Ultimately, the research aims to generate high-quality evidence to optimize standard exercise recommendations for breast cancer survivors and improve their long-term health and resilience.

02

Conditions studied

  • Cancer
  • Breast Cancer
  • Neoplasm
  • Metabolic Flexibility

Browse trials for

03

In context

Breast Neoplasms Reclassified

14,825 studies on the registry are indexed under Breast Neoplasms; 3,319 are open to participants now.

This study's planned enrollment of 44 is below the median of 72 across 10,896 interventional studies indexed under Breast Neoplasms.

Browse Breast Neoplasms studies →

Lead sponsor

University of Castilla-La Mancha is the lead sponsor of 107 studies on the registry; 26 are open to participants now.

Compared within Breast Neoplasms, this study's primary condition as ClinicalTrials.gg classifies it; the registry's first condition term is Neoplasms. The counts are of registry records indexed under each term, refreshed daily. How we classify →

04

Who can participate

Ages eligible
18 Years to 70 Years
Sexes eligible
Female
Accepts healthy volunteers
No

Go through the criteria one by one — yes, no or not sure — and take the list to your doctor or the study team. Kept in this browser only.

Inclusion criteria

  • Women aged between 18 and 70 years.
  • Confirmed diagnosis of breast cancer in stages I to III.
  • Received or adjuvant chemotherapy and completed the chemotherapy treatment within the 6 months prior to study enrolment.
  • Residency within a distance of less than 40 km from the Hospital Universitario de Toledo.

Exclusion criteria

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosis of stage IV breast cancer.
  • Undergone major surgery within the 4 months prior to enrolment or scheduled for breast reconstruction surgery during the study period.
  • Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus with poor glycaemic control, defined as an value greater than or equal to 8.5%.
  • Presence of an acute infectious disease.
  • Absolute or relative medical for physical exercise or maximal exercise stress testing, according to the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) guidelines.
  • Serious cardiac or cardiovascular disease, including a history of myocardial infarction, heart failure, or known cardiomyopathy.
  • Regular consumption of beta-blockers or any medication that alters the functioning of the nervous system.
  • Currently active, defined as engaging in more than 150 minutes per week of structured physical exercise during the 6 months prior to enrolment.
Terms in these criteria, in plain language(3)

Underlined terms in the criteria open these too. Explained by clinicaltrials.gg, not part of the registry record. The study team decides who can take part.

Adjuvant and neoadjuvant

Neoadjuvant treatment is given before the main treatment (usually surgery), often to shrink a tumour. Adjuvant treatment is given after it, to lower the chance of the cancer coming back.

HbA1c

A blood test of average blood sugar over the past two to three months, given as a percentage or in mmol/mol. 6.5% (48 mmol/mol) or more is the usual threshold for diabetes, normally confirmed by a second test.

Contraindication

A reason a treatment, test or procedure should not be given to a particular person, such as an allergy, another illness or a medicine they take.

05

Study design

Phase
Not applicable
Primary purpose
Prevention
Allocation
Randomized
Intervention model
Parallel assignment
Masking
Single (Outcomes assessor)
Enrollment
44 participants (estimated)

Study arms

  • Experimental
    EXERCISE GROUP

    Behavioral: Exercise

  • Other
    CONTROL GROUP

    Behavioral: Control

Interventions

  • BehavioralControl

    Participants assigned to the control group receive standard care typically provided to patients in this phase of recovery. Instead of a supervised exercise program, these individuals are sent educational materials via email. This material consists of a video and official documents containing basic guidelines and recommendations for a healthy lifestyle, based on standards from the World Health Organization (WHO) and the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) for cancer survivors. The documents provide general instructions on physical activity, reducing sedentary behavior, and maintaining overall health habits. Like the intervention group, participants in the control group undergo all clinical and functional evaluations at the start of the study, after 16 weeks, and during a 3-month follow-up.

  • BehavioralExercise

    The intervention consists of a supervised, in-person, combined exercise program lasting 16 consecutive weeks, conducted at a specialized exercise unit. Participants attend two sessions per week, with at least 48 hours of recovery between sessions, and each session lasts between 55 and 85 minutes. The program follows a "combined" methodology, meaning every session integrates both resistance (strength) and aerobic training. To ensure safety and precision, sessions are led by a graduate in Physical Activity and Sport Sciences with specialized training in oncology, and participants work in small groups of 6 to 8 people. Each session is structured into four distinct parts: a 10-minute warm-up involving low-to-moderate intensity activity and joint mobility; a resistance training block; an aerobic training block; and a cool-down featuring static stretching for 30-40 seconds per muscle group. The resistance training portion utilizes a "full body" approach.

06

What researchers measure

Primary outcomes

  1. Change in Crossover point

    Assessment of the metabolic crossover point determined through an individualized, submaximal incremental exercise test on a cycle ergometer with continuous measurement of expired gases (indirect calorimetry) to calculate substrate oxidation rates.

    Time frame: 7 months

  2. Changes in Cardiorespiratory Fitness

    Assessment of cardiorespiratory capacity determined through a maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test (stress test) on a cycle ergometer

    Time frame: 7 months

Secondary outcomes

  1. Change in maximal fat oxidation

    Assessment of the maximal fat oxidation rate determined through an individualized, submaximal incremental exercise test on a cycle ergometer with continuous measurement of expired gases (indirect calorimetry).

    Time frame: 7 months

  2. Change in maximal carbohydrate oxidation

    Assessment of the maximal carbohydrate oxidation rate determined through an individualized, submaximal incremental exercise test on a cycle ergometer with continuous measurement of expired gases (indirect calorimetry).

    Time frame: 7 months

  3. Change in Lower Body Muscular Strength

    Estimated one-repetition maximum (1RM) for the leg press. Measurements will be obtained through force-velocity profiling using a linear position transducer.

    Time frame: 7 months

  4. Change in Upper-Body Muscular Strength

    Estimated one-repetition maximum (1RM) for the vertical press. Measurements will be obtained through force-velocity profiling using a linear position transducer.

    Time frame: 7 months

  5. Change in 6-Minute Walk Test

    Evaluation of physical performance using the 6-minute walk test.

    Time frame: 7 months

  6. Change in Lower-Body Muscular Endurance (30-sec CST)

    Evaluation of physical performance using the 30-second chair stand test.

    Time frame: 7 months

  7. Change in Grip Strength

    Evaluation of upper-body isometric strength using a handheld dynamometer.

    Time frame: 7 months

  8. Change in Body Mass Index (BMI)

    BMI will be calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared (kg/m2).

    Time frame: 7 months

  9. Change in Body Fat Percentage

    Assessment of total body fat percentage using Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan.

    Time frame: 7 months

  10. Change in Lean Mass Percentage

    Assessment of total lean muscle mass percentage using Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan.

    Time frame: 7 months

  11. Change in Bone Mineral Density

    Assessment of bone mineral density (g/cm²) determined through a Dual-Energy X-ray Absorptiometry (DXA) scan.

    Time frame: 7 months

  12. Change in EQ-5D-5L Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)

    Evaluation of self-rated health using the EuroQol Visual Analogue Scale (EQ VAS). The scale is a vertical line with minimum value 0 (worst imaginable health) and maximum value 100 (best imaginable health). Higher scores indicate a better perceived health outcome.

    Time frame: 7 months

  13. Change in EQ-5D-5L Index Score

    Evaluation of health-related quality of life based on the EuroQol 5-dimension 5-level (EQ-5D-5L) descriptive system. This system assesses five dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression. Responses are converted into a single index score using a valuation algorithm. The index scale typically ranges from less than 0 to 1, where higher scores indicate a better outcome.

    Time frame: 7 months

  14. Change from Baseline in Cancer-Related Fatigue (FACIT-F)

    Evaluation using the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Fatigue (FACIT-F) scale. Total scores range from 0 to 52, where higher scores indicate lower levels of fatigue.

    Time frame: 7 months

  15. Change in Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)

    Evaluation using the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). The total score ranges from 0 to 42, where higher scores indicate greater psychological distress.

    Time frame: 7 months

07

Study locations

1 site
  • University of Castilla-La Mancha (PAFS Research Group)
    Toledo, Toledo 45071, Spain
08

Timeline

Tracking since Sep 25, 2026
ElapsedEstimatedEstimated, not yet reachedSimilar studies: half by the dot; the band is the middle halfHalf of similar studies reached it by the dot; the band is the middle half, from a quarter to three quarters

Start is estimated for Sep 2026; primary completion for Aug 2027, 11 months later.

Of 2,661 non-industry interventional studies with no phase under Breast Neoplasms, half reached primary completion within 33 months of starting (the median), counting those still running; a quarter within 16 and three quarters within 66. This study's planned 11 months is below that.

Counting every sponsor, half of 2,771 studies reached it within 33 months; a quarter within 15 and three quarters within 66.

How these figures are worked out, and which studies are left out of them.

Registered
Jan 27, 2026
First posted
Feb 12, 2026
StartEst.
Sep 2026
Primary completionEst.
Aug 2027
CompletionEst.
Dec 2027
Last update
May 28, 2026
What these dates mean
Start.
When the first participant enrolled; while estimated, when the study expects to open to recruitment.
Primary completion.
When the last participant was examined or treated to collect data for the study's main question, its primary outcome. A study that stopped early gives the date its data collection stopped.
Completion.
When the last participant's last visit took place, for every outcome, secondary ones and side effects included: the end of the study. Often later than primary completion, sometimes the same day.
Actual and Est.
Actual means the registry says the date has happened. Est. (estimated) is a date the sponsor plans or expects. It can still move, and the sponsor is expected to change it to actual once it has passed.
No changes since tracking began. The registry record was last updated on May 28, 2026, before this site started recording changes on Sep 25, 2026. Its history is on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗
09

Registry details

Key details

Study ID
NCT07405385
Responsible party
Susana Aznar Laín (Full professor, University of Castilla-La Mancha) — Principal investigator
First posted
Feb 12, 2026
Start date
Sep 2026 (estimated)
Primary completion
Aug 2027 (estimated)
Completion
Dec 2027 (estimated)
Last update
May 28, 2026

Study contacts

Susana Aznar Laín
Contact
susana.aznar@uclm.es
+34 669356600
Alejandro Jiménez Marín
Contact
alejandro.jimenez@uclm.es
+34 685414255

Oversight

FDA-regulated drug
No
FDA-regulated device
No
View the source record on ClinicalTrials.gov ↗

Not currently enrolling

This study is not yet recruiting, as verified in Jan 2026. You cannot join it, but the record below documents what was studied.

Follow this study

Get an email when the registry record changes — status, dates, results — or when someone posts here.

Sign in to follow

Discussion

Questions and observations about this study, from anyone following it. Not medical advice, and not a channel to the study team — their contact details are on the registry record.

Sign in to join the discussion. Reading takes no account; posting does. You choose a display name, and a pseudonym is the default.

Nothing here yet. If you are running this trial, taking part in it, or weighing whether to, this is the place to say so.

Start the discussion